University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
[section 1]
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 04. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
collapse section1. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 04. 
 05. 
 06. 
 07. 
 08. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  

collapse section 
  
  
  

The first facsimile reprint of Whitney's emblem-book was edited in 1866 by Henry Green, who as one of the founders of the Holbein Society pioneered the modern study of emblem literature.[1] Continuing his interest in reviving the study of Renaissance iconography, Green edited, between 1868 and 1872, many reprints ranging from Hans Holbein the Younger's Icones Historiarum Veteris Testamenti and Les Simulacres de la Mort (1869), to Henry Godyere's The Mirrour of Majestie (1870), and to the principal early editions of Alciati's Emblemata. Except in his last work, Andrea Alciati and His Books of Emblems (1872), nowhere did Green lavish as much effort as in the reprint of Whitney. In addition to the "Introductory Dissertation," "Index to the Mottoes," and "Postscript to the Introductory Dissertation," which traces the ancestry of Whitney, Green appended four "Literary and Bibliographical" essays, close to one hundred pages of "Notes" and "Addenda" as well as sixty-three plates, most of them title-pages and selected emblems from early emblem-books. Yet more recent scholars of emblem literature have paid only passing attention to Green's edition as a whole. Rosemary Freeman notes briefly that "H. Green in his edition of Whitney's A


33

Page 33
Choice of Emblemes. 1866. p. 252. has shown that 202 out of 248 woodcuts were printed from identical blocks."[2] In Studies in Seventeenth-Century Imagery, Mario Praz also notes tersely: "Edited in facsimile by Green for the Holbein Society, 1866, with a survey of the first emblem-writers, and various observations on sources, etc.; all with little method and less accuracy."[3] It is with Green's study of Whitney's sources that the other recent treatises on Choice have concerned themselves. John Franklin Leisher, in his 1952 Harvard dissertation, "Geoffrey Whitney's Choice of Emblemes and Its Relation to the Emblematic Vogue in Tudor England," corrects several of Green's oversights, discovers a new source in Georgette de Montenay's Les Emblèmes ou devises chrestiennes (1571), and eliminates all of Green's "similar" sources as irrelevant. In her 1964 Saint Louis University dissertation, Sister M. Simon Nolde reaches conclusions similar to those of Leisher, even though working apparently without knowledge of the latter's study.[4] Perhaps the first person ever to study the manuscript original of Choice (the presentation copy to the Earl of Leicester now in the Harvard College Library, designated, and hereinafter referred to, as MS. Typ 14), Leisher unfortunately made only perfunctory use of it. MS. Typ 14 is more fully described by Frank Fieler in his introduction to the 1967 reissue of Green's edition published by Benjamin Blom.[5] The general nature of this introduction, however, precludes any detailed treatment of the similarities and differences between the MS and the printed edition and the drawing of meaningful conclusions as to the process of converting from one to the other. The story of how

34

Page 34
Whitney produced the printed edition of Choice from the MS remains to be told.[6] Moreover, in view of the fact that the two recent revisions of Green's attribution of sources both appear in unpublished theses, a few readers still regard Green's edition as the sole authority and do not hesitate to rely on his findings, inaccurate though some of them have been proved to be.[7] There is a need, therefore, for a fresh study of Whitney's A Choice of Emblemes, in light especially of its manuscript, and of those aspects that have been neglected both by Green and by recent studies of Choice. This need is all the more urgent now that Whitney's emblem-book is rapidly becoming more available because both Choice itself and Green's edition of it have been reproduced by many enterprising reprint presses. For example, in 1969, just two years after the reissue of Green's edition by Blom, Choice was reprinted by the Scolar Press of Menston, England, as No. 3 of its English Emblem Books series with a note by John Horden, as well as by Amsterdam's Theatrum Orbis Terrarum (distributed in New York by Da Capo Press) as No. 161 of its English Experience series; and in 1971, Green's edition was again reprinted by Olms of Hildesheim, Germany (distributed in New York by Adler's Foreign Books). Although most of the biographical and bibliographical details in Green's edition remain useful, his neglect of Whitney's woodcuts, verses, annotations, and "newly devised" emblems must be remedied, and his treatment of Whitney's sources and mottoes reviewed and revised.

