3. Chapter III
Other considerations concerning Innate Principles, both Speculative and
Practical
1. Principles not innate, unless their ideas be innate.
Had those who would persuade us that there are innate
principles not taken them together in gross, but considered separately the parts out of which those propositions are
made, they would not, perhaps, have been so forward to believe they were innate. Since, if the ideas which made
up those truths were not, it was impossible that the propositions made up of them should be innate, or our
knowledge of them be born with us. For, if the ideas be not innate, there was a time when the mind was without
those principles; and then they will not be innate, but be derived from some other original. For, where the ideas
themselves are not, there can be no knowledge, no assent, no mental or verbal propositions about them.
2. Ideas, especially those belonging to principles, not born with children.
If we will attentively consider new-born
children, we shall have little reason to think that they bring many ideas into the world with them. For, bating
perhaps some faint ideas of hunger, and thirst, and warmth, and some pains, which they may have felt in the
womb, there is not the least appearance of any settled ideas at all in them; especially of ideas answering the terms
which make up those universal propositions that are esteemed innate principles. One may perceive how, by
degrees, afterwards, ideas come into their minds; and that they get no more, nor other, than what experience, and
the observation of things that come in their way, furnish them with; which might be enough to satisfy us that they
are not original characters stamped on the mind.
3. "Impossibility" and "identity" not innate ideas.
"It is impossible for the same thing to be, and not to be," is
certainly (if there be any such) an innate principle. But can any one think, or will any one say, that "impossibility"
and "identity" are two innate ideas? Are they such as all mankind have, and bring into the world with them? And
are they those which are the first in children, and antecedent to all acquired ones? If they are innate, they must
needs be so. Hath a child an idea of impossibility and identity, before it has of white or black, sweet or bitter? And
is it from the knowledge of this principle that it concludes, that wormwood rubbed on the nipple hath not the same
taste that it used to receive from thence? Is it the actual knowledge of impossible est idem esse, et non esse, that
makes a child distinguish between its mother and a stranger; or that makes it fond of the one and flee the other?
Or does the mind regulate itself and its assent by ideas that it never yet had? Or the understanding draw
conclusions from principles which it never yet knew or understood? The names impossibility and identity stand
for two ideas, so far from being innate, or born with us, that I think it requires great care and attention to form
them right in our understandings. They are so far from being brought into the world with us, so remote from the
thoughts of infancy and childhood, that I believe, upon examination it will be found that many grown men want
them.
4. "Identity," an idea not innate.
If identity (to instance that alone) be a native impression, and consequently so
clear and obvious to us that we must needs know it even from our cradles, I would gladly be resolved by any one
of seven, or seventy years old, whether a man, being a creature consisting of soul and body, be the same man
when his body is changed? Whether Euphorbus and Pythagoras, having had the same soul, were the same men,
though they lived several ages asunder? Nay, whether the cock too, which had the same soul, were not the same
with both of them? Whereby, perhaps, it will appear that our idea of sameness is not so settled and clear as to
deserve to be thought innate in us. For if those innate ideas are not clear and distinct, so as to be universally
known and naturally agreed on, they cannot be subjects of universal and undoubted truths, but will be the
unavoidable occasion of perpetual uncertainty. For, I suppose every one's idea of identity will not be the same that
Pythagoras and thousands of his followers have. And which then shall be true? Which innate? Or are there two
different ideas of identity, both innate?
5. What makes the same man?
Nor let any one think that the questions I have here proposed about the identity of
man are bare empty speculations; which, if they were, would be enough to show, that there was in the
understandings of men no innate idea of identity. He that shall with a little attention reflect on the resurrection,
and consider that divine justice will bring to judgment, at the last day, the very same persons, to be happy or
miserable in the other, who did well or ill in this life, will find it perhaps not easy to resolve with himself, what
makes the same man, or wherein identity consists; and will not be forward to think he, and every one, even
children themselves, have naturally a clear idea of it.
