University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  

 1.1. 
 1.2. 
 1.3. 
 1.4. 
 1.5. 
 1.6. 
 1.7. 
 1.8. 
 1.9. 
 1.10. 
 1.11. 
 1.12. 
 1.13. 
 1.14. 
 1.15. 
 1.16. 
 1.17. 
 1.18. 
 1.19. 
 1.20. 
 1.21. 
 1.22. 
 1.23. 
 1.24. 
 1.25. 
 1.26. 
 1.27. 
 1.28. 
 1.29. 
 1.30. 
 1.31. 
 1.32. 
 1.32. 
 1.34. 
 1.35. 
 1.36. 
 1.37. 
 1.38. 
 1.39. 
 1.40. 
 1.41. 
 1.42. 
 1.43. 
 1.44. 
 1.45. 
 1.46. 
 1.47. 
 1.48. 
 1.49. 
 1.50. 
 1.51. 
 1.52. 
 1.53. 
 1.54. 
 1.55. 
 1.56. 
 1.57. 
 1.58. 
 1.59. 
 1.60. 
 1.61. 
 1.62. 
 1.63. 
 1.64. 
 1.65. 
 1.66. 
 1.67. 
 1.68. 
 1.69. 
 1.70. 
 1.71. 
 1.72. 
 1.73. 
 1.74. 
 1.75. 
 1.76. 
 1.77. 
 1.78. 
 1.79. 
 1.80. 
 1.81. 
 1.82. 
 1.83. 
 1.84. 
 1.85. 
 1.86. 
 1.87. 
 1.88. 
 1.89. 
 1.90. 
 1.91. 
 1.92. 
 1.93. 
 1.94. 
 1.95. 
 1.96. 
 1.97. 
 1.98. 
 1.99. 
 1.100. 
 1.101. 

16. Resemblance between the two laborious classes.

The two classes of cultivators and artificers, resemble each other in many respects, and particularly that those who compose them do not possess any revenue, and both equally subsist on the wages which are paid them out of the productions of the earth. Both have also this circumstance in common, that they only gain the price of their labour and their disbursements, and that this price is nearly the same in the two classes. The proprietor agreeing with those who cultivate his ground to pay them as small a part as possible of its produce, in the same manner as he bargains with the shoemaker to buy his shoes as cheap as he can. In a word, neither the cultivator, nor the artificer receives more than a bare recompense for his labour.