The purpose of this essay, then, is to provide a more accurate and comprehensive study of Whitney's A Choice of Emblemes. It will concern itself with these areas: 1. source, 2. motto, 3. woodcut, 4. verse, 5. annotation, and 6. "newly devised" emblems. In each area the


35

Page 35
manuscript version will be compared with the printed version in order to disclose the process by which one is converted into the other, assuming of course that MS. Typ 14 was, if not the copy, at least the basis for the copy, of the printed edition. Comparison of the two versions will also reveal the number of emblem-books that were available to Whitney during the composition of the manuscript in England and the number of new sources he used in producing the printed version at Leyden. Of especial interest are those twenty emblems in the MS that have no known emblematic sources; ten of them were copied and made into woodcuts at Leyden by an artist/engraver who, under Whitney's instruction, added five more such emblems. A study of these fifteen "newly devised" emblems along with an examination of the other five areas will go far toward rescuing Whitney from the common modern estimate of him as merely an emblem-collector/translator of little originality and discovering him to be an emblem-writer of considerable ingenuity and skill. Above all, such a study will provide a more enlightening background for relating Whitney's emblem-making to poetic imagery of such English authors as Spenser, Shakespeare, Daniel, Chapman, and Donne. Before proceeding with the six areas of concern, it would be helpful to give some general ideas concerning the composition of both MS. Typ 14 and Choice, together with a brief account of the circumstances under which the latter was printed.

Bound in sixteenth-century vellum, MS. Typ 14 contains 98 folios, written on both sides of each leaf. Presented to the Earl of Leicester on 28 November 1585 (according to the date in the printed version of the "Epistle Dedicatorie" since the MS epistle is undated), it is decorated with 197 emblematic drawings in pen-and-ink, sepia, and blue water-color. Offered for sale in December 1899 in Quaritch Catalog 194, No. 1395, and bought by William Augustus White on 2 January 1900, it was presented to the Harvard College Library in 1941 by Harold T. White and Mrs. Hugh D. Marshall.[8] It has two parts. The first part, written in ink now turned brown, begins on fol. 1v with the arms of the Earl of Leicester and continues with the epistle dedicatory (fols. 2-5), the dedication to Jove (fol. 6v), and 91 drawings (fols. 7-50). The second part, written in violet ink, follows a blank page (fol. 50v) and has a half-title which has in the middle the Leicester crest of a muzzled bear chained to a ragged post surrounded by a knotted belt with the famous motto, "Honi soit qui mal y pense," and


36

Page 36
a six-line Latin quotation from Nicolas Reusner. Following this half-title are verses in praise of Leicester and his brother Warwick (fols. 51v-52) and 106 drawings (fols. 52v-98v). There is a missing leaf in the MS between fols. 43v and 44. On fol. 43v is a drawing with the motto "Quicquid delirant reges, plectuntr Achiui" and a stanza of ten iambic pentameter lines which correspond to the emblem "Non dolo, sed vi" on p. 58 of Choice. On the first half of fol. 44, instead of the beginning of the next emblem with its motto and woodcut, are the last two sextets of the missing emblem "Silentium" which in the printed edition appears on p. 60. The woodcut of "Silentium" pictures Harpocrates holding an index finger over his mouth while reading a book at his desk; it is supported by a seven-sextet verse, the first half of which appears on the same page with the woodcut. The remaining three and one half sextets continue on the next page, p. 61; separated from these verses by a horizontal bar of a decorative border, the alternate emblem, without woodcut, entitled "Video, & taceo" in eight lines of poulter's measure fills out the rest of this page. Correspondingly, the identical alternate emblem also fills out the second half of fol. 44. The missing leaf should then contain on its recto the emblem "Nimium rebus ne fide secundis" identical to that on p. 59 of Choice and on its verso the motto "Silentium," a drawing corresponding to the woodcut on p. 60 of Choice, and a verse of five sextets that is continued by the two sextets on fol. 44.[9] The MS measures 270 x 190 mm. (10 ¾ x 7 ½”). The drawings in the first twenty folios are enclosed in heavily lined (the rest in thin-lined) rectangular frames. The dimensions of the drawings vary, depending on whether they appear alone on a leaf, fill out half a leaf, or share a leaf with another drawing. The single drawing on a leaf measures 64 x 86 mm. (2 ½ x 3 ⅜”); the double drawings on a single leaf 44 x 80 mm. (1 ¾ x 3 ⅛”); drawings used to fill out the lower half of a leaf sometimes measure 58 x 83 mm. (2 ¼ x 3 ¼”). The changes in size between a model and an MS drawing, and between the latter and the woodcut in Choice, tax the ability of the copying artists and sometimes produce interesting results (see Section 3 below). These changes also reflect the progressive differences among designs of the model, the MS, and the printed version.