6. Whole and part, not innate ideas.
Let us examine that principle of mathematics, viz., that the whole is bigger
than a part. This, I take it, is reckoned amongst innate principles. I am sure it has as good a title as any to be
thought so; which yet nobody can think it to be, when he considers [that] the ideas it comprehends in it, whole and
part, are perfectly relative; but the positive ideas to which they properly and immediately belong are extension and
number, of which alone whole and part are relations. So that if whole and part are innate ideas, extension and
number must be so too; it being impossible to have an idea of a relation, without having any at all of the thing to
which it belongs, and in which it is founded. Now, whether the minds of men have naturally imprinted on them
the ideas of extension and number, I leave to be considered by these who are the patrons of innate principles.
7. Idea of worship not innate.
That God is to be worshipped, is, without doubt, as great a truth as any that can
enter into the mind of man, and deserves the first place amongst all practical principles. But yet it can by no
means be thought innate, unless the ideas of God and worship are innate. That the idea the term worship stands for
is not in the understanding of children, and a character stamped on the mind in its first original, I think will be
easily granted, by any one that considers how few there be amongst grown men who have a clear and distinct
notion of it. And, I suppose, there cannot be anything more ridiculous than to say, that children have this practical
principle innate, "That God is to be worshipped," and yet that they know not what that worship of God is, which
is their duty. But to pass by this.
8. Idea of God not innate.
If any idea can be imagined innate, the idea of God may, of all others, for many
reasons, be thought so; since it is hard to conceive how there should be innate moral principles, without an innate
idea of a Deity. Without a notion of a law-maker, it is impossible to have a notion of a law, and an obligation to
observe it. Besides the atheists taken notice of amongst the ancients, and left branded upon the records of history,
hath not navigation discovered, in these later ages, whole nations, at the bay of Soldania, in Brazil, [in Boranday,]
and in the Caribbee islands, etc., amongst whom there was to be found no notion of a God, no religion? Nicholaus
del Techo, in Literis ex Paraquaria, de Caiguarum Conversione, has these words: Reperi eam gentem nullum
nomen habere quod Deum, et hominis animam significet; nulla sacra habet, nulla idola. These are instances of
nations where uncultivated nature has been left to itself, without the help of letters and discipline, and the
improvements of arts and sciences. But there are others to be found who have enjoyed these in a very great
measure, who yet, for want of a due application of their thoughts this way, want the idea and knowledge of God.
It will, I doubt not, be a surprise to others, as it was to me, to find the Siamites of this number. But for this, let
them consult the King of France's late envoy thither, who gives no better account of the Chinese themselves. And
if we will not believe La Loubere, the missionaries of China, even the Jesuits themselves, the great encomiasts of
the Chinese, do all to a man agree, and will convince us, that the sect of the literari, or learned, keeping to the old
religion of China, and the ruling party there, are all of them atheists. Vid. Navarette, in the Collection of Voyages,
vol. i., and Historia Cultus Sinensium. And perhaps, if we should with attention mind the lives and discourses of
people not so far off, we should have too much reason to fear, that many, in more civilized countries, have no
very strong and clear impressions of a Deity upon their minds, and that the complaints of atheism made from the
pulpit are not without reason. And though only some profligate wretches own it too barefacedly now; yet perhaps
we should hear more than we do of it from others, did not the fear of the magistrate's sword, or their neighbour's
censure, tie up people's tongues; which, were the apprehensions of punishment or shame taken away, would as
openly proclaim their atheism as their lives do.
9. The name of God not universal or obscure in meaning.
But had all mankind everywhere a notion of a God,
(whereof yet history tells us the contrary,) it would not from thence follow, that the idea of him was innate. For,
though no nation were to be found without a name, and some few dark notions of him, yet that would not prove
them to be natural impressions on the mind; no more than the names of fire, or the sun, heat, or number, do prove
the ideas they stand for to be innate; because the names of those things, and the ideas of them, are so universally
received and known amongst mankind. Nor, on the contrary, is the want of such a name, or the absence of such a
notion out of men's minds, any argument against the being of a God; any more than it would be a proof that there
was no loadstone in the world, because a great part of mankind had neither a notion of any such thing nor a name
for it; or be any show of argument to prove that there are no distinct and various species of angels, or intelligent
beings above us, because we have no ideas of such distinct species, or names for them. For, men being furnished
with words, by the common language of their own countries, can scarce avoid having some kind of ideas of those
things whose names those they converse with have occasion frequently to mention to them. And if they carry with
it the notion of excellency, greatness, or something extraordinary; if apprehension and concernment accompany it;
if the fear of absolute and irresistible power set it on upon the mind,--the idea is likely to sink the deeper, and
spread the further; especially if it be such an idea as is agreeable to the common light of reason, and naturally
deducible from every part of our knowledge, as that of a God is. For the visible marks of extraordinary wisdom
and power appear so plainly in all the works of the creation, that a rational creature, who will but seriously reflect
on them, cannot miss the discovery of a Deity. And the influence that the discovery of such a Being must
necessarily have on the minds of all that have but once heard of it is so great, and carries such a weight of thought
and communication with it, that it seems stranger to me that a whole nation of men should be anywhere found so
brutish as to want the notion of a God, than that they should be without any notion of numbers, or fire.
