| 1.1. |
| 1.2. |
| 1.3. |
| 1.4. |
| 1.5. |
| 1.6. |
| 1.7. |
| 1.8. |
| 1.9. |
| 1.10. |
| 1.11. |
| 1.12. |
| 1.13. |
| 1.14. |
| 1.15. |
| 1.16. |
| 1.17. |
| 1.18. |
| 1.19. |
| 1.20. |
| 1.21. |
| 1.22. |
| 1.23. |
| 1.24. |
| 1.25. |
| 1.26. |
| 1.27. |
| 1.28. |
| 1.29. |
| 1.30. |
| 1.31. |
| 1.32. |
| 1.32. |
| 1.34. |
| 1.35. |
| 1.36. |
| 1.37. |
| 1.38. |
| 1.39. |
| 1.40. |
| 1.41. |
| 1.42. |
| 1.43. |
| 1.44. |
| 1.45. |
| 1.46. |
| 1.47. |
| 1.48. |
| 1.49. |
| 1.50. |
| 1.51. |
| 1.52. |
| 1.53. |
| 1.54. |
| 1.55. |
| 1.56. |
| 1.57. |
| 1.58. |
| 1.59. |
| 1.60. |
| 1.61. |
| 1.62. |
| 1.63. |
| 1.64. |
| 1.65. |
| 1.66. |
| 1.67. |
| 1.68. |
| 1.69. |
| 1.70. |
| 1.71. |
| 1.72. |
| 1.73. |
| 1.74. |
| 1.75. |
| 1.76. |
| 1.77. |
| 1.78. |
| 1.79. |
| 1.80. |
| 1.81. |
| 1.82. |
| 1.83. |
| 1.84. |
| 1.85. |
| 1.86. |
| 1.87. |
| 1.88. |
| 1.89. |
| 1.90. |
| 1.91. |
| 1.92. |
| 1.93. |
| 1.94. |
| 1.95. |
| 1.96. |
| 1.97. |
| 1.98. |
| 1.99. |
| 1.100. |
| 1.101. |
 | Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth |  |
65. Subdivisions of the class of cultivators into undertakers, or farmers, and hired persons, servants, and day-labourers.
Hence it follows, that the class of cultivators may be divided, like that of manufacturers, into two branches, the one of undertakers or capitalists, who make the advances, the other of simple stipendiary workmen. It results also, that capitals alone can form and support great enterprizes of agriculture, that give to the lands an unvariable value, if I may use the expression, and that secure to the proprietors a revenue always equal, and the largest possible.
| Reflections on the Formation and Distribution of Wealth | |