Skip directly to:Main content Main navigation

University of Virginia Library

The Plan of St. Gall

a study of the architecture & economy of & life in a paradigmatic Carolingian monastery

Horn, Walter William

THE PLAN OF ST. GALL

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I.

CONTENTS: VOLUME I

SYNOPSIS OF THE WORK

collapse section

THE PLAN AND ITS BUILDINGS: A PRELIMINARY ORIENTATION

collapse section

INDEX TO BUILDING NUMBERS OF PLAN

VERZEICHNIS DER GEBÄUDENUMMERN IM PLAN

INDEX TO PLAN: VERZEICHNIS ZUM PLAN: INDEX DU PLAN

collapse section

I.

collapse section

I. 1.

I.1.1.

I.1.2.

I.1.3.

I.1.4.

collapse section

I.1.5.

THE CONTROVERSY ABOUT THE SCALE OF THE PLAN

collapse section

I.1.6.

OTHER MORE GENERAL WORKS & NEW CRITICAL EDITIONS

I.1.7.

collapse section

I. 2.

I.2.1.

collapse section

I. 3.

I.3.1.

I.3.2.

I.3.3.

collapse section

I. 4.

I.4.1.

I.4.2.

collapse section

I. 5.

I.5.1.

I.5.2.

I.5.3.

collapse section

I. 6.

collapse section

I.6.1.

ABSENCE OF UNDERDRAWING

ABSENCE OF GUIDING CONSTRUCTION LINES IN THE ALIGNMENT OF BUILDINGS

ABSENCE OF GUIDING UNDERDRAWING IN THE INTERNAL LAYOUT OF INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS

ABSENCE OF CENTER POINTS IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF CIRCLES

ANGULAR DISTORTIONS CAUSED BY A SHIFT IN THE RELATIVE POSITION OF ORIGINAL AND OVERLAY

INCOMPATIBILITY BETWEEN THE FLUID EXECUTION OF THE DRAWING AND THE PRECISE DRAFTSMANSHIP REQUIRED IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ORIGINAL SCHEME

collapse section

I. 7.

I.7.1.

I.7.2.

collapse section

I.7.3.

THE TRANSFER OF HOUSES FOR THE WORKMEN AND CRAFTSMEN FROM AN EXTRAMURAL TO AN INTRAMURAL LOCATION

THE ESTABLISHMENT OF SEPARATE QUARTERS FOR VISITING MONKS

THE TRANSFER OF THE SCHOOL FOR LAYMEN AND SECULAR PRIESTS TO A LOCATION OUTSIDE THE CLAUSTRUM

I.7.4.

I. 8.

collapse section

I. 9.

collapse section

I.9.1.

CONCEPTUAL AFFINITIES WITH COLOGNE CATHEDRAL

RELATIVE CHRONOLOGY

LIKELIHOOD OF HILDEBOLD'S INVOLVEMENT IN ORIGINAL SCHEME

AN ORNAMENTAL DETAIL SUGGESTING THE COURT SCHOOL AS THE CONCEPTUAL HOME OF THE PROTOTYPE PLAN

collapse section

I. 10.

I.10.1.

I.10.2.

collapse section

I. 11.

collapse section

I.11.1.

REINHARDT, 1952

I.11.2.

collapse section

I. 12.

I.12.1.

I.12.2.

I.12.3.

I.12.4.

I.12.5.

I.12.6.

I.12.7.

collapse section

I. 13.

I.13.1.

I.13.2.

I.13.3.

I.13.4.

I.13.5.

I.13.6.

I.13.7.

I.13.8.

collapse section

I. 14.

I.14.1.

collapse section

I.14.2.

CONTRADICTORY TITLES NOT PART OF THE ORIGINAL SCHEME

THE TITLES NOT THE DRAWING REFLECT THE INTENT OF THE ORIGINAL SCHEME

THE DRAWING NOT THE TITLES SHOULD BE TRUSTED

THE INCONSISTENCIES NOT PART OF THE ORIGINAL CONCEPT BUT A CORRECTIVE MEASURE

CONFLICTING VIEWS ON SCALE OF THE PLAN

IMPROPER TEXTUAL EXEGESIS

ANACHRONISM IN MENSURATION

EARLY EXPRESSION OF THE VIEW THAT THE PLAN WAS DRAWN TO A CONSISTENT SCALE

collapse section

I.14.3.

A WORD OF CAUTION

THE 2½-FOOT MODULE (STANDARD MODULE)

THE 40-FOOT MODULE (LARGE MODULE)

THE 160-FOOT MODULE (SUPER MODULE)

THE 1¼-FOOT MODULE (SUBMODULE)

I.14.4.

I.14.5.

I.14.6.

collapse section

I.14.7.

SCRIPTORIUM & NORTHERN TRANSEPT ARM

THE MEDICINAL GARDEN

THE HOUSES FOR THE COWS AND THE FOALING MARES

I.14.8.

I.14.9.

collapse section

I. 15.

collapse section

I.15.1.