10. Ideas of God and idea of fire.
The name of God being once mentioned in any part of the world, to express a
superior, powerful, wise, invisible Being, the suitableness of such a notion to the principles of common reason,
and the interest men will always have to mention it often, must necessarily spread it far and wide; and continue it
down to all generations: though yet the general reception of this name, and some imperfect and unsteady notions
conveyed thereby to the unthinking part of mankind, prove not the idea to be innate; but only that they who made
the discovery had made a right use of their reason, thought maturely of the causes of things, and traced them to
their original; from whom other less considering people having once received so important a notion, it could not
easily be lost again.
11. Idea of God not innate.
This is all could be inferred from the notion of a God, were it to be found universally
in all the tribes of mankind, and generally acknowledged, by men grown to maturity in all countries. For the
generality of the acknowledging of a God, as I imagine, is extended no further than that; which, if it be sufficient
to prove the idea of God innate, will as well prove the idea of fire innate; since I think it may be truly said, that
there is not a person in the world who has a notion of a God, who has not also the idea of fire. I doubt not but if a
colony of young children should be placed in an island where no fire was, they would certainly neither have any
notion of such a thing, nor name for it, how generally soever it were received and known in all the world besides;
and perhaps too their apprehensions would be as far removed from any name, or notion, of a God, till some one
amongst them had employed his thoughts to inquire into the constitution and causes of things, which would easily
lead him to the notion of a God; which having once taught to others, reason, and the natural propensity of their
own thoughts, would afterwards propagate, and continue amongst them.
12. Suitable to God's goodness, that all men should have an idea of Him, therefore naturally imprinted by Him,
answered.
Indeed it is urged, that it is suitable to the goodness of God, to imprint upon the minds of men
characters and notions of himself, and not to leave them in the dark and doubt in so grand a concernment; and
also, by that means, to secure to himself the homage and veneration due from so intelligent a creature as man; and
therefore he has done it.
This argument, if it be of any force, will prove much more than those who use it in this case expect from it. For, if
we may conclude that God hath done for men all that men shall judge is best for them, because it is suitable to his
goodness so to do, it will prove, not only that God has imprinted on the minds of men an idea of himself, but that
he hath plainly stamped there, in fair characters, all that men ought to know or believe of him; all that they ought
to do in obedience to his will; and that he hath given them a will and affections conformable to it. This, no doubt,
every one will think better for men, than that they should, in the dark, grope after knowledge, as St. Paul tells us
all nations did after God (Acts 17. 27); than that their wills should clash with their understandings, and their
appetites cross their duty. The Romanists say it is best for men, and so suitable to the goodness of God, that there
should be an infallible judge of controversies on earth; and therefore there is one. And I, by the same reason, say it
is better for men that every man himself should be infallible. I leave them to consider, whether, by the force of
this argument, they shall think that every man is so. I think it a very good argument to say,--the infinitely wise
God hath made it so; and therefore it is best. But it seems to me a little too much confidence of our own wisdom
to say,--"I think it best; and therefore God hath made it so." And in the matter in hand, it will be in vain to argue
from such a topic, that God hath done so, when certain experience shows us that he hath not. But the goodness of
God hath not been wanting to men, without such original impressions of knowledge or ideas stamped on the
mind; since he hath furnished man with those faculties which will serve for the sufficient discovery of all things
requisite to the end of such a being; and I doubt not but to show, that a man, by the right use of his natural
abilities, may, without any innate principles, attain a knowledge of a God, and other things that concern him. God
having endued man with those faculties of knowledge which he hath, was no more obliged by his goodness to
plant those innate notions in his mind, than that, having given him reason, hands, and materials, he should build
him bridges or houses,--which some people in the world, however of good parts, do either totally want, or are but
ill provided of, as well as others are wholly without ideas of God and principles of morality, or at least have but
very ill ones; the reason in both cases, being, that they never employed their parts, faculties, and powers
industriously that way, but contented themselves with the opinions, fashions, and things of their country, as they
found them, without looking any further. Had you or I been born at the Bay of Soldania, possibly our thoughts
and notions had not exceeded those brutish ones of the Hottentots that inhabit there. And had the Virginia king
Apochancana been educated in England, he had been perhaps as knowing a divine, and as good a mathematician
as any in it; the difference between him and a more improved Englishman lying barely in this, that the exercise of
his faculties was bounded within the ways, modes, and notions of his own country, and never directed to any other
or further inquiries. And if he had not any idea of a God, it was only because he pursued not those thoughts that
would have led him to it.
