University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  
  

collapse section1. 
  
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
collapse section13. 
  
 13. 
 14. 
 15. 
 16. 
 17. 
 18. 
 19. 
 20. 
 21. 
 22. 
collapse section23. 
  
 23. 
collapse section24. 
  
 24. 
 25. 
 26. 
 27. 
collapse section28. 
  
 28. 
 29. 
 30. 
 31. 
collapse section32. 
  
 32. 
collapse section33. 
  
 33. 
collapse section34. 
  
 34. 
 35. 
 36. 
36.
 37. 
 38. 
collapse section39. 
  
 39. 
 40. 
 41. 
 42. 
 43. 
 44. 
collapse section45. 
  
 45. 
 46. 
 47. 
collapse section48. 
  
 48. 
 49. 
 50. 
collapse section51. 
  
 51. 
collapse section52. 
  
 52. 
collapse section53. 
  
 53. 
 54. 
collapse section55. 
  
 55. 
collapse section56. 
  
 56. 
collapse section57. 
  
 57. 
 58. 
 59. 
 60. 
 61. 
 62. 

36.

—We free spirits—we are the first to have the necessary prerequisite to understanding what nineteen centuries have misunderstood—that instinct and passion for integrity which makes war upon the “holy lie” even more than upon all other lies. . . Mankind was unspeakably far from our benevolent and cautious neutrality, from that discipline of the spirit which alone makes possible the solution of such strange and subtle things: what men always sought, with shameless egoism, was their own advantage therein; they created the church out of denial of the Gospels. . . .

Whoever sought for signs of an ironical divinity's hand in the great drama of existence would find no small indication thereof in the stupendous question-mark that is called Christianity. That mankind should be on its knees before the very antithesis of what was the origin, the meaning and the law of the Gospels—that in the concept of the “church” the very things should be pronounced holy that the “bearer of glad tidings” regards as beneath him and behind him—it would be impossible to surpass this as a grand example of world-historical irony—