University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
collapse section 
The Printing of Johnson's Journey (1775) by William B. Todd
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
  
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 

expand section 

247

Page 247

The Printing of Johnson's Journey (1775)
by
William B. Todd

After an early misunderstanding, Johnson's bibliographers are now generally agreed that the Journey to the Western Islands of Scotland (1775), previously described as of one or two or three states or impressions or issues, is properly identified as of two separate editions.[1] Nevertheless, as confusion still persists and, in fact, is still encouraged by those who find some advantage in the earlier classifications, it seems advisable at the outset to specify the exact nature of the variants. With this much recorded, the writer may then be indulged a few speculations as to how these variants were produced. For the latter purpose conjecture is supported by abundant evidence. Besides the material available in the Life and Letters much is to be learned from the original ledger of the printing,[2] much more from the book itself, in its paper, press figures, headlines, and offsets, still more from the information kindly supplied by those who have examined certain distinctive copies.[3] These various sources provide for the Journey a commentary more extensive and more explicit, I would say, than for any other book printed in the eighteenth century.

I. Description of Variants.

Edition 'A'

A | JOURNEY | TO THE | WESTERN ISLANDS | OF | SCOTLAND. | [ornament] | LONDON: | Printed for W. Strahan; and T. Cadell in the Strand. | MDCCLXXV.

Normal collation: 8°: A1 B-C8 D8(--D8+'D8') E-T8 U8(--U4+' * U4') X-2B8 2C1.

i title, ii blank, 1-384 text, 385 eleven errata, 386 blank.


248

Page 248

Published: January 18, 1775. 'Handsomely printed in one Volume Octavo, price 5s. sewed.'[4]

Number printed: 2000.

Paper: Heavy, with watermark initials 'IVH' (usually evident only in uncut copies). Size uncut: 22.9 x 14 cm. Average thickness of volume: unpressed copy 3.2 cm., pressed copy 2.4 cm.

Cancels: For an account of the original leaf D8, of which a unique specimen is now in the Hyde collection, and a reconstruction of the text for U4, see Professor A. T. Hazen's note in RES, XVII (1941), 201-203. To this may be added, from the evidence Mr. Wyllie has found in the University of Virginia copy, certain data on the printing of the cancels. These, it appears, were set with the title and errata leaves by half-sheet imposition, all eight of the type-pages being disposed in the forme as:

illustration

During the course of printing, the man at press (identified at D8v as number 4) interrupted his work to alter the paging of U4v from '226' to '296'. Then, after all work had been printed, and perfected on the same forme, the two copies of each sheet were cut apart and each copy placed at the end of the pile of folded text sheets, following 2B8, as a four-leaf gathering ordered D8r-v. 2C1v-r(inverted). * U4v-r(inverted). A1r-v. When these leaves were later separated for inclusion in the book, the pages of the Virginia copy carried these traces of their original location: A1r, an inverted offset of * U4r; D8r offset of 2B8v; U4v offset of 2C1r; 2C1r offset of U4v; 2C1v inverted offset of D8v.

From the juxtaposition of these leaves it is evident (1) that all four were printed off before issue, and (2) that as the title and errata leaves are disjoined in this imposition, their occasional appearance together must be regarded as an accident in the binding.

Copies: 1st state, U4v numbered 226: BM(287.f.15 [George III copy]); Bodl. (Gough Scotland 252); ULC (Syn.6.77.12); NN (Berg); ViU; Hyde Collection (1 copy); W. B. Todd. 2d state, U4v numbered 296: NN (Berg); CtY; Hyde Collection (3 copies).


249

Page 249

Edition 'B'

Title: of same setting as 1st edition.

Normal collation: 8°: A 2 B-2B8. Asterisk before $1 of all sheets except E, S, and some copies of B.

i title, ii blank, iii six errata, iv blank, 1-384 text. In this edition the errata leaf (originally 2C1) was printed as a quarter sheet with the title and usually remains conjugate to it.

Issued: immediately after 1st edition? Number printed: 2000.

Paper: Light and unwatermarked. Average thickness of volume: 2.2 cm. Those signatures of a setting identical with that in the first edition, and therefore impressed simultaneously or immediately after the original printing, are occasionally on paper of the earlier, watermarked variety.

Type: Continuously impressed with 1st edition: S8 2B8.
Same imposition but impression interrupted: 2A8.
Reimposed and reimpressed: A1r (title); A2r (6 errata, last 5 removed); D8r-v, U4r-v (type retained from cancels); Y8v, Z8.
Reset: B-R8, T-Y8 (less the 5 reimpressed pages).

Copies: 1st state, page 1 signed 'B': BM (579.g.35); Bodl. (G. A. Scotland 8°.895); Dyce (5290); NN (Berg—2 copies); CtY; Hyde Collection (2 copies). 2d state, page 1 signed '* B': Bodl. (G. A. Scotland 8°.24).

