7. CHAPTER VII
OF THE INFLUENCE OF LUXURY
The second objection to the principles already established, is derived
from the influence of luxury, and affirms "that nations, like individuals,
are subject to the phenomena of youth and old age, and that, when a people
by effeminacy and depravation of manners have sunk into decrepitude, it is
not within the compass of human ability to restore them to vigour and innocence."
This idea has been partly founded upon the romantic notions of pastoral
life and the golden age. Innocence is not virtue. Virtue demands the active
employment of an ardent mind in the promotion of the general good. No man
can be eminently virtuous who is not accustomed to an extensive range of
reflection. He must see all the benefits to arise from a disinterested proceeding,
and must understand the proper method of producing those benefits. Ignorance,
the slothful habits and limited views of uncultivated life, have not in them
more of true virtue, though they may be more harmless, than luxury, vanity
and extravagance. Individuals of exquisite feeling, whose disgust has been
excited by the hardened selfishness or the unblushing corruption which have
prevailed in their own times, have recurred in imagination to the forests
of Norway or the bleak and uncomfortable Highlands of Scotland in search
of a purer race of mankind. This imagination has been the offspring of disappointment,
not the dictate of reason and philosophy.
It may be true, that ignorance is nearer than prejudice to the reception
of wisdom, and that the absence of virtue is a condition more auspicious
than the presence of its opposite. In this case it would have been juster
to compare a nation sunk in luxury to an individual with confirmed habits
of wrong, than to an individual whom a debilitated constitution was bringing
fast to the grave. But neither would that comparison have been fair and equitable.
The condition of nations is more fluctuating, and will be found less
obstinate in its resistance to a consistent endeavour for their improvement,
than that of individuals. In nations some of their members will be less
confirmed in error than others. A certain number will be only in a very small
degree indisposed to listen to the voice of truth. This number, from the
very nature of just sentiments, must in the ordinary course of things perpetually
increase. Every new convert will be the means of converting others. In proportion
as the body of disciples is augmented, the modes of attack upon the prejudices
of others will be varied, and suited to the variety of men's tempers and
prepossessions.
Add to this that generations of men are perpetually going off the stage,
while other generations succeed. The next generation will not have so many
prejudices to subdue. Suppose a despotic nation by some revolution in its
affairs to become possessed of the advantages of freedom. The children of
the present race will be bred in more firm and independent habits of thinking;
the suppleness, the timidity, and the vicious dexterity of their fathers,
will give place to an erect mien and a clear and decisive judgement. The
partial and imperfect change of character which was introduced at first will
in the succeeding age become more unalloyed and complete.
Lastly, the power of reasonable and just ideas in changing the character
of nations is in one respect infinitely greater than any power which can
be brought to bear upon a solitary individual. The case is not of that customary
sort, where the force of theory alone is tried in curing any person of his
errors; but is as if he should be placed in an entirely new situation. His
habits are broken through, and his motives of action changed. Instead of
being perpetually recalled to vicious practices by the recurrence of his
former connections, the whole society receives an impulse from the same cause
that acts upon the individual. New ideas are suggested, and the languor and
imbecility which might be incident to each are counteracted by the spectacle
of general enthusiasm and concert.
But it has been further alleged, "that, even should a luxurious nation
be induced, by intolerable grievances, and notorious usurpation, to embrace
just principles of human society, they would be unable to perpetuate them,
and would soon be led back by their evil habits to their former vices and
corruption:" that is, they would be capable of the heroic energy that
should expel the usurper, but not of the moderate resolution that should
prevent his return. They would rouse themselves so far from their lethargy
as to assume a new character and enter into different views; but, after having
for some time acted upon their convictions, they would suddenly become incapable
of understanding the truth of their principles and feeling their influence.
Men always act upon their apprehensions of preferableness. There are few
errors of which they are guilty which may not be resolved into a narrow and
inadequate view of the alternative presented for their choice. Present pleasure
may appear more certain and eligible than distant good. But they never choose
evil as apprehended to be evil. Wherever a clear and unanswerable notion
of any subject is presented to their view, a correspondent action or course
of actions inevitably follows. Having thus gained one step in the acquisition
of truth, it cannot easily be conceived as lost. A body of men, having detected
the injurious consequences of an evil under which they have long laboured,
and having shaken it off, will scarcely voluntarily restore the mischief
they have annihilated. No recollection of past error can reasonably be supposed
to have strength enough to lead back, into absurdity and uncompensated subjection,
men who have once been thoroughly awakened to the perception of truth.