University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  

collapse section1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section2. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section3. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section4. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section5. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section6. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section7. 
  
  
  
  
collapse section8. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section9. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section10. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section11. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section12. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section13. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section14. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section15. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section16. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section17. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section18. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section19. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section20. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Results of Close Observations.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section21. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section22. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section23. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section24. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section25. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section26. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section27. 
  
  
  
  
  
 28. 

Results of Close Observations.

Curiously enough the key to the performance of circling in a light wind or a dead calm was not found through the usual way of gathering human knowledge, i. e., through observations and experiment. These had failed because I did not know what to look for. The mystery was, in fact, solved by an eclectic process of conjecture and computation, but once these computations indicated what observations should be made, the results gave at once the reasons for the circling of the birds, for their then observed attitude, and for the necessity of an


183

independent initial sustaining speed before soaring began. Both Mr. Huffaker and myself verified the data many times and I made the computations.

These observations disclosed several facts:

1st.—That winds blowing five to seventeen miles per hour frequently had rising trends of 10 degrees to 15 degrees, and that upon occasions when there seemed to be absolutely no wind, there was often nevertheless a local rising of the air estimated at a rate of four to eight miles or more per hour. This was ascertained by watching thistledown, and rising fogs alongside of trees or hills of known height. Everyone will readily realize that when walking at the rate of four to eight miles an hour in a dead calm the "relative wind" is quite inappreciable to the senses and that such a rising air would not be noticed.

2nd.—That the buzzard, sailing in an apparently dead horizontal calm, progressed at speeds of fifteen to eighteen miles per hour, as measured by his shadow on the ground. It was thought that the air was then possibly rising 8.8 feet per second, or six miles per hour.

3rd.—That when soaring in very light winds the angle of incidence of the buzzards was negative to the horizon—i. e., that when seen coming toward the eye, the afternoon light shone on the back instead of on the breast, as would have been the case had the angle been inclined above the horizon.

4th.—That the sailing performance only occurred after the bird had acquired an initial velocity of at least fifteen or eighteen miles per hour, either by industrious flapping or by descending from a perch.