II. Chronology of Presswork.

The earlier printing of the Journey can be traced most conveniently through the author's correspondence. On the 20th of June, 1774, we learn, the first sheets were put to press (356[5]); and work then continued without interruption until the 4th of July (357), when Johnson left for his excursion to Wales. Though Boswell was assured that the press would "go on slowly for a time," it is very doubtful that much was done, for after Johnson's return on September 30 his correspondent is informed that the work had been "detained" or "suspended" (363, 360) in his absence. Now that he was again in London, however, he proposed "to drive the book forward," and forward it went until October 20, when Johnson reported that, as 240 pages were then printed, the book might be out in a month (360.1). By the 20th, then, the 15 signatures through Q had been completed and 9 remained to be finished.

If we now assume that, except for an odd sheet or two, all printing was in fact suspended between July 4 and September 30, it will be observed that sustained work on the 15 signatures covered about five weeks, two before the trip, three after. This would mean that the sheets were processed at the rate of three a week, with B through G completed in the first sequence and H through Q in the second. That there was an interruption after G is confirmed in various ways, first by the appearance at I of two pressmen (1 and 7) not previously


250

Page 250
engaged; secondly by the occurrence in the outer forme of H of an imperfect headline,[6] the result, apparently of temporary storage against other formes; thirdly by the presence of numerous errors in the text. Before G, the author carefully revised his proofs, but afterwards, while the book was being 'driven forward,' he was less attentive and thus required the listing of errata for most of the signatures between H and T.

So long as Johnson was pressing forward on the nine sheets H—Q he had every reason to believe that, according to the previous rate, the nine remaining sheets (R—2B) could be finished in three weeks and the book published, as he expected, within the month. But shortly after this announcement the printing was so considerably retarded that the final proofs were not corrected until November 25 (363), the first of several cancels not proposed until the 30th (364), the work on the title-errata-cancels half-sheet thus not completed, probably, before December 12, and the first copy made ready for Mrs. Thrale's inspection not until December 17 (365.2). So, as it happened, the book confidently anticipated some time in November was eventually finished by the middle of December and, as the holiday season was then in full sway, deferred for publication until toward the end of January. Much of this delay is certainly due to Johnson; some may be traced to new measures belatedly adopted in the printing house.

Before the final proofs were returned there are several indications that Strahan, the printer, had already decided that the sale of the Journey would exceed his expectation; and as on earlier occasions[7] so on this he thereupon arranged that the issue of sheets for work still in hand, or still in prospect, should be increased from 2000 to 4000 copies, and that all work previously machined and distributed should be reset for another run of 2000 copies. With this arrangement in effect, no matter how long Johnson delayed the printing of the first edition, and no matter how much the Christmas season might then delay its publication, work on the increased issue—or as it should now be called, the second edition—could proceed in whatever order the convenience of the printer might dictate. Then as the proofs for the remaining sheets of the first edition were returned, these could be worked off with the others, and both editions then brought to completion one after the other. How and when all this work might have been accomplished remains to be determined.

Of the sheets printed after Q but before any increase in issue there are only five: R, T, U, X, and Y. Quite probably, therefore, these were machined at the usual rate of three signatures a week, at 2000 copies a forme, and were completed by Saturday, November 5. It may have been on the following Monday, then, that Strahan, a little irked at Johnson's procrastination, decided to go ahead with the new edition. From the type, press figures, and headlines it is evident that this decision was reached at a time when all but the last page of Y had been distributed, while all of Z and 2A were still intact, and before the original


251

Page 251
printing of S, 2B, title, errata, and cancels. These several pages and sheets thus occur in an identical setting for both editions. In the second edition the pages D8r-v, U4r-v, and Y8v appear as reimpressions in formes otherwise reset; the title and errata page (less five readings corrected in the second edition) as reimpressions now imposed together as a quarter-sheet; the full signature Z as a delayed impression (skeletons reversed, different figures); 2A as an interrupted impression (identical skeletons, different figures); and sheets S and 2B as a continuous impression (identical skeletons and figures). Of the full sheets it will be noted that S, containing the early charges of Johnson's mounting assault on Macpherson, was so long withheld that it was finally worked off with the last signatures of the book.

Among these later sheets, however, there is one important distinction: Though S was eventually machined without alteration, the work on 2A and 2B was stopped half-way through the impression to admit an asterisk before the initial signatures. Apparently, as Strahan may have realized after the completion of S—and possibly several other sheets—some mark was needed so that the warehouse-man could segregate the heaps for the first edition from those to be reserved for the second. By this means the printer anticipated the corrections Johnson later proposed and was able to keep the amended sheets apart from the others.

