University of Virginia Library


4

INTRODUCTION.

1. The Life of Wang Ch`ung.

The principal data of Wang Ch`ung's life are furnished by his
autobiography and by the biographical notice in chapter 79 p. 1 of the
Hou Han-shu, the History of the Later Han Dynasty, which was
written by Fan Yeh in the 5th cent. a.d. and commented on by Prince
Chang Huai Hsien of the T`ang dynasty. There we read:

"Wang Ch`ung, whose style was Chung Jên, was a native of
Shang-yü in K`uei-chi. His forefathers had immigrated from Yuanch`êng
in the Wei circuit. As a boy he lost his father and was
commended in his village for his filial piety. Subsequently he
repaired to the capital, where he studied at the academy.

The book of Yuan Shan Sung says that Wang Ch`ung was a very precocious
youth. After having entered the academy, he composed an essay on six scholars
on the occasion of the emperor visiting the Imperial College.

His teacher was Pan Piao from Fu-fêng. He was very fond
of extensive reading, but did not trouble much about paragraphs
or sentences. His family being poor, he possessed no books.
Therefore he used to stroll about the market-place and the shops
in Loyang and read the books exposed there for sale. That which
he had once read, he was able to remember and to repeat. Thus
he had acquired a vast knowledge of the tenets of the various
schools and systems. Having returned to his native place, he
led a very solitary life as a teacher. Then he took office in the
prefecture and was appointed secretary, but in consequence of
frequent remonstrances with his superiors, disputes, and dissensions
with his colleagues, he had to quit the service.

Wang Ch`ung had a strong penchant for discussions. At the
outset, his arguments would often appear rather queer, but his


5

final conclusions were true and reasonable. Being convinced that
the ordinary savants stuck too much to the letter, and thus
would mostly lose the true meaning, he shut himself up for
meditation, and no longer observed the ceremonies of congratulation
or condolence. Everywhere near the door, the windows,
and on the walls he had his knives and pens placed, with which
he wrote the Lun-hêng in 85 chapters containing over 200,000 words.

Yuan Shan Sung says in his book that at first the Lun-hêng written by
Wang Ch`ung was not current in the central provinces. When T`sai Yung came
to Wu, he discovered it there, and used to read it secretly as a help to conversation.
Afterwards Wang Lang became prefect of K`uei-chi, and likewise got
into possession of the book. On his return to Hsü-hsia his contemporaries were
struck with the great improvement of his abilities. Some one remarked that,
unless he had met with some extraordinary person, he must have found some
extraordinary book. They made investigations, and found out that in fact it was
from the Lun-hêng that he had derived this advantage. Thereupon the Lun-hêng
came into vogue. Pao P`u Tse relates that his contemporaries grudged T`sai Yung
the possession of a rare book. Somebody searched for it in the hiding place
behind his curtains, and there in fact found the Lun-hêng. He folded some
chapters together in order to take them away, when T`sai Yung proposed to him
that they should both keep the book, but not divulge its contents.

He explained the similarities and the diversities of the
different classes of things, and settled the common doubts and
errors of the time.

The governor Tung Ch`in made him assistant-magistrate.
Later on he rose to the rank of a sub-prefect. Then he retired
and returned home. A friend and fellow-countryman of his Hsieh
I Wu
addressed a memorial to the throne, in which he recommended
Wang Ch`ung for his talents and learning.

In the book of Hsieh Ch`êng it is stated that in recommending Wang Ch`ung,
Hsieh I Wu
said that his genius was a natural gift and not acquired by learning.
Even Mencius and Sun Ching in former times, or Yang Hsiung, Liu Hsiang, or
Sse ma Ch`ien more recently in the Han epoch could not surpass him.

Su Tsung commanded a chamberlain to summon Wang Ch`ung
into his presence, but owing to sickness, he could not go. When
he was nearly seventy years of age, his powers began to decline.
Then he wrote a book on "Macrobiotics" in 16 chapters, and
refraining from all desires and propensities, and avoiding all
emotions, he kept himself alive, until in the middle of the
Yung-yuan period, when he died of an illness at his home."


6

By his own testimony Wang Ch`ung was born in the third
year of the Chien-wu cycle, i. e. in a.d. 27, in Shang-yü-hsien, the
present Shao-hsing-fu of the province of Chekiang. His family had
originally been residing in Yuan-ch`êng = Ta-ming-fu in Chihli. His
father's name was Wang Sung. Owing to their violent temper his
ancestors had several times been implicated in local feuds, which
are still now of frequent occurrence in Fukien and Chekiang, and were
compelled to change their domicile. Wang Ch`ung's critics are scandalized
at his coolly telling us that his great-grandfather behaved like
a ruffian during a famine, killing and wounding his fellow-people.

If Wang Ch`ung's own description be true, he must have been
a paragon in his youth. He never needed any correction neither
at the hands of his parents nor of his teachers. For his age he
was exceptionally sedate and serious. When he was six years old,
he received his first instruction, and at the age of 8 he was sent
to a public school. There the teacher explained to him the Analects
and the Shuking, and he read 1,000 characters every day.
When he had mastered the Classics, one was astonished at the
progress he made, so he naïvely informs us. Of his other attainments
he speaks in the same strain and with the same conceit.
The Hou Han-shu confirms that he was a good son.

Having lost his father very early, he entered the Imperial
College at Loyang, then the capital of China. His principal teacher
was the historian Pan Piao, the father of Pan Ku, author of the
History of the Former Han dynasty. In Loyang he laid the foundation
of the vast amount of knowledge by which he distinguished
himself later on, and became acquainted with the theories of the
various schools of thought, many of which he vigorously attacks
in his writings. His aim was to grasp the general gist of what
he read, and he did not care so much for minor details. The
majority of the scholars of his time conversely would cling to the
words and sentences and over these minutiæ quite forget the
whole. Being too poor to buy all the books required to satiate
his hunger for knowledge, he would saunter about in the marketplace
and book-shops, and peruse the books exposed there for
sale, having probably made some sort of agreement with the booksellers,
who may have taken an interest in the ardent student.
His excellent memory was of great service to him, for he could
remember, even repeat what he had once read. At the same time
his critical genius developed. He liked to argue a point, and
though his views often seemed paradoxical, his opponents could
not but admit the justness of his arguments.


7

Having completed his studies, Wang Ch`ung returned to his
native place, where he became a teacher and lived a very quiet
life. Subsequently he took office and secured a small position as a
secretary of a district, a post which he also filled under a military
governor and a prefect. At last he was promoted to be assistant-magistrate
of a department. He would have us believe that he
was a very good official, and that his relations to his colleagues
were excellent. The Hou Han-shu, on the other hand, tells us that
he remonstrated so much with his superiors and was so quarrelsome,
that he had to leave the service. This version seems the
more probable of the two. Wang Ch`ung was much too independent,
much too outspoken, and too clever to do the routine business
well, which requires clerks and secretaries of moderate abilities, or
to serve under superiors, whom he surpassed by his talents. So
he devoted himself exclusively to his studies. He lived in rather
straitened circumstances, but supported his embarassments with philosophical
equanimity and cheerfulness. "Although he was poor
and had not an acre to dwell upon, his mind was freer than that
of kings and dukes, and though he had no emoluments counted
by pecks and bushels, he felt, as if he had ten thousand chung to
live upon. He enjoyed a tranquil happiness, but his desires did
not run riot, and though he was living in a state of poverty, his
energy was not broken. The study of ancient literature was his
debauchery, and strange stories his relish." He had a great admiration
for superior men, and liked to associate with people rising
above mediocrity. As long as he was in office and well off, he
had many friends, but most of them abandoned him, when he had
retired into private life.

In a.d. 86 Wang Ch`ung emigrated into the province of Anhui,
where he was appointed sub-prefect, the highest post which he
held, but two years only, for in 88 he gave up his official career,
which had not been a brilliant one. The reason of his resignation
this time seems to have been ill health.

So far Wang Ch`ung had not succeeded in attracting the attention
of the emperor. An essay which he had composed, when
the emperor had visited the college of Loyang, had passed unnoticed.
In the year 76, when parts of Honan were suffering from
a great dearth, Wang Ch`ung presented a memorial to the Emperor
Chang Ti in which he proposed measures to prohibit dissipation
and extravagancies, and to provide for the time of need, but his
suggestions were not accepted. He did not fare better with another
anti-alcoholic memorial, in which he advocated the prohibition of


8

the use of spirits. When finally the Emperor became aware of
Wang Ch`ung, it was too late. A friend and a countryman of his,
Hsieh I Wu recommended him to the throne for his talents and
great learning, saying that neither Mencius or Hsün Tse nor in the
Han time Yang Hsiung, Liu Hsiang or See Ma Ch`ien could outshine
him. The Emperor Chang Ti (76-88 a.d.) summoned him to his
presence, but owing to his ill-health Wang Ch`ung had to decline
the honour. His state had impaired so much, that already in 89
he thought that his end had come. But the next two years passed,
and he did not die. He found even the time to write a book
on "Macrobiotics," which he put into practice himself, observing
a strict diet and avoiding all agitations in order to keep his vital
fluid intact, until he expired in the middle of the Yung-yuan period
(89-104) about the year 97. The exact year is not known.

2. The Works of Wang Ch`ung.

Wang Ch`ung's last work, the Yang-hsing-shu or Macrobiotics in
16 chapters, which he wrote some years before his death, has
been mentioned. His first productions were the Chi-su-chieh-yi
"Censures on. Common Morals" in 12 chapters and the Chêng-wu,
a book on Government, both preceding his principal work, the
Lun-hêng, in which they are several times referred to in the two
biographical chapters.

Wang Ch`ung wrote his "Censures" as a protest against the
manners of his time with a view to rouse the public conscience.
He was prompted to write this work by the heartlessness of his
former friends, who abandoned him, when he was poor, and of
the world in general. To be read and understood by the people,
not the literati only, he adopted an easy and popular style. This
appears to have been contrary to custom, for he thought it necessary
to justify himself (p. 71).

The work on government owes its origin to the vain efforts
of the Imperial Government of his time to administer the Empire.
They did not see their way, being ignorant of the fundamental
principles (p. 70). From the Chêng-wu the territorial officials were
to learn what they needed most in their administration, and the
people should be induced "to reform and gratefully acknowledge
the kindness of the government" (p. 90).


9

These three works: the Macrobiotics, the Censures on Morals,
and the work on Government have all been lost, and solely the
Lun-hêng has come down to us. Whereas the Chi-su-chieh-yi censures
the common morals, the Lun-hêng = Disquisitions tests and criticises
the common errors and superstitions, the former being more ethical,
the latter speculative. Many of these errors are derived from the
current literature, classical as well as popular. Wang Ch`ung takes
up these books and points out where they are wrong. He avoids
all wild speculations, which he condemns in others, so he says
(p. 91). The Lun-hêng is not professedly a philosophical work,
intended to set forth a philosophical system, but in confuting and
contesting the views of others, Wang Ch`ung incidentally develops
his own philosophy. In this respect there is a certain resemblance
with the Theodicee of Leibniz, which, strictly speaking, is a polemic
against Bayle. Wang Ch`ung's aim in writing the Lun-hêng was
purely practical, as becomes plain from some of his utterances.
"The nine chapters of the Lun-hêng on Inventions, and the three
chapters of the Lun-hêng on Exaggerations, says he, are intended
to impress people, that they must strive for truthfulness." Even
such high metaphysical problems as that of immortality he regards
from a practical point of view. Otherwise he would not
write, as he does:—"I have written the essays on Death and on
the False Reports about Death to show that the deceased have no
consciousness, and cannot become ghosts, hoping that, as soon as
my readers have grasped this, they will restrain the extravagance
of the burials and become economical" (p. 90).

From a passage (Chap. XXXVIII) to the effect that the reigning
sovereign was contiuuing the prosperity of Kuang Wu Ti (25-57 a.d.)
and Ming Ti (58-75) it appears that the Lun-hêng was written
under the reign of the Emperor Chang Ti viz. between 76 and
89 a.d. From another remark that in the Chiang-jui chapter (XXX)
the auspicious portents, of the Yuan-ho and Chang-ho epochs (84-86
and 87-88) could not be mentioned, because of its being already
completed, we may infer that the whole work was finished before
84. Thus it must date from the years 76-84 a.d.

The Lun-hêng in its present form consists of 30 books comprising
85 chapters or separate essays. Ch`ien Lung's Catalogue
(Sse-k`u-chüan-shu-tsung-mu chap. 120 p. 1) shows that we do not possess
the Lun-hêng in its entirety. In his autobiography Wang Ch`ung
states that his work contains more than a hundred chapters
(p. 78), consequently a number of chapters must have been lost.
The 85 chapters mentioned above are enumerated in the index


10

preceding the text, but of the 44th chapter "Chao-chih" we have
merely the title, but not the text so, that the number of chapters
really existing is reduced to 84. The chapters exceeding 85 must
have already been lost in the first centuries, for we read in the
Hou Han-shu of the 5th cent. a.d. that Wang Ch`ung wrote the Lun-hêng
in 85 chapters.

Some interesting data about the history of the text are furnished
in another History of the Later Han Dynasty, the Hou
Han-shu
of Yuan Shan Sung of the Chin epoch (265-419 a.d.), who
lived anterior to Fan Yeh, the author of the officially recognised
History of the Later Han. Yuan Shan Sung's History was in 100 books
(cf. Li tai ming hsien lieh nü shih hsing p`u chap. 44, p. 35 v.), but it
has not been incorporated into the Twenty-four dynastic Histories.
Yuan Shan Sung, whose work is quoted by several critics, informs
us that at first the Lun-hêng was only current in the southern
provinces of China where Wang Ch`ung had lived. There it was
discovered by T`sai Yung (133-192 a.d.) a scholar of note from the
north, but instead of communicating it to others, he kept it for himself,
reading it secretly "as a help to conversation" i.e. he plundered
the Lun-hêng to be able to shine in conversation. Another scholar,
Wang Lang of the 2nd and 3d cent. a.d. is reported to have behaved
in a similar way, when he became prefect of K`uei-chi, where he
found the Lun-hêng. His friends suspected him of having come
into possession of an extraordinary book, whence he took his wisdom.
They searched for it and found the Lun-hêng, which subsequently
became universally known. The Taoist writer Ko Hung
of the 4th cent. a.d., known as Pao P`u Tse, recounts that the
Lun-hêng concealed by T`sai Yung was discovered in the same way.
At all events T`sai Yung and Wang Lang seem to have been instru
mental in preserving and transmitting the Lun-hêng.

In the History of the Sui dynasty (580-618 a.d.), Sui-shu
chap. 34 p. 7 v., an edition of the Lun-hêng in 29 books is mentioned,
whereas we have 30 books now. The commentary to this passage
observes that under the Liang dynasty (502-556 a.d.) there was the
Tung-hsü in 9 books and 1 book of Remarks written by Ying Fêng,
but that both works are lost. They seem to have been treatises
on the Lun-hêng, of which there are none now left. The Catalogue
of the Books in the History of the T`ang dynasty (Ch`ien T`ang-shu
chap. 47 p. 8) has the entry:— "Lun-hêng 30 books."

At present the Lun-hêng forms part of the well known collection
of works of the Han and Wei times, the Han Wei tsung-shu
dating from the Ming dynasty. The text of the Lun-hêng contained


11

in the large collection of philosophical works, the Tse shu
po chia,
is only a reprint from the Han Wei tsung-shu. In his useful
little biographical index, Shu-mu-tang wên, Chang Chih Tung records
a separate edition of the Lun-hêng printed under the Ming dynasty.
I have not seen it and do not know, whether it is still to be found
in the book-shops, and whether it differs from the current text.
In the many quotations from the Lun-hêng of the T`ai-p`ing Yü lan
(9th cent. a.d.) there is hardly any divergence from the reading of
our text. A commentary to the Lun-hêng has not been written.