13. Ideas of God various in different men.
I grant that if there were any ideas to be found imprinted on the minds
of men, we have reason to expect it should be the notion of his Maker, as a mark God set on his own
workmanship, to mind man of his dependence and duty; and that herein should appear the first instances of human
knowledge. But how late is it before any such notion is discoverable in children? And when we find it there, how
much more does it resemble the opinion and notion of the teacher, than represent the true God? He that shall
observe in children the progress whereby their minds attain the knowledge they have, will think that the objects
they do first and most familiarly converse with are those that make the first impressions on their understandings;
nor will he find the least footsteps of any other. It is easy to take notice how their thoughts enlarge themselves,
only as they come to be acquainted with a greater variety of sensible objects; to retain the ideas of them in their
memories; and to get the skill to compound and enlarge them, and several ways put them together. How, by these
means, they come to frame in their minds an idea men have of a Deity, I shall hereafter show.
14. Contrary and inconsistent ideas of God under the same name.
Can it be thought that the ideas men have of
God are the characters and marks of himself, engraven in their minds by his own finger, when we see that, in the
same country, under one and the same name, men have far different, nay often contrary and inconsistent ideas and
conceptions of him? Their agreeing in a name, or sound, will scarce prove an innate notion of him.
15. Gross ideas of God.
What true or tolerable notion of a Deity could they have, who acknowledged and
worshipped hundreds? Every deity that they owned above one was an infallible evidence of their ignorance of
Him, and a proof that they had no true notion of God, where unity, infinity, and eternity were excluded. To which,
if we add their gross conceptions of corporeity, expressed in their images and representations of their deities; the
amours, marriages, copulations, lusts, quarrels, and other mean qualities attributed by them to their gods; we shall
have little reason to think that the heathen world, i.e., the greatest part of mankind, had such ideas of God in their
minds as he himself, out of care that they should not be mistaken about him, was author of. And this universality
of consent, so much argued, if it prove any native impressions, it will be only this:--that God imprinted on the
minds of all men speaking the same language, a name for himself, but not any idea; since those people who
agreed in the name, had, at the same time, far different apprehensions about the thing signified. If they say that the
variety of deities worshipped by the heathen world were but figurative ways of expressing the several attributes of
that incomprehensible Being, or several parts of his providence, I answer: what they might be in the original I will
not here inquire; but that they were so in the thoughts of the vulgar I think nobody will affirm. And he that will
consult the voyage of the Bishop of Beryte, c. 13, (not to mention other testimonies,) will find that the theology of
the Siamites professedly owns a plurality of gods: or, as the Abbe de Choisy more judiciously remarks in his
Journal du Voyage de Siam, 107/177, it consists properly in acknowledging no God at all.
16. Idea of God not innate although wise men of all nations come to have it.
If it be said, that wise men of all
nations came to have true conceptions of the unity and infinity of the Deity, I grant it. But then this,
First, excludes universality of consent in anything but the name; for those wise men being very few, perhaps one
of a thousand, this universality is very narrow.