Since the asterisk seems to have been deliberately introduced and consistently used thereafter it may serve to identify all sheets printed before its appearance. These include not only all properly belonging to the first edition and the solitary sheet S, continuously impressed for both editions, but also E and most copies of B of the second edition. At least this number, then, were printed off before Johnson returned the last several proofs of the first edition.

It will now be expedient to summarize, in tabular form, the schedule of events from the time Strahan decided to enlarge the issue until the day when Mrs. Thrale received the first copy off the press.

                       
No. of  
Ed.   copies   Sig.   Comment  
2000  Nov. 7? Last page salvaged for later reimpression. 
2000  All pages held for reimpression. 
1-2  4000  Continuously impressed for both eds. No asterisk. 
2000  Work begun on earlier sheets of 2d ed. No asterisk. 
2000  Asterisk employed toward end of run on this sheet. 
2000  Reimpressed, with asterisk. 
1-2  4000  2A  {Nov. 26, proofs returned. After first 2000 copies 
1-2  4000  2B  {asterisk used to distinguish 2d ed. 
1000  A   Dec. 12? Title-errata-cancels, by half sheet imposition. 
Dec. 17. First copy sent to Mrs. Thrale. 

To the other signs of progression may be added, finally, the evidence of the headlines. As defined in Table I these recur in groups of four (two for each signature), originally combined in the sequence YEND, and then modified in the course of presswork through various other combinations. Again, unless we


252

Page 252
wish to argue for some erratic arrangement—such as a misplaced forme, in this instance—a definite order may be presumed from these gradations, and specific indications of that order discerned at those points where the skeletons are altered or replaced by others. The peculiar characteristics of the headlines and the extent to which each is used may be seen in the following summary.[8]                            
Original occurrence   Extent  
Key   Headline [*]   Defect   1st ed.   2d ed.   Comment  
JOURNEY  Bent serif at tail.  2, 44, 76  B-2B  D-X 
JOURNE Break in lower bar.  4, 50, 66  B-F 
E1   JOURNEY   Upper left serif of Y also defective.  104, 136  H-2B  B-Y  Variant of E 
ISLAND Lower serif broken.  25, 57, 89  C-T 
ISLANDS  Descender serif broken.  19, 35, 87  C-2A  B-H 
WESTERN  2d ascender broken.  313, 347  X-2A  C-F,U  Replaces D 
2d ed. A combination of breaks in inner forme 
{JOUR—E Upper serif (3v 118, 134} 
W1   {THE   Upper bar (1v ---, 130}  I-X  Replaces W 
{WESTERN  2d ascender (8r 127, 143} 
JOURNEY  2d ascender  188  Replaces N 
U1   ISLANDS  In page adjoining U defect, a battered L.  172-73  M,T,Y  Variant of U 
When compared with the full account to be found in Table I, this exemplifies the expected irregularity in the printing of the second edition. Evidently signature N preceded M; U preceded all signatures after H; and R and X, as well as others using the W1Y skeletons, normally came after those using a different combination.

With these and all other considerations in mind, and now adjusted one against the other, we may next offer in Table II a hypothetical sequence of all printing from the first sheet of the first edition to the last sheet of the second. Admitting Johnson's own statement that the book was laid on press June 20, 1774, and allowing the presumption implicit in a later remark that the work generally proceeded at the rate of 6000 copies a week (3 sheets x 2000, or 1½ x 4000), both editions could easily have been finished by January 16, 1775, two days before the first went on sale. That Strahan had actually committed himself this far, before he had a chance to gauge the demand for the first edition, is admittedly a questionable speculation. Even this, however, is more plausible than the alternative: that having resolved upon a second, and having printed off a few sheets for this, he then lost heart and did nothing further.


253

Page 253

That the schedule is, indeed, something more than a possibility appears in two references: one a reported statement by Cadell, the publisher, that 4000 copies were sold in the first week; the other, the record of the printing, in which Strahan definitely indicates that both editions, totalling this number, were charged against the publisher before the end of the month. Some objection may be raised against the first report in view of occasional advertisements, probably for remainders, as late as four months after the time alleged. Perhaps this account represents the usual exaggeration to be expected of a publisher, or a story essentially true when first related but somewhat embellished when it was relayed by another person.[9] Concerning the second report, however, no question arises, since this is in Strahan's own hand.[10]

M.r Thomas Cadell Dr

         
1775  [£] [s] [d] 
January 
Johnson's Tour. 24½ Sheets, N.° 2000 &c.mmat; £1:8:0  34- 6-0 
Corrections in D° throughout  3-10-0 
D° another Edit. N.° 2000  34- 6-0 
This tends more to confirm than to deny a simultaneous issue. If not on the same day, then certainly within two weeks after the original publication another edition had unobtrusively appeared on the market to meet a demand long anticipated and now fully satisfied.