In the appreciation of his countrymen Wang Ch`ung does
not rank very high. Chao Kung Wu (12th cent. a.d.) opines that
the Lun-hêng falls short of the elegant productions of the Former
Han epoch. Another critic of the 12th cent., Kao Sse Sun is still
more severe in his judgment. He declares the Lun-hêng to be a
medley of heterogeneous masses, written in a bad style, in which
morality does not take the place it ought. After his view the Lun-hêng
would have no intrinsic value, being nothing more than a
"help to conversation." Wang Po Hou and others condemn the
Lun-hêng on account of the author's impious utterances regarding
his ancestors and his attacks upon the Sage Confucius. That he
criticised Mencius might be excused, but to dare to find fault with
Confucius is an unpardonable crime. That mars the whole work.

In modern times a change of opinion in favour of Wang Ch`ung
seems to have taken place. In his Prefatory Notice to the Lun-hêng,
Yu Chun Hsi
pours down unrestricted praise upon him. "People
of the Han period, he remarks, were fond of fictions and fallacies.
Wang Ch`ung pointed out whatever was wrong; in all his arguments
he used a strict and thorough method, and paid special attention
to meanings. Rejecting erroneous notions he came near the truth.
Nor was he afraid of disagreeing with the worthies of old. Thus
he furthered the laws of the State, and opened the eyes and ears
of the scholars. People reading his books felt a chill at first, but
then they repudiated all falsehood, and became just and good.
They were set right, and discarded all crooked doctrines. It is
as if somebody amidst a clamouring crowd in the market-place
lifts the scale: then the weights and prices of wares are equitably
determined, and every strife ceases."

To a certain extent at least the Ch`ien Lung Catalogue does
him justice, while characterising his strictures on Confucius and
Mencius and his disrespect towards his forefathers as wicked and
perverse, its critics still admit that in exposing falsehoods and denouncing
what is base and low he generally hits the truth, and


12

that by his investigations he has done much for the furtherance of
culture and civilization. They conclude by saying that, although
Wang Ch`ung be impugned by many, he will always have admirers.

I presume that most Europeans, untramelled by Chinese moral
prejudices, will rather be among his admirers, and fall in with
Mayers speaking of Wang Ch`ung as "a philosopher, perhaps the
most original and judicious among all the metaphysicians China
has produced, ... who in the writings derived from his pen,
forming a work in thirty books, entitled Critical Disquisitions `Lun-hêng,'
handles mental and physical problems in a style and with a
boldness unparallelled in Chinese literature" (Reader's Manual
N. 795).

The first translator of the two chapters on Confucius and
Mencius and of the autobiography, Hutchinson, says of the Lun-hêng:—"The
whole book will repay perusal, treating as it does
of a wide range of subjects, enabling us to form some idea of the
state of the Chinese mind at the commencement of the Christian era.

The subjects (treated) are well calculated to enlist the interest
of the student and would most probably shed much light upon
the history of Chinese Metaphysics" (China Review vol. VII,
p. 40).

In my opinion Wang Ch`ung is one of the greatest Chinese
thinkers. As a speculative philosopher he leaves Confucius and
Mencius, who are only moralists, far behind. He is much more
judicious than Lao Tse, Chuang Tse, or Mê Ti. We might perhaps
place him on a level with Chu Hsi, the great philosopher of the
Sung time, in point of abilities at least, for their philosophies differ
very much.

In most Chinese works Wang Ch`ung is placed among the
Miscellaneous Writers or the Eclectics "Tsa Chia," who do not
belong to one single school, Confucianism, Mêhism, or Taoism, but
combine the doctrines of various schools. Wang Ch`ung is treated
as an Eclectic in the histories of the Sui dynasty and the T`ang
dynasty, in Ch`ien Lung's Catalogue, and in the Tse-shu-po-chia. Chang
Chih Tung,
however, enumerates him among the Confucianists, and
so does Faber (Doctrines of Confucius p. 31). Although he has not
been the founder of a school, I would rather assign to him a
place apart, to which his importance as a philosopher entitles him.
It matters not that his influence has been very slight, and that
the Chinese know so little of him. His work is hardly read, but
is extensively quoted in dictionaries and cyclopedias. At any rate
Wang Ch`ung is more of an Eclectic than a Confucianist. The Chinese


13

qualify as "Tsa Chia" all those original writers whom they cannot
place under any other head. Wang Ch`ung seems to regard himself
as a Confucianist. No other philosopher is more frequently mentioned
by him than Confucius, who, though he finds fault with him
here and there, is still, in his eyes, the Sage. Wang Ch`ung is most
happy, when he can prove an assertion by quoting the authority
of Confucius. This explains how he came to be classed by others
with the Confucianists.

3. Wang Ch`ung's Philosophy.

At first sight Wang Ch`ung's philosophy might seem dualistic,
for he recognises two principles, which are to a certain extent
opposed to each other, the Yang and the Yin fluid. But, although
the former, which is conceived as forming heaven as well as the
human mind, be more subtle than the latter, from which the earth
has been created, yet it is by no means immaterial. Both these
principles have been evolved from Chaos, when the original fluid
became differentiated and split into two substances, a finer one,
Yang, and a coarser one, Yin. We do not find a purely spiritual
or transcendent correlate to these two substances such e.g. as Tao,
the all-embracing mystical force of the Taoists, or Li "Reason,"
which in Chu Hsi's system rules over Matter "Ch`i," and thus makes
this system truly dualistic. Even Fate, which takes such a prominent
place in Wang Ch`ung's philosophy; has been materialised
by him, and it is hardly anything more than a sort of a natural
law. We cannot be far wrong, if we characterise his philosophy
as a materialistic monism.

Compared with western thought Wang Ch`ung's system bears
some resemblance to the natural philosophy of Epicurus and Lucretius.
In the East we find some kindred traits among the Indian materialists,
the Chârvâkas.

Epicurus attaches great importance to physics. The knowledge
of the natural causes of things shall be an antidote against superstitions.
Wang Ch`ung likewise takes a lively interest in all physical
problems, and tries to base his arguments on experience, as far as
possible. He wishes to explain all natural phenomena by natural
causes. His method is quite modern. If he often falls into error
nevertheless, it is not so much owing to bad reasoning as to the


14

poor state of Chinese science at his time. He regards many things as
proved by experience, which are not, and in spite of his radicalism
has still too much veneration for the sayings of old classical authors.

Wang Ch`ung's views agree, in many respects, with the Epicurean
Physics, but not with its Eudæmonology and Sensualism,
his Ethics being totally different. Ethical Epicureanism has its
representative in China in the pre-Christian philosopher Yang Chu, who
seems to have concerned himself with Ethics exclusively, whereas
Wang Ch`ung has especially devoted himself to the study of metaphysical
and physical questions. The professed aim of the philosophy
of Epicurus is human happiness. By delivering them from
errors and superstitions he intends to render people happy. Wang
Ch`ung
likewise hopes to do away with all inventions, fictions, and
falsehoods, but in doing so he has truth, and not so much happiness
in view.

a) Metaphysics.

The pivots of Wang Ch`ung's philosophy are Heaven and Earth,
which have been formed of the two fluids, Yang and Yin. "The
fluids of the Yin and Yang, he says, are the fluids of Heaven and
Earth" (Chap. XXX). These two principles are not of Wang Ch`ung's
invention, they are met with in ancient Chinese literature, in the
Yiking and the Liki for instance (see Tchou Hi, Sa Doctrine et son
influence, par S. Le Gall, Chang-hai 1894, p. 35).

Earth is known to us, it has a material body like man
(p. 93), but what are we to understand by Heaven? Is it a spirit,
the Spirit of Heaven or God, or merely an expanse of air, the
Blue Empyrean, or a substance similar to that of Earth? Wang
Ch`ung
considers all these possibilities and decides in favour of the
last. "Men are created by heaven, why then grudge it a body?"
he asks. "Heaven is not air, but has a body on high and far
from men" (Chap. XIX). "To him who considers the question, as
we have done, it becomes evident that heaven cannot be something
diffuse and vague." His reasons are that heaven has a certain
distance from earth, which by Chinese mathematicians has been
calculated at upwards of 60,000 Li, and that the constellations
known as the solar mansions are attached to it. These arguments
seem strange to us now, but we must bear in mind that the Greeks,
the Babylonians, and the Jews held quite similar views, regarding
heaven as an iron or a brazen vault, the "firmament" to which the
sun, the moon, and the stars were fixed, or supposing even quite a
number of celestial spheres one above the other, as Aristotle does.


15

With regard to the origin of the universe Wang Ch`ung simply
adopts the old creation theory, on which he writes as follows:—
"The commentators of the Yiking say that previous to the separation
of the primogenial vapours, there was a chaotic and uniform
mass, and the books of the Literati speak of a wild medley, and
of air not yet separated. When it came to be separated, the pure
elements formed heaven, and the impure ones, earth. According
to the expositors of the Yiking and the writings of the Literati
the bodies of heaven and earth, when they first became separated,
were still small, and they were not far distant from each other"
(loc. cit.). In conformity with this view Heaven and Earth were
originally one viz. air or vapour. This theory must be very old,
for it is already alluded to in the Liki, and the Taoist philosopher
Lieh Tse of the 5th cent. b.c., who gives the best exposition of it,
seems to refer it to the sages of former times. The passage is so
interesting, that I may be permitted to quote it in full:—

"The teacher Lieh Tse said:—The sages of old held that the
Yang and the Yin govern heaven and earth. Now, form being
born out of the formless, from what do heaven and earth take
their origin? It is said:—There was a great evolution, a great
inception, a great beginning, and a great homogeneity. During
the great evolution, Vapours were still imperceptible, in the great
inception Vapours originate, in the great beginning Forms appear,
and during the great homogeneity Substances are produced."

"The state when Vapours, Forms, and Substances though
existing were still undivided, is called Chaos, which designates
the conglomeration and inseparability of things. `They could not
be seen though looked at, not be heard though listened to, and
not be attained though grasped at,' therefore one speaks of (incessant)
evolution. Evolution is not bound to any forms or limits."

"Evolution in its transformations produces one, the changes
of one produce seven, the changes of seven produce nine. Nine
is the climax, it changes again, and becomes one. With one forms
begin to change."

"The pure and light matter becomes the heaven above, the
turbid and heavy matter forms the earth below. The mixture
of their fluids gives birth to man, and the vitalizing principle of
heaven and earth creates all beings" (Lieh Tse I, 2).

In the Liki we read:—"Propriety must have sprung from
the Great One. This by division became Heaven and Earth, and
by transformation the Yin and the Yang" (Legge's Liki, Vol. I,
p. 386).


16

It is curious to note the similarity of the Epicurean cosmogony
with that of the ancient Chinese. Lucretius sings:—

"Quippe etenim primum terrai corpora quæque,
propterea quod erant gravia et perplexa, coibant
in medio atque imas capiebant omnia sedes;
quæ quanto magis inter se perplexa coibant,
tam magis expressere ea quæ mare sidera solem
lunamque efficerent et magni mœnia mundi:
omnia enim magis hæc e levibus atque rotundis
seminibus multoque minoribu' sunt elementis
quam tellus, ideo, per rara foramina, terræ
partibus erumpens primus se sustulit æther
ignifer et multos secum levis abstulit ignis."
and further on:—

"Sic igitur terræ concreto corpore pondus
constitit, atque omnis mundi quasi limus in imum
confluxit gravis et subsedit funditus ut fæx;
inde mare, inde aër, inde æther ignifer ipse
corporibus liquidis sunt omnia pura relicta
et leviora aliis alia, et liquidissimus æther
atque levissimus aërias super influit auras,
nec liquidum corpus turbantibus aëris auris
commiscet."

(Lucr.V, 439-449; 485-493.)

The principle of division is the same:—the light primary
bodies Wang Ch`ung and the Chinese cosmogonists term Yang, the
heavy ones they designate by Yin. Only in respect of the line of
demarcation the Epicureans and the Chinese differ, for, whereas
the former regard earth alone as heavy and water, air and ether
as light matter, the Chinese comprise earth and water under the
term Yin, and air and fiery ether under Yang. From various utterances
of Wang Ch`ung it would appear that he conceives the Yang
as a fiery and the Yin as a watery element, in short that Yang is
fire and Yin water. This would tolerably well account for the
formation of the universe. Fire forms the sun, the moon, and the
other luminaries of Heaven, while from water and its sediments
Earth, the oceans, and the atmosphere are developed. "The solar
fluid is identical with the heavenly fluid" (Chap. XVIII), says Wang
Ch`ung,
and:—"Rain is Yin, and brightness Yang, and conversely
cold is Yin, and warmth is Yang" (Chap. XXI).

The other attributes given by Wang Ch`ung to the Yang and
the Yin principles are merely the qualities of fire and water. The


17

Yang, the fiery ether or the solar fluid, is bright, i. e. light (Chap. XX),
warm (Chap. XXI), dry (Chap. XVIII), vivifying, and creative
(Chap. XXI). The Yin, rain or water, is dark, cold, wet, and
destructive (p. 111). By itself water possesses neither light nor
warmth, and may well be called dark and cold.

There is not a strict separation of the fluids of Heaven and
Earth, they often mix and permeate one another. Heaven as well
as Earth enclose air (Chap. XIX). The immense mass of air forming
the gaseous part of Heaven, which, as we have seen, is credited
with a body, is called sky (p. 113).

Now, whereas Earth rests motionless in the centre of the
world, Heaven revolves around it, turning from east to west.
This movement is explained as the emission of the heavenly fluid
which, however, takes place spontaneously. Spontaneity is another
corner-stone of Wang Ch`ung's system. It means that this movement
is not governed by any intelligence or subservient to the
purposes of any spiritus rector, but is solely regulated by its own
inherent natural laws. The same idea is expressed in Madhavacharya's
Sarva-Darśsana Sangraha:

"The fire is hot, the water cold, refreshing cool the breeze of morn.
By whom came this variety? From their own nature was it born."

(Sarva-Darśsana-Samgraha,translated byE. B. CowellandA. E. Gough,
London 1882, p. 19.)

Wang Ch`ung admits that he has adopted the principle of
spontaneity from the Taoists, who however, have not sufficiently
substantiated it by proofs (p. 97). He shows that Heaven cannot
display a conscious activity like man, because such activity is
evoked by desires and impulses, which require organs:—the eye,
the mouth, etc. The heavenly fluid is not a human body with
eyes and ears, but a formless and insensible mass (p. 93). The
observation of the natural growth of plants and of the regularity
of other natural phenomena precluding the idea of special designed
acts, has confirmed our philosopher in his belief in spontaneity.
"The principle of Heaven is inaction," he says. "Accordingly in
spring it does not do the germinating, in summer the growing,
in autumn the ripening, or in winter the hiding of the seeds.
When the Yang fluid comes forth spontaneously, plants will germinate
and grow of themselves and, when the Yin fluid rises, they
ripen and disappear of their own accord" (p. 99).

The movement of the Yin fluid is spontaneous likewise.
"Heaven and Earth cannot act, nor do they possess any knowledge"


18

(p. 101). They are not inert, but their activity is unintentional
and purposeless. Thus spontaneity is the law of nature.

From this point of view Wang Ch`ung characterises the fluid of
Heaven as "placid, tranquil, desireless, inactive, and unbusied" (p.
93), all attributes ascribed by the Taoists to their Mundane Soul, Tao.

