Dictionary of the History of Ideas Studies of Selected Pivotal Ideas |
2 |
3 | ![]() |
1 |
1 |
1 |
![]() |
![]() |
9 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
![]() | V. |
![]() | VI. |
3 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
2 |
![]() | VI. |
2 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
2 | ![]() | III. |
2 |
3 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
6 | ![]() | V. |
5 |
3 | ![]() | V. |
3 |
1 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
![]() | III. |
8 | ![]() | II. |
4 |
3 | ![]() | I. |
3 |
2 | ![]() | I. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VII. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
4 | ![]() | V. |
![]() |
4 |
9 | ![]() | III. |
5 |
4 |
4 | ![]() | III. |
1 | ![]() |
1 |
![]() |
3 |
5 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
3 |
1 |
16 | ![]() | II. |
2 |
1 |
6 |
7 |
2 | ![]() | I. |
2 |
9 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
BIBLIOGRAPHY
|
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
![]() | VII. |
2 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | VII. |
3 | ![]() | VII. |
1 |
2 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
2 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
2 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
1 |
1 | ![]() | VII. |
1 |
![]() | III. |
![]() | IV. |
10 | ![]() | VI. |
10 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
3 | ![]() | V. |
3 |
4 | ![]() | V. |
2 |
10 | ![]() | III. |
1 |
6 | ![]() | III. |
5 |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
4 | ![]() | III. |
4 |
![]() | I. |
7 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
6 |
2 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
1 |
2 | ![]() | VII. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
5 | ![]() | I. |
2 |
2 |
1 |
4 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
3 |
7 | ![]() | I. |
4 |
8 | ![]() | I. |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
12 | ![]() | III. |
7 |
4 | ![]() | IV. |
2 |
4 | ![]() | III. |
2 | ![]() | IV. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | IV. |
1 |
1 | ![]() | IV. |
1 |
![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 | ![]() |
1 |
3 | ![]() | VI. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | V. |
1 |
2 | ![]() | III. |
2 |
1 | ![]() | VI. |
1 |
![]() | Dictionary of the History of Ideas | ![]() |
BIBLIOGRAPHY
For a detailed categorization and bibliography of models
in biology, see
W. R. Stahl, “The Role of Models in Theo-
retical Biology,” Progress in Theoretical Biology,
1 (1967),
165-218. See also M. W. Beckner, The Biological Way of
Thought (Berkeley, 1968),
Ch. III; R. B. Braithewaite, Sci-
entific Explanation (Cambridge, 1953), Chs.
III, V; J. Cairns,
G. S. Stent, and J. D. Watson, Phage and the Origins of
Molecular Biology (Cold Spring
Harbor, 1966); H. Freuden-
thal, ed.,
The Concept and the Role of the Model in Mathe-
matics and Natural and Social
Sciences (Dordrecht, 1961),
1-37, 163-94; R. MacArthur and R.
Levins, “The Limiting
Similarity, Convergence and Divergence
of Coexisting Spe-
cies,” The American Naturalist,
101 (1967), 377-85; A.
Rosenblueth and N. Wiener,
“The Role of Models in Sci-
ence,” Philosophy of Science,
12 (1943), 317-20; J. D.
Watson, The Double Helix (New York, 1968); K. E
. F. Watt,
Ecology and Resource Management (New York, 1968).
R. C. LEWONTIN
[See also Biological Homologies; Evolutionism; Genetic Continuity; Man-Machine; Recapitulation.]![]() | Dictionary of the History of Ideas | ![]() |