Secondly, it seems to me plainly to prove, that the truest and best notions men have of God were not imprinted,
but acquired by thought and meditation, and a right use of their faculties: since the wise and considerate men of
the world, by a right and careful employment of their thoughts and reason, attained true notions in this as well as
other things; whilst the lazy and inconsiderate part of men, making far the greater number, took up their notions
by chance, from common tradition and vulgar conceptions, without much beating their heads about them. And if it
be a reason to think the notion of God innate, because all wise men had it, virtue too must be thought innate; for
that also wise men have always had.
17. Odd, low, and pitiful ideas of God common among men.
This was evidently the case of all Gentilism. Nor
hath even amongst Jews, Christians, and Mahometans, who acknowledged but one God, this doctrine, and the
care taken in those nations to teach men to have true notions of a God, prevailed so far as to make men to have the
same and the true ideas of him. How many even amongst us, will be found upon inquiry to fancy him in the shape
of a man sitting in heaven; and to have many other absurd and unfit conceptions of him? Christians as well as
Turks have had whole sects owning and contending earnestly for it,--that the Deity was corporeal, and of human
shape: and though we find few now amongst us who profess themselves Anthropomorphites, (though some I have
met with that own it,) yet I believe he that will make it his business may find amongst the ignorant and
uninstructed Christians many of that opinion. Talk but with country people, almost of any age, or young people
almost of any condition, and you shall find that, though the name of God be frequently in their mouths, yet the
notions they apply this name to are so odd, low, and pitiful, that nobody can imagine they were taught by a
rational man; much less that they were characters written by the finger of God himself. Nor do I see how it
derogates more from the goodness of God, that he has given us minds unfurnished with these ideas of himself,
than that he hath sent us into the world with bodies unclothed; and that there is no art or skill born with us. For,
being fitted with faculties to attain these, it is want of industry and consideration in us, and not of bounty in him,
if we have them not. It is as certain that there is a God, as that the opposite angles made by the intersection of two
straight lines are equal. There was never any rational creature that set himself sincerely to examine the truth of
these propositions that could fail to assent to them; though yet it be past doubt that there are many men, who,
having not applied their thoughts that way, are ignorant both of the one and the other. If any one think fit to call
this (which is the utmost of its extent) universal consent, such an one I easily allow; but such an universal consent
as this proves not the idea of God, any more than it does the idea of such angles, innate.
18. If the idea of God be not innate, no other can be supposed innate.
Since then though the knowledge of a God
be the most natural discovery of human reason, yet the idea of him is not innate, as I think is evident from what
has been said; I imagine there will be scarce any other idea found that can pretend to it. Since if God hath set any
impression, any character, on the understanding of men, it is most reasonable to expect it should have been some
clear and uniform idea of Himself; as far as our weak capacities were capable to receive so incomprehensible and
infinite an object. But our minds being at first void of that idea which we are most concerned to have, it is a strong
presumption against all other innate characters. I must own, as far as I can observe, I can find none, and would be
glad to be informed by any other.
19. Idea of substance not innate.
I confess there is another idea which would be of general use for mankind to
have, as it is of general talk as if they had it; and that is the idea of substance; which we neither have nor can have
by sensation or reflection. If nature took care to provide us any ideas, we might well expect they should be such as
by our own faculties we cannot procure to ourselves; but we see, on the contrary, that since, by those ways
whereby other ideas are brought into our minds, this is not, we have no such clear idea at all; and therefore signify
nothing by the word substance but only an uncertain supposition of we know not what, i.e., of something whereof
we have no [particular distinct positive] idea, which we take to be the substratum, or support, of those ideas we do
know.
20. No propositions can be innate, since no ideas are innate.
Whatever then we talk of innate, either speculative or
practical, principles, it may with as much probability be said, that a man hath £100 sterling in his pocket, and yet
denied that he hath there either penny, shilling, crown, or other coin out of which the sum is to be made up; as to
think that certain propositions are innate when the ideas about which they are can by no means be supposed to be
so. The general reception and assent that is given doth not at all prove, that the ideas expressed in them are innate;
for in many cases, however the ideas came there, the assent to words expressing the agreement or disagreement of
such ideas, will necessarily follow. Every one that hath a true idea of God and worship, will assent to this
proposition, "That God is to be worshipped," when expressed in a language he understands; and every rational
man that hath not thought on it to-day, may be ready to assent to this proposition to-morrow; and yet millions of
men may be well supposed to want one or both those ideas to-day. For, if we will allow savages, and most country
people, to have ideas of God and worship, (which conversation with them will not make one forward to believe,)
yet I think few children can be supposed to have those ideas, which therefore they must begin to have some time
or other; and then they will also begin to assent to that proposition, and make very little question of it ever after.
