3.
CHAPTER III.
To prosecute successfully
our inquiry "What is a Frog?" it will be well now
to make acquaintance with the more remarkable forms
contained in its Order, after which, by
considering the other Batrachian orders, we may
arrive at a certain appreciation of its Class.
The Frog's own genus (Rana), which contains about
40 species, has its head-quarters in the East Indies
and in Africa, but extends over all the great regions
of the world, except Australia and parts more southerly
still and except countries situate above 66 ° north
latitude. In South America, however, but a single species
is as yet known to exist.
Amongst the largest species are
Rana tigrina, of India, and the Indian
Archipelago, and the bull-frog (
R. Mugiens) of North America. The
latter animal may often be seen in the Gardens of the
Zoological Society, where it is fed on small birds—a
sparrow being easily engulphed within its capacious jaws.
The Edible Frog, par excellence
(R. esculenta), is
found in England as well as on the Continent of Europe. It
is as widely distributed over the Old World as is
R. temporaria, but
it is unknown in America. It is easily to be discriminated
from the common species by the absence of that dark,
sub-triangular patch which extends backwards from the eye
in
R. temporaria.
Fig. 4.—The Edible Frog
(Rena esculenta).
The male of R. esculenta
is further to be distinguished from the male of the common
Frog by the fact of its having the floor of the mouth, on
each side, distensible as a pouch—the pouches, when
distended, standing out on each side of the head. These pouches
are called "vocal sacs," and no doubt aid in intensifying
these animals' croak, which is so powerful that (on account
of it and because of the country where they are common)
they have been nicknamed "Cambridgeshire Nightingales."
Specimens
from Cambridgeshire are preserved in the British
Museum.
Fig. 5.—A,
Clinotarsus robustus, nat. size; B, interior
of the mouth of ditto.
A large South American Frog (
Ceratophrys cornuta),
which devours other smaller Frogs as well as small
birds and beasts, is noteworthy on account of the
singular bony plates which are enclosed in the skin of
its back: a character which it shares with a small
South American Toad (
Brachycephalus ephippium),
and which we shall hereafter see to be a point of
special interest.
A Frog newly discovered [8]
(of a new genus but allied to Rana), called
Clinotarsus,
[9] has been represented, in
the hope that by the wider circulation of a figure of
it, it may be recognized, and its habitat so ascertained (Fg. 5).
The common Toad (Bufo
vulgaris) is as widely distributed over
the earth's surface as is Rana
esculenta. It is less aquatic than the
Frog, and more sluggish in its motions. In shape it
resembles the Frog, but is more swollen, with much
shorter legs and a warty skin. The toes are less webbed,
and the margin of the upper jaw, as well as the lower,
is entirely destitute of teeth. The jaws are similarly
toothless in all toads.
The toad is provided with an oblong, elongated gland
called (Parotoid)
behind each eye. These glands emit a milky secretion which
is acrid and very unpleasant to the mouth of some carnivorous
animals. Those who have observed a dog attacking a toad can
hardly have failed to notice the disgust
which the former animal seems to exhibit by the
copious flow of its saliva, its. many head-shakings,
&c. The toad's secretion, however, cannot be said
to be poisonous, and certainly it is not so in the
mode in which the venom of serpents is poisonous,
since a chicken may be inoculated with it, and yet
appear to suffer no injury whatever beyond the
infliction of the slight wound necessary for the
performance of the operation. Nevertheless the secretion
Fig. 6—The Common Toad
(Bufo vulgaris).
exercises a very decided effect upon certain animals,
since the tadpoles both of frogs and of salamanders
are very powerfully affected by being kept in the
same water with a toad, if the latter be specially
irritated in order to make it discharge its pungent
and irritating secretion.
True poison and organs fitted both to inflict wounds
and to convey the venom into them are not indeed
found in any animals which are even near allies of
the frogs and toads. Nevertheless a very perfect organ
for both wounding and poisoning has been discovered by
Dr. Günther to exist in a certain fish (
Thalassophryne reticulata), belonging to a group
Fig. 7.—Poison Organ of
Thalassophryne reticulata
(after Günther). 1, Hinder half of the bead with the venom-sac
of the opercular apparatus in situ.
* Place where the small opening in the sac has been observed. a,
Lateral line and it branches; b, gill-opening; c,
central fin; d, base of pectoral fin; e, base of
dorsal fin 2, Operculum, with the penorated
spine.
which, on account of their superficial resemblances to frogs, are
termed "
Batrachoid."
