University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  

expand section1. 
expand section2. 
expand section3. 
expand section4. 
expand section5. 
expand section6. 
expand section7. 
expand section8. 
expand section9. 
expand section10. 
expand section11. 
expand section12. 
collapse section13. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
Comparison With Aeroplanes.
  
  
  
expand section14. 
expand section15. 
expand section16. 
expand section17. 
expand section18. 
expand section19. 
expand section20. 
expand section21. 
expand section22. 
expand section23. 
expand section24. 
expand section25. 
expand section26. 
expand section27. 
 28. 

Comparison With Aeroplanes.

If we compare the bird figures with those made possible by the development of the aeroplane it will be readily seen that man has made a wonderful advance in imitating the results produced by nature. Here are the figures:

        
Machine  Weight in lbs.  Surface in sq. feet  Horse power  Supporting area per lb. 
Santos-Dumont 350 110.00 30 0.314 
Bleriot 700 150.00 25 0.214 
Antoinette 1,200 538.00 50 0.448 
Curtiss 700 258.00 60 0.368 
Wright [1]1,100 538.00 25 0.489 
Farman 1,200 430.00 50 0.358 
Voisin 1,200 538.00 50 0.448 

While the average supporting surface is in favor of


129

the aeroplane, this is more than overbalanced by the greater amount of horsepower required for the weight lifted. The average supporting surface in birds is about three-quarters of a square foot per pound. In the average aeroplane it is about one-half square foot per pound. On the other hand the average aeroplane has a lifting capacity of 24 pounds per horsepower, while the buzzard, for instance, lifts 5 pounds with 15-100 of a horsepower. If the Wright machine—which has a lifting power of 50
illustration

Other Parts of Huffaker's Bird Model.

[Description: Black and white illustration: Parts of model bird.]
pounds per horsepower—should be alone considered the showing would be much more favorable to the aeroplane, but it would not be a fair comparison.