University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  

collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
 III. 
 IV. 
 V. 
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
 III. 
 IV. 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
  
  
  
  
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
collapse section 
 I. 
collapse sectionII. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
collapse section 
collapse sectionI. 
  
  
  
  
  
Diverse Styles in the Same Edition
  
  
  
  
 II. 
collapse section 
collapse section 
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  

  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Diverse Styles in the Same Edition

Most of the above examples have started from what was by far the most
common pattern, that of a sequential alphabet, followed through all the
gatherings of each partbook. Among the possible alternatives, two were
frequently used: one involved using some form of conventional sign for
each book (as is to be found in the work of Susato, or of Sengenwald in
Jena);[20] the other involved different forms of the alphabetical sequence,
with each book starting with some form of "A":

  • 34. Arcadelt: III Madrigali à 4. Venice: Girolamo Scotto, 1539.

    RISM A1374=153923. Copy at Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana.

    Quarto: [C:] A-F4; [T:] a-f 4; [A:] AA-FF4; [B:] aa-ff 4.

A number of other editions printed by Scotto in his early years follow
a similar practice. An interesting example can be found in his 1540 edition
of masses by Morales, Gombert and Jachet:[21]

  • 35. Morales, Gombert and Jachet, Missae cum quatuor vocibus. Venice:
    Girolamo Scotto, 1540.

    RISM G2973=M3576=15404.

    Quarto: [C:] A1 B-F4; [T:] a1 b-f 4; [A:] AA1 BB-FF4; [B:] aa1 bb-ff 4.

    Note. Here, the first folio is separate from the rest of the book, and the
    foliation of each part runs [1] VII-XXVI. Evidently, as Bernstein
    argues, there was originally music for a six-folio first gathering,
    which was abandoned. It is reasonable to assume that the deleted
    music was by Morales and Gombert, who are poorly represented
    beside the three works of Jachet.[22]


213

Page 213

This pattern of roman and italic letters was employed in Scotto's house
with fair consistency—and a number of exceptions—for two years, after
which a different pattern, in which the Cantus used lower-case letters in
italic or gothic characters (as in RISM G269=15434), was adopted alongside
it.

Other possibilities involved using a mix of roman and italic initials,
capitals and lower case letters, or capitals of different sizes in the same
signature:

  • 36. Quattro Libri delle Villotte alla Napolitana à 3. Venice: Girolamo Scotto,
    1565.

    RISM 156511. Copy at Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek.

    Octavo: [C:] A-E 8; [T:] AA-EE8; [B:] AAa-EEe8.

  • 37. Musica Spirituale I di canzon à 5. Venice: Girolamo Scotto, 1563.

    RISM 1563.7 Copies at Bologna, Civico Museo Bibliografico Musicale;
    Valladolid, Cathedral; and Verona, Accademia Filarmonica.

    Quarto: [C:] A-C4 [using large capitals]; [T:] A-C4 [using small capitals];
    [A:] a-d 4; [B:] aa-cc 4; [5:] Aa-Cc4 Dd2.

Scotto was by no means the only printer to do this on a regular basis:
others did similar things, often simply increasing the number of initials from
one part to the next.

  • 38. Cifra: V Motecta à 2-4, Op. 11. Rome: Giovanni Battista Robletti, 1612.

    RISM C2190. Copy at Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek.

    Quarto: [C1:] A-C4 D2; [C2:] Aa-Cc4 Dd2; [Bassus ad Organum:] Aaa-Bbb4.

    Note. Almost identical instances can be found in many other books from
    the same press, such as Bernardi's Motecta à 2-4—RISM B2043—of
    1610.)

  • 39. Floridus Modulorum Hortus. Rome: Andrea Fei, 1647.

    RISM 16472. Copy at Bologna, Civico Museo Bibliografico Musicale.

    Quarto: [C:] A-F4; [T:] aa-dd4; [A:] Aa-Ff4; [B:] aaa-ddd4 eee8; [Organum:]
    a-f4 g2.

