University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
The Plan of St. Gall

a study of the architecture & economy of & life in a paradigmatic Carolingian monastery
  
  
  
  
 II. 
  
  
  

collapse sectionV. 
  
collapse sectionV. 1. 
collapse sectionV.1.1.. 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.1.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.1.3. 
  
 V.1.4. 
collapse sectionV. 2. 
collapse sectionV.2.1. 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
 10. 
 10. 
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.2.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 3. 
collapse sectionV.3.1. 
  
  
  
 V.3.2. 
collapse sectionV.3.3. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 4. 
 V.4.1. 
 V.4.2. 
 V.4.3. 
collapse sectionV. 5. 
 V.5.1. 
collapse sectionV.5.2. 
  
THE SPARRENDACH
  
collapse sectionV. 6. 
 V.6.1. 
 V.6.2. 
 V.6.3. 
 V.6.4. 
collapse sectionV. 7. 
collapse sectionV.7.1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.7.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.7.3. 
  
  
 V.7.4. 
 V.7.5. 
 V.7.6. 
collapse sectionV. 8. 
 V.8.1. 
 V.8.2. 
collapse sectionV.8.3. 
  
  
 V.8.4. 
 V.8.5. 
collapse sectionV.8.6. 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 V.8.7. 
collapse sectionV.8.8. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 9. 
collapse sectionV.9.1. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.9.2. 
  
  
 V.9.3. 
collapse sectionV. 10. 
collapse sectionV.10.1. 
  
  
  
 V.10.2. 
 V.10.3. 
collapse sectionV.10.4. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 11. 
collapse sectionV.11.1. 
  
  
collapse sectionV.11.2. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
 V.11.3. 
collapse sectionV. 12. 
 V.12.1. 
 V.12.2. 
 V.12.3. 
collapse sectionV. 13. 
 V.13.1. 
 V.13.2. 
collapse sectionV. 14. 
 V.14.1. 
 V.14.2. 
collapse sectionV. 15. 
collapse sectionV.15.1. 
  
collapse sectionV.15.2. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.15.3. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 V.15.4. 
collapse sectionV. 16. 
 V.16.1. 
 V.16.2. 
collapse sectionV.16.3. 
  
collapse sectionV.16.4. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 17. 
 V.17.1. 
collapse sectionV.17.2. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.3. 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.4. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.5. 
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.6. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.7. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.8. 
  
  
collapse sectionV. 18. 
 V.18.1. 
collapse sectionV.18.2. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.18.3. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse sectionV.18.4. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.18.5. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionVI. 
  
collapse sectionVI. 1. 
 VI.I.I. 
collapse sectionVI.1.2. 
  
  
 VI.1.3. 
 VI.1.4. 
collapse sectionVI. 2. 
 VI.2.1. 
collapse sectionVI.2.2. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionVI.2.3. 
  
  
  
  
  
 VI.2.4. 
collapse sectionVI. 3. 
 VI.3.1. 
 VI.3.2. 
collapse sectionVI.3.3. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionVI. 4. 
 VI.4.1. 
 VI.4.2. 
 VI.4.3. 
 VI. 5. 
  
  
collapse sectionVI.6. 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  

THE SPARRENDACH

The Sparrendach is a roof in which a continuous sequence
of coupled rafters of relatively light scantling discharge the
load and thrust of the roof at close intervals and in equal
increments upon the walls or beams on which the rafters
were footed. The most widely known house type employing
this system is the Lower Saxon farmhouse. A closely related
variant of this roof is common in the south and southeast of
England. Zippelius has advanced some cogent arguments
in favor of the assumption that the roofs of the Iron Age
houses of the type of Ezinge, Leens, and Fochteloo belonged
to the family of the Sparrendach,[200] and this suggests the
possibility that both the German and English variant of
this roof may have a common root in the Continental
homelands of the Saxons and their neighbors, the Frisians.

The earliest surviving domestic roof of this construction
type is, to the best of my knowledge, that of the aisled
Infirmary Hall of St. Mary's in Chichester, Sussex, which
dates from the close of the thirteenth century (figs. 341343).[201]
Although this hospital was a private foundation, its
layout follows a pattern that had been established in the
Anglo-Norman monasteries of the two preceding centuries.[202]
It consists of an oblong Infirmary Hall, originally
of six bays but now reduced to four bays, with its entrance
in the middle of the western gable wall. The eastern gable
wall opens into a masonry chapel with richly molded
Early English arches. The Hall itself is 45 feet wide, 43
feet high (clear inner measurements), and originally had a
length of 120 feet. Its roof is sustained by two rows of
wooden posts, framed together, at a height of 21 feet,
lengthwise by means of arcade plates and crosswise by
means of tie beams. The arcade plates are tenoned into a
recess in the head of the principal posts, and the tie beams
are locked into the arcade plates by means of dovetail
joints (fig. 356). The angles between the posts and their
superincumbent long and cross beams are strengthened by a
magnificent set of three-way double bracing struts of
heavy scantling which reduce the free span of the latter to
only a fraction of their total length. The rafters rise in two
flights, at the same angle, first from the wall plates to the
arcade plates, then from the arcade plates to the ridge of
the hall; those of the main roof are restrained from moving
longitudinally by a center purlin pegged into collar beams
and sustained by king posts rising from the center of each
alternate tie beam (figs. 341-342).