At all times Heaven has been personified and deified. With
the Chinese as well as with us Heaven has become a synonym
for God. Wang Ch`ung notices that human qualities have been
attributed to him. We see in him the Father of Mankind, the
Chinese an emperor, the "Supreme Ruler," Shang Ti. He lives in
heaven like a king in his palace, and göverns the world (Chap. XXII)
meting out rewards and punishments to mankind, rewarding the
virtuous (p. 160), and punishing the wicked (p. 164). He reprimands
the sovereigns on earth for their misrule by means of extraordinary
natural phenomena, and, unless they reform, visits them and their
people with misfortune (p. 126). Thunder is his angry voice, and
with his thunderbolt he strikes the guilty (Chap. XXII).

Regarding Heaven as nothing else than a substance, a pure
and tenuous fluid without a mind, Wang Ch`ung cannot but reject
these anthropomorphisms. Heaven has no mouth, no eyes; it
does not speak nor act (p. 183), it is not affected by men (p. 110),
does not listen to their prayers (p. 113), and does not reply to the
questions addressed to it (p. 184).

By a fusion of the fluids of Heaven and Earth all the organisms
on earth have been produced (p. 104). Man does not make an
exception. In this respect Heaven and Earth are like husband and
wife, and can be regarded as the father and the mother of mankind
(Chap. XX). The same idea has been enunciated by Lucretius:

"Postremo pereunt imbres, ubi eos pater œther
in gremium matris terrai præcipitavit:
at nitidæ surgunt fruges, ramique virescunt
arboribus, crescunt ipsæ fetuque gravantur."

(Lucr.I, 250-253.)

and further on:—

"Denique cælesti sumus omnes semine oriundi:
omnibus ille idem pater est, unde alma liquentis
umoris guttas mater cum terra recepit,
feta parit nitidas fruges arbustaque læta,
et genus humanum parit, omnia sæcula ferarum,
pabula cum præbet, quibus omnes corpora pascunt
et dulcem ducunt vitam prolemque propagant;
quapropter merito maternum nomen adeptast."

(Lucr.II, 988-995.)


19

Wang Ch`ung compares the creation of man to the freezing
of ice. He is the produce of the mixture and concretion or crystallization
of the two primary fluids:—"During the chilly winter
months the cold air prevails, and water turns into ice. At the
approach of spring, the air becomes warm, and the ice melts to
water. Man is born in the universe, as ice is produced so to
speak. The Yang and the Yin fluids crystallize, and produce man.
When his years are completed, and his span of life comes to its
end, he dies and reverts to those fluids" p. 196).

The Yin forms the body, and the Yang produces the vital
spirit and the mind. Both are identical, Wang Ch`ung does not
discriminate between the anima and the animus:—"That by which
man is born are the Yang and the Yin fluids; the Yin fluid produces
his bones and flesh, the Yang fluid the vital spirit. While man is
alive, the Yang and Yin fluids are in order. Hence bones and flesh
are strong, and the vital force is full of vigour. Through the vital
force he has knowledge, and with his bones and flesh he displays
strength. The vital spirit can speak, the body continues strong
and robust. While bones and flesh and the vital spirit are entwined
and linked together, they are always visible and do not perish"
(Chap. XVIII).

Man is imbued with the heavenly or vital fluid at his birth.
It is a formless mass like the yolk of an egg, before it is hatched,
showing in this respect the nature of the primogenial vapours, from
which it has been derived (p. 199). There is no difference between
the vital forces of man and animals. They have the same origin.
The vital fluid resides in the blood and the arteries, and is nourished
and developed by eating and drinking (p. 194). It has to
fulfil two difficult functions, to animate the body and keep it alive,
and to form its mind. All sensations are caused by the vital
fluid:—"When the vital fluid is thinking or meditating, it flows
into the eyes, the mouth or the ears. When it flows into the
eyes, the eyes see shapes, when it flows into the ears, the ears
hear sounds, and, when it flows into the mouth, the mouth speaks
something" (Chap. XVIII). Wang Ch`ung imagines that all sensations
are produced in their organs by the vital fluid, which must be the
mental power as well, since it thinks and meditates. Insanity is
defined as a disturbance of the vital force (eod.). There are no
supernatural mental faculties and no prophets or sages knowing
the future or possessing a special knowledge derived from any
other source than the vital force (p. 61). It is also the will, which
causes the mouth to speak. As such it determines the character.


20

which in Wang Ch`ung's belief depends upon its quantity (Chap. XXXI).
As vital energy it modifies the length of human life, which ceases,
as soon as this energy is used up (Chap. XXVII).

From what our author says about ghosts and spirits in particular,
which consist of the Yang fluid alone without any Yin, we
can infer that he conceived of the human soul also as an aura, a
warm breath identical to a certain extent with the solar fluid.

It is easy to see, how the Chinese came to denote the body
as Yin and the soul as Yang—I believe that these notions were already
current at Wang Ch`ung's time, who only took them up. The
body is formed of a much coarser stuff than the soul, consisting
as it does of solid and liquid matter. Therefore they presume
that it must have been produced from the heavier and grosser
substance, the Yin, while the purer and lighter Yang formed the
soul. A living body is warm, warmth is a quality of the Yang
fluid, consequently the vital force must be Yang. The mind enlightens
the body, the Yang fluid is light as well, ergo the mind
is the Yang fluid. The last conclusion is not correct, the mind not
being a material light, but a Chinese would not hesitate to use
such an analogy; their philosophy abounds with such symbolism.

The ideas of the Epicureans on the nature of the soul agree
very well with Wang Ch`ung's views. According to Epicurus the
soul is a tenuous substance resembling a breath with an admixture
of some warmth, dispersed through the whole organism:—ἡ ψυχὴ
σῶμά ἐστι λεπτομερές, παῤ ὅλον τὸ ἄϧροισμα παρεσπαρμένον, προσεμφερέστατον
δὲ πνεύματι ϧερμοῦ τινα κρᾶσιν ἔχοντι (Diog. Laert. X, 63).

Elsewhere the soul is described as a mixture of four substances:
a fiery, an aeriform, a pneumatical, and a nameless one,
which latter is said to cause sensations:—κρᾶμα ἐκ τεττάρων, ἐκ ποιοῦ
πυρώδους, ἐκ ποιοῦ ἀερώδους, ἐκ ποιοῦ πνευματικοῦ, ἐκ τετάρτου τινὸς ἀκατονομάστου
(Plut. Plac. IV, 3).

Lucretius says that the soul consists of much finer atoms than
those of water, mist or smoke, and that it is produced, grows, and
ages together with the body (Lucr. III, 425-427, 444-445). When
a man dies, a fine, warm, aura leaves his body (III, 232).

As regards man's position in nature Wang Ch`ung asserts that
he is the noblest and most intelligent creature, in which the mind
of Heaven and Earth reach their highest development (Chap. XLIII);
still he is a creature like others, and there exists no fundamental
difference between him and other animals (p. 202). Wang Ch`ung
likes to insist upon the utter insignificance of man, when compared
with the immense grandeur of Heaven and Earth. It seems


21

to have given him some satisfaction to put men, who are living
on Earth, on a level with fleas and lice feeding upon the human
body, for we find this drastic simile, which cannot have failed
to hurt the feelings of many of his self-sufficient countrymen, repeated
several times (p. 183, Chap. XXVI). In short, according to Wang
Ch`ung
man does not occupy the exceptional position in the world
which he uses to vindicate for himself. He has not been created
on purpose, as nothing else has, the principle of nature being
chance and spontaneity (p. 103). The world has not been created
for the sake of man. "Some people," remarks Wang Ch`ung, "are of
opinion that Heaven produces grain for the purpose of feeding
mankind, and silk and hemp to clothe them. That would be
tantamount to making Heaven the farmer of man or his mulberry
girl, it would not be in accordance with spontaneity" (p. 92). As
an argument against the common belief that Heaven produces his
creatures on purpose, he adduces the struggle for existence, for
says Wang Ch`ung:—"If Heaven had produced its creatures on
purpose, he ought to have taught them to love each other, and
not to prey upon and destroy one another. One might object that
such is the nature of the five elements that, when Heaven creates
all things, it imbues them with the fluids of the five elements,
and that these fight together and destroy one another. But then
Heaven ought to have filled its creatures with the fluid of one
element only, and taught them mutual love, not permitting the fluids
of the five elements to resort to strife and mutual destruction" (p. 104).

Here again Wang Ch`ung is in perfect accord with the Epicureans.
Epicurus asserts that nothing could be more preposterous
than the idea that nature has been regulated with a view to the
well-being of mankind or with any purpose at all. The world is
not as it ought to be, if it had been created for the sake of man,
for how could Providence produce a world so full of evil, where
the virtuous so often are maltreated and the wicked triumph?
(Zeller, Philosophie der Griechen, III. Teil, 1. Abt., 1880, pp. 398
seq. and 428.)

The same sentiment finds expression in the following verses
of the Epicurean poet:—

"Nam quamvis rerum ignorem primordia quæ sint,
hoc tamen ex ipsis cæli rationibus ausim
confirmare aliisque ex rebus reddere multis,
nequaquam nobis divinitus esse creatam
naturam mundi: tanta stat prædita culpa."

(Lucr. II, 177-181 and V, 185-189.)


22

Although man owes his existence to the Yang and the Yin fluids,
as we have seen, he is naturally born by propagation from his
own species. Heaven does not specially come down to generate
him. All the stories of supernatural births recorded in the Classics,
where women were specially fecundated by the Spirit of Heaven,
are inventions (p. 48). Human life lasts a certain time, a hundred
years at most, then man dies (p. 46). A prolongation of life is
impossible, and man cannot obtain immortality (p. 50):—"Of all
the beings with blood in their veins, says our philosopher, there
are none but are born, and of those endowed with life there are
none but die. From the fact that they were born, one knows that
they must die. Heaven and Earth were not born, therefore they
do not die. Death is the correlate of birth, and birth the counterpart
of death. That which has a beginning must have an end,
and that which has an end, must necessarily have a beginning.
Only that which is without beginning or end, lives for ever and
never dies" (Chap. XXVIII).

To show that the human soul is not immortal and does not
possess any personal existence after death Wang Ch`ung reasons as
follows:—During life the Yang fluid, i. e. the vital spirit or the soul,
adheres to the body, by death it is dispersed and lost. By its
own nature this fluid is neither conscious, nor intelligent, it has no
will and does not act, for the principle of the Yang or the heavenly
fluid is unconsciousness, inaction, and spontaneity. But it acquires
mental faculties and becomes a soul by its temporary connection
with a body. The body is the necessary substratum of intelligence,
just as a fire requires a substance to burn. By death "that which
harbours intelligence is destroyed, and that which is called intelligence
disappears. The body requires the fluid for its maintenance,
and the fluid the body to become conscious. There is no
fire in the world burning quite of itself, how could there be an
essence without a body, but conscious of itself" (p. 195). The state
of the soul after death is the same as that before birth. "Before
their birth men have no consciousness. Before they are born, they
form part of the primogenial fluid, and when they die, they revert
to it. This primogenial fluid is vague and diffuse, and the human
fluid a part of it. Anterior to his birth, man is devoid of consciousness,
and at his death he returns to this original state of
unconsciousness, for how should he be conscious?" (p. 194.)

Wang Ch`ung puts forward a number of arguments against
immortality. If there were spirits of the dead, they would certainly
manifest themselves. They never do, consequently there are none


23

(p. 193). Other animals do not become spirits after death, wherefore
should man alone be immortal, for though the most highly
organised creature, still he is a creature and falls under the general
laws (p. 191). The vital spirit or soul is affected by external influences,
it grows by nourishment, relaxes, and becomes unconscious
by sleep, is deranged and partly destroyed by sickness, and the
climax of sickness, death, which dissolves the body, should not
affect it at all? (p. 196.)

At all times the dogma of immortality has been negatived by
materialistic philosophers. The line of arguments of the Greek as
well as the Indian materialists is very much akin to that of Wang Ch`ung.

Epicurus maintains that, when the body decays, the soul becomes
scattered, and loses its faculties, which cannot be exercised in
default of a body:—καὶ μὴν καὶ διαλυομένου τοῦ ὅλου ἀϧροίσματος ἡ ψυχὴ
διασπείρεται καὶ οὐκέτι ἔχει τὰς αὐτὰς δυνάμεις οὐδὲ κινεῑται, ὥστ᾿ οὐδ᾿ αἴσϧησιν
κέκτηται. οὐ γὰρ οἷόν τε νοεῖν αὐτὴν αἰσϧανομένην, μὴ ἐν τούτῳ τῷ συστήματι
καὶ ταῖς κινήσεσι ταύταις χρωμένην, ὅταν τὰ στεγάζοντα καὶ περιέχοντα μὴ
τοιαῦτ᾿ ἦ οἷς νῦν οὖσα ἔχει ταύτας τὰς κινήσεις (Diog. Laert. X, 65-66).

He adds that an immaterial essence can neither act nor
suffer, and that it is foolish to say that the soul is incorporeal:—
τὸ δὲ κενὸν οὄτε ποιῆσαι οὔτε παϧεῖν δύναται . . . . οί λέγogr;ντες ἀσώματον εῖναι
τὴν ψυχὴν ματαἴζουσιν.

From the fact that the vital fluid is born with the body, that
it grows, develops, and declines along with it, Lucretius infers that
the fluid must also be dissolved simultaneously with the body,
scattered into the air like smoke:—

"ergo dissolvi quoque convenit omnem animai
naturam, ceu fumus, in altas aëris auras;
quandoquidem gigni pariter pariterque videmus
crescere et, ut docui, simul ævo fessa fatisci."

(Lucr. III, 455-458.)

What Wang Ch`ung asserts about the influence of sickness on the
soul (p. 196), Lucretius expresses in the following pathetic verses:—

"Quin etiam morbis in corporis avius errat
sæpe animus: dementit enim deliraque fatur,
interdumque gravi lethargo fertur in altum
æternumque soporem oculis nutuque cadenti;
unde neque exaudit voces nec noscere voltus
illorum potis est, ad vitam qui revocantes
circum stant lacrimis rorantes ora genasque,
quare animum quoque dissolvi fateare necessest,
quandoquidem penetrant in eum contagia morbi."

(Lucr. III, 463-471.)


24

The interaction of body and mind, which thrive only, as
long as they are joined together, and both decay, when they have
been separated, the poet describes as follows:—

"Denique corporis atque animi vivata potestas
inter se coniuncta valent vitaque fruuntur:
nec sine corpore enim vitalis edere motus
sola potest animi per se natura nec autem
cassum animi corpus durare et sensibus uti."

(Lucr. III, 556-560.)

As the tree does not grow in the sky, as fish do not live on
the fields, and as blood does not run in wood, thus the soul cannot
reside anywhere else than in the body, not in the clods of earth,
or in the fire of the sun, or in the water, or in the air (Lucr. V,
133-134) and, when the body dies, it must become annihilated
likewise.

"Denique in æthere non arbor, non æquore salso
nubes esse queunt, nec pisces vivere in arvis,
nec cruor in lignis neque saxis sucus inesse.
certum ac dispositumst ubi quicquid crescat et insit.
sic animi natura nequit sine corpore oriri
sola neque a nervis et sanguine longiter esse."

(Lucr. III, 781-786.)

"quare, corpus ubi interiit, periisse necessest
confiteare animam distractam in corpore toto."

(Loc. cit. 795-796.)

Of the Chârvâkas it is said by Sankara that "seeing no soul,
but body, they maintain the non-existence of soul other than
body."—"Thought, knowledge, recollection, etc. perceptible only
where organic body is, are properties of an organized frame, not
appartaining to exterior substances, or earth and other elements
simple or aggregate, unless formed into such a frame."

"While there is body, there is thought, and sense of pleasure
and pain, none when body is not, and hence, as well as from self-consciousness
it is concluded that self and body are identical."
(H. T. Colebroke, Miscellaneous Essays, vol. II, p. 428 seq.)