  • 40. Garulli: Modulationum à 5, Liber Primus. Venice: Girolamo Scotto, 1562.

    RISM G447. Copy at London, British Library.

    Quarto: [C:] A-B4 C2; [T:] Aa-Bb 4 Cc 2; [A:] Aaa-Bbb 4 Ccc 2; [B:] Aaaa-


    214

    Page 214
    Bbbb 4 Cccc 2; [5:] Aaaaa-Bbbbb 4 Ccccc 2. (Bassus A2 is signed aaaa 2;
    Quintus B1-2 are signed with Bbbb.)

Here is one place where the musical bibliographer needs to modify the
practices proposed by Bowers: his general recommendation is that, whenever
letters are doubled or tripled (AA or AAA), the bibliographer should
use the formulation 2A or 3A to indicate the pattern. Yet clearly such a
habit cannot distinguish between the signatures of the Tenor and Altus of
Example 39, or indicate the style of letters used in the volume of Villotte
(Example 36). To write "2a" in Example 37 may not raise the question of
whether one is referring to the Bassus or the Quintus, but to write "2A"
certainly does. It seems to me that there is no choice but to spell out all the
sequences as they appear in the book, and as I have done above. At the same
time, and for the same reason, the collation should normally distinguish
between signature letters in roman or italic or boldface, just as it does
between capitals and lower-case letters.

Similar patterns of change can occur in a single partbook, particularly
when each book was assigned only one letter:

  • 41. Bandiera: Psalmi Vespertini. Rome: Giacomo Fei, 1663.

    RISM B851. Copy at Bologna, Civico Museo Bibliografico Musicale.

    Quarto: [C:] A8 a4; [A:] B8 b4; [T:] C8 c4; [B:] D8 d4; [Organum:] E6 e2.

    Note. We can assume that the pattern of one signature per part was
    already settled before typesetting began. The subsequent need for
    more than one gathering to a part led to the use of a different
    form of the same letter for the final sheet. We cannot tell whether
    this need was the result of a miscalculation on the part of the printer,
    or of the addition of more material received from the composer.

Sometimes, the mix of letters and letter styles seems to be no more than
a product of caprice on the part of the typesetter:

  • 42. Mazzocchi: Sacrae Concertationes. Rome: Giacomo Fei, 1664.

    RISM M1678. Copy at Lucca, Seminario Arcivescovile.

    Quarto:

             
    [C:] [A]4 B-F4   [II C/B:] π4 A-E4  
    [T:] [A]4 B4 D4 E2 Ff4   [II A/T:] π4 A 4 B-D4  
    [A:] [AA]4 BB4 Cc4 Dd 4 Ee4 Ff2   [B:] π4 A-B 4 C4  
    [5:] A4 Aa4 Bb*4 C4 Cc*4 Dd2   [Organo 2:] π4 A 4 B-F4 G2  
    [Organo 1:] [Aa]4 Bb4 CC-GG4 HH2  

There is little else that can be done here, but list the signatures as they
actually appear. Not surprisingly, there are also errors in the signing of this
edition: for example, the second folio of gathering B of the Tenor has the
signature "Cc*2", presumably left in the forme after the Quintus was completed.

 
[20]

For Susato, see above, note 5. Sengenwald printed in Jena during the mid-seventeenth
century. He published his first music book in 1649, and another eleven appeared
during the next twenty years. Several were occasional books, commemorating a local death,
with the musical composition merely an appendix to a longer literary text. Others comprise
the usual mix of sacred and instrumental works by local composers.

[21]

The data here are taken from Bernstein, Music Printing, No. 11. The book was
apparently constructed so that each gathering of each partbook would contain just one mass.

[22]

A similar structure appears in the companion edition of five-voiced masses by
Morales and Jachet (RISM M3575 = 15403). Again, each gathering contains one mass, and
the first in each book (here intact) contains six folios, including the title-page and a table
of contents. Since the Tenor parts are much shorter than those of the other voices, the Tenor
collation is unusual: a6 b4 c2 d4 e2.