37

Page 37

Just ten days after he received the manuscript of Choice from Whitney, Leicester went to the Low Countries on 8 December 1585 as the Queen's Lord Lieutenant and Captain General of the English forces to help the Dutch States General against Spain. Whitney followed him there shortly as a supernumerary in the party of Janus Dousa, one of the ambassadors sent to England after the fall of Antwerp in August by the States General to seek Elizabeth's intervention. At the beginning of the new year (1586), the Dousas, father and son (to each of whom Whitney dedicated an emblem, and the younger Dousa also wrote the first commendatory verse, in Choice), along with Whitney were at the University of Leyden, where the senior Dousa was the rector and where on 11 January the Earl of Leicester was entertained as the honored guest. Leicester stayed in Leyden until the twentieth. It is not inconceivable that it was on this occasion that Whitney was persuaded to publish his collection of emblems from the MS, as he said that he was ". . . earnestlie required by somme that perused the same, to haue it imprinted. . ." ("To the Reader," sig. **3v). "By somme" might very well refer to the Dousas, who had taken a great personal interest in Whitney and his talents.[10] Perhaps to facilitate his task Whitney was matriculated at the university on 1 March 1586 and lived close to both the university and the Plantin printing shop, whose printer Francis Raphelengius later became professor of Hebrew at Leyden. Whether or not the printing of Choice by Raphelengius was also motivated politically to popularize Leicester's name so as to enable him to assume sovereign power in the Low Countries, as has been suggested by Fieler (p. xiii), may not be as relevant to our purposes here as the fact that Whitney had less than three months in which to publish the book—in which to select from the Plantin stock over 200 woodblocks, instruct an artist/engraver to copy 35 additional emblems and to devise five new ones, compose or translate verses for at least 62 emblems that were not in the MS, and to add a large amount of marginalia. The text of the verses in the printed edition shows signs of haste in the many punctuation and spelling errors by an illiterate compositor. Although Whitney caught nine of the "Faultes escaped in the Printing" (sig. ***2v), and although he mentioned that he had


38

Page 38
already corrected most of the faults, there are legions of others—particularly the overuse of commas and the atrocious use of the question marks. Yet, on the whole, the printed Choice, completed on 4 May 1586, is comparable in execution and attractiveness to the best of the continental emblem-books of the period.

A Choice of Emblemes follows the two-part division of the MS, but with the addition of the epistle "To the Reader" (sigs. **3v-**4v), seven commendatory verses (sigs. ***1-***2), the errata already mentioned and on the same page the same verse dedicated in the MS to Jove now addressed to D.O.M. (Deo, Optimo, Maximo). Part one has 113 emblems, one of them, on p. 61, as has been mentioned above, is a "naked" emblem, an emblem without woodcut, and one of them, on p. 95, is a "newly devised" emblem. Of the emblems in this part, 17 contain no marginalia; 31 are dedicated to Whitney's acquaintances. Part two has 135 emblems; 14 are "newly devised," 31 without annotation, and 60 are dedicated. All emblems in Choice are surrounded by decorative borders; those dual emblems that occupy the same page sometimes have borders only on two sides. The size of woodcuts is more uniform than that of the MS drawings; a vast majority of them measure in a square of 57 mm. (2 ¼”), although those from Sambucus and Junius vary in height from 47 to 51 mm. (1 ⅞ to 2”). The most noticeable exceptions in size are those woodcuts borrowed from Paradin which are unframed and measure as high as 83 mm. (3 ¼”). In changing these vertical rectangular models into his horizontal rectangular drawings, the MS artist produced a number of inferior copies. With this general description of both MS. Typ 14 and Choice, the full story of their conversion is now ready to be unfolded.