A UNION OF SCHEMATISM & REALISM

I. 16.

I. 17.

collapse section

II.

collapse section

II. 1.

II.1.1.

II.1.2.

collapse section

II.1.3.

CONNECTION WITH IRELAND?

CALL TOWERS OR FUNERARY LIGHT TOWERS?

BELL TOWERS OR TOWERS OF DEFENSE AND SURVEILLANCE?

THE EIGHT-LOBED ROSETTE: A STELLAR AND APOTROPAIC SYMBOL

collapse section

II.1.4.

ALTAR OF ST. PETER

II.1.5.

collapse section

II.1.6.

CHOIR OF ST. PETER

BAPTISMAL FONT AND ALTAR

ALTAR OF THE SAVIOR AT THE CROSS & THE PLACE OF WORSHIP FOR LAYMEN

LECTERNS FOR READING

collapse section

II.1.7.

THE CROSSING SQUARE AND ITS FURNISHINGS

SOUTHERN TRANSEPT ARM

NORTHERN TRANSEPT ARM

collapse section

II.1.8.

HIGH ALTAR: ST. MARY AND ST. GALL

TOMB OF ST. GALL AND ITS RELATION TO THE CRYPT

collapse section

II.1.9.

ALTAR OF ST. PAUL

collapse section

II.1.10.

II.1.11.

collapse section

II.1.12.

ADMINISTRATIVE ORGANIZATION

READING COLLECTION

WRITING POSTURE AND VARIOUS CLASSES OF SCRIBES

METHOD OF CATALOGING AND SHELVING BOOKS

NUMBER OF SCRIBES & COLLABORATION

DAILY WORK SPAN

A NOBLE OR BACKBREAKING TASK?

II.1.13.

collapse section

II. 2.

collapse section

II.2.1.

MATERIAL AND WALL THICKNESS

collapse section

II.2.2.

GEORG DEHIO (1887) & JOSEPH HECHT (1924)

HANS REINHARDT (1937 and 1952)

ARGUMENTS IN FAVOR OF DEHIO'S INTERPRETATION

WOLFGANG SCHÖNE (1960)

ADOLF REINLE (1963-64)

collapse section

II. 3.

II.3.1.

II.3.2.

II.3.3.

II.3.4.

II.3.5.

II.3.6.

II.3.7.

II.3.8.

II.3.9.

collapse section

II.3.10.

PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF THE GRID OF SQUARES

MEDITERRANEAN OR NORTHERN ROOTS: A DIVISION OF MINDS

INCREASING PROPENSITY FOR MODULAR SPACE DIVISION IN PRE-CAROLINGIAN AND CAROLINGIAN ARCHITECTURE NORTH OF THE ALPS

NEW LITURGICAL NEEDS CONTRIBUTING TO MODULAR SPACE DIVISION

MODULAR SPACE DIVISION: AN INTRINSIC FEATURE OF PREHISTORIC, PROTOHISTORIC, AND MEDIEVAL WOOD CONSTRUCTION

MODULAR AREA DIVISION: AN INTRINSIC FEATURE IN THE LAYOUT AND DESIGN OF ILLUMINATED PAGES IN HIBERNO-SAXON AND CAROLINGIAN MANUSCRIPTS

MODULAR AREA DIVISION: AN INTELLECTUAL PRINCIPLE AFFECTING THE CONCEPTUAL ORGANIZATION IN THE RELATIONSHIP OF CHURCH AND STATE

SETBACK AND RE-EMERGENCE

collapse section

III.

collapse section

III. 1.

III.1.1.

III.1.2.

III.1.3.

collapse section

III.1.4.

THE PUZZLE OF THE SAVIN PLANT

THE GALLERIED PORCHES

collapse section

III.1.5.

collapse section

HOW THE MONKS ARE TO SLEEP

LAYOUT OF THE BEDS

FEARS OF THE VIGILANT ABBOT

ABSENCE OF STAIRS

collapse section

METHOD OF HEATING

collapse section

III.1.6.

A STRANGE VISIT AT NIGHT: ITS SANITARY, MORAL, AND ARCHITECTURAL IMPLICATIONS

TIMES SET FORMALLY ASIDE FOR THE USE OF THE PRIVY

collapse section

III.1.7.

CONCEPT OF CLEANLINESS & DIRECTIVES CONCERNING THE USE OF BATHS

NUMBER, LOCATIONS & LAYOUT OF FACILITIES FOR BATHING & WASHING

collapse section

III.1.8.

collapse section

TABLES AND BENCHES

READER'S PULPIT

LACK OF FACILITIES FOR HEATING

LAYOUT OF TABLES AND BENCHES IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

NUMBER AND HOURS OF MEALS OF THE MONKS

THE MONKS' DIET

MONKS' BEHAVIOR DURING THE MEAL

WHO IS ADMITTED BESIDE THE MONKS

collapse section

WHAT CLOTHES THE MONKS ARE TO WEAR

collapse section

III.1.9.

