University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
collapse section 
The Editions of Robert Greene's A Quip for an Upstart Courtier (1592) by Edwin Haviland Miller
  
  
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 

expand section 

107

Page 107

The Editions of Robert Greene's A Quip for an Upstart Courtier (1592)
by
Edwin Haviland Miller

After R. B. McKerrow, in 1906, published the results of his examination of Robert Greene's quarto, A Quip for an Upstart Courtier (1592), it was generally accepted that only two editions of the tract appeared in the year of publication: one (collating A-H4) with the attack on the Harveys, an 'issue' with the cancel of this passage, and other copies in which the collation reads A-F4.[1] An examination of all extant copies of the 1592 edition, however, reveals that at least six editions appeared in that year. Copies in the Westminster Abbey Library, the Harvard University Library, the Huntington Library, the Folger Shakespeare Library, and the collection of Dr. A. S. Rosenbach were found to be separate editions. Thus Greene's intemperate criticism of Gabriel Harvey and his two brothers, John and Richard, not only precipitated the vitriolic Harvey-Nashe controversy, which continued for at least the next four years, but also created a great demand for the Quip, which the printer had to meet by rushing editions through the presses.

Since, beginning with the second edition, the collation remains the same, and all copies are paginary reprints, occasionally with the transfer of formes from one edition to another, the tract presents difficult bibliographical problems, especially as to order of printing. However, through scrutiny of variant readings and through a line-by-line examination of type it is possible, I believe, to establish a plausible order.


108

Page 108

The collations of the editions of the Quip examined are as follows:

  • Q1a A | QVIP FOR AN VP-|ſtart Courtier: | Or, | A quaint diſpute betvveen Veluet breeches | and Cloth-breeches. | Wherein is plainely ſet downe the diſorders | in all Eſtates and Trades. | [woodcut: a courtier and a country gentleman in a rural setting (6.9 x 7.7 cm.)] | LONDON | Imprinted by Iohn Wolfe, and are to bee ſold at his | ſhop at Poules chayne. 1592.

    Collation: 4°: A-H4

    HT (sig. B1)] [orn.: head-piece with animals and satyrs, entwined in vines (1.6 x 7 cm.)] | A quip for an vpſtart | Courtier.

    Contents: A1: Blank. A2: Title (verso blank). A3: Dedication: [orn.: triple row (6) of type-orn. (2.4 x 7.6 cm.)] | a 'To the Right VVoorſhipfull | Thomas Barnabie Eſquire, Robert | Greene wiſheth hartes eaſe, and | heauens bliſſe.' (22 ll., ital.). A3v: Completion of 'The Epiſtle Dedicatorie.' (11 ll., ital.). Signed 'Robert Greene.' | [orn.: lozenge-shaped, with leaves and vines (5.6 x 5.6 cm.)]. A4: [orn.: double A head-piece (1.8 x 7.7 cm.)] | 'To the Gentlemen Rea-|ders health." stet al in rom. (23 ll., rom.). A4v: Completion of 'To the Reader.' (13 ll., rom.), followed by [orn.: square, with Tudor rose (6.2 x 6.4 cm.)]. B1: HT with text: B. L. with quotations in ital. and sidenotes in rom. H3: 'FINIS.' | [orn.: double row (4) of type-orn. (1.7 x 5 cm.)]. H4r-v: Blank.

    RT] A quippe for | an vpſtart Courtier. B1v-H3 (excepting: quippe [with reversed first p] C-E1v, G2v, BF3v.)

    CW] A3 that B3 an C3 (mai-)stership D3 for E3 doth E3v (Sa-)turne E4 (Gen-)tlewoman, F3 ouer-(glased) G3 pence

    Note: On sig. D2 the last line ends 'beseem a pan-', and the first line of the next page begins 'of long profession'. The CW is 'dor of'.

    Sig.: $2 F, H; $3 B, D; $4 A, C, E, G; b. l. caps with arabic numerals, except A3 in ital. caps. E3,4 37 ll.

