University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
Notes
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section 
collapse section1. 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
collapse section1. 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
collapse section 
 1.0. 
collapse section2.0. 
collapse section2.1. 
 2.1a. 
 2.1b. 
collapse section2.2. 
 2.2a. 
 2.2b. 
  

collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 

Notes

 
[*]

A paper read at the English Institute, Columbia University, September, 1960.

[1]

By the Rev. John William Ellison (New York, 1957).

[2]

Paul Tasman, "Literary Data Processing," IBM Journal of Research and Development, I (July, 1957), 249-256.

[3]

By Guy Montgomery (Berkeley, 1957).

[4]

The program used for Arnold was described by Mr. Painter in "Computer Preparation of a Poetry Concordance," Communications of the ACM, III (February, 1960), 91-95. Both Mr. Painter's account of the program and mine, however, now fall in the realm of history, for the techniques have been wholly revised for forthcoming concordances.

[5]

One might be mentioned — the surprising necessity of collating texts printed in the Tinker and Lowry Commentary on Arnold (1940) with texts printed in the Tinker and Lowry edition of Arnold (1950).

[6]

The Shakespearean Ciphers Examined (Cambridge, 1957).