University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  

expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
  
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
  
expand section 
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
Conclusions
expand section 
  
  
expand section 
expand section 
  
expand section 
  
  
  
  
  
expand section 
  


281

Page 281

Conclusions

Godwin has been identified as having a distinctive style in the materials
examined, which cover much of his writing life. The two main features of
his style are that he generally has a much higher lexical richness score than
any of the other writers analyzed, and that he makes much less use of the core
vocabulary than many of his contemporaries. Of the two pamphlets in question,
Reflexions sits within the boundaries of Godwin's other writings in all
the charts and in all examinations provides positive indications that he is the
likely author. Investigation of the pamphlets of other writers at the time
certainly offers no other candidate. This is significant, since the external evidence
for the authorship of Reflexions is the weaker of the two pamphlets
under consideration. The focus of this examination has been Law because
it is the better attested of the two pamphlets, yet it appeared to be outside
the boundary of Godwin material in one crucial respect, that of lexical richness.
However, further analysis revealed that Law sits well within the norms
for Godwin's use of the core vocabulary and shares with Reflexions very
similar use or non-use of marker functional vocabulary, and that lexical
vocabulary is present at the phrasal level linking Godwin's known work with
both Law and Reflexions. The low lexical richness score has been identified
as having its source in the unusually high level of repetition contained in the
central portion of the pamphlet, which is a function of the way the author
has chosen to lay out the argument. This authorial decision has greatly reduced
the amount of vocabulary items relative to the length of text, not only
in respect of Godwin's work, but also in relation to what would be expected
in any text of a similar length. This means that the statistical scores, without
the large historical segments and the regular references to parliamentary
procedures, could be expected to be more like Defence and Strictures. In the
light of all these factors, it is our opinion that there is sufficient internal
evidence from this investigation to support the contemporary manuscript
ascriptions and the related evidence in Godwin's diary, and to attribute authorship
of both anonymous pamphlets to Godwin.

These two pamphlets on the Regency Crisis are important additions to
the canon of Godwin's works.[14] They are significant for what they reveal
about both his developing political views and his consistent resourcefulness
as a pamphlet writer. They demonstrate that his practical engagement with
contemporary British politics did not lessen towards the end of the 1780s,
as is often thought, but that he continued to support the Foxite Whigs right
up to the spring of 1789. At the same time, they indicate just how much Godwin
was preoccupied with constitutional questions on the eve of the French
Revolution, two years before he began writing Enquiry. Finally, Godwin's
Regency pamphlets, in their mixture of abstract speculation and engagement


282

Page 282
with concrete political questions, adumbrate a central feature of his thought
as it developed through the 1790s, and beyond. As experiments in combining
speculative and practical politics, Law and Reflexions help to explain how
Godwin became the author of not only Enquiry but also Strictures, his most
successful intervention in contemporary politics, in which he demolished the
government's case of high treason brought against twelve leading radicals in
1794.

APPENDIX
List of codes and word counts of all texts used in the computer analysis

                                       
Works by
William Godwin 
Words  Works by
Thomas Paine 
Words  Law, Reflexions,
Regency pamphlets,
and other texts 
Words 
WG1=Defence  8576  TP1=CommonSense1  2161  Law  10317 
WG2=Instructions  13074  TP2=CommonSense2  3484  Reflexions  8377 
WG3=Imogen1  7389  TP3=CommonSense3  2646  [WG]=ShortView  2656 
WG4=Imogen2  9553  TP4=CommonSense4  3865  JLDL=Observations  2650 
WG5=Imogen3  5963  TP5=Crisis7  7942  [JM]=Arguments  2228 
WG6=Imogen4  5700  TP6=Crisis11  7964  CL1=Letters1  4598 
WG7=Imogen5  7635  TP7=Crisis15  2457  CL2=Letters2  3550 
WG8=Imogen6  9325  TP8=Rights2.1  1737  CL3=Letters3  2047 
WG9=Strictures  7315  TP9=Rights2.2  776 
WG10=Hist. Rom.  5174  TP10=Rights2.3  5257  RP1=Add. Observ.  10756 
WG11=Enquiry5.1  3306  TP11=Rights2.4  8435  RP2=Discourse  8693 
WG12=Enquiry5.7  1651  TP12=Reason1.1  1140  JT=Sermon  2956 
WG13=Enquiry5.8  3079  TP13=Reason1.8  1728  MW=Vindic.9  4539 
WG14=Enquiry5.14  2217  TP14=Reason2.1  1832  JP=Phlogiston  5598 
WG15=Enquiry5.15  4538  TP15=Reason2.9  1940  MWS=LastMan1.1  5941 
WG16=Thoughts1  3550 
WG17=Thoughts4  4721 
WG18=Thoughts9  4078 
WG19=Thoughts23  3810 
 
[14]

For an edition of the two pamphlets, together with a fuller discussion of the material
summarized in this paragraph, see Pamela Clemit, "Two Pamphlets on the Regency
Crisis by William Godwin," Enlightenment and Dissent 20 (2001) (forthcoming).