The dictum that everyone is the child of his time applies to
Wang Ch`ung also, free-thinker though he be. He has thrown over
board a great many popular beliefs and superstitions, but he could
not get rid of all, and keeps a good deal. His veneration of antiquity
and the sages of old is not unlimited, but it exists and induces
him to accept many of their ideas, which his unbiassed
critical genius would probably have rejected. Like the majority


25

of his countrymen he believes in Fate and Predestination. However,
his Fate is not Providence, for he does not recognise any Superior
Being governing the world, and it has been considerably materialised.
On a rather vague utterance of Tse Hsia, a disciple of
Confucius, who probably never thought of the interpretation it would
receive at the hands of Wang Ch`ung, he builds his theory:—"Life
and death depend on Destiny, wealth and honour come from Heaven"
(Analects XII, 5). The destiny, says Wang Ch`ung, which fixes the
duration of human life, is the heavenly fluid, i. e. the vital force,
with which man is imbued at his birth. This fluid forms his
constitution. It can be exuberant, then the constitution is strong,
and life lasts long; or it is scanty, then the body becomes delicate,
and death ensues early. This kind of Fate is after all nothing else
than the bodily constitution (pp. 138 and 46). In a like manner is
wealth and honour, prosperity and unhappiness transmitted in the
stary fluid, with which men are likewise filled at their birth. "Just
as Heaven emits its fluid, the stars send forth their effluence,
which keeps amidst the heavenly fluid. Imbibing this fluid men
are born, and live, as long as they keep it. If they obtain a fine
one, they become men of rank, if a common one, common people.
Their position may be higher or lower, and their wealth bigger
or smaller" (p. 138). Consequently this sort of Fate determining
the amount of happiness which falls to man's share during his
life-time, depends on the star or the stars under which he has
been born, and can be calculated by the astrologers. This science
was flourishing at Wang Ch`ung's time and officially recognised. On
all important occasions the court astrologers were consulted.

Now, Fate, whether it be the result of the vital force or of
the stary fluid, is not always definitive. It may be altered or
modified by various circumstances, and only remains unchanged,
if it be stronger than all antagonistic forces. As a rule "the
destiny regulating man's life-time is more powerful, than the one
presiding over his prosperity" (p. 137). If a man dies suddenly,
it is of no use that the stary fluid had still much happiness in store
for him. Moreover "the destiny of a State is stronger than that
of individuals" (loc. cit.). Many persons are involved in the disaster
of their country, who by Heaven were predetermined for a
long and prosperous life.

The circumstances modifying man's original fate are often
denoted as Time. Besides Wang Ch`ung distinguishes Contingencies,
Chances,
and Incidents, different names for almost the same idea
(p. 142). These incidents may be happy or unhappy, they may


26

tally with the original destiny or disagree with it, completely
change it, or be repulsed. If an innocent man be thrown into jail,
but is released again, this unlucky contingency was powerless
against his favourable destiny; whereas, when hundreds or thousands
perish together in a catastrophe "the disaster they met with
was so paramount that their good fate and thriving luck could not
ward it off" (eod.).

We see Wang Ch ung's Fate is not the inexorable decree of
Heaven, the εἱμαρμένη of the Greeks, the dira necessitas, or the
patristic predestination, being partly natural (vital fluid), partly
supernatural (stary fluid), and partly chance.

Epicurus impugns fatalism, and so does Mê Ti and his school
on the ground that fatalism paralyzes human activity and is subvertive
of morality. There were scholars at Wang Ch`ung's time who
attempted to mitigate the rigid fatalism by a compromise with self-determination.
They distinguished three kinds of destiny:—the
natural, the concomitant, and the adverse. Natural destiny is a
destiny not interfered with by human activity. The concomitant
destiny is a combination of destiny and activity both working in
the same direction, either for the good or for the bad of the
individual, whereas in the adverse destiny the two forces work in
opposite directionś, but destiny gets the upper hand (p. 138).

Wang Ch`ung repudiates this scholastic distinction, urging that
virtue and wisdom, in short that human activity has no influence
whatever on fate, a blind force set already in motion before the newborn
begins to act (p. 141). There is no connection and no harmony
between human actions and fate. Happiness is not a reward for
virtue, or unhappiness a punishment for crimes. Wang Ch`ung adduces
abundance of instances to show, how often the wise and
the virtuous are miserable and tormented, while scoundrels thrive
and flourish (Chap. XII). Therefore a wise man should lead a
tranquil and quiet life, placidly awaiting his fate, and enduring
what cannot be changed (p. 145).

In the matter of Fate Wang Ch`ung shares all the common
prejudices of his countrymen. Fate, he thinks, can be ascertained
by astrology and it can be foreseen from physiognomies, omens, dreams,
and apparitions of ghosts and spirits. There are special soi-disant
sciences for all these branches:—anthroposcopy, divination, oneiro-mancy,
necromancy, etc.

Anthroposcopy pretends to know the fate not only from man's
features and the lines of his skin (p. 47), but also from the osseous
structure of the body and particularly from bodily abnormities


27

(Chap. XXIV). Many such instances have been recorded in ancient
Chinese books. Of features the physiognomists used to distinguish
70 different classes (p. 72). In accordance with this theory Wang
Ch`ung
opines that the vital fluid, the bearer of destiny, finds expression
in the forms and features of the body, and can be read
by the soothsayers. He remarks that a person's character may
likewise be determined from his features, but that no regular science
for this purpose has been developed (Chap. XXIV).

Of Omens or Portents there are auspicious and inauspicious
ones, lucky or unlucky auguries. Freaks of nature, and rare specimens,
sometimes only existing in imagination, are considered auspicious
e. g. sweet dew and wine springs believed to appear in very
propitious times, in the vegetable kingdom:—the purple boletus, and
auspicious grass, in the animal kingdom:—the phœnix, the unicorn,
the dragon, the tortoise, and other fabulous animals (p. 56). Wang
Ch`ung
discourses at great length on the nature and the form of
these auguries. They are believed to be forebodings of the rise
of a wise emperor or of the birth of a sage, and harbingers of a
time of universal peace. Those Sages are oftentimes distinguishable
by a halo or an aureole above their heads. The Chinese historical
works are full of such wonderful signs. But all these omens are
by no means intentionally sent by Heaven, nor responses to questions
addressed to it by man. They happen spontaneously and
by chance (p. 186), simultaneously with those lucky events, which
they are believed to indicate. There exists, as it were, a certain
natural harmony between human life and the forces of nature,
manifested by those omens.

"Dreams, says Wang Ch`ung, are visions. When good or bad
luck are impending, the mind shapes these visions" (p. 215). He
also declares that dreams are produced by the vital spirit (p. 200),
which amounts to the same, for the mind is the vital fluid. In
Wang Ch`ung's time there already existed the theory still held at
present by many Chinese that during a dream the vital spirit leaves
the body, and communicates with the outer world, and that it is
not before the awakening that it returns into the spiritless body.
Wang Ch`ung combats this view, showing that dreams are images
only, which have no reality. He further observes that there are
direct and indirect dreams. The former directly show a future
event, the latter are symbolical, and must be explained by the
oneirocritics.

Wang Ch`ung denies the immortality of the soul, but at the
same time he believes in Ghosts and Spirits. His ghosts, however,


28

are very poor figures, phantoms and semblances still less substantial
than the Shades of Hades. They are unembodied apparitions, have
no consciousness (p. 194), feel neither joy nor pain, and can cause
neither good nor evil (Chap. XLII). They have human shape or
are like mist and smoke (Chap. XLIV). The origin of ghosts and
spirits is the same as that of the other manifestations of fate: features,
omens, and dreams, namely the solar fluid and the vital force
or Yang. "When the solar fluid is powerful, but devoid of the Yin,
it can merely produce a semblance, but no body. Being nothing
but the vital fluid without bones or flesh, it is vague and diffuse,
and when it appears, it is soon extinguished again" (Chap. XVIII).

Consequently ghosts and spirits possess the attributes of the
solar fluid:—"The fluid of fire flickers up and down, and so phantoms
are at one time visible, and another, not. A dragon is an
animal resorting from the Yang principle, therefore it can always
change. A ghost is the Yang fluid, therefore it now appears and
then absconds. The Yang fluid is red, hence the ghosts seen by
people, have all uniform crimson colour. Flying demons are Yang,
which is fire. Consequently flying demons shine like fire. Fire
is hot and burning, hence the branches and leaves of trees, on
which these demons alight, wither and die" (eod.). The solar
fluid is sometimes poisonous, therefore a ghost being burning poison,
may eventually kill somebody (Chap. XXIII).

Many other theories on ghosts were current at Wang Ch`ung's
time, one of which very well agrees with his system, to wit that
in many cases ghosts are visions or hallucinations of sick people.
Others were of opinion that ghosts are apparitions of the fluid of
sickness, some held that they are the essence of old creatures.
Another idea was that ghosts originally live in men, and at their
deaths are transformed, or that they are spiritual beings not much
different from man. According to one theory they would be the
spirits of cyclical signs (Chap. XVIII).

According to Wang Ch`ung's idea ghosts and spirits are only
one class of the many wonders and miracles happening between
heaven and earth. "Between heaven and earth, he says, there
are many wonders in words, in sound, and in writing. Either the
miraculous fluid assumes a human shape, or a man has it in himself,
and performs the miracles. The ghosts, which appear, are all
apparitions in human shape. Men doing wonders with the fluid
in them, are sorcerers. Real sorcerers have no basis for what they
say, and yet their lucky or unlucky prophecies fall from their lips
spontaneously like the quaint sayings of boys. The mouth of boys


29

utters those quaint sayings spontaneously, and the idea of their
oration comes to wizards spontaneously. The mouth speaks of
itself, and the idea comes of itself. Thus the assumption of human
form by the miracles, and their sounds are spontaneous, and their
words come forth of their own accord. It is the same thing in
both cases" (loc. cit.). The miraculous fluid may also assume the
shape of an animal like the big hog foreboding the death of Duke
Hsiang of Ch`i (eod.), or of an inanimate thing like the yellow
stone into which Chang Liang was transformed (Chap. XXX).

b) Physics.

Wang Ch`ung does not discriminate between a transcendental
Heaven and a material Sky. He knows but one solid Heaven formed
of the Yang fluid and filled with air.

This Heaven appears to us like an upturned bowl or a reclining
umbrella, but that, says Wang Ch`ung, is an optical illusion
caused by the distance. Heaven and Earth seem to be joined at
the horizon, but experience shows us that that is not the case.
Wang Ch`ung holds that Heaven is as level as Earth, forming a
flat plain (Chap. XX).

Heaven turns from East to West round the Polar Star as a
centre, carrying with it the Sun, the Moon, and the Stars. The
Sun and the Moon have their own movements in opposite direction,
from West to East, but they are so much slower than that of
Heaven, that it carries them along all the same. He compares
their movements to those of ants crawling on a rolling mill-stone
(eod.). Plato makes Heaven rotate like a spindle. The planets
take part in this movement of Heaven, but at the same time, though
more slowly, move in opposite direction by means of the σϕάνδυλΟι
forming the whirl (überweg-Heinze, Geschichte der Philosophie,
vol. I, p. 180).

Heaven makes in one day and one night one complete circumvolution
of 365 degrees. One degree being calculated at 2,000 Li,
the distance made by Heaven every 24 hours measures 730,000 Li.
The sun proceeds only one degree = 2,000 Li, the Moon 13 degrees
= 26,000 Li. Wang Ch`ung states that this is the opinion
of the Literati (eod.). Heaven's movement appears to us very
slow, owing to its great distance from Earth. In reality it is very
fast. The Chinese mathematicians have computed the distance at
upwards of 60,000 Li. The Taoist philosopher Huai Nan Tse avers
that it measures 50,000 Li (Chap. XIX).


30

The body of the Earth is still more solid than that of Heaven
and produced by the Yin fluid. Whereas Heaven is in constant
motion, the Earth does not move (Chap. XX). It measures 10,000 million
square Li, which would be more than 2,500 million square-km.,
and has the shape of a rectangular, equilateral square, which is of
course level. Wang Ch`ung arrives at these figures in the following
way. The city of Loyang in Honan is by the Chinese regarded as
the centre of the world and Annam or Jih-nan as the country over
which the sun in his course reaches the southermost point. Annam
therefore would also be the southern limit of the Earth. The
distance between Loyang and Annam is 10,000 Li. Now, Chinese
who have been in Annam have reported that the sun does not
reach his south-point there, and that it must be still further south.
Wang Ch`ung assumes that it might be 10,000 Li more south. Now
Loyang, though being the centre of the known world i.e. China,
is not the centre of the Earth. The centre of the Earth must be
beneath the Polar Star, the centre of Heaven. Wang Ch`ung supposes
the distance between Loyang and the centre of the Earth below
the pole to be about 30,000 Li. The distance from the centre of
the Earth to its southern limit, the south-point of the sun, thus
measuring about 50,000 Li, the distance from the centre to the
north-point must be the same. That would give 100,000 Li as the
length of the Earth from north to south, and the same number
can be assumed for the distance from east to west (Chap. XIX).

The actual world (China) lies in the south-east of the universe
(Chap. XX). This peculiar idea may owe its origin to the observation
that China lies south of the Polar Star, the centre of Heaven, and
that at the east-side China is bordered by the ocean, whereas in
the west the mainland continues.

Tsou Yen, a scholar of the 4th cent. B.C. has propounded the
doctrine that there are Nine Continents, all surrounded by minor
seas, and that China is but one of them, situated in the south-east.
Beyond the Nine Continents there is still the Great Ocean. Wang
Ch`ung
discredits this view, because neither the Great Yü, who is
believed to have penetrated to the farthest limits of the Earth and
to have written down his observations in the Shan-hai-king, nor
Huai Nan Tse, who had great scholars and experts in his service,
mention anything about different continents (Chap. XIX).

This Earth is high in the North-West and low in the South-East,
consequently the rivers flow eastwards into the ocean (Chap. XX).
This remark again applies only to China, which from the table land
of Central Asia slopes down to the ocean, where all her big rivers flow.


31

Among the celestial bodies the Sun is the most important. He
is a star like the Moon and the Planets, consisting of fire. His
diameter has been found to measure 1,000 Li. The Sun follows
the movement of Heaven, but has his own at the same time. The
common opinion that the sun and the other stars are round is
erroneous. They only appear so by the distance. The Sun is
fire, but fire is not round. The meteors that have been found,
were not round. Meteors are stars, ergo the stars are not round
(loc. cit.).

At noon, when the Sun is in the zenith, he is nearer to us
than in the morning or the evening, because the perpendicular line
from the zenith to the earth is shorter than the oblique lines,
which must be drawn at sunrise or sunset. It is for this reason
also that the sun is hottest, when he is culminating. That the
Sun in the zenith appears smaller than, when he rises or sets,
whereas, being nearer then, he ought to be bigger, is because in
bright daylight every fire appears smaller than in the darkness or
at dawn (eod.).

This question has already been broached by Lieh Tse V, 9
who introduces two lads disputing about it, the one saying that
the Sun must be nearer at sunrise, because he is larger then, the
other retorting that at noon he is hottest, and therefore must be
nearest at noon. Confucius is called upon to solve the problem,
but cannot find a solution.

Wang Ch`ung is much nearer the truth than Epicurus, whose
notorious argument on the size of the sun and the moon, is not
very much to his credit. He pretends that the stars must be
about the size, which they appear to us, because fires did not
lose anything of their heat, or their size by the distance (Diog.
Laert.
X, 91), which is an evident mis-statement. Lucretius repeats
these arguments (Lucr. V, 554-582).