But such an assent upon hearing, no more proves the ideas to be innate, than it does that one born blind (with
cataracts which will be couched to-morrow) had the innate ideas of the sun, or light, or saffron, or yellow;
because, when his sight is cleared, he will certainly assent to this proposition, "That the sun is lucid, or that
saffron is yellow." And therefore, if such an assent upon hearing cannot prove the ideas innate, it can much less
the propositions made up of those ideas. If they have any innate ideas, I would be glad to be told what, and how
many, they are.
21. No innate ideas in the memory.
To which let me add: if there be any innate ideas, any ideas in the mind which
the mind does not actually think on, they must be lodged in the memory; and from thence must be brought into
view by remembrance; i.e., must be known, when they are remembered, to have been perceptions in the mind
before; unless remembrance can be without remembrance. For, to remember is to perceive anything with memory,
or with a consciousness that it was perceived or known before. Without this, whatever idea comes into the mind is
new, and not remembered; this consciousness of its having been in the mind before, being that which
distinguishes remembering from all other ways of thinking. Whatever idea was never perceived by the mind was
never in the mind. Whatever idea is in the mind, is, either an actual perception, or else, having been an actual
perception, is so in the mind that, by the memory, it can be made an actual perception again. Whenever there is
the actual perception of any idea without memory, the idea appears perfectly new and unknown before to the
understanding. Whenever the memory brings any idea into actual view, it is with a consciousness that it had been
there before, and was not wholly a stranger to the mind. Whether this be not so, I appeal to every one's
observation. And then I desire an instance of an idea, pretended to be innate, which (before any impression of it
by ways hereafter to be mentioned) any one could revive and remember, as an idea he had formerly known;
without which consciousness of a former perception there is no remembrance; and whatever idea comes into the
mind without that consciousness is not remembered, or comes not out of the memory, nor can be said to be in the
mind before that appearance. For what is not either actually in view or in the memory, is in the mind no way at all,
and is all one as if it had never been there. Suppose a child had the use of his eyes till he knows and distinguishes
colours; but then cataracts shut the windows, and he is forty or fifty years perfectly in the dark; and in that time
perfectly loses all memory of the ideas of colours he once had. This was the case of a blind man I once talked
with, who lost his sight by the small-pox when he was a child, and had no more notion of colours than one born
blind. I ask whether any one can say this man had then any ideas of colours in his mind, any more than one born
blind? And I think nobody will say that either of them had in his mind any ideas of colours at all. His cataracts are
couched, and then he has the ideas (which he remembers not) of colours, de novo, by his restored sight, conveyed
to his mind, and that without any consciousness of a former acquaintance. And these now he can revive and call to
mind in the dark. In this case all these ideas of colours, which, when out of view, can be revived with a
consciousness of a former acquaintance, being thus in the memory, are said to be in the mind. The use I make of
this is,--that whatever idea, being not actually in view, is in the mind, is there only by being in the memory; and
if it be not in the memory, it is not in the mind; and if it be in the memory, it cannot by the memory be brought
into actual view without a perception that it comes out of the memory; which is this, that it had been known
before, and is now remembered. If therefore there be any innate ideas, they must be in the memory, or else
nowhere in the mind; and if they be in the memory, they can be revived without any impression from without; and
whenever they are brought into the mind they are remembered, i.e., they bring with them a perception of their not
being wholly new to it. This being a constant and distinguishing difference between what is, and what is not in the
memory, or in the mind;--that what is not in the memory, whenever it appears there, appears perfectly new and
unknown before; and what is in the memory, or in the mind, whenever it is suggested by the memory, appears not
to be new, but the mind finds it in itself, and knows it was there before. By this it may be tried whether there be
any innate ideas in the mind before impression from sensation or reflection. I would fain meet with the man who,
when he came to the use of reason, or at any other time, remembered any of them; and to whom, after he was
born, they were never new. If any one will say, there are ideas in the mind that are not in the memory, I desire him
to explain himself, and make what he says intelligible.
