University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  

 1.1. 
 1.2. 
 1.3. 
 1.4. 
 1.5. 
 1.6. 
 1.7. 
 1.8. 
 1.9. 
 1.10. 
 1.11. 
 1.12. 
 1.13. 
 1.14. 
 1.15. 
 1.16. 
 1.17. 
 1.18. 
 1.19. 
 1.20. 
 1.21. 
 1.22. 
 1.23. 
 1.24. 
 1.25. 
 1.26. 
 1.27. 
 1.28. 
 1.29. 
 1.30. 
 1.31. 
 1.32. 
 1.32. 
 1.34. 
 1.35. 
 1.36. 
 1.37. 
 1.38. 
 1.39. 
 1.40. 
 1.41. 
 1.42. 
 1.43. 
 1.44. 
 1.45. 
 1.46. 
 1.47. 
 1.48. 
 1.49. 
 1.50. 
 1.51. 
 1.52. 
 1.53. 
 1.54. 
 1.55. 
 1.56. 
 1.57. 
 1.58. 
 1.59. 
 1.60. 
 1.61. 
 1.62. 
 1.63. 
 1.64. 
 1.65. 
 1.66. 
 1.67. 
 1.68. 
 1.69. 
 1.70. 
 1.71. 
 1.72. 
 1.73. 
 1.74. 
 1.75. 
 1.76. 
 1.77. 
 1.78. 
 1.79. 
 1.80. 
 1.81. 
 1.82. 
 1.83. 
 1.84. 
 1.85. 
 1.86. 
 1.87. 
 1.88. 
 1.89. 
 1.90. 
 1.91. 
 1.92. 
 1.93. 
 1.94. 
 1.95. 
 1.96. 
 1.97. 
 1.98. 
 1.99. 
 1.100. 
 1.101. 

20. First method, or cultivation by labourers on wages.

They may, in the first place, pay men by the day or the year, to work their fields, and reserve to themselves the whole of the produce; this includes a supposition that the proprietor pays all advances, both for seed, and the wages of the labourers, until after the harvest. But this method requires great labour and assiduity on the part of the proprietor, who alone can direct his men in their labour, see that they employ their time well, and watch over their fidelity, that they shall not carry away any part of the produce. It is true that he may pay a man of more knowledge, and whose fidelity he knows, who, in quality of manager and conductor, may direct the workmen, and keep an account of the produce; but he will be always subject to fraud. Besides, this method is extremely expensive, unless a large population, or want of employ in other species of labour, forces the workmen to content themselves with very low salaries.