University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  
  

collapse section1. 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section2. 
  
  
collapse section1. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
(b.) Sitting on the Lap or between the Thighs of an Assistant who is seated on a Chair or on the Floor.
  
  
collapse section 
  
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section2. 
  
  
collapse section3. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section4. 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section5. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  

(b.) Sitting on the Lap or between the Thighs of an Assistant who is seated on a Chair or on the Floor.

I look upon this position as identical with that on the obstretric chair, although more simple and more ancient; and I believe that it will be apparent to every one, if the relative positions are considered, that the obstetric chair is merely an imitation of the more pliable and sensitive support afforded by the husband or assistant, who is himself made to suffer whilst holding the parturient woman during


112

the tedious hours of labor. I am heartily in accord with the statement of Rigby, although seriously questioned by Ploss, that, "as far as we may rely upon the meagre records which history gives us upon this subject, among the more civilized people of antiquity the semi-recumbent sitting posture was by far the most common. In proof of this I will again refer to the oft-mentioned funeral urn which so vividly pictures the position of patient, husband, and nurse in the lying-in chamber during the moment of the greatest trial, during the expulsion of the child. The patient is seated in the lap of an assistant. I can hardly say whether this is the husband or a female assistant, whether it is a male or female figure; at all events she is seated in the lap of a person whose arms encircle her waist, the hands pressing firmly upon the fundus of the uterus. The midwife is seated upon a low stool, between the separated legs of the patient, and is just in the act of receiving the head of the new-born child. This vessel, called Huaco, represents a parturient scene precisely as it is still enacted among the descendants of the Incas to this day, and Dr. Coates assures me that he has, during his stay in Peru, not unfrequently acted accoucheur, the woman always taking this position with the husband behind. Upon that entire coast of South America the inhabitants seem faithfully to adhere to the customs of their ancestors, and no better proof can be found of the correctness of the representation of the labor scene depicted upon this vessel than the above statement of Dr. Coates, and of other physicians, the most interesting of which is perhaps one by Dr. Ruschenberger,[100] who, whilst in Colina, in Chili, in 1823, was called to a case of placenta previa and found a lady, a lady of rank by the way, with her feet near the foot of the bed, the knees drawn up, reclining against her husband, a rather short corpulent man, who was sitting in the middle of the bed wearing his riding cap, booted and spurred, with the legs extended on each side of her and his hands clasped in front of her chest to afford support. The antiquity of this position is also proven by a passage in

113

Genesis (xxx. 3), which says that the Hebrew women were confined upon the lap of a female assistant.[101] In ancient Rome this position was assumed in cases either of urgent necessity, or among the poor where the obstetric chair was not to be had. Moschion teaches his readers to help themselves in this way and it seems that these teachings, revived in Italy by Joannis Michaelis of Savonarola,[102] finally found their way into Germany. In France, also, an author like De
illustration

FIG. 30.—The Scientific Posture advocated in the 16th century. From Joannis Michaelis Savonarola, 1547.

[Description: Woman seated on low y-shaped stool, with assistants behind her. Black and white illustration.]
La Motte[103] became a warm advocate of this position. Joannis Michaelis highly lauds a very low three-legged stool which serves as a seat for the assistant in whose lap the patient reclines; he speaks of it as being of great antiquity, and much esteemed by the ancient Greeks. The assistant stands behind, on a rounded knob, supporting the patient, who is seated in front, upon the forked portion of the stool. At a comparatively late period a similar method of delivery was adopted among the modern Greeks.[104] The parturient

114

woman being seated upon a kind of tripod, behind her upon a somewhat higher stool sits an assistant whose arms are clasped over the fundus of the womb whilst the midwife is seated in front. I regard these positions as in the lap of an assistant and can certainly not look upon a simple stool, as it was probably found in any kitchen at the time, as an obstetric chair, but from that, most unquestionably, the obstetric chair takes its origin, and a very pointed statement to this effect is made by Dr. Metzler,[105] who in the early part of this century found an obstetric chair in some remote village where he little expected to see it, which had been constructed by a carpenter who had neither seen an obstetric chair nor heard of one; but his wife had found her labor so easy, while sitting upon his lap, his legs separated, that he soon obtained a reputation in his native village, so that finally not a woman in the place would be confined in any other way than upon this good man's lap; this he soon found so irksome that he constructed this chair, and, in his endeavors to copy the position assumed by himself, a very fair obstetric chair resulted.[106] The above also seems to verify the statement that certain persons seem especially fitted, and acquire a reputation for such work; in Holland they were a regular convenience at every labor, and were known as "shootsteers;'' but not only here and there in Germany, in France or Holland, but also among the early Scotch, Welsh, and English was this position frequently resorted to, and we need not be astonished to see this same custom in our own country.