22. Principles not innate, because of little use or little certainty.
Besides what I have already said, there is another
reason why I doubt that neither these nor any other principles are innate. I that am fully persuaded that the
infinitely wise God made all things in perfect wisdom, cannot satisfy myself why he should be supposed to print
upon the minds of men some universal principles; whereof those that are pretended innate, and concern
speculation, are of no great use; and those that concern practice, not self-evident; and neither of them
distinguishable from some other truths not allowed to be innate. For, to what purpose should characters be graven
on the mind by the finger of God, which are not clearer there than those which are afterwards introduced, or
cannot be distinguished from them? If any one thinks there are such innate ideas and propositions, which by their
clearness and usefulness are distinguishable from all that is adventitious in the mind and acquired, it will not be a
hard matter for him to tell us which they are; and then every one will be a fit judge whether they be so or no.
Since if there be such innate ideas and impressions, plainly different from all other perceptions and knowledge,
every one will find it true in himself of the evidence of these supposed innate maxims, I have spoken already: of
their usefulness I shall have occasion to speak more hereafter.
23. Difference of men's discoveries depends upon the different application of their faculties.
To conclude: some
ideas forwardly offer themselves to all men's understanding; and some sorts of truths result from any ideas, as
soon as the mind puts them into propositions: other truths require a train of ideas placed in order, a due comparing
of them, and deductions made with attention, before they can be discovered and assented to. Some of the first sort,
because of their general and easy reception, have been mistaken for innate: but the truth is, ideas and notions are
no more born with us than arts and sciences; though some of them indeed offer themselves to our faculties more
readily than others; and therefore are more generally received: though that too be according as the organs of our
bodies and powers of our minds happen to be employed; God having fitted men with faculties and means to
discover, receive, and retain truths, according as they are employed. The great difference that is to be found in the
notions of mankind is, from the different use they put their faculties to. Whilst some (and those the most) taking
things upon trust, misemploy their power of assent, by lazily enslaving their minds to the dictates and dominion of
others, in doctrines which it is their duty carefully to examine, and not blindly, with an implicit faith, to swallow;
others, employing their thoughts only about some few things, grow acquainted sufficiently with them, attain great
degrees of knowledge in them, and are ignorant of all other, having never let their thoughts loose in the search of
other inquiries. Thus, that the three angles of a triangle are quite equal to two right ones is a truth as certain as
anything can be, and I think more evident than many of those propositions that go for principles; and yet there are
millions, however expert in other things, who know not this at all, because they never set their thoughts on work
about such angles. And he that certainly knows this proposition may yet be utterly ignorant of the truth of other
propositions, in mathematics itself, which are as clear and evident as this; because, in his search of those
mathematical truths, he stopped his thoughts short and went not so far. The same may happen concerning the
notions we have of the being of a Deity. For, though there be no truth which a man may more evidently make out
to himself than the existence of a God, yet he that shall content himself with things as he finds them in this world,
as they minister to his pleasures and passions, and not make inquiry a little further into their causes, ends, and
admirable contrivances, and pursue the thoughts thereof with diligence and attention, may live long without any
notion of such a Being. And if any person hath by talk put such a notion into his head, he may perhaps believe it;
but if he hath never examined it, his knowledge of it will be no perfecter than his, who having been told, that the
three angles of a triangle are equal to two right ones, takes it upon trust, without examining the demonstration;
and may yield his assent as a probable opinion, but hath no knowledge of the truth of it; which yet his faculties, if
carefully employed, were able to make clear and evident to him. But this only, by the by, to show how much our
knowledge depends upon the right use of those powers nature hath bestowed upon us, and how little upon such
innate principles as are in vain supposed to be in all mankind for their direction; which all men could not but
know if they were there, or else they would be there to no purpose. And which since all men do not know, nor can
distinguish from other adventitious truths, we may well conclude there are no such.
24. Men must think and know for themselves.
What censure doubting thus of innate principles may deserve from
men, who will be apt to call it pulling up the old foundations of knowledge and certainty, I cannot tell;--I
persuade myself at least that the way I have pursued, being conformable to truth, lays those foundations surer.