    Copy used: Huntington Library (STC 12300).

  • Q1b [Same as Q1a with these exceptions:] CW] E3 come E3v Deuill E4 should Sig.: E3, E4, b. l. caps with rom. numerals. Note: E3r-v 33 ll. E4 34 ll. E4v 35 ll. Copy used: Bodleian Library.
  • Q2 A | QVIP FOR AN VP-|ſtart Courtier: | Or, | A quaint diſpute betvveen Veluet breeches | and Cloth-breeches. | Wherein is plainely ſet downe the diſorders | in all Eſtates and Trades. | [woodcut: same as in Q1a] | LONDON | Imprinted by Iohn Wolfe, and are to bee ſold at his | ſhop at Poules chayne. 1592.

    Collation: 4°: A-F4


    109

    Page 109

    HT (sig. A3)] A quip for an vpſtart Courtier, stet comma instead of period.

    Contents: A1: Title (verso blank). A2: Dedication: 'To the Right Worſhipful Thomas Burnabie Eſquier | Robert Greene wiſheth hartes eaſe, and | heauens bliſſe.' (26 ll., ital.). Signed 'Robert Greene.' A2v: 'To the Gentlemen Readers health.' (28 ll., rom.). A3: HT with text: B. L. with quotations in ital. F4: 'FINIS.'

    RT] A quippe for | an vpſtart Courtier. A3v-F4 (excepting: A quippe for | for an vpſtart Courtier. CEF2v, BD3v).

    CW] [Catch-words of Q2-Q6 given later in special list.]

    Sig.: [Not cited because of cropping.]

    Notes: BD3v, E4 39 ll. D1, E3 38½ ll. D2v, D3 37 ll.

    Copy used: Westminster Abbey Library.

  • Q3 [Same as Q2 with these exceptions:] HT (sig. A3)] A quip for an vpſtart Courtier. RT] A Quip for an | vpſtart Courtier stet no period A3v-A4 A quippe for | an vpſtart Courtier. A4v-F4 (excepting: A quippe for | for an vpſtart Courtier. B1v, EF2v, CD3v; A quippe | an vpſtart Courtier. B4v, D2v). Sig.: $2 F; $3 A, C, D; $4 B, E; b. l. caps with arabic numerals. Notes: [Same as Q2, excepting:] B4 37 ll. E4v 39 ll. Standing type of sheets E and F of Q2 used. Copy used: Huntington Library.
  • Q4 [Same as Q2 with these exceptions:] RT] A Quip for an | vpſtart Courtier stet no period A3v-A4 A quippe for | an vpſtart Courtier. A4v-F4 (excepting: A quippe for | for an vpſtart Courtier. B1v). Sig.: $2 F; $3 A, C-E; $4 B. Numeral in D3 placed next to cap. Notes: B3v 39 ll. B4 ll. Standing type of sheets A and B of Q3 used. Copies used: Harvard Library (formerly the White copy, STC 12301) and British Museum (formerly the Ashley copy, P.5785.Ash.833.)[2]

  • 110

    Page 110
  • Q5 [Same as Q2 with these exceptions:] Contents: A2: 'To the Right Worſhipful Thomas Barnabie Eſquier' RT] A quippe for | an vpſtart Courtier. A3v-F4 (excepting: puippe C2v). Sig.: $2 F; $3 A-E. C3. instead of C3 Note: B4 39 ll. C3 37ll. Standing type of sheets C (i) and F(1v,4) of Q4 used. Copies used: Folger Shakespeare Library and British Museum (P.5785.95. b.19.)[3]
  • Q6 [Same as Q2 with these exceptions:] Contents: [Same as Q5] RT] A quippe for | an vpſtart Courtier. A3v-F4 Sig.: $2 F; $3 A, C-E; $4 B. Numeral in C2 inverted. Notes: B3v 39 ll. B4 37 ll. Copy used: Collection of Dr. A. S. Rosenbach.

