University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
The Plan of St. Gall

a study of the architecture & economy of & life in a paradigmatic Carolingian monastery
  
  
  
  
 II. 
  
  
  

collapse sectionV. 
  
collapse sectionV. 1. 
collapse sectionV.1.1.. 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.1.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.1.3. 
  
 V.1.4. 
collapse sectionV. 2. 
collapse sectionV.2.1. 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
 10. 
 10. 
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.2.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 3. 
collapse sectionV.3.1. 
  
  
  
 V.3.2. 
collapse sectionV.3.3. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 4. 
 V.4.1. 
 V.4.2. 
 V.4.3. 
collapse sectionV. 5. 
 V.5.1. 
collapse sectionV.5.2. 
  
  
collapse sectionV. 6. 
 V.6.1. 
 V.6.2. 
 V.6.3. 
 V.6.4. 
collapse sectionV. 7. 
collapse sectionV.7.1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.7.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.7.3. 
  
  
 V.7.4. 
 V.7.5. 
 V.7.6. 
collapse sectionV. 8. 
 V.8.1. 
 V.8.2. 
collapse sectionV.8.3. 
  
  
 V.8.4. 
 V.8.5. 
collapse sectionV.8.6. 
  
THE KING'S CLAIM ON MONASTIC HOSPITALITY
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 V.8.7. 
collapse sectionV.8.8. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 9. 
collapse sectionV.9.1. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.9.2. 
  
  
 V.9.3. 
collapse sectionV. 10. 
collapse sectionV.10.1. 
  
  
  
 V.10.2. 
 V.10.3. 
collapse sectionV.10.4. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 11. 
collapse sectionV.11.1. 
  
  
collapse sectionV.11.2. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
 V.11.3. 
collapse sectionV. 12. 
 V.12.1. 
 V.12.2. 
 V.12.3. 
collapse sectionV. 13. 
 V.13.1. 
 V.13.2. 
collapse sectionV. 14. 
 V.14.1. 
 V.14.2. 
collapse sectionV. 15. 
collapse sectionV.15.1. 
  
collapse sectionV.15.2. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.15.3. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 V.15.4. 
collapse sectionV. 16. 
 V.16.1. 
 V.16.2. 
collapse sectionV.16.3. 
  
collapse sectionV.16.4. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV. 17. 
 V.17.1. 
collapse sectionV.17.2. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.3. 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.4. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.5. 
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.6. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.7. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.17.8. 
  
  
collapse sectionV. 18. 
 V.18.1. 
collapse sectionV.18.2. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.18.3. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse sectionV.18.4. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionV.18.5. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionVI. 
  
collapse sectionVI. 1. 
 VI.I.I. 
collapse sectionVI.1.2. 
  
  
 VI.1.3. 
 VI.1.4. 
collapse sectionVI. 2. 
 VI.2.1. 
collapse sectionVI.2.2. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionVI.2.3. 
  
  
  
  
  
 VI.2.4. 
collapse sectionVI. 3. 
 VI.3.1. 
 VI.3.2. 
collapse sectionVI.3.3. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionVI. 4. 
 VI.4.1. 
 VI.4.2. 
 VI.4.3. 
 VI. 5. 
  
  
collapse sectionVI.6. 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  

THE KING'S CLAIM ON MONASTIC HOSPITALITY

To the north of the Church in a large enclosure, which
forms the counterpart to the court of the Hospice for
Pilgrims and Paupers, is a house whose elaborate layout
reveals it to be a guesthouse for visitors of unusual stature.
It is here that the traveling emperor or king was received,
his court or his agents (missi), and also, perhaps, the visiting
bishops and abbots.

The king's right to draw on the hospitality of the monasteries
for food and quarters while traveling dates back to
the early days of the introduction of monastic life in transalpine
Europe. But the use that the rulers made of it in the
time of the Carolingians was considerably more burdensome
than it had been under the Merovingians.[305] Ever-changing
political necessities, the protection of the boundaries, the
maintenance of peace in the interior, prevented the emperor
from establishing a permanent residence. "Performing his
high craft by constantly shifting around,"[306] he moved from
one of his royal estates to the other—making full use of the
obligations of the abbots and bishops to provide him with
lodging—according to the circumstances that his itinerary
imposed upon him, or simply in response to the necessity
of finding additional subsistance for himself and his court.
The primary motivations for such visits were not always of
an economic or military nature. Gauert's analysis of
Charlemagne's itinerary has shown that the emperor's general
travel schedule often had embedded in it a special
"Gebetsitinerar," at times involving lengthy detours for
visits to religious places where the emperor went primarily
for the purpose of prayer, to participate in important religious
festivals, or to venerate the local saints.[307] The heaviness
of the economic obligations that a monastery took upon
itself on such occasions depended on the frequency of the
visits, the length of the emperor's stay, and the size of his
retinue. Charlemagne and Louis the Pious availed themselves
of monastic hospitality with discretion; under the
later Carolingian kings the burden became heavier.[308] But
even as early as the second decade of the ninth century the
sum of monastic obligations in hospitality had reached proportions
so heavy as to drive the witty abbot Theodulf,
Bishop of Orléans, to remark desperately that had St.
Benedict known how many would come, "he would have
locked the doors before them."[309]

 
[305]

Lesne, II, 1922, 287.

[306]

To use a phrase coined by Schulte, 1935, 132. For the ambulatory
life of medieval kings in general, see Peyer, 1964.

[307]

See Gauert, 1965, especially 318ff.

[308]

For more details cf. Lesne's informative chapter on monastic
hospitality extended to kings and their representatives, (Lesne, II,
1922, 287ff.) and Voigt's remarks on the increasingly intolerable economic
burden royal visits imposed upon the abbeys, bishoprics and counties
under the reign of Charles the Bald and Louis the German (Voigt,
1965, 27ff). When Louis the German invaded the empire of the West-Franks
in 858, the bishops, in a petition drafted by Hincmar of Reims,
beseeched the emperor to bolster his economic capabilities through
more efficient management of the crown estates, rather than by depleting
the resources of the abbots, bishops and counts for the sustenance of his
traveling court. They made a plea that their contribution to the maintenance
of the emperor's train be reduced to the share customary during
the reign of his father, Louis the Pious. (Epistola synodi Cariasiacensis
ad Hludowicum regem Germaniae directa,
chap. 14, ed. Krause, Mon.
Germ. Hist. Legum Sec.
II, Capit. Reg. Franc., II, Hannover, 1897,
437). In a subsequent letter written to Charles the Bald, Hincmar informed
the latter that the substance of his petition to Louis the German
was, in an even more urgent sense, addressed to him (ibid., 428).

[309]

Expositio Hildemari, ed. Mittermüller, 1880, 501: "Per Deum, si
nunc adesset S. Benedictus, claudere illis ostium fecisset
".