SPEAKING OF SPIRITUALISM.
A CORRESPONDENT seizes his typewriter (the machine, not
the maid) with both hands, and peremptorily demands to
be informed why I "don't jump on that fake called
Spiritualism." O I don't know, unless it's because more
corporeal things than spooks continue to jump on me.
It seems a waste of energy to criticize disembodied spirits
who do no worse than "revisit the pale glimpses of the
moon." I have never heard of a ghost robbing other than
its own grave. They are not addicted to despoiling widows
and orphans, then putting up long-winded prayers. They
do not sing "Jesus lover of my soul" on Sunday, then sell
that same soul to the devil for six-bits on Monday. No
ghost, so far as I know, was ever accused of lying about
his neighbor, fracturing the Seventh Commandment or
beating his butcher-bills. They appear to be quite harmless
creatures, therefore not legitimate game for the
ICONOCLAST. Furthermore, I am not fully convinced that
Spiritualism is a "fake." There appears to be as good
biblical and natural reasons for belief in Spiritualism as
for belief in the Immaculate Conception or the efficacy of
baptism. Doubtless some of the professors are frauds,
but as much can be said for the professors of all other
faiths. I confess that I haven't much confidence in "mejums,"
who find employment for the shades of G. Washington,
J. Cæsar, and others of that ilk, at table-tipping,
slate-writing and such unproductive enterprises; nor in
the class of spooks who "materialize" in dark rooms,
come prancing out of "cabinets" and other uncanny
corporeal incubators for no other apparent purpose than
to enable their mundane manipulators to realize two
dollars in the coin of the realm. I opine that a ghost who
must retire to a "cabinet" to pull himself together is no
honest ghost; that those who consent to tip tables and
indulge in crude telegraphy for the entertainment of a lot
of long-haired hemales and credulous females must find
time hang very heavy on their hands in the great henceforth,
and heartily wish themselves back here wrestling
with Republican prosperity, doctor bills and other blessings.
It seems to me that were I a ghost I would float
about on cloud banks and bathe in the splendors of the
morning, instead of hiding in bat-caves all day and snooping
about all night seeking an unsalaried situation at
some dark-lantern seance. When America's greatest
lexicographer writes me an ungrammatical message on a
double-barreled slate, signs it "noeh webstur," and
instructs his terrestial to deliver it to me on payment of one
cart-wheel dollar, I suspect that there's something sphacelated
in the psychological Denmark. Of course they may
have the phonetic system of orthography in Elysium, but
in dealing with mortals I scarce think the old man would
discredit his own dictionary. A spook manipulator once
solemnly assured me that the spirit of Tecumseh was my
guardian angel, that the old Shawnee chief was ever at my
elbow. I don't believe it; had he been there on recent
occasions he would have hit sundry and various Baptists
on the head with his tomahawk. If old Tecum is trailing
me around I want to give him a pointer right here that as
a guardian angel he's utterly no good in a clime
"Where the rage of the vulture, the love of the turtle,
Now melt into sorrow, now madden to crime,"
and he had best cast his ægis over some Boston editor. It
by no means follows, however, that because many professional
fakirs and intellectual fuzziewuzzies have "gone in
for Spiritualism," it is all a fraud. If the morad floating
in a sunbeam be indestructible, existing in some shape from
everlasting to everlasting, it is inconceivable that mind,
the lord of matter, should perish utterly—should fade like
an echo into the great inane. That were a reversal of the
law of the survival of the fittest—casting away a priceless
jewel while preserving its tawdry setting. That the lesser
should survive the greater; that the case of Anaxarchus
should continue and Anaxarchus' proud self become nonexistent,
were to leave matter without law and wreck the
universe, for law itself presupposes prescience. "Natural
law," so called, must either be an act of intelligence
compelling order, or a freak of nescience entailing chaos;
hence if order be eternal mind must necessarily be immortal,
for it is an axiom of science that "Nature wastes
nothing." What becomes of the mighty life-force of a
Milton? If it be utterly extinguished; if it becomes a
forceless shade on Acheron's shore, or an "angel"
withdrawn from active influence in the universe, it is certainly
wasted, in so far as what we call nature is concerned.