He found in the fish no less than four spines, each
perforated like the tooth of a viper, and each having
a sac at its base. One such poison-spine was situated
on each side of the hinder part of the head in front
of the gill-opening. Two others were dorsal spines placed one
behind the other on the mid-line of the back. These poison-organs
are probably only used for defence. They are formed, however, on
the very same type as are the poison fangs of vipers. Unlike
the latter, however, they are not modified teeth, nor
Fig. 8—Vertical, Longitudinal
Section of the Poison-fang of a Serpent (after Owen). g,
deep groove; o, its lover termination, which affords exit
to the Poison; p, pulp-cavity.
Fig. 9—Magnified Transverse
Section of a Serpent's Poison-fang (after Owen). g, groove
round which the substance of the tooth (containing p, the
pulp-cavity) is bent: j, the point where the sides of the
tooth meet and convert the "groove" into what is practically a
central cavity.
are they situated within the mouth as they always are in poisonous
serpents.
A Frog (Pelobates fuscus)
which is common in France (and which is interesting on account of
the form of its skull hereafter to be pointed out), though
really harmless enough, has a singular power of making itself
offensive.
Both males and females of this species utter a kind
of croak, and both, if the thigh is pinched, produce
a sound like the mewing of a cat. At the same time
they emit a strong odour, which is like that of garlic,
and becomes stronger as the animals are more
disturbed. This emission not only affects the sense of
smell, but even makes the eyes water as mustard or
horseradish does.
This singular power, together with the acrid secretion
of the toad, are the nearest approximation to venomous
properties possessed by any members of the order, no
toad—not even the giant of the order
Bufa agua—being
really poisonous.
A small Frog, by no means uncommon in France and Germany
(Alytes obstetricans),
has a very singular habit. The female lays its eggs (about sixty
in number) in a long chain, the ova adhering successively
to one another by their tenacious investment. The
male twines this long chaplet round his thighs, so
that he acquires the appearance of a courtier of the
time of James I. arrayed in trunk hose and puffed
breeches. Thus encumbered, he retires into some
burrow (at least during the day) till the period when
the young are ripe for quitting the egg. Then he
seeks water, into which he has not plunged many
minutes when the young burst forth and swim away,
and he, having disencumbered himself of the remains
of the ova, resumes his normal appearance.
Certain Frogs (forming a very large group) are termed
Tree-Frogs, from their adaptation to arboreal life by means
of the dilatation of the ends of the digits into sucking discs,
by which they can adhere to leaves. One of them, the common
green Tree-Frog (Hyla arborea),
is spread over Europe, Asia, and Africa, in the same manner as
R. esculenta
except that it is not found in the British Isles.
A few toads also have the tips 6f their digits
similarly dilated. Such, e.g., is the case with the
genera
Kaloula of India,
and
Brachymerus of South
Africa.
The female of a peculiar American Tree-Frog (
Nototrema marsupiatum) has a pouch extending
over the whole of the back and opening posteriorly.
Fig. 10—The female of
(Nototrema marsupiatum,
with the pouch partially cut open (after Günther).
Into this the eggs are introduced for shelter and protection.
A dorsal pouch also exists in the allied American genus,
Opisthodelphys. An
American species of
Hylodes
has the habit of laying its eggs in trees singly in the axils
of leaves, and the only water they can obtain is the drop or
two which may from time to time be there retained.
A still more remarkable mode of protecting the egg is
developed by the Great Toad of tropical America (Pipa
americana). In this case the skin
of the female's back at the laying season thickens
greatly and becomes of quite a soft and loose
texture. The male, as soon as the eggs are laid, takes
them and imbeds them in this thick, soft skin, which
closes over them. Each egg then undergoes its
process of development so enclosed, and the tadpole
stage is, in this animal, passed within the egg, so
Fig. 11—The Sarinam Toad
(Pipa americana).
that the young toads emerge from the dorsal cells
of the mother completely developed miniatures of
the adult. As many as 120 of these dorsal cells
have been counted on the back of a single individual.
The only instance of a similar cutaneous modification is
that pointed out by Dr. Günther [10]
in the
skin of the belly of the Siluroid fish,
Aspredo batrachus.