Because the catch-words in Q2-Q6 are important in determining the number of editions of this tract, and because the differences are often minute, for ease of identification of editions I have listed all significant changes in the table below. (When, because of cropping, I cannot cite catch-words in Q2, I have used question marks.)

     
Q2  Q3  Q4  Q5  Q6 
A3  thus  thus  thus  thu[4]   thus 
B3v   match  match  Italian  match 

111

Page 111
                                               
Q2  Q3  Q4  Q5  Q6 
B4  only  only  only  onely 
C2v   Suppose  Suppose  suppose,  suppose 
C3  through  through[5]   through  through 
C3v   shauen  shauen  shauen  shaun 
C4  art  art,  art,  art 
D1  hath  hath  mace  hath  hath 
D2v   questioned  questioned  brawled?  brawled?  brawled? 
D3  worthy  worthy  commodity  commodity  commo-(dity) 
D3v   Lords  counsaile  counsaile  counsaile 
D4v   they  they  that  that  that 
E1  for  for  honest  honest  honest 
E1v   the  the  stuffe  stuff  stuffe 
E2  tha  that  that  that 
E2v   trusse  of  of  of 
E3  I smild  fat  fat  fat 
E3v   for  haue  haue  haue 
E4  of  are  are  are 
E4v   conuey  conuey  (con-)uey  (con-)uey  (con-)uey 
F1v   therefore  therefore  therefore  therefore  there-(fore) 
F2  Gentelwomen  Gentlewomen  Gentlewomen  Gentle-(women) 
F2v   What  What  What  What  What 
F3  (commo-)ditie  (commo-)dity  (commo-)dity  (commo-)dity 
F3v   rest  rest  rest  after 

The two states of the first edition of the Quip are easily differentiated by means of the cancel of the attack on the Harveys. Thus in Q1b the last two leaves of E signature were reset,[6] and the lengthy side-note on sig. E4 of Q1a threatening Richard Harvey with ridicule in the theater eliminated. The rest of Q1b has the typesettings of Q1a. In sheet F, however, two alterations were made. On sig. F1, a seventeen-line side-note was added (because of cropping I have had to reconstruct the reading in part):

Wel sho[uld] | the lords [of] | the Coun[cil] | do to loo[ke] | to those b[ase] | knaue s[hoo-] | makers t[oo, who] | ioyne wi[th] | coosenin[g] | curriers [a-]|gainst th[eir] | own com[pa-] | nie to the [vn-]|doing of [ma-]|ny hones[t] | poore m[en] | of that tr[ade.]
And the passage on sig. F4v of Q1a reading "And as for you goodman Baker, that delight to be seen where most people resort, euen on the pillory

112

Page 112
in the cheefe market place. . . ." became in Q1b "And for you goodman Baker, you that are cosine to Christ in brooking the pillorie as hee did the crosse. . . ." Two minor verbal changes before and after the above passage were necessary in order to fill out the lines of type. Since the running-titles are the same in both states in sheet F, these changes were undoubtedly made while Q1a was being run off. We cannot be positive on this point because only one copy of each state is extant.

When demand for the tract necessitated a second printing, the work was reset in entirety: all ornaments and side-notes were eliminated, and the number of gatherings reduced from eight to six. Furthermore, except for the accidental omission of lines and the usual orthographical changes when a work goes through many printings, the text became standardized and is sharply differentiated from Q1a-b because of five deletions made presumably before Greene's death on September 3, 1592.[7] Since all later editions follow Q1b in removing the Harvey attack and in altering the phraseology of the allusion to the bakers, Q1b obviously became the copy-text.[8] It should also be noted that Q2-Q5 have the same title-page and the same typesetting on sig.A2v. Catch-words and signatures, as the collations above indicate, are practically the same in Q2-Q6. In view of these similarities, we may be certain that the different forms of the Quip were run off the presses within a short time.

