19. The revolutions of the sun and moon, the properest measures of time for mankind.
The diurnal and annual
revolutions of the sun, as having been, from the beginning of nature, constant, regular, and universally observable
by all mankind, and supposed equal to one another, have been with reason made use of for the measure of
duration. But the distinction of days and years having depended on the motion of the sun, it has brought this
mistake with it, that it has been thought that motion and duration were the measure one of another. For men, in the
measuring of the length of time, having been accustomed to the ideas of minutes, hours, days, months, years, etc.,
which they found themselves upon any mention of time or duration presently to think on, all which portions of
time were measured out by the motion of those heavenly bodies, they were apt to confound time and motion; or at
least to think that they had a necessary connexion one with another. Whereas any constant periodical appearance,
or alteration of ideas, in seemingly equidistant spaces of duration, if constant and universally observable, would
have as well distinguished the intervals of time, as those that have been made use of. For, supposing the sun,
which some have taken to be a fire, had been lighted up at the same distance of time that it now every day comes
about to the same meridian, and then gone out again about twelve hours after, and that in the space of an annual
revolution it had sensibly increased in brightness and heat, and so decreased again,--would not such regular
appearances serve to measure out the distances of duration to all that could observe it, as well without as with
motion? For if the appearances were constant, universally observable, in equidistant periods, they would serve
mankind for measure of time as well were the motion away.