University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  

collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
 III. 
 IV. 
 V. 
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
 III. 
 IV. 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
  
  
  
  
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
collapse section 
 I. 
collapse sectionII. 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
collapse section 
collapse sectionI. 
  
  
  
Miscalculations
  
  
  
  
  
  
 II. 
collapse section 
collapse section 
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
 I. 
 II. 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  

  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Miscalculations

In many volumes (principally those not containing madrigals or other
secular vocal music), the various partbooks had to be of different sizes, to
contain music of differing complexity in the various parts. This would not
normally cause a problem in planning the signatures:

  • 22. Portinaro: III Madregali à 5-6. Venice: Antonio Gardano, 1557.

  • RISM P5226. Copy at Munich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek.

  • Quarto: [C:] A-C4 D2; [T:] E-H4; [A:] I-M4; [B:] N-Q4; [5:] R-V4.


208

Page 208

In this case, a compositor or his foreman realised that all partbooks
would need at least part of a fourth gathering, and planned accordingly. It
does not matter which voice-part he used to make the calculation, for all
would have yielded the same conclusion. Occasionally, however, the lengths
of the various parts might differ significantly. A competent compositor (or
house editor) could plan ahead, and assign signatures accordingly, before
work started:

  • 23. Brumel: Misse. Venice: Ottaviano Petrucci, 1503.

  • RISM B4643. Copy at Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek.

  • Quarto: [S:] A-B8 C4; [T:] D10; [A:] E-F8 G4; [B:] H-I8.

  • 24. Sabino: V Madrigali à 5-6. Venice: Giacomo Vincenti & Ricciardo Amadino,
    1586.

  • RISM S50. Copy at Krakow, Biblioteta Jagielloʼnska.

  • Quarto: [C:] A-C4; [T:] D-G4; [A:] H-K4; [B:] L-N4; [5:] O-Q4.

  • Note. In the second example, Vincenti and Amadino placed the music
    for the Sexta Pars in the few pieces with six voices at the end of the
    Tenor book: they provided for this in the pattern of signatures, in
    which the Tenor was allocated an extra gathering and signature
    letter.

In some cases, the printer seems not to have been able to foresee this
need, and was faced, late in the process, with inserting an extra gathering at
the end of one or more of the partbooks:

  • 25. Annibale Padovano: I Ricercari à 4. Venice: Antonio Gardano, 1556.

  • RISM A1250. Copies at London, Royal College of Music, and Szombathely,
    Püpöski Könyvtár.

  • Quarto: [C:] A-C4 *2; [T:] D-F4 +2; [A:] G-I4; [B:] K-N4.

Here, the original plan had evidently been to have three gatherings for
each partbook, though in fact three of the parts required more space, only
the Alto conforming to pattern. For the Basso, which was last in sequence,
there was no problem in assigning a signature: the additional fourth gathering
could be signed with the next letter in the alphabet. For the Canto and
Tenore, however, this would have resulted in duplicated letters, and conventional
signs were used instead.[15]

When an additional gathering had to be inserted in this manner, an
alternative method (and one perhaps of more use to the binder) was to use a
different form, or a double statement, of the immediately preceding signing
letter, as for the Altus of the following example:


209

Page 209
  • 26. Animuccia: I Madrigali à 4-6. Venice: Antonio Gardano, 1547.

  • RISM A1421. Copy at Verona, Accademia Filarmonica.

  • Quarto: [C:] A-E4; [T:] F-K4; [A:] L-P4 PP2; [B:] Q-V4; [5:] X-Z4.

This example does indeed look as though it represents a miscalculation
in the printing shop: but in many cases, we can not tell whether the signatures
indicate a change of plan (for example, involving the addition of more
compositions) or a miscalculation:

  • 27. Lassus and others: I Missae à 4-5. Milan: Francesco & eredi di Simone
    Tini, 1588.

  • RISM 15884. Copy at Bologna, Civico Museo Bibliografico Musicale.

  • Quarto: [C:] A-D4 e4; [T:] E-H4 i4; [A:] I-M4 n4; [B:] N-R4; [5:] S4.

  • 28. Corfini: Il secondo libro de motetti. Venice: Alessandro Gardano, 1581.

  • RISM C3932. Copy at Lucca, Seminario Arcivescovile.

  • [C:] A-D4, 2D2; [T:] E-H4; [A:] I-M4, 2M2; [B:] N-Q4, 2Q2; [5:] R-V4, 2V4;
    [6:] X-Z4 AA-BB4.

  • Signatures:] Aij [$2-1,1.[16] No signatures on title-pages. The first of each
    two-folio gathering signed in the pattern] D3

In both these cases, I suspect, there was a slip on the part of the printer,
who had apparently allocated four gatherings (and signature letters) to each
voice part. In the first case, he had discovered the problem before the Quinta
Pars was set, so that the Bassus could have a normal fifth signature. In the
second, it looks as though Gardano planned the book on the basis of the
Tenor part. All the other parts have an extra gathering, and all except the
Sesto employ a repeat signature.[17]

On occasion a section of music is omitted. This could occur because the
compositor made a simple mistake, perhaps a haplograph, or because the
imposition of the pages in the forme omitted one or two complete pages.
The latter seems to be the likely cause of the following:

  • 29. Massaino: Concentus quinque vocum. Venice: Angelo Gardano, 1576.

  • RISM M1266. Copy at Bologna, Civico Museo Bibliografico Musicale.

  • Quarto: [C:] A-D4 (C4 + 1).


210

Page 210

The folio after C4 is a single leaf containing omitted material. The leaf
has a line reading:] Questa Carta Va posta drieto il numero 22 in Cantus.[18]

 
[15]

This is also an argument that this book was prepared with "vertical setting", so
that the first sheets of the lower voice-parts had already been set before the problem with
the Cantus was discovered

[16]

A few general conventions need to be noted for the descriptions. A colon followed
by a closing bracket, thus, :] is used to indicate that what precedes is comment, and what
follows is a quotation from the specific document or source. If further comment is needed
after the quotation, the bracket is reopened. For example:

Signatures:] A II [$4

(In the example, A II is an exemplary signature from the item in question.) This formulation
also allows me to indicate when there is punctuation at the end of the quoted material.
The manner of describing the signing pattern in particular is discussed in detail below, at
Example 32.

[17]

This book is another example of the same situation described in Example 18
above: here again, following the Sesto book, there was no subsequent partbook to use
BB-EE.

[18]

An amusing case of faulty imposition occurs in the 1512 edition of Reuchlin's
Scenica progymnasmata (printed in Tübingen by Thomas Anshelm), one of the editions
which contains music by Megel. Printed in the middle of folio C4r, an otherwise empty
page, is the note] Erratus est hic in supputatione positionis & nihil omissum. | Verte
paginam & mox sequitur Loco uix eredito &c. [thereby also indicating the first three words
found on the verso.