Because these later editions are paginary reprints, it will not be possible to prove conclusively the order of printing. Nevertheless, we can, I believe, arrive at a hypothetically correct order. First, it is necessary to cite the evidence for Q2 as the second edition:

  • (1) As the partial list of variant readings given below reveals, Q2, more frequently than any of the other editions, retains the phraseology of Q1b. (The first citations are from Q1b-Q2, and the line references are from Q2; the latter readings are from Q3-Q6.)
    • A3 l. 4 cleere: cheere 9 me: men

    • 113

      Page 113
    • B1v 33 courtiers: country
    • B3 26 seing that: seeing
    • B3v 1 take: takes 32 or other suts: in other sutes
    • B4 24 of hart: of the hart
    • B4v 21 wars: warre
    • D4 2 hides or backes: backs or hides 28 a little heere: heere a little 32 espied: spied
  • (2) On sig. A4, l. 11, of Q2, we find the reading: "the the Deuill". This is an easily understood error if we turn to sig. B2 of Q1b, where the catch-word is "the" and the first two words of the next page "the Deuill". The printer probably set up "the" in Q2, turned to the next page in Q1b, and composed "the Deuill". (Although Q1a-b have identical type-settings here, it seems more logical that Q1b was being followed, since, as I have previously noted, Q2 adopts all the emendations of the second issue of the first edition.)

On the basis of this evidence, although it cannot be considered conclusive, Q2 appears to be the second edition of the pamphlet.[9]

To determine the order of the other printings, our best guide is the use of standing type in the various editions. The chart below shows graphically how typesettings were transferred from one edition to another, beginning with Q3. (I have not noted in this chart that sigs. A1 and A2v are identical in Q2-Q5.)

illustration

That Q3 is a later edition than Q2 is proven by the fact that in Q3 the


114

Page 114
standing type from Q2 has been altered for correction on every page, except on sig. E1, which is a new setting, and on sig F1, which is identical.[10] A line inadvertently omitted on sig. E4v of Q2 is restored in Q3.[11] In addition, the compositor of Q3 followed the settings of signatures C and D in Q2, as illustrated by the unusual appearance of a half line of type on the signature line of sig. D1:
vppon precept to arrest mee, D hath
The printing history of Q3, then, can be easily reconstructed. When John Wolfe decided to run off a third edition of the Quip, he found the standing type of sheets E and F of Q2. Since the type of sig. E1 had been disturbed, he had that page reset and obvious typographical errors on the other pages corrected.

Then, when the popularity of the tract necessitated a fourth printing, Wolfe found that the standing type of sheets A and B from Q3 was still intact and could be used in Q4. However, because type had been disturbed, sig. B1 in entirety, the running-titles of sigs. B2v and B4v, and the catchword of sig. B4v had to be reset. Although the changes made during the resetting of sig. B1 do not necessarily indicate that Q4 is later than Q3,[12] the number of variant readings introduced in this printing points to this conclusion. Another argument for the correctness of the order of printing outlined here is the appearance of the broken h in "shall" on sig. C2, l. 29, of Q5, the inner forme of this signature being the same in Q4 and Q5.

Q4 and Q5 are even more closely related than the chart above indicates. In sheet A, not only are sigs. A1 and A2v identical settings, but also the same typesetting appears on sig. A2, with the exception of these corrections (the readings from Q4 appear first): l. 1 Burnabie: Barnabie l. 8 theit: their. The second correction indicates the priority of Q4. And, as


115

Page 115
the chart illustrates, C(i) and one-half (1v, 4) of F(i) have identical typesettings. ("FINIS" on sig. F4 appears lower on the page in Q5.) In addition, the catch-words in these two editions are the same with these two exceptions (the readings from Q4 appear first): B3v match: Italian; D1 mace: hath. Moreover, a tabulation of the last two words of lines toward the middle of the page (one page from each forme of each signature) reveals differences only on sigs. B4 and C2v. (The compositor of Q5, after referring to Q1b-Q3, restored a line omitted on sig. B4 of Q4.)[13]

