Dictionary of the History of Ideas Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas |
2 |
3 | ![]() |
1 |
1 |
1 |
![]() |
![]() |
9 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
![]() | V. |
![]() | VI. |
3 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
2 |
![]() | VI. |
2 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
2 | ![]() | III. |
2 |
3 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
6 | ![]() | V. |
5 |
3 | ![]() | V. |
3 |
1 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
![]() | III. |
8 | ![]() | II. |
4 |
3 | ![]() | I. |
3 |
2 | ![]() | I. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VII. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
4 | ![]() | V. |
![]() |
4 |
9 | ![]() | III. |
5 |
4 |
4 | ![]() | III. |
1 | ![]() |
1 |
![]() |
3 |
5 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
3 |
1 |
16 | ![]() | II. |
2 |
1 |
6 |
7 |
2 | ![]() | I. |
2 |
9 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
![]() | VII. |
2 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | VII. |
3 | ![]() | VII. |
1 |
2 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
2 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
1 |
1 | ![]() | VII. |
1 |
![]() | III. |
![]() | IV. |
10 | ![]() | VI. |
10 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
3 | ![]() | V. |
3 |
4 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
BIBLIOGRAPHY
|
10 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
6 | ![]() | III. |
5 |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
4 | ![]() | III. |
4 |
![]() | I. |
7 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
6 |
2 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
5 | ![]() | I. |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
3 |
7 | ![]() | I. |
4 |
8 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
12 | ![]() | III. |
7 |
4 | ![]() | IV. |
2 |
4 | ![]() | III. |
2 | ![]() | IV. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | IV. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | IV. |
1 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() |
1 |
3 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | III. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
![]() | Dictionary of the History of Ideas | ![]() |
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Stanislaw Ossowski's seminal work, Class Structure in
the
Social Consciousness (New York, 1963) is a basic
source,
especially for the first part of this article. Other books
covering aspects of the subject: Goetz A. Briefs, The
Pro-
letariat (New York,
1937); Ernst Troeltsch, The Social
Teachings of the
Christian Churches, 2 vols. (London, 1931);
Ralf Dahrendorf,
Essays in the Theory of Society (Stanford,
1969), esp. Chs. 6 and 7; Raymond Williams, Culture
and
Society (New York, 1963); Frank E
. Manuel, The New World
of Henri Saint-Simon (Cambridge,
Mass., 1956); Michael
Young, The Rise of the
Meritocracy (New York, 1959); Hans
Gerth and C. Wright Mills,
trans. and eds., From Max Weber:
Essays in
Sociology (New York, 1946); Reinhard Bendix and
Seymour M. Lipset,
eds., Class, Status and Power, 2nd rev.
ed. (New
York, 1966). Cf. also K. Davis and W. E
. Moore,
“Some
Principles of Stratification,” American
Sociological
Review,
10, 2 (1945); Melvin Tumin, “Some Principles
of
Stratification: A Critical Analysis,” American Sociological
Review,
18, 4 (1953), and “On
Inequality,” American Socio-
logical Review,
28, 1 (1963). Also useful are the entries under
“Stratification, Social” by Bernard Barber and Seymour
M.
Lipset, International Encyclopedia of the Social
Sciences
(New York, 1968), Vol. 15.
LEWIS A. COSER
[See also Economic History; Education; Equality; Hierar-chy; Ideology; Marxism; Property; Socialism; Utopia.]
![]() | Dictionary of the History of Ideas | ![]() |