Here he found that " the whole lower surface of the
belly, thorax, throat, and even a portion of the
pectoral fins, showed numerous shallow, round
impressions, to which a part of the ova still
adhered." He concludes that "it is more than
probable that towards the spawning time the skin
of the lower parts becomes spongy, and that, after
having deposited the eggs, the female attaches them
to it by merely lying over them." "When the eggs
are hatched the excrescences disappear, and the skin
of the belly becomes smooth as before." Even in the
highest class of animals (
Mammalia) we are familiar,
Fig. 12—
Dactylethra capensis.
in the Kangaroo and Opossum order (
Marsupialia), with a special external
receptacle (the marsupial pouch) for the protection and
secure development of the
young; but nothing of the kind exists amongst birds
or reptiles. In fishes, however, the male of the little
Sea-horse (
Hippocampus)
is provided with a ventral pouch in which the eggs are
sheltered, and the same class presents us with a mode of
carrying the eggs still more bizarre than that of
Alytes obstetricans
just related. In the fish
Arius fissus the male
actually carries about the ova in the mouth, protected by
the jaws, till relieved of the inconvenience by the hatching
of the young fry.
A South African Toad (
Dactylethra capensis) is interesting,
as we shall hereafter see, on account of certain anatomical
points in which it agrees with Pipa, and differs
from all other Anoura.
No interesting facts, however, are known as to its habits.
Another noteworthy form is the Mexican
Rhinophrynus dorsalis, the exceptional
characters of which are the tongue, which is free in front
instead of behind, and the enormous Spur-like tarsal tubercle.
Fig. 13.—
Rhinophrynus dorsalis.
Almost all frogs and toads pass the first stages
of their existence in water, going through a free,
tadpole stage, and all are more or less aquatic when adult.
The only exceptions are
Pipa,Nototrema
,
Opisthodelphys,
and the
Hylodes before
referred to. Very many kinds, however, are, when adult, inhabitants
Fig. 14—Skeleton of the Flying Dragon.
(Showing the elongated ribs which support the flitting organ.)
of trees. The question may suggest itself to some,
"Are there any, which can be said in any sense to
be aërial animals?" Birds are almost all
capable of true flight, as also are those aërial
existing beasts the Bats, and as were those extinct
reptiles the Pterodactyles. Certain squirrels and
opossums can take flitting jumps by means of an extension
of the skin of the flank, and a similar, though much
greater extension, supported by elongated freely ending
ribs, is found in the little lizards (
Draco) called Flying Dragons.
The class of Fishes supplies us, also, with an
example of aërial locomotion in the well-known Flying
Fish.
Since, then, every other class of vertebrate animals
(Beasts, Birds, Reptiles and Fishes) presents us with
more or fewer examples of the aërial species, we
might perhaps expect that the Frog class would also
exhibit some forms fitted for progression through
the air. We cannot say with certainty that such is
the case; but Mr. Alfred Wallace, in his travels in
the Malay Archipelago, encountered in Borneo a Tree-frog
(Rhacophorus)
to which he considers the term "flying" may fairly
be applied, and of which he says, it "is the first
instance known of a flying frog." Of this animal he
gives us the following account:—
"One of the most curious and interesting creatures
which I met with in Borneo was a large tree-frog which
was brought me by one of the Chinese workmen. He assured
me that he had seen it come down, in a slanting direction,
from a high tree as if it flew. On examining it I found
the toes very long and fully webbed to their extremity,
so that, when expanded, they offered a surface much larger
than
the body. The fore-legs were also bordered by a
membrane, and the body was capable of considerable
inflation. The back and limbs were of a very deep
shining green colour, the under surface and the inner
toes yellow, while the webs were black rayed with
Fig. 15.—The Flying
Frog (from Wallace's "Malay Archipelago").
yellow. The body was about four inches long,
while the webs of each hind foot, when fully
expanded, covered a surface of four square inches, and
the webs of all the feet together about twelve square
inches. As the extremities of the toes have dilated
discs for adhesion, showing the creature to be a true
Tree-frog, it is difficult to imagine that this immense
membrane of the toes can be for the purpose of
swimming only, and the account of the Chinaman
that it flew down from the tree becomes more
credible."
The great group of Frogs and Toads, rich as it is
in genera and species, and widely as it is diffused
over the earth's surface, is one of singular uniformity
of structure. The forms most aberrant from our type,
the common Frog, have now been noticed, except that
perhaps the maximum respectively of obesity and
slenderness may be referred to. In the former respect
the Indian Toad, Glyphoglossus,
may serve as an example, and for the latter may be
selected Hylorana jerboa.
FOOTNOTES: Chapter 3
[[8]]
The type of this genus is a species
which was in my own collection (with no clue to the
locality whence it originally came), but is now deposited
in the British Museum. It was first described in the
Proceedings of the Zoological Society for 1868, under
the name Pachybatrachus.
[[9]]
Proc. Zool. Soc., 1869.
[[10]]
See Catalogue of the Fishes in the
British Museum, vol. v. p. 268.