University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
  
 2. 
 3. 
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
collapse section2. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
collapse section3. 
 01. 
 02. 
 03. 
 04. 
 05. 
 06. 
collapse section4. 
 01. 
 02. 
collapse section5. 
 01. 
 02. 
 6. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
  
Notes
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
collapse section5. 
 01. 
 6. 
 7. 
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  

collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  

Notes

 
[1]

His listing was in response to an extended discussion in previous issues and appeared in 1st ser. 10 (1854), 477-478, 497-498, and 517-520. It was reprinted with four additional entries and minor corrections in volume IV of the Elwin-Courthope edition of Pope's Works (1882), pp. 299-311.

[2]

"The Dunciad of 1728," Modern Philology, 13 (1915), 1-18.

[3]

The Times Literary Supplement's response to this volume reflects the interest attending the Dunciad question. The TLS was so greatly impressed that it continued its praise of the Pope section a second week, justifying the special treatment on the grounds that the bibliography was "so much in advance of anything which has hitherto appeared" (22 May 1924, p. 328; the first review appeared on 15 May, p. 303). Neither TLS article mentioned Griffith's work.

[4]

The trouble between Wise and Griffith may have been presaged in 1920. When the Wrenn collection was moved to Austin, Wise helped Wrenn's son compile a catalog of it (A Catalogue of the Library of the late John Henry Wrenn [1920]). William Todd has indicated that these numbered copies were assigned according to the honor intended to their recipients. Wise, his family, and his friends received the early copies; Griffith, who had been crucial in obtaining the collection for Texas, was far down the list and got number 71 in the edition of 120 copies ("Unfamiliar Collections, II: The Wrenn Library," Library Chronicle of the University of Texas, NS 8 [1974], 73-81).

[5]

"The First Edition of the Dunciad," MP, 29 (1931), 59-72.

[6]

P. 582 in "The Dunciad Duodecimo," Colophon, NS 3 (1938), 569-586.

[7]

"Two Cruces in Pope Bibliography," 24 Jan. 1958, p. 52.

[8]

My use of the Hinman Collator has revealed a different pattern of resettings from that which Foxon's catalog records on the basis of visual inspection. Mr. Foxon has informed me that he has no disagreement with my tally.

[9]

Philip Gaskell, A New Introduction to Bibliography (1972; rpt. with corrections, 1974), p. 109.

[10]

An Introduction to Bibliography for Literary Students (1927), pp. 190, 189.

[11]

For a survey of relevant printing house procedures, see the sections "Distributions" (pp. 53-54), "Stripping, and Skeletons" (pp. 109-110), and "Standing Type" (pp. 116-117) in Gaskell's New Introduction.

[12]

I am grateful to Phillip Harth, Standish Henning, and G. Thomas Tanselle for commenting on drafts of this paper.