The different lengths of day and night in winter and summer
Wang Ch`ung attributes to the shorter and longer curves described
by the Sun on different days. In his opinion the Sun would take
16 different courses in heaven during the year. Other scholars
speak of 9 only (eod.). Wang Ch`ung is well acquainted with the
winter and summer Solstices and the vernal and autumnal Equinoxes
(eod.).

Whereas the Sun consists of fire, the Moon is water. Her
apparent roundness is an illusion; water has no definite shape
(eod.). Of the movement of the Moon we have already spoken.
In Chinese natural philosophy the Moon is always looked upon as


32

the opposite of the Sun. The Sun being the orb of day and light
is Yang, fire, consequently the Moon, the companion of night and
darkness, must be Yin, water. The Sun appears brilliant and hot
like a burning fire, the Moon pale and cool like glistening water.
What wonder that the ancient Chinese should have taken her for
real water, for Wang Ch`ung merely echoes the general belief.

In the matter of Eclipses Wang Ch`ung does not fall in with
the view of many of his time, to the effect that the Sun and the
Moon over-shadow and cover one another, nor with another theory
explaining the eclipses by the preponderance of either of the two
fluids, the Yin or the Yang, but holds that by a spontaneous movement
of their fluids the Sun or the Moon shrink for a while to
expand again, when the eclipse is over. He notes that those
eclipses are natural and regular phenomena, and that on an average
an eclipse of the Sun occurs every 41 or 42 months, and an eclipse
of the Moon every 180 days (eod.).

Epicurus and Lucretius are both of opinion that the fading of
the Moon may be accounted for in different ways, and that there
would be a possibility that the Moon really decreases i.e. shrinks
together, and then increases again (Diog. Laert. X, 95; Lucr. V,
719-724).

Wang Ch`ung is aware that ebb and high-tide are caused by
the phases of the Moon, and that the famous "Bore" at Hangchou
is not an ebullition of the River, resenting the crime committed
on Wu Tse Hsü, who was unjustly drowned in its waters (p. 48).

The Stars except the Five Planets, which have their proper
movement, are fixed to Heaven, and turn round with it. Their
diameter has been estimated at about 100 Li viz. 1/10; of the diameter
of the Sun. That they do not appear bigger to us than eggs is
the effect of their great distance (Chap. XX). They are made
of the same substances as the Sun and the Moon and the various
things, and not of stone like the meteors. They emit a strong
light. The Five Planets:—Venus, Jupiter, Mercury, Mars, and
Saturn consist of the essence of the Five Elements:—water, fire,
wood, metal, and earth. The fact that the Five Planets are in
Chinese named after the Five Elements:—The Water Star (Mercury),
the Fire Star (Mars), etc. must have led Wang Ch`ung to the belief
that they are actually formed of these elements. The language
must also be held responsible for another error into which Wang
Ch`ung
has fallen. He seems to believe that the stars and constellations
are really what their Chinese names express e. g., that
there are hundreds of officials and two famous charioteers in


33

Heaven, who by emitting their fluid, shape the fate of men, (p. 138)
and that the 28 Solar Mansions are actually celestial postal stations
(Chap. XIX). It is possible however that the intimations of Wang
Ch`ung
to this effect are not to be taken literally, and that he only
makes use of the usual terminology without attaching to them the
meaning which his words would seem to imply. We are sometimes
at a loss to know, whether Wang Ch`ung speaks his mind or
not, for his words are often only rhetorical and dialectical devices
to meet the objections of his opponents.

Wang Ch`ung's ideas on Meteors and Shooting Stars are chiefly
derived from some classical texts. He comes to the conclusion that
such falling stars are not real stars, nor stones, but rain-like phenomena
resembling the falling of stars (Chap. XX).

Rain is not produced by Heaven, and, properly speaking, does
not fall down from it. It is the moisture of earth, which rises
as mist and clouds, and then falls down again. The clouds and
the fog condense, and in summer become Rain and Dew, in winter
Snow and Frost (eod.). There are some signs showing that it is
going to rain. Some insects become excited. Crickets and ants
leave their abodes, and earth-worms come forth. The chords of
guitars become loose, and chronic diseases more virulent. The fluid
of rain has this effect (p. 109).

The same holds good for Wind. Birds foresee a coming storm,
and, when it is going to blow, become agitated. But Wang Ch`ung
goes farther and adopts the extravagant view that wind has a
strange influence on perverted minds, such as robbers and thieves,
prompting them to do their deeds, and that by its direction it influences
the market-prices. From its direction moreover, all sorts
of calamities can be foreseen such as droughts, inundations, epidemics,
and war (p. 111). There is a special science for it, still practised
to-day by the Imperial Observatory at Peking.

Heat and Cold correspond to fire and water, to the regions,
and to the seasons. Near the fire it is hot, near the water, cool.
The Yang fluid is the source of heat, the Yin fluid that of cold.
The South is the seat of the Yang, the North of the Yin. In summer
the Yang fluid predominates, in winter the Yin. The temperature
can never be changed for man's sake, nor does Heaven express
its feelings by it. When it is cold, Heaven is not cool, nor
is it genial and cheerful, when it is warm (Chap. XXI).

When the Yin and the Yang fluids come into collision, we
have Thunder and Lightning (p. 126). The fire of the sun colliding
with the water of the clouds causes an explosion, which is the


34

thunder. Lightning is the shooting forth of the exploding air
(Chap. XXII, XXIX). Wang Ch`ung alleges 5 arguments to prove that
lightning must be fire (Chap. XXII). He ridicules the idea that thunder
is Heaven's angry voice, and that with its thunderbolt it destroys
the guilty. "When lightning strikes, he says, it hits a tree, damages
a house, and perhaps kills a man. But not unfrequently
a thunder-clap is without effect, causing no damage, and destroying
no human life. Does Heaven in such a case indulge in useless
anger?" And why did it not strike a fiend like the Empress
Hou,
but often kills sheep and other innocent animals? (eod.) Lucretius
asks the same question:—

"Quod si Juppiter atque alii fulgentia divi
terrifico quatiunt sonitu cælestia templa
et jaciunt ignem quo qoiquest cumque voluptas,
cur quibus incautum scelus aversabile cumquest
non faciunt icti flammas ut fulguris halent
pectore perfixo, documen mortalibus acre,
et potius nulla sibi turpi conscius in re
volvitur in flammis innoxius inque peditur
turbine cælesti subito correptus et igni?
cur etiam loca sola petunt frustraque laborant?"

(Lucr. VI, 380-389).

The poet states that tempests are brought about by the conflict
of the cold air of winter with the hot air of summer. It is
a battle of fire on the one, and of wind and moisture on the other
side. Lightning is fire (eod. 355-375). Thunder is produced by
the concussion of the clouds chased by the wind (eod. 94seq.).

c) Ethics.

In the Lun-hêng, ethical problems take up but a small space.
Probably Wang Ch`ung has treated them more in detail in his lost
work, the Chi-su-chieh-yi "Censures on Morals." In the Lun-hêng
they are touched upon more incidentally.

Men are all endowed with the same heavenly fluid, which
becomes their vital force and their mind. There is no fundamental
difference in their organisation. But the quantity of the fluids
varies, whence the difference of their characters. "The fluid men
are endowed with, says Wang Ch`ung, is either copious or deficient,
and their characters correspondingly good or bad" (Chap. XXXI).
Epicurus explains the difference of human characters by the different
mixture of the four substances constituting the soul.


35

The vital fluid embraces the Five Elements of Chinese natural
philosophy: Water, fire, wood, metal, and earth, which form the
Five Organs of the body: the heart, the liver, the stomach, the
lungs, and the kidneys. These inner parts are the seats of the
Five Virtues:—benevolence, justice, propriety, knowledge, and truth
(p. 105). The Five Virtues are regarded as the elements of human
character and intelligence. Thus the quantity of the original fluid
has a direct influence upon the character of the person. A small
dose produces but a small heart, a small liver, etc. and these
organs being small the moral and mental qualities of the owner
can be but small, insufficient, bad. The copiousness of the fluid
has the opposite result.

The Five Organs are the substrata of the "Five Virtues."
Any injury of the former affects the latter. When those organs
become diseased, the intellect loses its brightness, and morality
declines, and, when these substrata of the mind and its virtues
are completely destroyed by death, the mind ceases likewise (p. 195).

Being virtually contained in the vital or heavenly fluid, the
Five Virtues must come from Heaven and be heavenly virtues
(Chap. XLIII). Heaven is unconscious and inactive, therefore it
cannot practise virtue in a human way, but the results of the spontaneous
movement of the heavenly fluid are in accordance with virtue.
It would not be difficult to qualify the working of nature as benevolent,
just, and proper, which has been done by all religions, although
unconscious benevolence and unconscious justice are queer
notions, but how about unconscious knowledge and unconscious
truth, the last of the Five Virtues? Wang Ch`ung finds a way out
of this impasse:—"The heart of high Heaven, he says, is in the
bosom of the Sages," an idea expressed already in the Liki (Cf.
Legge's transl. Vol. I, p. 382). Heaven feels and thinks with their
hearts (p. 128 seq.). Heaven has no heart of its own, but the heart
of the Sages as well as of men in general are its hearts, for they have
been produced by the heavenly fluid. This fluid, originally a shapeless
and diffuse mass, cannot think or feel by itself. To become conscious
it requires an organism. In so far it can be said that by
consulting one's own heart, one learns to know the will of Heaven,
that "Heaven acts through man" and that "when it reprimands,
it is done through the mouths of Sages" (eod.).

Wang Ch`ung does not enter upon a discussion on what the
moral law really is, and why it is binding. He simply takes the
Five Virtues in the acceptation given them by the Confucianists.
But he ventilates another question, which has been taken up by


36

almost all the moralists from Mencius downward, that of the original
goodness or badness of human nature. Wang Ch`ung acquaints
us with the different views on this subject. The two extremes
are represented by Mencius, who advocates the original goodness,
and by Hsün Tse, who insists upon its badness. There are many
compromises between these two contrasting theories. Wang Ch`ung
himself takes a middle course, declaring that human natural disposition
is sometimes good, and sometimes bad, just as some people
are by nature very intelligent, while others are feeble-minded
(Chap. XXXII).

Original nature may be changed by external influences. Good
people may become bad, and bad ones may reform and turn good.
Such results can be brought about by intercourse with good or
bad persons. With a view to reforming the wicked the State makes
use of public instruction and criminal law (Chap. XXXI). Wang
Ch`ung
adopts the classification of Confucius, who distinguishes average
people and such above and below the average (Analects VI, 19).
"The character of average people," he says, "is the work of habit.
Made familiar with good, they turn out good, accustomed to evil,
they become wicked. Only with extremely good, or extremely bad
characters habit is of no avail." These are the people above and
below the average. Their characters are so inveterate, that laws
and instructions are powerless against them. They remain what
they are, good or bad (Chap. XXXII).

The cultivation of virtue is better than the adoration of spirits,
who cannot help us (Chap. XLIV). Yet it would be a mistake to believe
that virtue procures happiness. Felicity and misfortune depend
on fate and chance, and cannot be attracted by virtue or crime
(Chap. XXXVIII). On the whole Wang Ch`ung does not think much
of virtue and wisdom at all. He has amalgamated the Confucian
Ethics with his system as far as possible, but the Taoist ideas
suit him much better and break through here and there. The
Taoists urge that virtue and wisdom are a decline from man's original
goodness. Originally people lived in a state of quietude and
happy ignorance. "Virtuous actions were out of the question, and
the people were dull and beclouded. Knowledge and wisdom did
not yet make their appearance" (p. 100). They followed their
natural propensities, acted spontaneously, and were happy. Such
was the conduct of the model emperors of antiquity, Huang Ti, Yao,
and Shun. They lived in a state of quietude and indifference, did
not work, and the empire was governed by itself (p. 98). They
merely imitated Heaven, who's principle is spontaneity and inaction.


37

Now-a-days this high standard can only be attained by
the wisest and best men. "A man with the highest, purest, and
fullest virtue has been endowed with a large quantity of the
heavenly fluid, therefore he can follow the example of Heaven,
and be spontaneous and inactive like it" (loc. cit.). He need not
trouble about virtue, or act on purpose, for he is naturally virtuous,
and all his spontaneous deeds are excellent. The majority
of people, however, cannot reach this height. Having received
but a small quota of the heavenly fluid, they cannot follow its
example, and become active. They practise the routine virtues,
which for the superior man, who naturally agrees with them, are
of little importance.

d) Critique.

Wang Ch`ung not only criticises the common ideas, superstitions,
and more or less scientific theories current at his time, but he also
gives his judgment upon the principal scholars, whose tenets he
either adopts or controverts, and it is not without interest to learn,
how he values well known philosophers and historians.

α) Philosophers.

Of all philosophers by far the most frequently cited is Confucius.
In Wang Ch`ung's estimation he is the Sage of China. He
calls him the "Nestor in wisdom and virtue, and the most eminent
of all philosophers" (Chap. XXXII). Wang Ch`ung seems to believe
that he has won his cause, whenever he can quote Confucius as his
authority, and that with a dictum of the Sage he can confound
all his adversaries. In quoting Confucius he uses great liberty, interpreting
his utterances so as to tally with his own views. But
this veneration does not prevent him from criticising even Confucius.
He thinks it necessary to vindicate himself from the charge of
impiety and immorality, intimating that even Sages and Worthies
are not infallible and may err sometimes (Chap. XXXIII). He might
have done anything else, but this offence the Literati will never condone.
His attacks on Confucius are very harmless and not even very
clever. He does not impugn the Confucian system, which on the
contrary he upholds, though he departs from it much farther than
he himself knows. His method consists in hunting up contradictions
and repugnancies in the Analects. He not seldom constructs
a contradiction, where there is none at all, by putting much
more into the words of Confucius than they contain. He forgets


38

that in freely talking with friends or pupils—and the Analects
are nothing else than such conversations—one does not weigh
every word. Besides the peculiar circumstances and the form of
mind of the speaker must be taken into consideration, which Wang
Ch`ung
often neglects. In short, the essay on Confucius is in no
way a master-piece of criticism and not worth the fuss made about it.

Mencius, the second Sage, is also very often mentioned. Wang
Ch`ung
holds him in high esteem, but treats his work in the same
way as the Analects. The objections raised keep more or less on
the surface, and do not affect the substance of his doctrine.

The highest praise is bestowed on Yang Hsiung, another famous
Confucianist of the Han epoch. Wang Ch`ung compares the historian
Sse Ma Ch`ien with the Yellow River and Yang Hsiung with the Han
(Chap. XXXVII). He rose like a star (p. 81), and his chief work,
the T`ai-hsüan-ching was a creation (p. 88).

Like Huai Nan Tse, Wang Ch`ung very often mentions Mê Ti
conjointly with Confucius as the two great Sages of antiquity. At
that time the fame of Confucius had not yet eclipsed the philosopher
of mutual love. Though appreciating him, Wang Ch`ung rejects his
system as unpractical, maintaining that its many contradictions
have prevented its spreading (Chap. XXXVII). The Mêhists believe
in ghosts and spirits and adore them, imploring their help. At the
same time they neglect the funerals and the dead, and they deny
the existence of fate.

When Lao Tse is referred to, he is usually introduced together
with Huang Ti, who like Lao Tse is looked upon as the
father of Taoism. They are both called truly wise (p. 98). The
Taoist school established the principle of spontaneity and inaction.
The philosophy of Wang Ch`ung is to a great extent based on their
doctrines without, however, becoming Taoistic, for he leaves out
the quintessence of their system, Tao, nor will he have anything
of their transcendentalism, mysticism or other extravagancies.