LAYOUT AND FURNISHINGS

DESIGN OF COOKING RANGE

ARCHITECTURAL SHELL

KITCHEN UTENSILS

RULES GOVERNING WORK IN THE KITCHEN

collapse section

III.1.30.

collapse section

LAYOUT, DESIGN, AND DIMENSIONS OF CASKS

collapse section

THE BARRELS IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE

An invention of the Celts

Egyptian & Greco-Roman methods of storing wine

The barrel: constructional & viticultural advantages

The oldest extant barrel and the earliest visual representations

collapse section

THE MEASURE OF WINE AND BEER ALLOWED TO THE MONKS

Conflicting views among the early fathers

No difference in alcoholic content between ancient and modern wines

The hemina of St. Benedict: Charlemagne's attempts to establish its value

The Carolingian inflation of capacity measures

The probable daily allowance of wine at the time The Plan of St. Gall was drawn

ARE THE BARRELS DRAWN TO SCALE AND SCALED TO NEED?

LACK OF FACILITIES FOR THE PRESSING OF GRAPES

collapse section

III.1.11.

ITS DUAL ROLE: CONVERSATION WITH VISITORS & WASHING OF FEET

MANDATUM FRATRUM AND MANDATUM HOSPITUM

collapse section

III. 2.

III.2.1.

III.2.2.

collapse section

III.2.3.

LAYOUT OF THE CLOISTER

NOVICES AND THEIR SUPERVISORS

DIET AND CLOTHING

collapse section

III.2.4.

LAYOUT OF THE CLOISTER

CARE OF THE SICK: THEIR DIETARY PREROGATIVES

ADMISSION TO INFIRMARY

III.2.5.

collapse section

III.2.6.

collapse section

ROMAN IMPERIAL PROTOTYPES

Constantine's basilica at Trier

The porticus villa at Konz

Other porticus villas in the territory of the Salian Franks

Could they still be seen in Carolingian times?

collapse section

III.2.7.

THREE SEPARATE CLOISTERS: AN ANSWER TO MONASTIC STRATIFICATION

AXIALITY OF CHURCHES: A PRINCIPLE INHERITED FROM EARLY CHRISTIAN ARCHITECTURE

GROUPING OF BUILDING MASSES: A TRANSFER TO SITE ORGANIZATION OF PRINCIPLES DEVELOPED IN BOOK ILLUMINATION

III.2.8.

collapse section

III. 3.

III.3.1.

III.3.2.

III.3.3.

III.3.4.

III.3.5.

collapse section

IV.

collapse section

IV. 1.

collapse section

IV.1.1.

AUTHORITY AND OBLIGATION

ELECTIVITY OF OFFICE

MANORIAL POWER AND MILITARY OBLIGATIONS

IV.1.2.

IV.1.3.

IV.1.4.

IV.1.5.

IV.1.6.

IV.1.7.

IV.1.8.

IV.1.9.

IV.1.10.

IV.1.11.

IV.1.12.

collapse section

IV. 2.

IV.2.1.

IV.2.2.

collapse section

IV.2.3.

collapse section

IV. 3.

collapse section

IV.3.1.

collapse section

IV. 4.

IV.4.1.

IV.4.2.

collapse section

IV. 5.

IV.5.1.

collapse section

IV. 6.

collapse section

IV.6.1.

RESPONSIBLE MONASTIC OFFICIALS

MANAGEMENT BY MONKS OR BY LAYMEN?

collapse section

IV. 7.

collapse section

IV.7.1.

IMPROVEMENT OF TREES BY GRAFTING

IMPROVED METHODS IN MANAGEMENT: BREEDING OF LIVESTOCK

NEW STANDARDS IN MANAGERIAL PRACTICE AND THEORY

collapse section

IV.7.2.

NEW OR UNUSUAL HEATING DEVICES

SYSTEMATIC USE OF WATER POWER

IV.7.3.

IV.7.4.

IV.7.5.

IV.7.6.

IV.7.7.

collapse section

Collapse All | Expand All expand section

CONTRADICTORY TITLES NOT PART
OF THE ORIGINAL SCHEME

Two of the earlier students of the Plan, Hugo Graf[317] and
August Hardegger[318] proposed to solve these inconsistencies
with the assumption that the explanatory titles were not
part of the original textual annotations of the Plan but were
inserted at a later time, presumably when the plan was
subjected to a final revision before the actual construction
of the church by Abbot Gozbert in 830. Bischoff's palaeographical
analysis of the inscriptions has disproved this view
by establishing that the titles that list the dimensions of
the Church were written by the same hand that wrote the
letter of transmittal, whose writer refers to himself explicitly
as the author of the Plan.[319] The measurements, for this
reason, cannot be ascribed to a revision undertaken by
Abbot Gozbert or any of his builders. Their inconsistency
with the drawing is an intrinsic feature of the Plan itself.

[317]

Graf, 1892, 454 note 26.

[318]

Hardegger, 1917, 45ff; and Hardegger, Schlatter, Schiess, 1922, 68
note 1.

[319]

See above, pp. 13ff.