University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
The Representative Nature of Strahan's Methods
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
  
collapse section 
  
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
 13. 
 14. 
 15. 
 16. 
 17. 
 18. 
 19. 
 20. 
 21. 
 22. 
 23. 
 24. 
 25. 
 26. 
 27. 
 28. 
 29. 
 30. 
 31. 
 32. 
 33. 
 34. 
 35. 
 36. 
 37. 
 38. 
 39. 
 40. 
 41. 
 42. 
 43. 
 44. 
 45. 
 46. 
 47. 
 48. 
 49. 
 50. 
 51. 
 52. 
 53. 
 54. 
 55. 
 56. 
 57. 
 58. 
 59. 
 60. 
 61. 
 62. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1.0. 
collapse section2.0. 
collapse section2.1. 
 2.1a. 
 2.1b. 
collapse section2.2. 
 2.2a. 
 2.2b. 
  

collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

The Representative Nature of Strahan's Methods

There is sufficient published evidence about other eighteenth-century printers to confirm what logic dictates: that Strahan's highly codified procedures discussed above were not his invention but were the procedures of the large or moderately large London printing companies


111

Page 111
during most of the century. Four examples of similarity of method will serve to indicate the kind of evidence from which I infer the representative nature of Strahan's ledgers as they reflected his business practices.

The practices of William Bowyer II can be partially reconstructed from study of John Nichols' complicated but valuable Biographical and Literary Anecdotes of William Bowyer, Printer, F.S.A. (1782); Bowyer appears to have used much the same methods of working and of recording his business that Strahan used.[9] Samuel Richardson's similar printing practices are detailed in William M. Sale Jr.'s Samuel Richardson: Master Printer (1950) and in I. G. Philips' William Blackstone and the Reform of the Oxford University Press in the Eighteenth Century (Oxford Bibliographical Society Publications, New Series, VII, 1957 for 1955) where are reproduced several documents Richardson wrote about London printing scales and practices. We also have a good sampling of the ledgers of Benjamin Collins of Salisbury, published in an appendix to Charles Welsh's study of Newbery, A Bookseller of the Last Century (1885).[10] A fourth source of evidence is John Smith's The Printer's Grammar (1755), probably the only eighteenth-century handbook for compositors. Smith's description of procedures is remarkably like those Strahan must have followed in order to have kept the ledgers as he did.

The methods and scales of Strahan's private business can, then, be safely taken as the typical procedures of printing in London during the eighteenth century — not "primitive" or "antique" but detailed and necessary practices inherent in the mass production of literature and still used today in a great many shops because they are the proper practices for printing in quantity. From Strahan's ledgers we can gain information not only about the thousands of books Strahan printed but about the production of other books printed in London in the eighteenth century.