Wang Ch`ung is well acquainted with the Taoist writer Huai
Nan Tse,
from whose work he freely culls, oftener than he mentions
him. He refutes the legend that Huai Nan Tse by his alchimistical
studies obtained immortality, and with his entire household,
including his dogs and poultry ascended to Heaven, submitting
that he either was beheaded for some political intrigues
or committed suicide (Chap. XXVIII).

Against Han Fei Tse, who wrote on the theory of government
and legislation, and whose writings are strougly tainted with
Taoism, Wang Ch`ung shows a pronounced antipathy. He most


39

vehemently attacks him for having declared the scholars and literati
to be useless grubs in the State. Han Fei Tse was of opinion
that rewards and punishments were sufficient to keep up order.
Wang Ch`ung objects that in his system virtue has no place. Han
Fei Tse
despises divination, which Wang Ch`ung defends. Han Fei
Tse
was much appreciated by the Emperor Ch`in Shih Huang Ti, a
great admirer of his works, which, however, did not hinder the
tyrant from condemning him to death for some political reason.

It is passing strange that the great Taoist philosophers Lieh
Tse
and Ch`uang Tse are not once named. Were they so little read
at Wang Ch`ung's time, that he did not know them? Some of his
stories are told in Lieh Tse likewise with nearly the same words,
but it does not follow, that they must be quoted from Lieh Tse,
for such narrations are often found in several authors, one copying
from the other without acknowledging his source.

A scholar, of whom Wang Ch`ung speaks very often is Tung
Chung Shu,
a very prolific writer of the 2nd cent. b.c. He was said
by many to have completed the doctrine of Confucius, while others
held that he had perverted it. Wang Ch`ung thinks that both views
are wrong (Chap. XXXVII). Tung Chung Shu devoted his labours to
the Ch`un-ch iu, but he also wrote on the magical arts (p. 84) and
on Taoism. Wang Ch`ung says that his arguments on Taoist doctrines
are very queer, but that his ideas on morals and on government
are excellent. In human nature Tung Chung Shu distinguishes
between natural disposition and feeling. The former,
he says, is the outcome of the Yang principle and therefore good, the
feelings are produced by the Yin and are therefore bad (Chap. XXXII).
Tung Chung Shu seems to have been the inventor of a special
rain-sacrifice. The figure of a dragon was put up to attract the
rain. Wang Ch`ung stands up for it with great fervour and attempts
to prove its efficacy (p. 55, N. 47).

Of Tsou Yen many miracles were already related at Wang
Ch`ung's
time. He rejects them as fictions. Tsou Yen's writings
were brilliant, he says, but too vague and diffuse (Chap. XXXVII).
With his above mentioned theory of the Nine Continents Wang
Ch`ung
does not agree.

The sophist Kung Sun Lung as well as Kuan Tse and Shang
Yang,
who both have philosophised on the State, are rather severely
dealt with (Chap. XXXVII). On the other hand Wang Ch`ung
is very lavish in his praise of the writers of the Han time viz. Liu
Hsiang, Lu Chia,
author of the Hsin-yü, a work on government, Huan
Chün Shan,
author of the Hsin-lun, and Huan K`uan, who wrote the


40

Yen-t`ieh-lun, a work on finance and other State questions. Besides
Wang Ch`ung gives the names of a number of his contemporaries
to whom he predicts immortality, but he has been a bad prophet,
for save one they are all forgotten now.

β) Historians.

It was a great controversy during the Han epoch, which
commentary to the Ch`un-ch`iu was the best. The Tso-chuan had
not yet secured the position, it holds now; many scholars gave
the preference to the works of Kung Yang or Ku Liang. Wang
Ch`ung
avers that Tso Ch`iu Ming's Tso-chuan surpasses all the others,
and that having lived nearer to Confucius' time than the other
commentators, Tso Ch`iu Ming has had more facilities to ascertain
the views of the Sage and to give them in their purest form.
Wang Ch`ung confirms that the Kuo-yü is also the work of Tso
ch`iu Ming
(Chap. XXXVII). Many of Wang Ch`ung's stories and
myths are taken from the Tso-chuan.

Of the Lü-shih-ch`un-ch`iu of Lü Pu Wei, an important work
for antique lore, Wang Ch`ung says that it contains too much of
the marvellous.

To illustrate his theories Wang Ch`ung often lays the Shi-chi
under contribution. Of its author, Sse Ma Ch`ien, he speaks with
great deference, and regards him as the greatest writer of the Han
period. What he reproaches him with, is that Sse Ma Ch`ien too
often leaves us in the dark as to his own opinion on a question,
stating only the bare facts, or giving two different versions of the
same event without deciding, which is the correct one (loc. cit.).

Pan Ku, Wang Ch`ung's contemporary and the son of his
teacher Pan Piao, is lauded for his good verses and memorials
(loc. cit.). He is the one contemporary of our philosopher, who
really has become immortal by his great work, the Han-shu. At
Wang Ch`ung's time it had not yet appeared, and so is never referred
to. It was completed and published after Pan Ku's death
by his sister Pan Chao.

That he possesses some abilities in the field of literary and
historical critique himself, Wang Ch`ung shows in his remarks on
the origin and history of the Classics. He tells us, how they were
composed, how discovered after the Burning of the Books, how
handed down, and how divided into books and chapters (Chap.
XXXVI). In spite of his profound veneration for the classical
literature he does not hesitate to censure those passages, which do
not find his approval, or to expose the exaggerations and fables


41

with which they teem (p. 51, N. 27). In like manner he is indefatigable
in detecting Taoist fictions and inventions and in reducing
them to their true measure, for it does not satisfy him to
demonstrate their impossibility; he desires to find out, how they
originated (p. 50, N. 24). He combats the legends which have
found their way into the historical literature, although they are
less frequent than in the Taoist works (p. 50, N. 25-26). The
entire Lun-hêng is a big battle agains these errors. His discussions
would seem sometimes a little lengthy, and the subject not to require
such an amount of arguments, for we would prove the same with
a few words, or not discuss it at all, the proposition being for us
self-evident. We must however bear in mind, that what for us
now is self-evident and indisputable, was not so for the Chinese,
for whom Wang Ch`ung wrote his book, and that to shake them in
their deep-seated persuasions a huge apparatus of logic was necessary.
Even then probably the majority held fast to their preconceptions.
The triumphant march of logic is checked, as soon
as sentiment and prejudice comes in.

Historically Wang Ch`ung takes another point of view than
his contemporaries, who for the most part took little interest in
their own time, and let their fancies wander back to the golden
age of remote antiquity. Wang Ch`ung is more modern than most
Chinese of the present day. He was of opinion that the Han dynasty
was as good, even better than the famous old dynasties
(p. 56, N. 56). Five essays bear upon this thesis. His reasoning
is very lame however, for instead of speaking of the government,
he only treats of the auspicious portents proving the excellence of
the ruling sovereigns.

e) Religion and Folklore.

The religion of the Chinese at the Han time was a cult of
nature combined with ancestor worship. They regarded certain
parts of nature and certain natural phenomena as spirits or as
animated by spirits, and tried to propitiate them and the ghosts
of their ancestors by prayers and sacrifices. Convinced that these
spirits and ghosts could help them, or do them harm, as they
chose, they contrived to win their good graces, praying for happiness,
imploring them to avert evil, and showing their gratitude for
received benefits by their offerings.

The chief deities worshipped during the Chou period were:—


42

Heaven and its parts:—the Sun, the Moon, and the Stars. Among
the latter the Five Planets take the first place, but the 28 Solar
Mansions
and other constellations, such as the Dipper and the Stars
of Longevity
were likewise adored.

Earth and its parts, Mountains and Rivers, the Soil, and the
Grain growing on it, and some of its phenomena:—Earth-quakes,
Water
(Inundations), and Droughts.

Meteorological phenomena:—Wind and Rain, Heat and Cold,
Thunder
and Lightning.

The Four Seasons and the Four Quarters.

The Five Parts of the House:—The Gate, the Door, the Wall,
the Hearth, and the Court.

Deified Heaven was often looked upon as an emperor, the Emperor
on High or the Supreme Ruler, and so were the Planets,
called the Blue, Red, Yellow, White, and Black Emperors. The
other stars and constellations were their officials. All these deities
have, as a rule, no distinct personality, and still quite clearly show
the traces of their origin. The "Prince of the Wind," the "Master
of Rain," the "Thunderer," the "Door God," and the "Spirit of
the Hearth" or "Kitchen God" were perhaps more than the
others apprehended as personal gods.

The Spirits of the Soil and Grain were at the outset probably
not different from the other spirits animating nature, but according
to very old traditions two persons:—Kou Lung and Ch`i have after
their deaths been deified and raised to the rank of tutelary genii
of the land and grain. These apotheoses of men after their death
became more frequent in later ages. Under the Ch`in dynasty
Ch`ih Yu, a legendary personage renownded for his military exploits,
was worshipped as War God. The three sons of the mythical
emperor Chuan Hsü after their death became Water Spirits and Spirits
of Epidemics,
and a woman, who had died in childbed, and whose
ghost had appeared to somebody after her decease, was made
Princess of Demons under the Han dynasty.

Here we have ancestral worship. Every family used to revere
the ghosts of its deceased ancestors, but only in such exceptional
cases as those quoted above did these ghosts later on become
national gods.

The cult of the afore-mentioned deities was continued during
the Han epoch, and with some few alterations has gone on up to
the present day. It is the State religion of China, sanctioned by
Government, and practised by the Son of Heaven and his highest
officials. Buddhism and Taoism are only tolerated. Confucianism


43

is no religion, but the official moral system, which completely
agrees with the cult of nature.

The sacrifices to the spirits of nature were in ancient times
performed by the Emperor, the Feudal Princes, and the officials,
acting as high-priests for their people. The people used to sacrifice
only to their own ancestors and to the Spirits of the Door or
the Hearth. The oblations were burnt-offerings of animals and
libations of wine. There was no clergy to mediate between the
gods and the people. These rules were less strictly observed
during the Han epoch, when occasionally priests sacrificed in the
place of the Emperor, and even priestesses were allowed to make
offerings in their temples. In out-of-the-way places, where no
officials were near, the people could themselves worship the gods,
whose service else was incumbent upon the magistrates (cf. Chap. XLI,
XLII and Shi-chi chap. 27-28).

Wang Ch`ung asserts that most of these sacrifices are superfluous,
because the deities thus honoured are merely parts of others,
to which offerings are made likewise. The Sun, the Moon, and the
Stars are parts of Heaven. They must participate in the oblations
offered to Heaven, why then give them special sacrifices to boot?
With Mountains and Rivers, the Soil and Grain, which are the
constituent parts of Earth, it is the same. Would any reasonable
person, irrespective of his usual meals, specially feed his limbs?
(Chap. XLI.)

Moreover, spirits and ghosts cannot enjoy the sacrifices, for
there are none, at least not personal beings, as people seem to
imagine (Chap. XLIV). If they were air, they could not eat nor smell,
and if they had a body, it would be so enormous, that men could
never satisfy their appetite. How should they feed the Earth or even
a Mountain or a River? (eod. and Chap. XLI.) Being formed of the
shapeless fluid, ghosts and spirits can neither feel nor act, consequently
they cannot do anything for man nor against him. Ergo by sacrifices
he does not obtain his end, divine protection (Chap. XLII). Therefore
sacrifices can be nothing more than symbolical acts, showing
the gratitude and the affection of the sacrificer. He is thankful
for all the kindness he has received from Heaven and Earth, and
from his parents and forefathers (eod.). Sacrifices are manifestations
of the piety of him, who offers them, but their omission cannot
have any evil consequence.

Exorcism is the correlate of prayers and sacrifices. The ancient
Chinese used to practise it particularly with the Spirit of
Sickness, whom they expelled. Wang Ch`ung thinks it as useless as


44

sacrifices, for, says he, provided the spirits are mist and vapours,
they cannot do any harm, should they really exist, however, then
they would indubitably not allow themselves to be driven off.
They would not only offer resistance, but also resent the affront,
and take their revenge upon the exorcist (Chap. XLIV).

Primitive Chinese religion has not produced a mythology
worth speaking of, but a variety of superstitions have clustered
around it. Some of them Wang Ch`ung brings to our notice. The
principle aim of Chinese religion is to obtain happiness and to
remove evil. But is does not suffice to worship the spirits, one
must also avoid such actions, as might bring down misfortune. In
the popular belief there is a certain mystic connection, a sort of
harmony between fate and human activity, though one does not
see how. When the Yamen officials are very bad, the number of
tigers increases so much, that plenty of people are devoured by
them. The rapacity of the underlings is believed to cause grubs
and insects to eat grain (p. 55, N. 48-49). It is dangerous to extend
a building to the west, one must not see women who recently
have given birth to a child, and children born in the first or the
fifth months should not be brought up, for they will be the cause
of their parents death (p. 59, N. 68). Exceptional precautions must
be taken in building a new house (p. 60, N. 74).

For most actions in every-day-life the time chosen is of the
utmost importance. An unlucky time spoils everything. The Chinese
at the Han epoch had not only their dies fasti and nefasti, but propitious
and unpropitious years, months, days, and hours. Special
books gave the necessary information. For some actions certain
lucky days had to be chosen, for others certain unlucky ones had
to be avoided. Special days were assigned for the commencing of
a new-building or for funerals. Bathing on certain days, women
were sure to become lovely, on others they would become ill-favoured.
Moving one's residence one should avoid a collision
with the Spirit of the North, T`ai Sui (p. 59, N. 70, 72, 73). People
neglecting these rules would fall in with malignant spirits, or meet
with evil influences. These ideas have come down to our time, and
are still cherished by the majority of the Chinese. The calendar
published every year by the Board of Astronomy serves them as
a guide, noting that which may be safely done on each day, and
that which may not. Wang Ch`ung has done his best to eradicate
these superstitions, showing their unreasonableness and futility, as
we see with little success, so deeply are they still rooted in the
Chinese mind after nearly two thousand years.


45

4. Table of Contents of the Lun-hêng.

Book I.

1. Chap. I. Fêng-yü [OMITTED].

This chapter treats of the relation between officers and their
sovereign. To be appreciated and successful an official must find
the right prince, who understands him and puts him in the right
place. One must not make the successful responsible for their
success, or the unsuccessful for their failure, because not their talents,
but time and circumstances are decisive.

2. Chap. II. Lei-hai [OMITTED].

The difficulties and annoyances which people have to endure
come from abroad, and are not the result of their own works. Therefore
they must not be blamed. Fear and good conduct have no
influence on fortune or misfortune. "Fortune is what we obtain
without any effort of our own, and misfortune what happens to
us without our co-operation." The chief annoyances of officials at
the court and in the provinces are slanderous reports of envious
persons. Three kinds of calumnies are distinguished. The wise
do not feel troubled about this, and lead the life which most
suits them.

*3. Chap. III. Ming-lu [OMITTED] (On Destiny and Fortune).

Destiny predetermines the length of man's life, and whether
he shall be rich and honourable, or poor and mean. There is no
correspondence between human virtue and fate. The wicked and
the unintelligent are very often happy, whereas men endowed with
the highest faculties and the noblest character perish in misery,
as is shown by various examples from history. The knowing,
therefore, do not hunt after happiness, but leave everything to
Heaven, suffering with equanimity what cannot be avoided, and
placidly awaiting their turn. The opinions of several philosophers
holding similar views are given.

*4. Chap. IV. Ch`i-shou [OMITTED] (Long Life and Vital Fluid).

There are two kinds of fate, the one determining the events
of life, the other its length. The length of life depends on the


46

quantity of the vital fluid received at birth. Accordingly the body
waxes strong or weak, and a strong body lives longer than a
feeble one. The normal length of human life should be a hundred
years. The Classics attest that the wise emperors of the Golden
Age:—Yao, Shun, Wén Wang, Wu Wang, and others all lived over
hundred years.

