University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
The Plan of St. Gall

a study of the architecture & economy of & life in a paradigmatic Carolingian monastery
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 I. 
  
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  

collapse sectionI. 
collapse sectionI. 1. 
  
 I.1.1. 
 I.1.2. 
 I.1.3. 
 I.1.4. 
collapse sectionI.1.5. 
  
collapse sectionI.1.6. 
  
 I.1.7. 
collapse sectionI. 2. 
 I.2.1. 
collapse sectionI. 3. 
 I.3.1. 
 I.3.2. 
 I.3.3. 
collapse sectionI. 4. 
 I.4.1. 
 I.4.2. 
collapse sectionI. 5. 
 I.5.1. 
 I.5.2. 
 I.5.3. 
collapse sectionI. 6. 
collapse sectionI.6.1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionI. 7. 
 I.7.1. 
 I.7.2. 
collapse sectionI.7.3. 
  
  
  
 I.7.4. 
 I. 8. 
collapse sectionI. 9. 
collapse sectionI.9.1. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionI. 10. 
 I.10.1. 
 I.10.2. 
collapse sectionI. 11. 
collapse sectionI.11.1. 
  
  
  
 I.11.2. 
collapse sectionI. 12. 
 I.12.1. 
 I.12.2. 
 I.12.3. 
 I.12.4. 
 I.12.5. 
 I.12.6. 
 I.12.7. 
collapse sectionI. 13. 
 I.13.1. 
 I.13.2. 
 I.13.3. 
 I.13.4. 
 I.13.5. 
 I.13.6. 
 I.13.7. 
 I.13.8. 
collapse sectionI. 14. 
 I.14.1. 
collapse sectionI.14.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionI.14.3. 
  
  
  
  
  
 I.14.4. 
 I.14.5. 
 I.14.6. 
collapse sectionI.14.7. 
  
  
  
  
 I.14.8. 
 I.14.9. 
collapse sectionI. 15. 
collapse sectionI.15.1. 
  
 I. 16. 
 I. 17. 
collapse sectionII. 
collapse sectionII. 1. 
  
 II.1.1. 
 II.1.2. 
collapse sectionII.1.3. 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionII.1.4. 
  
 II.1.5. 
collapse sectionII.1.6. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionII.1.7. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionII.1.8. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionII.1.9. 
  
  
collapse sectionII.1.10. 
  
  
 II.1.11. 
collapse sectionII.1.12. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 II.1.13. 
collapse sectionII. 2. 
collapse sectionII.2.1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionII.2.2. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionII. 3. 
 II.3.1. 
 II.3.2. 
 II.3.3. 
 II.3.4. 
 II.3.5. 
 II.3.6. 
 II.3.7. 
 II.3.8. 
 II.3.9. 
collapse sectionII.3.10. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII. 
collapse sectionIII. 1. 
 III.1.1. 
 III.1.2. 
 III.1.3. 
collapse sectionIII.1.4. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII.1.5. 
collapse section 
Dormitory
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII.1.6. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII.1.7. 
  
  
collapse sectionIII.1.8. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
collapse sectionIII.1.9. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII.1.30. 
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII.1.11. 
  
  
collapse sectionIII. 2. 
 III.2.1. 
 III.2.2. 
collapse sectionIII.2.3. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII.2.4. 
  
  
  
 III.2.5. 
collapse sectionIII.2.6. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse sectionIII.2.7. 
  
  
  
 III.2.8. 
collapse sectionIII. 3. 
 III.3.1. 
 III.3.2. 
 III.3.3. 
 III.3.4. 
 III.3.5. 
collapse sectionIV. 
  
collapse sectionIV. 1. 
collapse sectionIV.1.1. 
  
  
  
 IV.1.2. 
 IV.1.3. 
 IV.1.4. 
 IV.1.5. 
 IV.1.6. 
 IV.1.7. 
 IV.1.8. 
 IV.1.9. 
 IV.1.10. 
 IV.1.11. 
 IV.1.12. 
collapse sectionIV. 2. 
 IV.2.1. 
 IV.2.2. 
collapse sectionIV.2.3. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionIV. 3. 
collapse sectionIV.3.1. 
  
  
collapse sectionIV. 4. 
 IV.4.1. 
 IV.4.2. 
collapse sectionIV. 5. 
 IV.5.1. 
collapse sectionIV. 6. 
collapse sectionIV.6.1. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionIV. 7. 
collapse sectionIV.7.1. 
  
