University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  

collapse section1. 
 1.1. 
 1.2. 
 1.3. 
 1.4. 
 1.5. 
 1.6. 
 1.7. 
 1.8. 
 1.9. 
 1.10. 
 1.11. 
 1.12. 
 1.13. 
 1.14. 
 1.15. 
 1.16. 
 1.17. 
 1.18. 
 1.19. 
 1.20. 
 1.21. 
 1.22. 
 1.23. 
 1.24. 
 1.25. 
 1.26. 
 1.27. 
 1.28. 
 1.29. 
 1.30. 
 1.31. 
collapse section2. 
 2.1. 
 2.2. 
 2.3. 
 2.4. 
 2.5. 
 2.6. 
 2.7. 
 2.8. 
 2.9. 
 2.10. 
 2.11. 
 2.12. 
 2.13. 
 2.14. 
collapse section3. 
 3.1. 
 3.2. 
 3.3. 
 3.4. 
 3.5. 
 3.6. 
 3.7. 
 3.8. 
Sixe points set downe by our learned forefathers for a generall regiment of all good utterance be it by mouth or by writing.
 3.9. 
 3.10. 
 3.11. 
 3.12. 
 3.13. 
 3.14. 
 3.15. 
 3.16. 
 3.17. 
 3.18. 
 3.19. 
 3.20. 
 3.21. 
 3.22. 
 3.23. 
 3.24. 
 3.25. 
 3.26. 

3.8. Sixe points set downe by our learned forefathers for a generall regiment of all good utterance be it by mouth or by writing.

Bvt before there had bene yet any precise obseruation made of figuratiue speeches, the first learned artificers of language considered


130

that the bewtie and good grace of vtterance rested in no many pointes: and whatsoeuer transgressed those lymits, they counted it for vitious; and thereupon did set downe a manner of regiment in all speech generally to be obserued, consisting in sixe pointes. First they said that there ought to be kept a decent proportion in our writings and speach, which they termed Analogia. Secondly, that it ought to be voluble vpon the tongue, and tunable to the eare, which they called Tasis. Thirdly, that it were not tediously long, but briefe and compendious, as the matter might beare, which they called Syntomia. Fourthly, that it should cary an orderly and good construction, which they called Synthesis. Fiftly, that it should be a sound, proper and naturall speach, which they called Curiologia. Sixtly, that it should be liuely & stirring, which they called Tropus. So as it appeareth by this order of theirs, that no vice could be committed in speech, keeping within the bounds of that restraint. Bit sir, all this being by them very well conceiued, there remayned a greater difficultie to know what this proportion, volubilitie, good construction, & the rest were, otherwise we could not be euer the more relieued. It was therefore of necessitie that a more curious and particular description should bee made of euery manner of speech, either transgressing or agreeing with their said generall prescript. Whereupon it came to passe, that all the commendable parts of speech were set foorth by the name of figures, and all the illaudable partes vnder the name of vices, or viciosities, both of which it shall be spoken in their places.