Book II.

*5. Chap. I. Hsing-ou [OMITTED] (On Chance and Luck).

Happiness and misfortune are not the outcome of man's good
or bad actions, but chance and luck. Some have good luck, others
bad. Good and bad fortune are not distributed in a just way,
according to worth, but are mere chance. This is true of man
as well as of other beings. Even Sages are often visited with
misfortune.

*6. Chap. II. Ming-yi [OMITTED] (What is meant by Destiny?).

The school of Mé Ti denies the existence of Destiny. Wang
Ch`ung
follows the authority of Confucius. There are various kinds
of destinies. The length of human life is regulated by the fluid
of Heaven, their wealth and honour by the effluence of the stars,
with which men are imbued at their birth. Wang Ch`ung rejects
the distinction of natural, concomitant, and adverse fate, but admits
contingencies, chances, and incidents, which may either agree with
the original fate and luck, or not. The fate of a State is always
stronger than that of individuals.

*7. Chap. III. Wu-hsing [OMITTED] (Unfounded Assertions).

At birth man receives the vital fluid from Heaven. This
fluid determines the length of his life. There are no means to
prolong its duration, as the Taoists pretend. Some examples from
history are shown to be untrustworthy. At death everything ends.
The vital force disperses, and the body is dissolved.

*8. Chap. IV. Shuai-hsing [OMITTED] (The Forming of Characters).

There are naturally good, and there are naturally bad characters,
but this difference between the qualities of low and superior
men is not fundamental. The original fluid permeating all is the
same. It contains the germs of the Five Virtues. Those who are


47

endowed with copious fluids, become vrituous, those whose fluid
is deficient, wicked. But by external influences, human nature can
turn from good into bad, and the reverse. Bad people can be improved,
and become good by instruction and good example. Therefore
the State cannot dispense with instructions and laws.

*9. Chap. V. Chi-yen [OMITTED] (Auspicious Portents).

Auspicious portents appear, when somebody is destined to
something grand by fate, especially, when a new dynasty rises.
These manifestations of fate appear either in the person's body,
or as lucky signs in nature, or under the form of a halo or a
glare. A great variety of instances from ancient times down to
the Han dynasty are adduced in proof.

Book III.

10. Chap. I. Ou-hui [OMITTED].

Fate acts spontaneously. There are no other alien forces at
work besides fate. Nobody is able to do anything against it.
Human activity is of no consequence.

*11. Chap. II. Ku-hsiang [OMITTED] (On Anthroposcopy).

The heavenly fate becomes visible in the body, and can be
foreseen by anthroposcopy. The Classics contain examples. The
physiognomists draw their conclusions from the osseous structure
and from the lines of the skin. The character can also be seen
from the features.

*12. Chap. III. Ch`u-ping [OMITTED] (Heaven's Original Gift).

Destiny comes down upon man already in his embryonic state,
not later on during his life. It becomes mind internally and body
externally. This law governs all organisms. Heaven never invests
virtuous emperors, because it is pleased with them, for this would
be in opposition to its principle of spontaneity and inaction. Utterances
of the Classics that Heaven was pleased and looked round,
etc. are to be taken in a figurative sense. Heaven has no human
body and no human qualities. Lucky omens are not sent by Heaven,
but appear by chance.


48

*13. Chap. IV. Pén-hsing [OMITTED] (On Original Nature).

The different theories of Chinese moralists on human nature
are discussed. Shih Tse holds that human nature is partly good,
partly bad, Mencius that it is originally good, but can be corrupted,
Sun Tse that it is originally bad, Kao Tse that it is neither good
nor bad, and that it all depends on instruction and development,
Lu Chia that it is predisposed for virtue. Tung Chung Shu and
Liu Hsiang distinguish between natural disposition and natural feelings.
Wang Ch`ung holds that nature is sometimes good and sometimes
bad, but essentially alike, being the fluid of Heaven, and
adopts the Confucian distinction of average people, people above,
and people below the average. The latter alone can be changed
by habit.

*14. Chap. V. Wu-shih [OMITTED] (The Nature of Things).

Heaven and Earth do not create man and the other things
on earth intentionally. They all grow of themselves. Had Heaven
produced all creatures on purpose, it would have taught them
mutual love, whereas now one destroys the other. Some have explained
this struggle for existence by the hypothesis that all creatures
are filled with the fluid of the Five Elements, which fight together
and overcome one another. Wang Ch`ung controverts this view and
the symbolism connected therewith.

*15. Chap. VI. Chi-kuai [OMITTED] (Miracles).

Wang Ch`ung proves by analogies that the supernatural births
reported of several old legendary rulers, who are said to have been
procreated by dragons or a special fluid of Heaven, are impossible.
The Spirit of Heaven would not consort with a woman, for only
beings of the same species pair. Saints and Sages are born like
other people from their parents.

Book IV.

16. Chap. I. Shu-hsü [OMITTED].

The chapter contains a refutation of a series of wrong statements
in ancient books. The assertion that Shun and died in the
South is shown to be erroneous. Wang Ch`ung explodes the idea
that the "Bore" at Hang-chou is caused by the angry spirit of
Wu Tse Hsü, who was thrown into the Ch`ien-t`ang River, and remarks
that the tide follows the phases of the moon. (Bk. IV, p. 5v.)


49

17. Chap. II. Pien-hsü [OMITTED].

Wang Ch`ung points out that many reports in ancient literature
concerning extraordinary phenomena, not in harmony with the laws
of nature, are fictitious and unreliable, e. g. the story that touched
by the virtue of Duke Ching of Sung, the planet Mars shifted its
place, that Heaven rewarded the Duke with 21 extra years, or that
the great Diviner of Ch`i caused an earthquake.

Book V.

18. Chap. I. Yi-hsü [OMITTED].

The impossibility of some miracles and supernatural events
is demonstrated, which have been handed down in ancient works,
and are universally believed by the people and the literati, e. g. the
birth of Pao Sse from the saliva of dragons.

19. Chap. II. Kan-hsü [OMITTED].

Wang Ch`ung contests that nature can be moved by man and
deviate from its course. Various old legends are critically tested:—
the alleged appearence of ten suns in Yao's time, the report that
the sun went back in his course, the wonders which happened
during the captivity of Tsou Yen and Tan, Prince of Yen.

The tenor of the last four chapters all treating of unfounded
assertions or figments "hsü" is very similar.

Book VI.

*20. Chap. I. Fu-hsü [OMITTED] (Wrong Notions about Happiness).

Happiness is not given by Heaven as a reward for good actions,
as the general belief is. The Mêhist theory that the spirits protect
and help the virtuous is controverted by facts. Wang Ch`ung
shows how several cases, adduced as instances of how Heaven recompensed
the virtuous are illusive, and that fate is capricious
and unjust.

*21. Chap. II. Huo-hsü [OMITTED] (Wrong Notions on Unhappiness).

The common belief that Heaven and Earth and the spirits
punish the wicked and visit them with misfortune, is erroneous,
as shown by examples of virtuous men, who were unlucky, and
of wicked, who flourished. All this is the result of chance and
luck, fate and time.


50

*22. Chap. III. Lung-hsü [OMITTED] (On Dragons).

The dragon is not a spirit, but has a body and lives in pools.
It is not fetched by Heaven during a thunderstorm, as people believe.
The different views about its shape are given:—It is represented
as a snake with a horse's head, as a flying creature, as a reptile
that can be mounted, and like earthworms and ants. In ancient
times dragons were reared and eaten. The dragon rides on the
clouds during the tempest, there being a certain sympathy between
the dragon and clouds. It can expand and contract its body, and
make itself invisible.

*23. Chap. IV. Lei-hsü [OMITTED] (On Thunder and Lightning).

Thunder is not the expression of Heaven's anger. As a spirit
it could not give a sound, nor could it kill a man with its
breath. It does not laugh either. Very often the innocent are
struck by lightning, and monsters like the Empress Lü Hou are
spared. The pictorial representations of thunder as united drums,
or as the thunderer Lei Kung, are misleading. Thunder is fire or
hot air, the solar fluid Yang exploding in its conflict with the Yin
fluid, lightning being the shooting forth of the air. Five arguments
are given, why thunder must be fire.

Book VII.

*24. Chap. I. Tao-hsü [OMITTED] (Taoist Untruths).

Man dies and can become immortal. The Taoist stories of
Huang Ti and Huai Nan Tse's ascension to heaven, of the flying
genius met by Lu Ao, and of Hsiang Man Tse's travel to the moon
are inventions. The magicians do not possess the powers ascribed
to them. The Taoist theory of prolonging life by quietism and
dispassionateness, by regulating one's breath, and using medicines
is untenable.

*25. Chap. II. Yü-tsêng [OMITTED] (Exaggerations).

Wang Ch`ung points out a number of historical exaggerations
e. g. that the embonpoint of Chieh and Chou was over a foot, that
Chou had a wine-lake, from which 3,000 persons sucked like cattle,
that Wên Wang could drink 3,000 bumpers of wine, and Confucius
100 gallons, and some mis-statements concerning the simplicity of
Yao and Shun, and the cruelty of Shih Huang Ti, and tries to reduce
them to the proper limits.


51

Book VIII.

*26. Chap. I. Ju-tsêng [OMITTED] (Exaggerations of the Literati).

Wang Ch`ung goes on to criticise some old traditions:—on the
abolition of punishments under Yao and Shun, on the wonderful
shooting of Yang Yu Chi and Hsiung Ch`ü Tse, on the skill of Lu Pan,
on Ching K`o's attempt upon Shih Huang Ti's life, on the miracles
connected with the Nine Tripods of the Chou dynasty, etc.

27. Chap. II. Yi-tsêng [OMITTED].

People are fond of the marvellous and of exaggerations, in
witness whereof passages are quoted from the Shuking, the Shiking,
the Yiking, the Lun-yü, and the Ch`un-ch`iu.

Book IX.

*28. Chap. I. Wên K`ung [OMITTED] (Criticisms on Confucius).

The Confucianists do not dare to criticise the Sages, although
the words of the Sages are not always true and often contradictory.
It is also, because they do not understand the difficult
passages, and only repeat what the commentators have said. Wang
Ch`ung
vindicates the right to criticise even Confucius. Such criticisms
are neither immoral nor irrational. They help to bring out
the meaning, and lead to greater clearness. Wang Ch`ung then takes
up a number of passages from the Analects for discussion, in which
he discovers contradictions or other flaws, but does not criticise
the system of Confucius or his theories in general.

Book X.

*29. Chap. I. Fei Han [OMITTED] (Strictures on Han Fei Tse).

Han Fei Tse solely relies on rewards and punishments to govern
a State. In his system there is no room for the cultivation of
virtue. He despises the literati as useless, and thinks the world
to be so depraved and mean, that nothing but penal law can keep
it in check. Wang Ch`ung shows by some examples taken from Han
Fei Tse's
work that this theory is wrong. Men of letters are as
useful to the State as agriculturists, warriors, and officials, for they
cultivate virtue, preserve the true principles, and benefit the State
by the good example they set to the other classes.


52

*30. Chap. II. T`se Mêng [OMITTED] (Censures on Mencius).

Wang Ch`ung singles out such utterances of Mencius, in which
according to his view his reasoning is defective, or which are conflicting
with other dicta of the philosopher.

Book XI.

*31. Chap. I. T`an-t`ien [OMITTED] (On Heaven).

The old legend of the collapse of Heaven, which was repaired
by Nü Wa, when Kung Kung had knocked with his head against
the "Pillar of Heaven," is controverted, as is Tsou Yen's theory
of the existence of Nine Continents. Heaven is not merely air,
but has a body, and the earth is a square measuring 100,000 Li
in either direction.

*32. Chap. II. Shuo-jih [OMITTED] (On the Sun).

A variety of astronomical questions are touched. Wang Ch`ung
opposes the view that the sun disappeares in darkness during the
night, that the length or shortness of the days is caused by the
Yin and the Yang, that the sun rises from Fu-sang and sets in
Hsi-liu, that at Yao's time ten suns appeared, that there is a raven
in the sun, and a hare and a toad in the moon. Heaven is not
high in the south and depressed in the north, nor like a reclining
umbrella, nor does it enter into or revolve in the earth. Heaven
is level like earth, and the world lying in the south-east. The sun
at noon is nearer than in the morning or in the evening. Wang
Ch`ung
further speaks on the rotation of the sky, the sun, and the
moon, on the substance of the sun and the moon, on their shape,
the cause of the eclipses, meteors, and meteorological phenomena.

33. Chap. III. Ta-ning [OMITTED].

On the cunning and artful.

Book XII.

34. Chap. I. Ch`êng-t`sai [OMITTED].

The difference between scholars and officials is pointed out.
Wang Ch`ung stands up for the former, and places them higher than
the officials, because they are of greater importance to the State.
The people however think more of the officials.


53

35. Chap. II. Liang-chih [OMITTED].

The same subject as treated in the preceding chapter.

36. Chap. III. Hsieh-tuan [OMITTED].

Men of letters as well as officials have their shortcomings.
The former are interested in antiquity only, and neglect the present,
the Ch`in and Han time. They only know the Classics, but even
many questions concerning the age and the origin of the Classics
they cannot answer. The officials know their business, but often
cannot say, why they do a thing, since they do not possess the
necessary historical knowledge.

Book XIII.

37. Chap. I. Hsiao-li [OMITTED].

The chapter treats of the faculties of the scholars and the
officials, and of their energy and perseverance displayed in different
departments.

38. Chap. II. Pieh-t`ung [OMITTED].

There is the same difference between the learned and the
uncultivated as between the rich and the poor. Learning is a
power and more important than wealth.

39. Chap. III. Ch`ao-chi [OMITTED].

There are various degrees of learning. Some remarks are
made on the works of several scholars, e.g. the philosopher Yang
Tse Yün
and the two historians Pan.

Book XIV.

40. Chap. I. Chuang-liu [OMITTED].

Scholars do not strive for office. As for practical success
they are outrivalled by the officials, who are men of business.

*41. Chap. II. Han-wên [OMITTED] (On Heat and Cold).

Wang Ch`ung contests the assertion of the phenomenalists that
there is a correspondence between heat and cold and the joy and
anger of the sovereign. He points out that the South is the seat
of heat, and the North of cold. Moreover the temperature depends
on the four seasons and the 24 time-periods.


54

*42 Chap. III. Ch`ien-kao [OMITTED] (On Reprimands).

The savants hold that Heaven reprimands a sovereign whose
administration is bad, visiting him with calamities. First the causes
extraordinary events. If the sovereign does not change then, he
sends down misfortunes upon his people, and at last he punishes
his own person. Heaven is represented like a prince governing
his people. These heavenly punishments would be at variance
with Heaven's virtue, which consists in spontaneity and inaction.
Heaven does not act itself, it acts through man, and speaks
through the mouths of the Sages, in whose hearts is ingrafted its
virtue. The utterances of the Classics ascribing human qualities
to Heaven are only intended to give more weight to those teachings,
and to frighten the wicked and the unintelligent.

Book XV.

*43. Chap. I. Pien-tung [OMITTED] (Phenomenal Changes).

Heaven influences things, but is not affected by them. All
creatures being filled with the heavenly fluid, Heaven is the master,
and not the servant. The Yang and the Yin move things, but are
not moved. The deeds and the prayers of a tiny creature like
man cannot impress the mighty fluid of Heaven, and the sobs of
thousands of people cannot touch it. Heaven is too far, and its
fluid shapeless without beginning or end. It never sets the laws
of nature aside for man's sake.