St. Mary's Hospital was founded as a temporary home
for the sick and the infirm who were tended by a privately
endowed community of thirteen permanent attendants
under the guidance of a prior and warden. Its elongated
shape is determined by its use as a building for attending
to the needs of a considerable number of people, including
wandering pilgrims and paupers who sought refuge for a
night only.[203] The contemporary palace and manor halls
were shorter. A typical example of the latter with a classical
Sparrendach was the manor hall of Nurstead Court, Kent
(figs. 344-346). Judging by its architectural style, this hall
must have been built during the period when the manor of
Nurstede was in possession of the Gravensend family and
its construction is generally ascribed to Stephen de Gravensend,
who inherited the manor from his father in 1303,
became Bishop of London in 1318, and died in 1338.[204] The
hall remained essentially unaltered until around 1837 when
in response to a need for greater comfort in living one half
of it was demolished to make room for a double-storied
structure built in the prevailing taste of the period. The
other half, likewise, was subdivided into several levels and
a variety of rooms, but here the newly inserted walls and
ceilings were suspended in the original frame of timber,
which is intact although no single part of it can be seen in
its entire height. From these remaining parts of the original
fabric and several extraordinary sets of drawings made just
before the hall was altered, by the superb architectural
draftsmen Edward Blore, William Twopeny, and Ambrose
Poynter, the original design of the hall can be reconstructed.

The hall was 34 feet wide and 79 feet long externally.
Its walls were built in flint and rose to a height of 11½ feet
With its ridge the roof reached a height of 36 feet. It was
hipped on both ends and had small triangular gables at the
peak of each hip. The supporting frame of the roof consisted
of three powerful trusses, resting on wooden columns
with molded bases and capitals and arched braces, rising
from the top of the capitals lengthwise to the arcade
plates and crosswise to the tie beams. The latter met in the
center, forming forcefully pointed arches. The tie beams
(like the other principal members, richly molded) are of
unusually heavy scantling and have sharp and elegant
camber. The roof itself is a classical example of the southern
and southeastern English Sparrendach: a continuous sequence


104

Page 104
[ILLUSTRATION]

350.A GREAT COXWELL, BERKSHIRE, ENGLAND

BARN OF THE ABBEY GRANGE, FIRST DECADE OF THE 14TH CENTURY. PLAN

Measured externally and excluding buttresses, the barn of Great Coxwell is 152′ 2″ long by 43′ 10″ wide. It reaches a height of 48 feet at the
roof ridge. The walls are built in roughly coursed rubble of Cotswold stone and are reinforced by ashlar-faced buttresses of one stage in the side
walls and of three stages in the gable walls. Its vast roof is carried by two rows of slender timber posts so successfully framed together that after
some 700 years of resisting pressure and thrust, not one single principal member has been dislodged from its original position. The main
components of this frame are six principal and seven intermediary trusses of oak so spaced as to divide the interior lengthwise into a nave and
two flanking aisles, and crosswise into a sequence of seven bays. The uprights of the principal trusses
(fig. 350.B) rise from tall bases of stone
almost 7 feet high, providing a verticality of breathtaking beauty, unmatched by any other extant example of this type of construction. The
intermediate trusses are cruck-shaped and rise directly from the aisle walls
(fig. 350.C).


105

Page 105
[ILLUSTRATION]

GREAT COXWELL, BERKSHIRE, ENGLAND

350.C

350.B

BARN OF THE ABBEY GRANGE, FIRST DECADE OF THE 14TH CENTURY. TRANSVERSE SECTION

A feature of striking beauty at Great Coxwell is the design of the three-way double braces (fig. 351) which rise from the main posts to their
connecting long and cross beams. Reducing the unsupported length of the beams that they brace to less than one third their total length, the
braces prevent them from sagging under the weight of the super-incumbent rafters. At the same time, they protect the frame from rocking and
swerving by stiffening the angles. The manner in which these braces reach out into space and assist the principal members of the supporting roof
frame to divide the interior into a sequence of separate bays may be compared to the rise and spread of the bay-dividing shafts and arches of a
medieval masonry church. It has been argued with great plausibility that this method of framing space by an all-pervasive armature of structural
members is older in wood construction than in stone
(see I, 223ff).


106

Page 106
[ILLUSTRATION]

351. GREAT COXWELL, BERKSHIRE, ENGLAND

BARN OF ABBEY GRANGE, FIRST DECADE OF 14TH CENTURY. INTERIOR LOOKING SOUTHWARD

[by courtesy of the National Buildings Record, London]

An even greater tribute than that accorded to this building by William Morris (fig. 349) was made by Thomas Hardy when in a passage of
great historical sensitivity, he wrote about a similar building in Dorsetshire:

"They sheared in the great barn, called for the nonce the Shearing-barn, which on ground-plan resembled a church with transepts. It not only
emulated the form of the neighbouring church of the parish, but vied with it in antiquity. . . . One could say about this barn, what could hardly
be said of either the church or the castle, akin to it in age and style, that the purpose which had dictated its original erection was the same to
which it was still applied. Unlike and superior to either of those two typical remnants of mediaevalism, the old barn embodied practises which
had suffered no mutilation at the hands of time
" (Far from the Madding Crowd, chapter XXII).