In his lecture on "Evolution," Henry Ward Beecher said:
"I believe there is a universal and imminent constant
influence flowing directly from the bosom of God, and that is
the inspiration of the human race." Is God continually
giving out this "influence," this life-force, this
vis vitalis,
to the people of this planet, and with each death withdrawing
a portion thereof and either casting it into the
waste-basket of Perdition or cording it up, like back-number newspapers, in the New Jerusalem, never to be
again employed? If it "flows directly from the bosom of
God" is it not God? And if Nature waste nothing can
Nature's Prince be such a prodigal? Is he not rather the
great psychological heart of the universe through which
the same life-current, the same intellect flows back and
forth forever? But here! We are drifting into metempsychosis—
are in a fair way to get ourselves excommunicated.
Furthermore, we are actually predicating a probability
that the editor of the Chicago
Inter-Ocean is a
reincarnation of Balaam's ass. I am not prepared to
assert that Spiritualism is all brazen charlantry or foolish
self-deception. It may be that the "inspiration" of
which Beecher speaks as an emanation from God himself,
is but a higher wisdom taught the longing heart by those
it has loved and lost. The souls of the dead scratch no
messages on greasy slates for stupid eyes, shout none
across the Styx that can be heard by vulgar ears; but
there be men who can hear in the silent watches of the
night the music of lips long mute. There be those for
whom the veil that separates the two eternities is no black
inpenetrable pall, but an Arachne's web, a sacred shadow
through which comes sweeping, not the roar of myriad
voiced hosannahs and the rustle of countless wings of
dazzling white beating the everlasting blue; but the soft
incense of love, bringing healing to broken hearts, calm
to rebellious souls. These seek no thaumaturgic incantations
to secure messages from the other shore, for they
are coming continually. They do but listen, and interpret
as best they may to their dull-eared brethren, the celestial
wisdom. The latter protest that they "inspired," and the
trumpet Fame casts upon them her purple robe. It is not
the peripatetic "mediums," but the poets and prophets
who "call up the spirits" and bid them speak to us;
those who find all the dead Past living in the Present; who
are themselves so spirituelle that they can understand
Nature's finer tones—who realize that
"Life is but a dome of many-colored glass
That stains the white radiance of eternity."
All truly great men are spiritualists—even mystics. A
materialist may be a logician, a mathematician, in a
limited way; but never an orator nor a poet. He is of
the earth earthly; an intellectual Antæus—the moment
his feet leave the sodden clay he is strangled by the gods.
For him there is no Fount of Castaly whose sweet waters
make men mad. Parnassus is but an Egyptian pyramid
to be scaled with ladders, and by the aid of guides who
serve for salary. Fancy has no wings to waft him among
the stars. He sees in the Bible only its errors, never its
wild beauty. For him Villon was only a sot and Anacreon
a libertine. In his cosmos there's neither Garden of the
God, nor Groves of Daphne. He can understand neither
the platonic love of Petrarch nor the psychological
ferocity of Rousseau.
"The Apostle of affliction, he who threw
Enchantment over passion, and from
Woe wrung overwhelming eloquence."
For him all, all is clay—even the laughter of childhood
is a cunning mechanism, and the Uranian Venus but a
lump of animated earth. The flowers bring him messages
only from the muck in which their roots are buried, the
"concord of sweet sounds" is but a disturbance of the
atmosphere. Such men do not live; they merely exist.
They do not enjoy life; they do not even suffer its pangs.
They know naught of that sweetness "for which Love is
indebted to Sorrow." God pity them.
* * *
The gang of mutton-heads whose duty it was to select
twelve poets whose names should be commemorated in the
new congressional library, excluded that of Tom Moore
on the plea that he wasn't much of a poet, and now the
Irish-Americans are fairly seething with indignation.
Take it easy; Tom Moore doesn't need a memorial tablet.
He will be read and honored centuries after the library
building with its poet's corner has perished of old age.
He is the poet of the people, and has more readers than
any ten of those honored by the committee.