(c): Opportunities for an eclectic text.
Our last category, where some textual errors listed arise probably
from copyists' carelessness, gives us the opportunity for some investigation
into the source and reliability of the Sloane transcript. As already stated, it
seems to have been commissioned for Sloane himself, possibly when the
original volume of the Register it duplicates was temporarily misplaced; but
the copyist has allowed himself some latitude, for some variants we meet
in it appear to be founded on no authority but their own. Often he indulges
in tautological paraphrase:
. . . diminishing more and more; according as the Tree
groweth
in greatness; and as soon as the Worm is wholly turned into the Tree,
rooting in the ground, and so growing great? (HRS,
161)
becomes
. . . diminishing more and more, according as the Tree groweth in
greatness; and as the tree groweth in greatness and as soon as the Worm is
wholly turned into the Tree, rooting in the ground, and so growing great?
(MS. cit.)
where, it is true, the error may be akin to that noted above which was due
to the eye having mistaken the lines of the original, but this does not
account elsewhere for the synonym 'squib' for the 'jeer' 'put upon the
Portuges' (
HRS, 161), nor for 'seed' replacing
'wood' (
sc. aloes,
which 'comes most from
Cambodia, and
Siam',
171-172). In the latter instance all manuscripts are changed to the correct
reading, 'wood', in a later hand, again probably Birch's, an alteration akin
to the erasure, in the Register, of the words 'and Scritores' after the word
'Chests' in the passage in
HRS, 165, given as: 'Chests which
comes from
Jappan into
Europe' and to the
alteration of the original reading of the manuscripts, 'Pharmocopedia', to
conform to
HRS 'Pharmocopeia' (167). Likewise the word
'removing', nonsense in its context, has been emended to the correct
'renewing' (Birch, i. 485, has the text correctly as has
HRS,
199) in the following (
HRS, 232): '[On taking away a pair
of
bellows thrust into the windpipe of a dissected, yet living, dog, the heart
had]
convulsive motions; but upon removing the motion of the
Bellows, the Heart recovered its former motion.' This may be
further
evidence for attributing to
Birch the Register emendations of Robert Hooke's paper on the weather
(
HRS, 173
ff.);
Slo (698,
ff.
58-61) seems to be a transcript of
R rather than of
CP.
Examples of careless mis-copying are, happily, infrequent: only one
need be noticed. HRS, 'observabit' (187) for the doubtlessly
correct 'aberrabit' of CP and R in the sentence
'Calculus . . . a vero aberrabit' may be compared with the error of
'observe' for 'above' in 'the more Peter you allow it
[gunpowder], it will still be the better, till you come to observe Eight parts'
(278) to prove that both papers were the work of the same copyist or
compositor. In the latter quotation R is again emended to
follow
the printed text, here of course wrongly.
Small graphical errors rarely affect the sense materially: '. . . People
of the Country do take' ('rake,' R) 'it [saltpetre] off the
ground'
(262-263); '. . . Great Rains may easily bring it to the Lake in
Macedonia. . . ' (263), where the Register's 'that Lake'
makes
clear the point, destroyed in the History text, that the
particular
lake was one specifically referred to earlier in the paper, citing Pliny:
Natural History, X. 107; 'The Stuffs to be dyed are first
boyled
in Allum-liquors, and the Allum afterwards (as they say) cleared from the
said Stuff again' (CP: 'same Stuff'), 'before any Colour at all
to be applyed' (288); and 'Some Colours or Stuffs are best dyed by
reiterated Dippings ever' (CP: 'even') 'into the same Liquor
at
several distances of time' (304). Two similar Latin examples are relegated
to a footnote for the reason given previously.[12] All manuscript sources agree in the
sentence (164):
'[Chewing durian] causes a Dirthea, which easily degenerates
to a
Tenasmus, by us called Peirsing', where the fourth edition of
HRS conjectures and prints 'diarhea'; one hesitates, however,
to give the more modern forms 'tenesmos' and 'piercing'. Since the
CP draft of the paper about salt-petre is no longer extant we
may legitimately make a text compounded of that of
HRS and
of
R, just as editors compound texts of some Shakespearean
plays based on the Quarto or Quartos and the Folio; the legitimacy of such
a procedure has, of course, been denied. An example is: '. . . Though
Peter go alway in Gun-powder, yet if you fulminate it in a
Crucible, and burn of[f] the volatile part with Powder of Coal
[
sc. 'charcoal'], Brimstone, Antimony or Meal, there will
remain a Salt' (274-275), where the Register reads 'go all away' in the
sense of 'calcine'. Sometimes punctuation can affect the issue: compare
The last I shall name is . . . other great variety of Handling: An
account of all which is that History of Dying ['dyeing'] we intend
(287)
with
The last I shall name is . . . other great variety; of handling, an
account of all which is the history of Dying we intend
(R),
and the following, where the writer is referring to ambergrease:
To endeavour the getting of more certain knowledge; what it
is,
being reported to be bred in the bottom of the Sea like to a thick
mud? (168)
with
To endeavour the getting of more certain knowledge what it is; being
reported to be bred in the bottom of the sea like to a thick mud?
(R),
where the latter perhaps gives the better sense. Finally, readers are invited
to take their pick of readings in the following four samples:
Yet such Effects of the Macassars Arts [i.e.
sympathetic
poisonings] are unknown to us' (165. CP, Slo.: Macassar
dartes);
[Cinnamon has] a most Excellent taste; so that by Sunning it looseth
rather than acquires any taste or force; the Tree being pill'd is cut down to
the root; but the young Sprigs after a year or two give the best and finest
Cinnamon' (169. Slo.: evil for 'exct'
of CP and adds
before 'young Sprigs' the Surac or);
It [saltpetre] is no sooner dilated by Rain-water, or the Moisture of
the Earth, but it is immediately appylyed to the production or nutriment of
some Plant' (265.
R: diluted);
The use of Allum is to be a Vinculum between the
Cloth
and the Colour, as clammy-Oyls and Gum-waters are in Painting and
Limming' (290. CP: claying-Oyls; R: Clayie
Oyls).
Lest the materials presented above be considered ill digested, a word
must be said by way of summary. It must be emphasized that they are only
samples, intended to show the kind of problem likely to be
faced by the editor of a seventeenth century science text: they neither
postulate nor prove any thesis. Data are inadequate, for instance, to furnish
any clues as to what kind of error, if any, 'T.R.' 's compositors were prone
when setting HRS, and the Errata of its first
edition
are all literals and refer only to Sprat's portion of the book. In what specific
tasks, then, may the examples cited be of service? There is much to be
done in the publication or republication of seventeenth century science
authorities: Boyle, long recognized as an English stylist, needs reprinting;
Wren's scientific work has not yet been satisfactorily collected; only
recently has the publication of Newton's correspondence been put in hand;
and in addition there is the whole corpus
of unpublished material by lesser men, British and Continental — it
is
surprising, moreover, but typical of this state of affairs that although we
have a satisfactory biography of Robert Hooke (Margaret 'Espinasse, 1956)
we have as yet no collected edition of his works. Rarely, in this discipline,
is any one text absolutely authoritative as a source text. One day,
nevertheless, we may see the magnum opus of a dictionary,
by
subjects and by persons, of every major scientific activity in Europe during
the century: to such an El Dorado the present paper can only tentatively
point the way.