This I am certain, I have not made it my business either to quit or follow any authority in the ensuing Discourse.
Truth has been my only aim; and wherever that has appeared to lead, my thoughts have impartially followed,
without minding whether the footsteps of any other lay that way or not. Not that I want a due respect to other
men's opinions; but, after all, the greatest reverence is due to truth: and I hope it will not be thought arrogance to
say, that perhaps we should make greater progress in the discovery of rational and contemplative knowledge, if
we sought it in the fountain, in the consideration of things themselves; and made use rather of our own thoughts
than other men's to find it. For I think we may as rationally hope to see with other men's eyes, as to know by other
men's understandings. So much as we ourselves consider and comprehend of truth and reason, so much we
possess of real and true knowledge. The floating of other men's opinions in our brains, makes us not one jot the
more knowing, though they happen to be true. What in them was science, is in us but opiniatrety; whilst we give
up our assent only to reverend names, and do not, as they did, employ our own reason to understand those truths
which gave them reputation. Aristotle was certainly a knowing man, but nobody ever thought him so because he
blindly embraced, and confidently vented the opinions of another. And if the taking up of another's principles,
without examining them, made not him a philosopher, I suppose it will hardly make anybody else so. In the
sciences, every one has so much as he really knows and comprehends. What he believes only, and takes upon
trust, are but shreds; which, however well in the whole piece, make no considerable addition to his stock who
gathers them. Such borrowed wealth, like fairy money, though it were gold in the hand from which he received it,
will be but leaves and dust when it comes to use.
25. Whence the opinion of innate principles.
When men have found some general propositions that could not be
doubted of as soon as understood, it was, I know, a short and easy way to conclude them innate. This being once
received, it eased the lazy from the pains of search, and stopped the inquiry of the doubtful concerning all that was
once styled innate. And it was of no small advantage to those who affected to be masters and teachers, to make
this the principle of principles,--that principles must not he questioned. For, having once established this
tenet,--that there are innate principles, it put their followers upon a necessity of receiving some doctrines as such;
which was to take them off from the use of their own reason and judgment, and put them on believing and taking
them upon trust without further examination: in which posture of blind credulity, they might be more easily
governed by, and made useful to some sort of men, who had the skill and office to principle and guide them. Nor
is it a small power it gives one man over another, to have the authority to be the dictator of principles, and teacher
of unquestionable truths; and to make a man swallow that for an innate principle which may serve to his purpose
who teacheth them. Whereas had they examined the ways whereby men came to the knowledge of many universal
truths, they would have found them to result in the minds of men from the being of things themselves, when duly
considered; and that they were discovered by the application of those faculties that were fitted by nature to receive
and judge of them, when duly employed about them.
26. Conclusion.
To show how the understanding proceeds herein is the design of the following Discourse; which I
shall proceed to when I have first premised, that hitherto,--to clear my way to those foundations which I conceive
are the only true ones, whereon to establish those notions we can have of our own knowledge,--it hath been
necessary for me to give an account of the reasons I had to doubt of innate principles. And since the arguments
which are against them do, some of them, rise from common received opinions, I have been forced to take several
things for granted; which is hardly avoidable to any one, whose task is to show the falsehood or improbability of
any tenet;--it happening in controversial discourses as it does in assaulting of towns; where, if the ground be but
firm whereon the batteries are erected, there is no further inquiry of whom it is borrowed, nor whom it belongs to,
so it affords but a fit rise for the present purpose. But in the future part of this Discourse, designing to raise an
edifice uniform and consistent with itself, as far as my own experience and observation will assist me, I hope to
erect it on such a basis that I shall not need to shore it up with props and buttresses, leaning on borrowed or
begged foundations: or at least, if mine prove a castle in the air, I will endeavour it shall be all of a piece and hang
together. Wherein I warn the reader not to expect undeniable cogent demonstrations, unless I may be allowed the
privilege, not seldom assumed by others, to take my principles for granted; and then, I doubt not, but I can
demonstrate too. All that I shall say for the principles I proceed on is, that I can only appeal to men's own
unprejudiced experience and observation whether they be true or not; and this is enough for a man who professes
no more than to lay down candidly and freely his own conjectures, concerning a subject lying somewhat in the
dark, without any other design than an unbiased inquiry after truth.