University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section4. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 03. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
collapse section8. 
 01. 
 02. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 04. 
collapse section3. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
collapse section4. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 04. 
 05. 
 06. 
 07. 
 08. 
(7)
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
collapse section11. 
 01. 
 02. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  

collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

(7)

Although concluding on such a negative note seems poor rhetorical strategy, it nonetheless is indicative of the psychological experience that sometimes results from a futile search for a sharing printer. The commitment to printer research assumes a willingness to endure such frustration. The discovery of sharing, however, is important in itself and is a source of satisfaction. In fact, shared printing is the only area where new discoveries in relatively large numbers are within easy reach, given the high probability that we have found all the extant manuscripts of plays by important Elizabethan/ Jacobean authors. Beyond that, an enormous amount of work remains to be done by employing font analysis to verify the tentative assignments in new STC that are based upon ornamental stock. A practical problem exists in regard to the recording and dissemination of the new information that will be generated by typographical analysis. Detailed evidence that affects our understanding of the transmission of early texts should find its way into print as a matter of course. However, the overwhelming majority of early books probably do not merit such treatment although typographical information about them can be extremely valuable in the context of printer identification. Publication of such information in printed format is obviously out of the question: the Short Title Catalogue with its abbreviated descriptions exemplifies the practical limits both in terms of economics and dedication (bibliographers cannot help feeling a sense of gratitude to Katharine V. Pantzer every time the revised STC is consulted). The creation of on-line computer databases, however, offers the exciting prospect of instant (or nearly so) dissemination of current bibliographical information that can be expanded and updated as the need arises. The proposal by Henry L. Snyder (University of California, Riverside), Director of the Eighteenth-Century Short Title Catalogue for North America, to include the STC in the on-going project of converting the ESTC to an electronic database has, in fact, been underway for some time.[49] Although the abbreviated entries of the revised STC serve as the basic records for the database, Snyder envisions expanding them "so that they


228

Page 228
would be comparable to ESTC records in fullness, content, and format." The possibility of adding to the database once it is completed should provide additional motivation for bibliographers to record routinely the kinds of evidence that are pertinent to shared printing and printer identification.