  
  
collapse sectionIV.7.2. 
  
  
 IV.7.3. 
 IV.7.4. 
 IV.7.5. 
 IV.7.6. 
 IV.7.7. 

Dormitory

HOW THE MONKS ARE TO SLEEP

How the monks are to sleep is set forth in chapters 22 and
55 of the Rules of St. Benedict. According to these, each
monk must have his separate bed, assigned to him in
accordance with the date of his conversion. If possible, all
of the brethren should sleep in one room; but if their
number does not allow this, in groups of ten and twenty,
with seniors to supervise them. The young monks may not
sleep in a group among themselves, but interspersed with
their elders. A light must burn in the dormitory throughout
the night and the monks must sleep "clothed and girt with
girdles or cords," so that they can rise without delay when
the signal calls them to the work of God. They must not
sleep "with their knives at their sides lest they hurt themselves."

"When they rise for the work of God," St. Benedict
advises, "let them gently encourage one another, on account


250

Page 250
[ILLUSTRATION]

196. ST. RIQUIER (CENTULA)

ANGILBERT'S CHURCH AND CLOISTER (790-799)
[after Effman, 1912, fig. 1]

The original manuscript of Hariulf's Chronicon Centulense,
written before 1088, (ed. Lot, 1894) perished in fire in 1719. It
contained Hariulf's drawing of the Carolingian abbey church and
cloister still in their original condition. His drawing is known through
two copies. The earliest and most authentic
(above) was made in
1612 and published in Petau's
De Nithardo Caroli magni
nepote,
Paris, 1913. Our knowledge of the exterior of the
Carolingian church is derived from it. The interior layout was
reconstructed independently, with virtually the same results, by
Georges Durand
(1911) and Wilhelm Effmann (1912) through
analysis of the description of religious services and liturgical
processions in Hariulf's chronicle. The best plan, because it takes into
account irregularities in the Gothic church reflecting conditions of its
Carolingian predecessor, is that of Irmingard Achter, 1956
(figs. 135
and 168
).

of the excuses to which the sleepy are addicted."[35]
In waking each other, as Hildemar informs us in more
detail, "the wise and older monk will arouse the brother
who sleeps next to him . . . but no junior monk should ever
arouse another junior, because of the temptation this may
offer for sin (propter occasionem peccati); rather one or two
seniors, after having lit a candle, will walk through the
dormitory to wake the sleepy brothers; yet, in performing
this duty will never touch the brother but only a board of
his bed or something similar."[36]

For bedding they are allowed: a mattress (matta), a
blanket (sagum), a coverlet (lena), and a pillow (capitale).
The possession of any personal property other than that
which is issued to all of the brothers[37] is severely prohibited,
and in order to guard against infractions of this regulation
the beds are frequently inspected by the abbot.[38]

We must assume that the beds were provided with some
locker or storage space, in which the monks could keep the
duplicate set of clothing which the Rule permitted them
"to allow for a change at night and for the washing of these
garments."[39]

During the hours which are set aside for sleeping,
whether in the day or at night, silence is vigorously enforced
in the dormitory;[40] but on certain specified periods
of the daily cycle, such as when the monks return from
their chapter readings, they may engage in conversation, in
groups of two or three or more.[41] Even during the midday
rest in the summer, conversation is permitted, provided
that it does not "injure the peace of those who sit and read
in bed." Should there be any need for sustained talk, the
monks must go outside (i.e., to the cloister walk) and
conduct their business there.[42]

 
[35]

Singuli per singula lecta dormiant; lectisternia pro modo conuersationis
secundum dispensationem abbae suae accipiant. Si potest fieri, omnes in uno
loco dormiant; sin autem multitudo non sinit, deni aut uiceni cum senioribus,
qui super eos solliciti sint, pausent. Candela iugiter in eadem cella ardeat
usque mane. Uestiti dormiant et cincti cingulis aut funibus, ut cultellos suos
ad latus suum non habeant, dum dormiunt, ne forte per somnum uulnerent
dormientem . . . Adulescentiores fratres iuxta se non habeant lectos, sed
permixti cum senioribus. Surgentes uero ad opus Dei inuicem se moderare
cohortentur propter somnulentorum excusationes. Benedicti regula,
chap. 22;
ed. Hanslik, 1960, 77-78; ed. McCann, 1952, 70-71; ed. Steidle, 1952,
200-201.

