University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  

 1.1. 
 1.2. 
 1.3. 
 1.4. 
 1.5. 
 1.6. 
 1.7. 
 1.8. 
 1.9. 
 1.10. 
 1.11. 
 1.12. 
 1.13. 
 1.14. 
 1.15. 
 1.16. 
 1.17. 
 1.18. 
 1.19. 
 1.20. 
 1.21. 
 1.22. 
 1.23. 
 1.24. 
 1.25. 
 1.26. 
 1.27. 
 1.28. 
 1.29. 
 1.30. 
 1.31. 
 1.32. 
 1.32. 
 1.34. 
 1.35. 
 1.36. 
 1.37. 
 1.38. 
 1.39. 
 1.40. 
 1.41. 
 1.42. 
 1.43. 
 1.44. 
 1.45. 
 1.46. 
 1.47. 
 1.48. 
 1.49. 
 1.50. 
 1.51. 
 1.52. 
 1.53. 
 1.54. 
 1.55. 
 1.56. 
 1.57. 
 1.58. 
 1.59. 
 1.60. 
 1.61. 
 1.62. 
 1.63. 
 1.64. 
 1.65. 
 1.66. 
 1.67. 
 1.68. 
 1.69. 
 1.70. 
 1.71. 
 1.72. 
 1.73. 
 1.74. 
 1.75. 
 1.76. 
 1.77. 
 1.78. 
 1.79. 
 1.80. 
 1.81. 
 1.82. 
 1.83. 
 1.84. 
 1.85. 
 1.86. 
 1.87. 
 1.88. 
 1.89. 
 1.90. 
 1.91. 
 1.92. 
 1.93. 
 1.94. 
 1.95. 
 1.96. 
 1.97. 
 1.98. 
 1.99. 
 1.100. 
 1.101. 

25. Fourth Method. Partial colonization

These lands, rendered free at the expence of rent, may yet change masters, may divide or reunite by means of succession and sale; and such a vassal may in his turn have more than he can cultivate himself. In general the rent to which those lands are subject, is not so large, but that, by cultivating them well, the cultivator is enabled to pay all advances, and expences, procure himself a subsistence, and besides, an excess of productions which form a revenue. Henceforth the proprietary vassal becomes desirous of enjoying this revenue without labour, and of having his lands also cultivated by others. On the other hand, the greater part of the lords grant out those parts of their possessions only, which are the least within their reach, and retain those they can cultivate with the least expence. The cultivation by slaves not being practicable, the first method that offers, and the most simple to engage free men to cultivate lands which do not belong to them, was to resign to them such a portion of the produce, as would engage them to cultivate better than those husbandmen who are employed at a fixed salary. The most common method has been to divide it into equal parts, one of which belonged to the cultivator and the other to the proprietor. This has given place to the name (in France) of metayer (medietarius) or cultivator for half produce. In arrangements of this kind, which take place throughout the greatest part of France, the proprietor pays all contingencies; that is to say, he provides at his expence, the cattle for labour, ploughs, and other utensils of husbandry, seed, and the support of the cultivator and his family, from the time the latter enters into the metairie until the first harvest.