Q6 is easily distinguished from the editions we have examined, for on the title-page the setting of "A | QVIP FOR AN VP-| ſtart Courtier:" is different in this printing,[14] and sig. A2v, identical in Q2-Q5, has been reset. In addition, the initial I on sig. A3 has a noticeable break in the upper left-hand corner, not apparent in Q2-Q5. Q6 is also characterized by attempts at perfection of the text in regard to orthography ("ancient" for "antient," for example), consistent capitalization of proper names, new paragraph divisions and proper indentation of the paragraph beginning on l. 16 of sig. B4 (previously not indented), and more logical punctuation throughout the tract. Since catch-words and line-endings are usually the same in Q4-Q6, it is not possible to ascertain whether Q6 follows Q4 or Q5. The line irregularities noted in the collation point to Q4, but, on the basis of the variant readings, Q5 seems the more logical candidate, as in at least twenty-four instances Q6 retains readings which appear first in Q5.

Further proof that the order of printing outlined here is substantially correct is furnished by the transfer of running-titles from edition to edition. If we look at the collations, we see that "A quippe for | for an vpſtart Courtier." appears five times in Q2 and Q3, once in Q4, and not at all in Q5 and Q6. We also find that erroneous running-titles are gradually eliminated, until in Q6 there is complete uniformity.

Thus, on the basis of the transfer of formes and running-titles, the introduction of variant readings, and attempts at perfection, particularly in Q6, the printing history of the Quip in 1592 appears to be clear. Moreover, after careful examination of all extant copies of the tract printed in this year, we have definite evidence that at least six editions, rather than two as heretofore supposed, appeared in 1592. Finally, this bibliographical analysis of the pamphlet demonstrates that it caused no small sensation


116

Page 116
in London literary circles, probably because of the vicious attack on the Harveys, and that Greene himself was an unusually popular writer in the Elizabethan era.[15]

Notes

 
[1]

See "Early Editions of Greene's 'Quip for an Upstart Courtier' (1592)," The Gentleman's Magazine, CCC (1906), 68-71. In Robert Greene et ses romans (Paris, 1938), pp. 474-475, n., René Pruvost discusses the editions of this tract. Because of his ambiguous terminology, it is difficult to ascertain whether he believes that there were three or four editions in 1592. Although he notes that S.T.C. entry 12301a, collating A1-F3, supposedly in the Huntington Library, is erroneous, later he appears to accept this non-existent copy as a separate printing. Thus he identifies the editions called here Q1a-b, Q4 (the White copy, now in the Harvard Library), and Q5 (the copy in the British Museum, which is a later state of this printing, as I indicate below.)

[2]

The Ashley copy differs from the Harvard copy in the following respects (the readings from the Harvard copy appear first:

  • A3v, l. 38, gaue: geue
  • B2, l. 38, than: then
  • B3v, l. 37, tye: tie
  • C2, CW (fa-) thers: (fa-)there
  • C3, CW, though: through
  • F3 [unsigned]: [signed]
On sigs. B3 and C3 the signatures are placed differently, and on sig. F1v the RT is placed differently. In the above list it will be noted that all variants occur in the last line of the text, in the direction-line, or in the running-title, except in the case of sig. B3v, where the change appears in the third line from the bottom of the page. Thus these variants probably indicate loosened type during the course of the same run. If this was the case, then, the appearance of corrected sheets, sigs. B2 and C3 in Ashley and sigs. A3v and C2 in Harvard, is attributable to the mixing of sheets in binding. If this explanation is correct, the use of the standing type of sigs. C2 and F1v in Q4 and Q5 is understandable. It also becomes clear why on sig. B2 Q3 and Ashley coincide in a variant reading as against Harvard, and why on sig. B3v Q3 and Harvard coincide in a variant reading as against Ashley.

