University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  
  

collapse section1. 
 1.1. 
collapse section1.2. 
 1.2.1. 
 1.2.2. 
 1.2.3. 
 1.2.4. 
 1.2.5. 
collapse section1.3. 
 1.3.1. 
 1.3.2. 
 1.3.3. 
 1.4. 
collapse section2. 
collapse section2.1. 
 2.1.1. 
§ 1. RACE.
 2.1.2. 
 2.1.3. 
 2.1.4. 
 2.1.5. 
collapse section2.2. 
 2.2.1. 
 2.2.2. 
 2.2.3. 
 2.2.4. 
collapse section2.3. 
 2.3.1. 
 2.3.2. 
 2.3.3. 
collapse section2.4. 
 2.4.1. 
 2.4.2. 
collapse section3. 
collapse section3.1. 
 3.1.1. 
 3.1.2. 
 3.2. 
 3.3. 
 3.4. 
 3.5. 

  

§ 1. RACE.

This factor, race, must be placed in the first rank, for in itself it far surpasses in importance all the others. We have sufficiently studied it in another work; it is therefore needless to deal with it again.


73

We showed, in a previous volume, what an historical race is, and how, its character once formed, it possesses, as the result of the laws of heredity such power that its beliefs, institutions, and arts — in a word, all the elements of its civilisation — are merely the outward expression of its genius. We showed that the power of the race is such that no element can pass from one people to another without undergoing the most profound transformations.
[_]

[7]

[7]

[_]

The novelty of this proposition being still considerable and history being quite unintelligible without it, I devoted four chapters to its demonstration in my last book ("The Psychological Laws of the Evolution of Peoples"). From it the reader will see that, in spite of fallacious appearances, neither language, religion, arts, or, in a word, any element of civilisation, can pass, intact, from one people to another.

Environment, circumstances, and events represent the social suggestions of the moment. They may have a considerable influence, but this influence is always momentary if it be contrary to the suggestions of the race; that is, to those which are inherited by a nation from the entire series of its ancestors.

We shall have occasion in several of the chapters of this work to touch again upon racial influence, and to show that this influence is so great that it dominates the characteristics peculiar to the genius of crowds. It follows from this fact that the crowds of different countries offer very considerable differences of beliefs and conduct and are not to be influenced in the same manner.