107

Page 107
[ILLUSTRATION]

352. PARÇAY-MESLAY, NEAR TOURS (INDRE-ET-LOIRE), FRANCE

BARN OF ABBEY GRANGE, 1211-1227. EXTERIOR VIEW FROM THE NORTHEAST

The grange consisted of a large rectangular yard, enclosed by a tall masonry wall. Incorporated into this wall in the south was a gate house
with a monumental round-arched passageway, and on a second level above it, a fenestrated chamber with fireplace—the dwelling doubtless of the
supervising granger. Its vast five-aisled barn, with masonry gables rising from floor to ridge, is the only surviving structure of an intricate group
of buildings once forming the inhabited nucleus of this agricultural enterprise. For á plan showing the full complement of buildings of such a
grange, made at a time when it was substantially in its original form, see Horn and Born, 1968, Pl. XIX, fig. 10.


108

Page 108
[ILLUSTRATION]

353. PARÇAY-MESLAY, NEAR TOURS (INDRE-ET-LOIRE), FRANCE

BARN OF ABBEY GRANGE, 1211-1227. INTERIOR LOOKING EAST

The low pitch of the roof of this barn—distinctly different from the steep ascent of the roof of the barn at Great Coxwell (figs. 349-51)
is conditioned in part by its extraordinary width (twice that of Great Coxwell), but the decision to develop space in breadth rather than
height may have been conditioned also by climatic and cultural factors: the barn lies at the southern boundary of the area of distribution
of steep roofs.


109

Page 109
of paired rafters with collar beams pegged to a
center purlin by crown posts that rise from the middle of
each tie beam.

The westernmost bay of the hall was of two stories,
screened off against the two center bays on the ground
floor by timber screens; higher up, by a wall of plaster
reaching all the way up to the ridge of the roof. This end
served as the private quarters for the lord of the manor. The
opposite end of the hall was screened off in a similar manner
by a low timber screen with three doorways; the middle one
opened into a passage that led outside; the two outer ones,
into two rooms which could either have served as quarters
for the servants or as buttery and pantry. The kitchen was in
a separate building to the north of the hall and could be
reached from the latter through a door in the northern long
wall.

The hall of the manor of Nurstead is one of the last
examples of the traditional open hall where the lord and the
servants still lived and ate under the same roof in opposite
ends of the building—an arrangement that is very similar
to, although not identical in all details with that of the
House for Distinguished Guests of the Plan of St. Gall
(fig. 396). The two center bays of the hall were communal
space, which on festive occasions was the stage for banquets
with the open fire burning in the middle of the center
floor, as can be inferred from the smoke blackened beams
and rafters.

At the very same time England had already developed a
new plan, which provided for two double-storied cross
wings at the end of the hall, one of which served as the
private dwelling of the lord and his family; the other, as
quarters for the servants (including space for kitchen,
buttery, and pantry.) A typical example of this new arrangement
is the manor hall of Little Chesterford, Essex, a
plan and perspective reconstruction of which are shown in
figures 347-348. The hall has been ascribed by its earlier
students to about 1275[205] and by J. T. Smith to about
1320-30.[206] One of its aisles has been dismantled. Originally
the hall was 27 feet wide and 37 feet long. It was of three
bays with the one near the entrance serving as a narrow
screen-bay. The walls were timber framed, but all other
details were very similar to those of the hall of Nurstead
Court—less forceful and elegant, yet still of genuine refinement.
In the fourteenth century the English lowlands must
have been dotted with countless variants of this type of
hall.[207]

 
[200]

Zippelius, 1953.

[201]

For the date of St. Mary's Hospital in Chichester, see Victoria
History of the Counties of England, Sussex,
III, 1907, 101ff. For further
literature on this building, see Horn and Born, 1965, 47 note 24.

[202]

A comprehensive review of this material will be found in the
Master of Art thesis of Carol Anne Chazin, "The Planning of English
Monastic Infirmary Halls in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries:
A Typographical Study," University of California, Berkeley, 1965.

[203]

The original terms of the hospital are known through the records
of numerous gifts and deeds made between 1225 and 1250, and through
a charter established by Thomas Lichfield (1232-48) setting forth the
admission procedures for the establishment. The original text of this
charter (Oxford, Bodleian Library, Dept. of Western Manuscripts,
MS. University College 148, 10-11) has never been published to my
knowledge. A translation into English may be found in Swainson, 1872,
44-47.

[204]

For Nurstead Court, see Gentlemen's Magazine, 1837, 364-67;
Parker, II, 1853, 281ff; Oswald, 1933, 14ff; J.T. Smith, 1956, 84ff.

[205]

Royal Commission on Ancient and Historical Monuments, Essex, I,
1916, 173-75.

[206]

J. T. Smith, 1956, 83.

[207]

For a brief description of others, see Smith, ibid., 76ff.