[36]

Expositio Hildemari; ed. Mittermüller, 1880, 335-36.

[37]

See below under "Vestiary." The synod of 817 added to the
standard equipment which the monks could keep near their beds, a
specified supply of soap and unction; Synodi secundae decr. auth. chap.
38; ed. Semmler, Corp. cons. mon., I, 1963, 480.

[38]

Benedicti regula, chap. 55; ed. Hanslik, 1960, 130; ed. McCann,
1952, 126-27; ed. Steidle, 1952, 269.

[39]

Benedicti regula, chap. 55; ed. Hanslik, 1960, 129; ed. McCann,
1952, 124-25; ed. Steidle, 1952, 269.

[40]

Consuetudines Corbeienses; ed. Semmler, Corp. cons. mon., I, 1963,
417: "Quando uero dormiendi tempus fuerit siue in die siue in nocte silentium
funditus in ore, ita in incessu, ut nullus iniuriam patiatur, summa cautela
esse debet.
"

[41]

Ibid., 416-17: "Quando loqui licet, quia locutio semper ibi seruanda
est siue duo seu tres seu aetiam plures sicuti fieri solet quando de capitulo
surgunt coniungantur.
"

[42]

Ibid., 417: "Quod si aliquis etiam ad legendum in lectulo suo resederit,
nequaquam alterum sibi ibidem ad colloquium coniungat, sed si
necessitatem loquendi diutius habuerint, exeant foras et ibi loquantur.
"

LAYOUT OF THE BEDS

The layout of the beds in the Monks' Dormitory is complex
and ingenious. We have already discussed the manner
in which it was designed in our analysis of the scale and
construction methods used in designing the Plan.[43] The
number 77 is not likely to be an accident.[44] Yet I have been
able to find only one instance where the number of monks
was confined to this figure.[45]

The Monk's Dormitory, like the two other principal
buildings of the cloister, the Refectory and the Cellar, has
no internal architectural wall partitions whatsoever, and for
that reason must be thought of as a unitary space, open from
end to end. This should not be interpreted to mean, however,
that the beds were in full and open view of everyone
throughout the entire length and width of the building.
They must have been separated from one another by
wooden panels sufficiently high and long to protect the
monks from interfering with one another. The Custom of
Subiaco
stipulates "that there be wooden partitions between
bed and bed, so that the brothers may not see each
other when they rest or read in their beds, and overhead
they must be covered [with canopies] because of the dust
and the cold." The same custom also requires "that these


251

Page 251
[ILLUSTRATION]

197. ST. RIQUIER (CENTULA). PLAN WITH ABBEY CHURCH & CLOISTER

[after Durand, 1911, 241, fig. 5]

This 19th-century cadastral plan of the city of St. Riquier shows the Gothic abbey church (1) and superimposed in the area to the south the
course of the covered walks that once enclosed its triangular cloister, with the church of St. Benedict
(2) in one, and the church of St. Mary (3)
in the other corner. This layout, first suggested by Jean Hubert (1957, 293-309, Pl. 1.C), and again in Hubert, Porcher, and Volbach (1970,
297, fig. 341
), on the basis of a documentary study, was confirmed by excavations of Honoré Bernard (Karl der Grosse, III, 1965, 370).


