University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
V.
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
 notes. 
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section3. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section4. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section5. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section6. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section7. 
 1. 
 2. 
 8. 
collapse section9. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section10. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section11. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section12. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section13. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section14. 
 1. 
 2. 
collapse section15. 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
collapse section2.1. 
 2.1a. 
 2.1b. 
collapse section2.2. 
 2.2a. 
 2.2b. 
 notes. 

collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 4. 
 6. 
 7. 

V.

A concluding word may be devoted to the question of Gibbon's motives for writing the Mémoire Justificatif. Early and late commentators have carelessly implied or stated that the historian received his place at the Board of Trade for penning this pamphlet.[11] The origin of this idea is laid at the feet of John Wilkes by Gibbon's bibliographer (p. 26) with little consideration for either eighteenth-century politics or the clear implications of Wilkes's statements. It is evident from simple chronological study that Gibbon did not receive his post as a reward for having written the Mémoire Justificatif.[12] Gibbon would scarcely have written in anticipation of payment. "I will never make myself the Champion of a party," he declared. Such prostitution


197

Page 197
of pen was beneath him. But having accepted office, and in large part for financial reasons, he could no less afford to refuse the "very polite request" to become "the Advocate of my Country against a foreign enemy" (Prothero, I, 371-372). The political morality of the eighteenth century allowed a man of letters who accepted pension or place to become the anonymous mistress of a mercenary government, but did not demand a public display of the relationship. John Wilkes was not in error when he noted the plethora of literary state papers "since the ministerial purchase" of Gibbon's pen. He rightly viewed the Mémoire Justificatif as no more than the product of the ardent zeal of "a very late ministerial convert," a task "commanded by a task-master more cruel than those of Egypt." He did not baldly assert that "Gibbon was made a Lord Commissioner of Trade as a reward for writing it," as Norton implies (p. 26), but to the contrary deplored that "a lord of trade [had] been employed to traffic in the grossest abuse" of political polemic.[13] True, Wilkes blamed Gibbon for accepting a position at the hands of a government of which the historian disapproved, but his attack upon the author of the Mémoire Justificatif was a reaction to the undignified prostration of Clio before Mammon after the goddess's prayers had been answered. For that Wilkes need not be so heartily condemned—nor Gibbon so glibly exonerated.