44. Chap. II. Chao-chih [OMITTED].

(This chapter has been lost.)

45. Chap. III. Ming-yü [OMITTED].

The rain sacrifice, which during the Ch`un-ch`iu period was
performed at times of drought, forms the subject of this essay.
People use to pray for rain and happiness, as they implore the
spirits to avert sickness and other evils. Some believe that rain
is caused by the stars, others that it depends on the government
of a State, others again that it comes from the mountains. The
last opinion is shared by Wang Ch`ung.

46. Chap. IV. Shun-ku [OMITTED].

The chapter treats of the religious ceremonies performed to
avert inundations, in which the beating of drums is very important.


55

Book XVI.

47. Chap. I. Luan-lung [OMITTED].

As a means to attract the rain by the sympathetic action of
similar fluids Tung Chung Shu had put up a clay dragon. Wang
Ch`ung
attempts to demonstrate the efficacy of this procedure by
15 arguments and 4 analogies.

48. Chap. II Tsao-hu [OMITTED].

Wang Ch`ung controverts the popular belief that, when men
are devoured by tigers, it is the wickedness of secretaries and minor
officials which causes these disasters.

49. Chap. III. Shang-ch`ung [OMITTED].

The common belief that the eating of the grain by insects
is a consequence of the covetousness of the yamen underlings is
shown to be futile.

*50. Chap. IV. Chiang-jui [OMITTED] (Arguments on Ominous
Creatures).

Wang Ch`ung denies that the literati would be able to recognise
a phœnix or a unicorn, should they appear, nor would they
know a sage either. The phœnix and the unicorn are regarded
as holy animals and as lucky auguries. The old traditions about
their appearance at various times and their shape, which are very
conflicting, are discussed. Wang Ch`ung holds that these animals do
not only appear at the time of universal peace, that as ominous
creatures they are born of a propitious fluid, and do not belong
to a certain species, but may grow from dissimilar parents of a
common species of animals.

Book XVII.

51. Chap. I. Chih-jui [OMITTED].

The discussion on the phœnix and the unicorn is continued.
Wang Ch`ung impugns the opinion that these animals are not born
in China, but come from abroad, when there is a wise emperor.
They grow in China, even, when there is no sage.


56

52. Chap. II. Shih-ying [OMITTED].

This chapter treats of the various lucky omens of the Golden
Age:—the purple boletus, the wine springs, the sweet dew, the
Ching star, the monthly plant, the phœnix, the unicorn, and of
some other fabulous animals.

53. Chap. III. Chih-ch`i [OMITTED].

The praise of antiquity, its high virtue and happiness is unfounded.
There is nothing but fate. Human activity is powerless.

Book XVIII.

*54. Chap. I. Tse-jan [OMITTED] (Spontaneity).

Heaven emits its generating fluid spontaneously, not on purpose.
It has no desires, no knowledge, and does not act. These
qualities require organs:—a mouth, eyes, hands, etc., which it
does not possess. Its body must be either like that of Earth, or
air. Heaven's fluid is placid, desireless, and unbusied. This spontaneity
is a Taoist theory, but they did not sufficiently substantiate
it. Only Sages resembling Heaven can be quite spontaneous and
inactive, others must act, and can be instructed. Originally men
lived in a happy state of ignorance. Customs, laws, in short
culture is already a decline of virtue.

55. Chap. II. Kan-lei [OMITTED].

Natural calamities and unlucky events are not the upshot of
human guilt, as a thunderstorm is not a manifestation of Heaven's
anger.

*56. Chap. III. Ch`i-shih [OMITTED] (The Equality of the Ages).

People of old were not better, nor stronger, taller or longer
lived than at present. Heaven and Earth have remained the same,
and their creatures likewise. There is a periodical alternation of
prosperity and decline in all the ages. The present time is not
inferior to antiquity, but the literati extol the past and disparage
the present. Even sages like Confucius would not find favour with
them, if they happened to live now. And yet the Han dynasty is
quite equal to the famous old dynasties.


57

Book XIX.

57. Chap. I. Hsüan Han [OMITTED].

The scholars hold that in olden days there has been a Golden
Age, which is passed and does not come back owing to the badness
of the times. Wang Ch`ung stands up for his own time, the
Han epoch. He enumerates the lucky portents observed under the
Han emperors, and refers to the great achievements of the Han
dynasty in the way of colonising and civilising savage countries.

58. Chap. II. Hui-kuo [OMITTED].

Wang Ch`ung gives to the Han dynasty the preference over
all the others, and again discourses on the lucky auguries marking
its reign.

59. Chap. III. Yen-fu [OMITTED].

The discovery of gold under the Han dynasty, and of purple
boletus, the sweet-dew-fall in several districts, and the arrival of
dragons and phœnixes are put forward as so many proofs of the
excellence of the Han dynasty.

Book XX.

60. Chap. I. Hsü-sung [OMITTED].

This chapter is a variation of the two preceding.

61. Chap. II. Yi-wên [OMITTED].

The subject of this treatise is purely literary. It discusses
the discovery of the Classics in the house of Confucius, the Burning
of the Books under Ch`in Shih Huang Ti, and the literature of the
Han epoch, of which several authors are mentioned.

*62. Chap. III. Lun-sse [OMITTED] (On Death).

Man is a creature. Since other creatures do not become
ghosts after death, man cannot become a ghost either. If all the
millions that have lived, became spirits, there would not be sufficient
room for all the spirits in the world. The dead never give
any sign of there existence, therefore they cannot exist any more.
The vital fluid forming the soul disperses at death, how could it


58

become a ghost. A spirit is diffuse and formless. Before its birth
the -soul forms part of the primogenial fluid, which is unconscious.
When at death it reverts thereto, it becomes unconscious again.
The soul requires the body to become conscious and to act. If
sleep causes unconsciousness, and if a disease disorganises the mind,
death must do the same in a still higher degree.

Book XXI.

*63. Chap. I. Sse-wei [OMITTED] (False Reports about the Dead).

A number of ghost stories are quoted from the Tso-chuan and
other ancient works, where discontented spirits are reported to have
taken their revenge upon, and killed their enemies. Wang Ch`ung
either rejects these stories as inventions, or tries to explain them
in a natural way.

Book XXII.

*64. Chap. I. Chi-yao [OMITTED] (Spook Stories).

Several spook and ghost stories recorded in the Shi-chi and
the Tso-chuan are analysed. Wang- Ch`ung explains them in accordance
with his theory on the spontaneity of Heaven, and on the
nature of apparitions and portents.

*65. Chap. II. Ting-kuei [OMITTED] (All about Ghosts).

Wang Ch`ung sets forth the different opinions on the nature
of ghosts, propounded at his time. Some hold that ghosts are
visions of sick people, or the fluid of sickness. Others regard them
as the stellar fluid, or as the essence of old creatures, or as the
spirits of cyclical signs. After an excursion on the demous, devils,
and goblins mentioned in ancient books, Wang Ch`ung gives his own
views, according to which ghosts are apparitions and phantoms
foreboding evil, which have assumed human form, but are only
semblances and disembodied. They consist of the solar fluid, the
Yang, are therefore red, burning, and to a certain extent poisonous.

Book XXIII.

*66. Chap. I. Yen-tu [OMITTED] (On Poison).

Animal and vegetable poison is the hot air of the sun. All
beings filled with the solar fluid contain some poison. Snakes,
scorpions, and some plants have plenty of it. Ghosts, which consist


59

of the pure solar fluid, are burning poison, which eventually kills.
There is poison in some diseases, in a sun-stroke for instance and in
lumbago. Wang Ch`ung discovers real poison in speech, in beauty, and
in several tastes, which only metaphorically might be called poisonous,
and mixes up the subject still more by improper symbolism.

67. Chap. II. Po-tsang [OMITTED].

This chapter is directed against the extravagance in funerals,
on the score that the dead have no benefit from it.

68. Chap. III. Sse-wei [OMITTED].

There is a popular belief that four things are dangerous
and bring misfortune viz. to enlarge a house at the west side, to
allow a banished man to ascend a tumulus, the intercourse with
women, during the first month after they have given birth to a
child, and the rearing of children born in the 1st and the 5th months,
who will cause the deaths of their parents. Wang Ch`ung combats
these superstitions.

69. Chap. IV. Lan-shih [OMITTED].

Wang Ch`ung discourses on the common belief that in building
one must pay attention to an unpropitious time, which may be
warded off by amulets. He further speaks of the spirits of the
year, the months, etc.

Book XXIV.

70. Chap. I. Chi-jih [OMITTED].

Some more superstitions concerning unlucky years, months,
and days, which must be shunned to avoid misfortunes, are investigated.
For many actions the election of a proper time is
deemed to be of great importance, e. g. for a funeral, or for commencing
a building. Bathing on certain days, women become beautiful;
bathing on others makes their hair turn white. On the day
of T`sang Hsieh's death, who invented writing, one must not study
calligraphy, and on the day of the downfall of the Yin and Hsia
dynasties one does not make music.

*71. Chap. II. Pu-shih [OMITTED] (On Divination).

People often neglect virtue and only rely on divination.
They imagine that by means of tortoise shells and milfoil they


60

can interrogate Heaven and Earth about the future, and that they
reply by the signs of the shells and the straws. Wang Ch`ung
shows that such an opinion is erroneous, but, whereas Han Fei Tse
condemns divination altogether, he upholds this science. In his
idea visions, signs, and omens are true by all means, only they
are very often misunderstood or misinterpreted by the diviners.
The lucky will meet with good omens, which, however, are not the
response of Heaven, but happen by chance.

*72. Chap. III. Pien-sui [OMITTED] (Criticisms on Noxious Influences).

Most people are under the delusion that by disregarding an
unpropitious time viz. years, months, and days of dread, they will
have to suffer from noxious influences, falling in with evil spirits,
which work disaster. This is an error, as shown by experience,
but horoscopists and seers are silent on all cases contradicting their
theory. A vast literature has sprung up on this subject, and the
princes dare not take any important step in life, any more than
their people, without reference to it.

73. Chap. IV. Nan-sui [OMITTED].

Wang Ch`ung impugns the view that by moving one's residence
one may come into collision with the Spirit of the North Point,
Nan Sui, which would be disastrous.

Book XXV.

74. Chap. I. Ch`i-shu [OMITTED].

The chapter treats of the precautions which used to be taken
in building houses, special attention being paid to the family name,
the number of the house, the situation, etc.

*75. Chap. II. Chieh-ch`u [OMITTED] (On Exorcism).

By exorcism malignant spirits are expelled after having been
feasted. Exorcism and conjurations are of no use, for either would
the ghosts not yield to the force employed against them, and resent
the affront, or, if they are like mist and clouds, their expulsion
would be useless. In ancient times, sickness was expelled in this
way. The propitiation of the Spirit of Earth, after having dug up
the ground, is also useless, for Earth does not hear man nor
understand his speech. All depends upon man, not on ghosts.


61

*76. Chap. III. Sse-yi [OMITTED] (Sacrifices to the Departed).

Sacrifices are merely manifestations of the feelings of love
and gratitude, which the living cherish towards ghosts and spirits.
The latter cannot enjoy the sacrifices, which are presented to them,
because having no body, they are devoid of knowledge and cannot
eat or drink. If Heaven and Earth could eat or drink, they
would require such enormous quantities of food, that man could
never appease their hunger. Wang Ch`ung treats of the nature of
ghosts, and refers to the sacrifices to Heaven and Earth, to the
House, to the Gods of Wind, Rain, and Thunder, to the Sun, the
Moon, and the Stars, and to the Ancestors.

*77. Chap. IV. Chi-yi [OMITTED] (Sacrifices).

The various old sacrifices are described, those to Heaven and
Earth, to the Mountains and Rivers, to the Spirits of the Land
and Grain, to the Six Superior Powers, to the Seasons, Heat and
Cold, Water and Drought, the Rain Sacrifice, those to the Four
Cardinal Points, to the Sun, the Moon, and the Stars, the Five
Genii of the House, and to the Ancestors. All these sacrifices
saving the last were State sacrifices and reserved for the emperor,
the feudal princes, and their officials. They are thank-offerings for
kindness received. There are no spirits present to enjoy them, nor
can they bestow happiness on the sacrificers, or visit with misfortune
those who neglect them. Therefore sacrifices are a beautiful
custom, but of no great consequence.

Book XXVI.

78. Chap. I. Shih-chih [OMITTED].

Saints and Sages are credited with an extraordinary knowledge.
They need not learn or study, for they are cognisant of
everything intuitively, and know the past as well as the future.
This is a fallacy. There are no supernatural faculties, and even
those of the Sages follow the natural laws.

79. Chap. II. Chih-shih [OMITTED]

Confucius was not prescient and not a prophet, as has been
asserted. 16 examples are given, all showing his inability to foreknow
the future.


62

Book XXVII.

80. Chap. I. Ting-hsien [OMITTED].

The nature of the Worthies is defined. Examples are adduced
of what they are not. No exceptional talents are required,
but a certain amount of intelligence and honesty. Worthies belong
to the same class as Saints or Sages, but are somewhat inferior.

Book XXVIII.

*81. Chap. I. Chêng-shuo [OMITTED] (Statements Corrected).

This chapter contains critical remarks on the composition
and the history of the Shuking, the Shiking, the Ch`un-ch`iu, the
Yiking, the Liki, and the Analects. The meaning of the dynastic
names of T`ang, Yü, the Hsia, Yin, and Chou dynasties is explained,
and some hints as to how the Canons are to be interpreted are
added.

82. Chap. II. Shu-chieh [OMITTED].

The chapter deals with learning and erudition, with literary
composition, and with the various kinds of men of letters.

Book XXIX.

*83. Chap. I. An-shu [OMITTED] (Critical Remarks on Various
Books).

Wang Ch`ung criticises the famous authors of his time and
their works, beginning with some writers of the Chou epoch. He
finds fault with Mê Ti, the sophist Kung Sun Lung, and the speculative
philosopher Tsou Yen, and commends Tso Ch`iu Ming, the
author of the Tso-chuan and the Kuo-yü. He speaks with great
respect of the historians Sse Ma Ch`ien and Pan Ku, the philosopher
Yang Tse Yün, and Liu Hsiang, and in the highest terms of Lu
Chia,
who published the Ch`un-ch`iu-fan-lu, and of Huan Chün Shan
and Huan K`uan, the authors of the Hsin-lun and the Yen-t`ieh-lun.

*84. Chap. II. Tui-tso [OMITTED] (Replies in Self-Defence).

Wang Ch`ung gives the reasons, why he wrote his principal
works, the Lun-hêng and the Chêng-wu, a treatise on government.
In the Lun-hêng he wishes to explain common errors, to point out


63

the exaggerations and inventions in literature, and thus deliver
mankind of its prejudices. The Lun-hêng weighs the words and
holds up a balance for truth and falsehood. Wang Ch`ung shows
the advantage which might be derived from different chapters,
and meets the objections which his opponents would perhaps raise.

Book XXX.

*85. Chap. I. Tse-chi [OMITTED] (Autobiography).

Wang Ch`ung is a native of Shang-yü-hsien in Chekiang. His
family originally lived in Chihli. He was born in a.d. 27, and already
as a boy was very fond of study. In his official career he was
not very successful. The highest post which he held about a.d. 86
was that of a sub-prefect. The equanimity of a philosopher helped
him over many disappointments. His ideal was to possess an extensive
knowledge, a keen intellect, and a noble mind. Besides his
chief work the Lun-hêng, he wrote 12 chapters on common morals
in a plain and easy style, and a treatise "Macrobiotics" in a.d. 91.
He defends the style, the voluminousness, and the contents of the
Lun-hêng against the attacks directed against it.

 

Note:—The chapters marked with an asterisk have been translated.