University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
Establishment of the Unit Price: Entries before 1749
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
  
collapse section 
  
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
 13. 
 14. 
 15. 
 16. 
 17. 
 18. 
 19. 
 20. 
 21. 
 22. 
 23. 
 24. 
 25. 
 26. 
 27. 
 28. 
 29. 
 30. 
 31. 
 32. 
 33. 
 34. 
 35. 
 36. 
 37. 
 38. 
 39. 
 40. 
 41. 
 42. 
 43. 
 44. 
 45. 
 46. 
 47. 
 48. 
 49. 
 50. 
 51. 
 52. 
 53. 
 54. 
 55. 
 56. 
 57. 
 58. 
 59. 
 60. 
 61. 
 62. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1.0. 
collapse section2.0. 
collapse section2.1. 
 2.1a. 
 2.1b. 
collapse section2.2. 
 2.2a. 
 2.2b. 
  

collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Establishment of the Unit Price: Entries before 1749

A few months after William Strahan's death in 1785, the London compositors and Masters came to their first "union wage agreement" which was binding for most (certainly the majority) of the printing


94

Page 94
companies in the city and set the precedent for a later agreement on pressmen's wages.[6] The principal grievance of the compositors was insecurity about their wages: not all printers charged the same prices for the same work and therefore did not give the same wages for the same work. Consequently, a compositor could not leave one shop to go to another one with any ease, for he had no assurance that the second shop would give the same wages he had been getting. Further, in any one shop the compositors did not have any assurance that the Master Printer would charge, or pay in wages, at the same rate for two similar jobs. The demand of the compositors in 1785 was that all prices and wages in all shops be the same for any given job. The same demand is still being made today, in union and non-union printing companies, for the problem of the standard scale of prices is persistent in the printing industry. Even when a standard scale exists, it will be imperfect as far as the employees are concerned, because a scale is fixed whereas the material they work on will not be the same for any two jobs.

In spite of the complaints of the eighteenth-century compositors, price scales were being used long before 1785, and, specifically in the business of William Strahan, the scale was consistent and practical but flexible. The compositors could not have had as strong a grievance against Strahan as they had against some small shops. Even though there is not enough information available to prove whether Strahan's scale resulted in high or in low wages, there is ample evidence to prove that Strahan's wages must have been the same for two similar jobs and that they must have been consistent. We can know this by extrapolating from the consistency of the prices he charged his customers. I shall, therefore, examine the price scales for standard work as it was charged to the customer at Strahan's private business.[7]

Discussion of Strahan's standard scale of prices for his customers can be divided into three parts: the methods of entry in the ledgers, the unit price for work, and the cost of paper. In addition to the standard scale, Strahan maintained a separate, consistent scale for "extra" work. Since this discussion will concentrate on the methods of


95

Page 95
entry and the unit price for work, there will be no concentration on paper or "extra" charges, which are separate studies in themselves.