252

Page 252
[ILLUSTRATION]

199. LORSCH

FIRST MONASTERY OF CHRODEGANG (760-774)

AXONOMETRIC RECONSTRUCTION [after Behn, 1949, pl. 1]

[ILLUSTRATION]

198. LORSCH

FIRST MONASTERY OF CHRODEGANG (760-774)

PLAN [after Selzer, 1955, 14]

Lorsch is the earliest medieval monastery with a square cloister
attached to one flank of the church. But a layout of similar shape
may already have existed in Pirmin's abbey of Reichenau-Mittelzell,
built between 724 and 750, if Erdmann's reconstruction of its
claustral compound is correct
(Erdmann, 1974, 499, fig. TA 4). For
Lorsch see Behn and Selzer, and a more recent summary by
Schaefer in
Vorromanische Kirchenbauten, 1966-68,
179-82.

spaces be so arranged, as to be provided with a window
admitting daylight for reading and writing as well as a
small table and a chair and whatever else is necessary for
that purpose."[46]

The Custom of Subiaco is a relatively late source[47] and
already reflects a relaxation of the Rule of St. Benedict in
favor of greater privacy—a development in the further
course of which the dormitory ended up by being subdivided
internally into a sequence of individual cubicles
ranged along the walls of the building, with a passage left
in the middle, each cubicle forming a separate enclosure
fitted, besides the bed, with a chair and a desk beneath a
window. This arrangement, so well known from the dorter
of Durham Cathedral (built by Bishop Skirlaw in 13981404)[48]
was clearly not in the mind of the churchmen who
ruled on the details of the layout of the Monks' Dormitory
on the Plan of St. Gall. Yet even here we might be justified
in counting on at least a rudimentary system of partition
walls between the beds—if not for moral protection, for
purely practical reasons: since the brothers were permitted
to read in bed during their afternoon rest period, they were
in need of at least a headboard against which to lean.

 
[43]

See above, p. 80, fig. 60, and p. 89.

[44]

See above, p. 123.

[45]

The Abbey of Lobbes, around 850, numbered seventy-seven monks;
see below, p. 343.

[46]

Sit tamen inter lectum et lectum intersticium tabularum, quod prohibeat
mutuam visionem fratrum in lectis jacencium vel legencium; sintque desuper
cooperti propter pulveres et frigus. Loca eciam sic sint ordinata, ut quilibet
habeat fenestram pro lumine diei ad legendum et scribendum et mensulam
ibidem collacatam atque sedem et hujusmodi que necessaria sunt pro talibus.

(Conseutudines Sublacenses, chap. 3, ed. Albers. Cons. Mon., II, 1905,
125-26.)

[47]

The oldest preserved manuscripts of the Consuetudines Sublacenes
(St. Gall Stiftsbibliothek, Cod. Lat. 928 and 932) date from around 1436.
See Albers, 1902, 201ff.

[48]

On the dorter of Durham, see VHC, Durham, 1928, 130.

FEARS OF THE VIGILANT ABBOT

The eternal fear of the vigilant abbot was, of course, the
pollution of monastic life by what St. Benedict designated
with his distinctive discretion simply as impropriety
(improbitas),[49] but to which others before and after him
referred with less restraint as "that habit which is contrary
to nature" (usus qui est contra naturam) perpetrated by
men, who oblivious of their own sex turn nature into
iniquity "by committing shameless acts with other men
(masculi in masculos turpitudinem operantes),[50] or "that
most wicked crime . . . detestable to God" (istud scelus
valde nefandissimum . . . quae valde detestabile est Deo
).[51]
The crime was common enough to come to the attention of
Charlemagne, who dealt with it in a vigorous act of public
legislation, incorporated in a general capitulary for his Missi
issued in 802.[52]

The monk Hildemar, writing in 845, devoted several
pages to this precarious subject and discussed in detail the
precautions an abbot must take to guard against this
danger. The abbot, he tells us, must watch not only over
the boys and adolescents, but also over those who enter the
monastery at a more advanced age. To each group of ten
boys there must be assigned three or four seniors, or
masters, so that no one among them is ever without supervision.
After the late evening service, Compline, "the boys
must leave the choir, and their masters, with a light in
hand, will take them to every altar of the oratory to pray a
little, one master walking in front, one in the middle, and
the third behind" (unus magister ante, alter magister vadat
in medio, et tertius magister retro
); "then whoever wants to
go to the privy, should go perform the necessities of
nature with a light, and their master with them" (cum
lumine et magister eorum cum illis
).[53] If a boy finds himself


253

Page 253
compelled to respond to this call during the night, "he
must waken his master, who will light a lamp and take him
to the privy, and with the light burning, bring him back
to bed."[54] Even the dreamlife of the monks and its sexual
connotations are subject to supervision. Depending on the
varying degree of sleep or consciousness, the employment
of the senses of touch and vision, or the extent of deliberate
procrastination, the offense must be atoned for by the
recitation of psalms, five, ten, or fifteen respectively, and
if the indulgence was committed with no restraint, by the
reading of the entire psalter.[55]

 
[49]

Benedicti regula, chap. 2 and 23; ed. Hanslik, 1960, 24, 79; ed.
McCann, 1952, 20-22, 72-73; ed. Steidle, 1952, 82-83, 200-201.