[Tables overpage]


254

Page 254

TABLE I PRESS FIGURES AND FORME SKELETONS

                                                     
1st Edition   2d Edition  
Fig   Skel   Fig   Skel  
Sig   (i)  (o)  (i)  (o)  (i)  (o)  (i)  (o) 
E1  
E1  
E1  
E1   E1  
W1  
E1   W1  
W1  
E1   E1   U1  
E1  
E1   E1  
W1  
E1   W1  
W1  
3   4   Y   E 1   3   4   Y   E 1  
E1   U1  
E1   E1  
W1  
E1   E1   U1  
4   2   N   W  
2A  2   5   N   W  
2B  5   8   E 1   Y   5   8   E 1   Y  

[_]
Notes: Italics in 2d column indicate reimpression, in both columns a continuous impression. Figure at C(o), 1st edition, is occasionally missing. At D8r(i) figure is that appearing in original leaf; cancels register 4 at D8v.

TABLE II CHRONOLOGY OF PRINTING

                                           
Date   Ed.   Issue   Shts   Sigs   Skel  
1774 
June 20-July 4  2000  B-G  YEDN 
Oct. 1-20  H-Q  YE1DN 
Oct 21-28  R,T-U  YE1DN 
Oct 29-Nov 5  X-Z  YE1WN 
Nov 7-12  1-2  4000 
Nov 14-17  2000  E,B 
Nov 18-20 
Nov 21-26  1-2  4000  2A 
Nov 28-Dec 3  1-2  4000  2B 
Dec 5-10  2000  C,F,G 
Dec 12  1000  A   -- 
Dec 13-14  2000  YE1WN 
Dec 14-17  H,U  NE1E1
Dec 19-22  I,N  W1YE1
Dec 23-31  LMKY  W1YE1U1  
1775 
Jan 2-5  P,T 
Jan 6-10  Q,O  W1YE1
Jan 11-14  R,X  W1YW1
Jan 16  1000  A   -- 

[_]
Notes: Imposition of D, 2d edition, was necessarily deferred until after impression of cancel D8 type in A, whereupon this type was reused in its proper signature. In 2d edition errata uncorrected in HLMN, corrected in OPQT. Quite possibly by the time the errata list was received, the earlier four sheets were already composed, if not then on press.

Notes

 
[1]

Undoubtedly, as Professor Hazen assures me, this is now the consensus; but I have yet to find it acknowledged in print except as a passing note in Dr. R. W. Chapman's recent edition of Johnson's Letters (1952), II, 12, n.4. In an admirable study of Chapman's earlier speculations on these variants (New Colophon, I [1948], 179-180) Mr. H. W. Liebert moves very close to the definitions I would propose, dismisses the "second" of "three impressions" as a mixed copy, but leaves undecided the facts concerning the only later "impression" or edition of 1775. This, I am quite sure, was not corrected at press; and any exemplar which so appears may also appear, from its press figures, to be a mixed copy. In original condition the second invariably contains an errata sheet with the first 6 of the 11 errors listed in the first edition, and with the remaining 5 corrected in the text.

[2]

Reproduced through the courtesy of Mr. R. A. Austen-Leigh, Chairman of Spottiswoode & Ballantyne, Ltd.

[3]

To Mrs. Donald F. Hyde I am especially indebted for an account of the six copies in the magnificent Hyde collection, and to Mr. John Cook Wyllie for his file of research on the headlines of both editions and on the series of offsets in the University of Virginia copy. Without their advice this study could not have begun; without their insistence it would not have been finished.

[4]

See Morning Chronicle, Daily Advertiser and other papers of this date. Preliminary announcements citing this as the day of publication appear in various papers beginning January 11; and repeated notices occur thereafter through January 21. After this there are scattered references, probably to remainders of the second edition, in the Morning Post for February 9, the Public Advertiser for February 13, and the Morning Post, again, as late as June 1.

[5]

References are to item number in Chapman's edition of the Letters.

[6]

Identified later as headline E1.

[7]

See the account of Gibbon's Decline and Fall in Miss Norton's bibliography (1940), pp. 36-45; and, for a less successful venture, my note on Fielding's Amelia in PBSA, XLVII (1953), 72-75.

[*]

[Affected letters printed in italics]

[8]

Where the headlines are used for a printing extending through both editions, they are counted only once. Thus E1, N, and W, all recurring at the end of the second edition (sigs. Z—2B), actually were printed off at the end of the first.

[9]

The information comes from Hannah More. Life, eds. Hill-Powell, II,310,n.2.

[10]

Buff quarto account book, fol. 57v. On 58r, under date of December 30, 1775, Strahan credits Cadell with full payment of £72-2-0 for the two editions. It may be noted that while 71 of the 386 type-pages are of the same setting in the second edition, no reduction has been made in the charge.