Type
From the scale of prices above, we see that before 1749, when almost
all entries included the type face used, the faces most frequently mentioned
were:
1. Pica ............................................... |
52 |
2. English ............................................ |
41 |
3. Small Pica ......................................... |
37 |
4. Long Primer ........................................ |
18 |
5. Great Primer ....................................... |
6 |
6. Brevier ............................................ |
5 |
7. Pica and Long Primer ............................... |
2 |
8. Long Primer and Brevier ............................ |
2 |
9. Double Pica ........................................ |
1 |
10. Pica and Small Pica ................................ |
1 |
11. Bourgeois .......................................... |
0 |
12. Small Letter ....................................... |
0 |
|
__ |
|
165 |
From this frequency list, we can arrive at the "standard" faces:
Appropriate for text or medium sheets:
English, Pica, Small Pica
Appropriate for notes or small sheets:
Long Primer and some Brevier
After 1749, when Strahan simplified his ledger entries, he eliminated
mention of any faces except those used in an unusual or "extra" manner.
This absence of mention provides us with one of the three kinds of evidence
about type after 1749. We would expect that the "standard" faces,
established above, would not appear often in the entries but that the smaller
faces might appear as "extra charges." Such is exactly the case. I could find
only forty-nine instances after 1749 in which type face was named, either
in the standard entries or in the
"extra charges." These show just the reversal of frequency which we would
expect:
-
Instances
- 1. English ............................................... 0
- 2. "Large Letter"
[Great Primer?] ...................................... 1
- 3. Pica and Small Pica ...................................
1
- 4. Small Pica with Brevier ...............................
1
- 5. "Large Pica" [Double Pica? or large
sheet of Pica?] ...................................... 2
- 6. Bourgeois .............................................
2
- 7. Small Pica ............................................
3
- 8. Pica .................................................. 5
- 9. Brevier ............................................... 6
- 10. Long Primer ...........................................
9
- 11. Small Letter ..........................................
19
It is apparent that if Strahan only mentioned type faces forty-nine times
after 1749, he must have been using his price scale (which has been
reconstructed above) to set each unit charge; using the scale would
eliminate the necessity for recording type faces in the ledgers. However,
"small letter" was still recorded with some frequency — in the
context
of notes, indexes and appendixes rather than of text or body work.
When frequency is correlated with price in the scale, we find that
Strahan's charges for standard and non-standard faces were completely
consistent with the size appropriate for body or text work and notes or
small work:
Cheapest: |
Double Pica |
|
Great Primer |
Intermediate: |
English |
|
Pica |
|
Small Pica |
Extra Charge: |
Bourgeois |
|
Long Primer |
|
Brevier |
High Extra Charge: |
Small Letter |
|
(Non Pareil or Pearl) |
The other two kinds of evidence about type after 1749 are found in
two ledgers which show (1) Strahan's purchases for the private business and
(2) type on hand at the law house.
Purchases of Type for the
Private Business
Five pages in Ledger B show forty-one purchases of type from the
firm of Alexander Wilson, typefounder in Glasgow, between 1754 and
1776, as well as four returns of unused or faulty type. Although these
records do not show all of Strahan's purchases of type, they do show how
much of each kind he purchased from one company over a period of
years.
Since we do not know what type Strahan already had on hand, the
only safe conclusion which can be drawn from this table is that he
purchased more English type than any other kind from Wilson between
1754 and 1776; we cannot conclude, of course, that Strahan did not use
Pica, etc., at all, for we know from the ledger entries that he did. Further,
it is notorious that Scottish type height has always been different from
London type height; some twentieth-century printing companies still keep
old Scottish type separately cased. Therefore, Strahan probably bought his
Pica, etc., from a Scottish founder rather than from his other regular
supplier, William Caslon, whose type was used in the law house.
Type on Hand at the Law House
The amounts of type used in the law house seem to correlate more
closely with the mention and lack of mention of type in the ledgers than do
the type purchases from Wilson shown above. The following table shows
the total poundage of old and new type on hand for the four presses of the
law house when it was inventoried at the expiration
of the Law Patent in 1789. The relative proportions of type faces are close
to the proportions one would expect to find in the private business except
that the law house had no Double Pica or Bourgeois in 1789 and that the
poundage is much less than would have been on hand at the private
business, which was easily three times the size of the law house.