[50]

St. Paul, Epistola ad Romanes, I, 26-27.

[51]

Expositio Hildemari, ed. Mittermüller, 1880, 332-34.

[52]

"For a most pernicious rumor has come to our ears that many in
our monasteries have already been detected in fornication and in abomination
and uncleanness. It especially saddens and disturbs us that it can
be said, without a great mistake, that some of the monks are understood
to be sodomites, so that whereas the greatest hope of salvation to All
Christians is believed to arise from the life and chastity of the monks,
damage has been incurred instead. Therefore, we also ask and urge that
henceforth all shall most earnestly strive with all diligence to preserve
themselves from these evils, so that never again such a report shall be
brought to our ears. And let this be known to all, that we in no way dare
to consent to those evils in any other place in our whole kingdom; so
much the less, indeed, in the persons of those whom we desire to be
examples of chastity and moral purity. Certainly, if any such report
shall have come to our ears in the future, we shall inflict such a penalty,
not only on the guilty but also on those who have consented to such
deeds, that no Christian who shall have heard of it will ever dare in the
future to perpetrate such acts." (Here quoted after translations and
Reprints, VI, Laws of Charles the Great, ed. D. C. Monro, n.d., 21.
For the original text see Capitulare Missorum Generale, AD 802, Mon.
Germ. Hist., Legum
II, Capit. I, 1883, 94.)

[53]

Expositio Hildemari, ed. Mittermüller, 1880, 333.

[54]

Ibid., 334.

[55]

Ibid., 336.

ABSENCE OF STAIRS

The author of the Plan of St. Gall did not consider it a
matter of vital importance to express himself in great detail
about the stairs which connected the Dormitory with the
Church, the cloister, and the privy. He made it absolutely
clear, however, where such connections should be established.
There is no doubt that the door that leads from the
Dormitory to the southern transept arm of the Church
must have opened onto a flight of stairs by which the
monks descended into the Church for their nocturnal services.
A direct ascent to the dormitory a parte ecclesiae in
the Abbey of St. Gall is mentioned in Ekkehart's Casus
sancti Galli.
[56] Flights of night stairs of precisely this type
survive in an excellent state of preservation in the transepts
of the Cistercian abbey churches of Fontenay and Silvacane,
both from about 1150, and the Benedictine abbey
church of Hexham (fig. 101), from about 1200-1225.[57] The
area in the middle of the Dormitory left unobstructed by
beds might have been meant to serve as landing for an inner
stair connecting Dormitory with Warming Room. This
same stair could also have been used for daytime access
from ground level to Privy, which to judge by numerous
later parallels must have been level with the Dormitory.

 
[56]

Ekkeharti (IV.) Casus sancti Galli, chap. 91; ed. Meyer von
Knonau, 1877, 322ff; ed. Helbling, 1958, 164ff. Cf. II, 327.

[57]

For night stairs in general see Aubert, I, 1957, 304-305. For
Fontenay, see Ségogne-Maillé, 1946, fig. 5; for Silvacane: Pontus, 1966,
38; for Hexham: Cook, 1961, pl. VII and Cook-Smith, 1960, pl. 39.
A night stair survives in the north transept of Tintern Abbey. Others in
varying degrees of preservation are found in many other medieval
churches (Beaulieu Abbey; St. Augustine, Bristol; Hayles Abbey, and
others). The remains of the earliest medieval flight of dormitory night
stairs known to me are those which have been excavated by Otto Doppelfeld
in the northern transept arm of Cologne Cathedral. They are virtually
coeval with the Plan of St. Gall. See Weyres, 1965, 395ff and 417,
fig. 5.