We have seen how the modern Peruvians still follow the ways of the Incas, and so the descendants of these Germans, Welsh, or Scotch have not forgotten the habits of their ancestors, although they have crossed the seas and have mingled with a more enlightened civilization. It may surprise some of our city practitioners of to-day, who see little of the country population, and especially those who have not practiced in rural districts years ago, that in our


115

own States women are confined sitting upon the lap of the husband or an assistant; this was, of course, much more frequent thirty years ago than it is now, but I still hear of it in many of our States, especially in southern Ohio, Pennsylvania, southwestern Missouri, Georgia, and the mountain regions of Virginia

A graphic description of obstetric practice in the rural districts of Ohio is given me by Dr. E. B. Stevens of Lebanon, Ohio, and embodies all that has been written me from other States. To quote his own words: "When I commenced to practice, a good many years ago, the almost universal habit of confinement throughout the regions of southern

Ohio was about as follows: two old-fashioned, straight-backed, slip-bottom chairs made the lounge, one chair erect the other turned down; a few old comforters upon this framework completed a very comfortable couch; the husband took his seat first, astride, the wife reclining in his arms, where she remained until labor was completed, unless there was much delay, in which case the patient was walked about or assumed any other position as dictated by fancy or impulse; the position of the accoucheur was upon an inverted half-bushel measure, so placed that he sat just between the limbs of the patient. Labor completed the soiled clothes were changed and the patient was placed in bed.

116

This position was certainly not a bad one for all parties with the exception of the husband, who, in tedious cases, suffered rather severely; but then this little tax on his affectionate nature was, in those days, considered the very least return he could make for the mischief he had occasioned.''

I have been told of this position in so many different parts of this country that it would be superfluous to refer to individual statements; it is found in Pennsylvania, and among Pennsylvania emigrants in southwestern Missouri,

the position being practically the same, but differing somewhat in the details: thus, three chairs are placed in the form of a triangle, facing towards a common centre; the husband takes his seat in one of these, and has a sheet, or broad towel, or any cloth heavy enough, bound around his thighs, leaving the knees about six inches apart. This cloth serves as a seat for the parturient, and prevents the husband's legs from spreading apart when tired by the long continued strain; the patient puts her feet on the rounds

117

of two other chairs, while a woman, seated in each of them, takes one of the patient's hands and supports the knee next to hers.

A professional friend in this State, who, like many other practitioners, tells me that the first patient he ever delivered was confined in this position, says that since then he has delivered quite a number of women in this way, and thinks it a great help in cases where the head constantly retreats after the pain ceases; in the rural districts of Georgia both negro and white women, now and then, still

follow this custom; so, also, in Virginia. A very minute description of such a labor in the mountain districts of northwest Virginia, in the first third of this century, is given in the "New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal'' for 1860.[107] It is not surprising to see the white man thus patiently assisting his wife in the hour of her trial; but it does seem somewhat strange that we should find this position, and the laborious duty imposed by it, undertaken by

118

our red brethren, as the Indian braves are usually so averse to work; but I must say that it is only now and then, among the Utes and the Pueblos in Mexico, that this occurs, and they possibly have copied the Mexicans.

The Indians, and lower class of Mexicans in the vicinity of San Luis Potosi, are confined either in a kneeling position partially suspended, or sitting upon the floor. If confined in the latter position, the accouchée sits on a sheepskin on the floor, between the legs of one of the assistants, the tenedora, or holder, who is seated on a little cushion, and serves as a support to the patient, her thighs pressing against the patient's hips, and her arms encircling her waist, the hands clasped just above the fundus of the distended uterus, so that she can follow the child in its descent, and exert a gradual but strong compression; the partera, of course, takes her position in front of the patient. Sometimes, in a tedious labor, this awkward posture is retained for one or two days, with not a little suffering to the tenedora as well as the patient.[108]

The custom of the Sandwich Islanders varies very little from this, and it is a matter of some interest to note their habits, as these islands, two thousand miles west of San Francisco, were entirely unknown one hundred years ago, and even fifty years ago were perfectly barbarous; it is important to us, more especially as they still retain, in a great measure, their crude ideas and practices. Very interesting statements as to the obstetric practices in these islands are made by Dr. Charles H. Wetmore,[109] who has had a professional experience of twenty-two years upon Hawaii. When the labor is fairly commencing, the patient assumes a sitting posture upon a hard pillow or stone, her husband, or some intimate male or female friend, kneeling behind her, whose duty it is to clasp her above the abdomen in such a way that he can press down with considerable force upon the uterus and its contents, never relaxing this grasp to allow the fetus to recede. The accoucheur's position is in front; she has little to do but to receive the child. Precisely


119

the same custom prevails among the Andamanese, on the coast of India,[110] the only difference being that the patient and supporting husband are seated upon the ground So, also, the Bedouins,[111] the child, however, being caught in a sieve, which is held by an assistant.

I have repeatedly had occasion to refer to the nomadic and barbarous tribes of Asia, as they have so successfully

resisted the encroachments and innovations of civilization, and among them many of these, to us peculiar positions, are still retained by parturient women; but, like the Indian brave, the Asiatic warrior is little inclined to assist his suffering partner; only among the Kalmucks is the parturient woman delivered in the lap of an assistant. The patient is seated upon the knees of a vigorous young man, who also exercises considerable pressure upon the abdomen by the hands which encircle the woman's waist.[112] It seems peculiar

120

that young men should, among some people, be chosen for this office; here he serves as an obstetric chair, and among the Brulé-Sioux a young warrior serves as a support for the parturient squaw, who suspends herself from his neck; only the Japanese see that the physician is an aged male, in case that these positions are assumed for obstetric purposes.