[3]

The BM copy has a number of stop-press corrections (the readings from the Folger copy appear first):

  • A3, l. 11 wanean: wantan Almongst: A mongst CW thu:thus
  • A4v 18 heerein: herein 25 io: to 26 thareby . . . that: thereby . . . t at 27 bralwing: brawling
  • B2v 8 presse: pressd 20 outlandish . . . me: vplandish . . . mee 31 when you: whenyou
  • B3 26 faest: facst
The only significant alteration occurs on sig. B2v, l. 20, where the printer evidently checked earlier editions and restored in the BM copy the original reading "vplandish". (Q6 reprints "outlandish".)

[4]

This catch-word was corrected while Q5 was being run through the press. See footnote 3.

[5]

See footnote 2.

[6]

Although the Harvey passage consists of twenty-two lines in Q1a, the second issue of this edition lacks only thirteen lines, because the printer spaced out words, eliminated contracted forms, and added words and phrases. See footnote 8.

[7]

See my "Deletions in Robert Greene's A Quip for an Upstart Courtier (1592)," The Huntington Library Quarterly, XV (1952), 277-282.

[8]

The following emendations which appear in Q1b are retained in all subsequent printings (the readings from Q1a appear first, and signature and line references pertain only to that edition):

  • E3, l. 33 of: vpō
  • E3v 14 may see: may apparantly see 15 Pillorie: Pillory, (in the sight of a great many good and sufficiente witnesses,) 21 a cudgell: a good crab-tree cudgell
  • E4 25 questioned them their: questioned with them of their seuerall 27 the third: and the third
  • E4v 2 the statutes: the aunciente lawes and Statutes
  • F4v 32 as: [omitted] 37 weight, you: weight by many ounces, you

[9]

Another error in Q2 is comprehensible only if this edition preceded Q3 and Q4. On sig. F4, l. 3, a new paragraph begins illogically in the middle of a sentence with "Whome". In Q1b there is no paragraph at this point, but in Q3 and in all later editions a paragraph begins with the words "Worshipfull sir" in the preceding line. The compositor of Q2 probably misinterpreted the author's (or printer's) paragraph symbol in the margin of Q1b.

[10]

Representative examples of the corrections made in Q3 are cited below (the readings from Q2 appear first):

  • E1v, l. 7 rhem: them 12 will: well
  • E2 22 pradon: pardon
  • E2v 25 willl: will
  • F1v 15 mau: man
  • F2v 10 a is: is a

[11]

In Q2 the last line of sig. E4 and the first line of the next page read:

breeches and Veluet breeches and that wee needed them to be | [CW] of | are my parishoners, and we haue beene drinking with a poore man
(Because of cropping, the catch-word is taken from Q3.) In Q3 the first line of sig. E4v reads correctly: "of the quest. mary (quoth sir Ihon) a good motion, know these all".

[12]

In the resetting of sig. B1 of Q4, the following changes appear (the readings from Q3 appear first):

  • B1 l. 19 Fense schoole: Fence scoole 31 country: countrie 33 England Nor: England. Nor
Probably because of movement of type, we find that "in costy" on sig. B4v, l. 2, of Q3, appears as one word "incosty" in Q4.

[13]

The following line is omitted in Q4 on sig. B4 after l. 11: "preach the Gospell: the Lawier to reforme wronges and maintaine".

[14]

There are two fairly obvious alterations in the placement of the letters in the title: the A is further to the left of the O in "FOR" in Q6, and the O in "FOR" and C in "Courtier", which are directly under each other in Q2-Q5, are not aligned in the sixth edition.

[15]

In preparing this paper, I am indebted to the following for their generous cooperation: Mr. William A. Jackson, of the Houghton Library; Mr. Herman R. Mead, of the Huntington Library; Mr. H. M. Nixon, of the British Museum; and Mr. Lars Hanson, of the Bodleian Library. The late Dr. A. S. Rosenbach kindly granted me permission to examine his copy of the Quip. Dr. W. H. Bond, of the Houghton Library, made many invaluable suggestions, as did the editor of Studies in Bibliography.