University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
 
 

 
 
 
expand section
expand section
expand section
 
 
 
 
 
expand section
expand section
 
 
expand section
expand section
 
expand section
 
expand section
expand section
expand section
expand section
expand section
expand section
 
expand section
expand section
 
 
collapse section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THE REAL CONTEXT OF THE DREAM
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
expand section
expand section

THE REAL CONTEXT OF THE DREAM

Our constant consideration should be for the fact, emphasized by William James, that there is "no recall


383

without a cue."[29] Here we have a scratching sensation provoked by a mouse as the immediate and demonstrated cue. The images that followed in serial response, proved upon investigation to have been wholly derived from a certain conversation with Dr. X., the night before. The subject had been reflex-action and especially the scratch-reflex of the guinea-pig[30] as investigated by Sherrington; we had discussed also the attempts of other authors to explain the higher mental functions in terms of reflex-action.[31] My own preference for such studies as applied to the explanation of dreams had been touched upon. This preference had in turn been contrasted with the fact that I was at the time of the dream called upon to spend much time studying histological specimens through the microscope. Incidentally, I told him that this was bad for my eyes, and likewise, I had complained that his dreams were not written out clearly enough to suit my purpose to study them carefully. Such interest had been aroused in the subject of reflexology, that Dr. X. and I had stayed up late that night discussing it.

A study of the dream in the light of these facts will show how perfectly the dreaming mind appears to have "taken advantage of" them—in reality following cues along the lines of least resistance.