University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  

collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section1. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section3. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section4. 
  
  
  
  
Workmen's Progress
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section5. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section6. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section7. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section8. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section9. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section10. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section11. 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
collapse section 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  

Workmen's Progress

Changes in Jefferson's design, of course, would have long-term implications for the physical
layout and characteristics of the lawn and ranges but for the most part did not effect the
immediate practical considerations of the actual contractors involved. James Dinsmore and
John Perry, in addition to carrying on the building that they had contracted for with the
Central College, began taking on new responsibilities, and two other contractors, James
Oldham and Richard Ware, began work on their pavilions, hotels, and dormitories. The
foundation for Perry's new building was delayed until mid-August, when he was scheduled
to "commence as soon as they have succeeded in blowing a rock which has impeaded there
progress in diging his foundation."[281] Perry, however, besides working on the buildings he
contracted for earlier, kept busy supervising brickmaking and cutting lumber at his sawmill.
Dinsmore did spend time in mid-May laying off the grounds for the new pavilion and its
adjacent dormitories on the eastern side of the lawn following the previously discussed
meeting of the committee of superintendence on 11 May. He agreed to lay off the grounds
along the new plan for the eastern side of the square so that the proctor would not have to
return so soon from Richmond since the "hands now engaged diging out the foundation for
the 2. buildings on the West of the lawn, would be idle after those are compleated."[282] By
early June Dinsmore was back at work on Pavilion II, and the proctor, making a visit to the
Academical Village for a few days, submitted an alternate second floor plan for the building
that "saves the running of the 2nd staircase immediately before the front door."[283]
Jefferson acknowledged that the two staircases "is a very exceptionable thing. but the
changes proposed to avoid it appear to me to produce greater disadvantages."[284] Early
August found Dinsmore putting up the "Modellians on the Cornice of his Pavillian"[285] and
by mid-August he was calling for stone door sills, so George W. Spooner, Jr., finding it
impractical to procure them from the "presant Quarry without the assistance of a man
aquainted with blowing," went hunting for stone that could be more readily procured and
discovered a number of "well shapen Blocks that will answer the purpose" on William D.
Meriwether's land, about three-fourths of a mile "farther than the presant" quarry.[286]

The enterprising James Oldham, a most superior woodworker, immediately set to work on
Pavilion I and by the middle of June was anxiously seeking quality lumber from which to
fashion his window sashes. The building's ornamental "Ordre Dorique" entablature was
inspired by Charles Errard and Roland Fréart de Chambray's beautiful depiction of the Baths
of Diocletian in Parallele de l'Architecture Antique avec la Moderne (1650; Paris
1766).[287] On 21 June Oldham wrote to the master of Monticello with questions about the
pavilion and sent his old employer

the Draughts of the window frames for his examination. the Dorick of
diocletion, baths, chambray is not in the Book of Palladio which I have, and I
must aske the faver of Mr. Jefferson to lone me the book to lay down my
cornice and I will immediately return it safe. I will be thankefull for instructions
as respects the ceiling of the Portico which I have to do, those that are now
finishing I discover are calculated for the ceilings to finish close down on the
Top of the Cap of the Column, this kinde of finish it appears to me will have an
Aucword affect, but if the ceiling is resest and the Architrave of the cornice is
returnd on the inside of the Portico it will make a meteriall change in the
appearance of the Columns, and will come something neare the rule lade down
by Palladio for finishing of Porticoes. Our Proctor is not heare, he gave me no
positive instructions as to the manner of finish but referred to those that were
going on. it is nesary for the Scantling to be made sutable for the finish.[288]
Less than two months later George W. Spooner, Jr., informed the proctor that Oldham was
"Making his Frames & we shall be ready for his floor of Joists in the course of
tomorrow."[289] Oldham had only one helper, however, and a few days later Spooner urged
Brockenbrough to send some "hands" to Oldham as soon as possible, "as I am affraid the
bricklayers will be delayd on his building, for they are really ready for his Joists."[290]

 
[281]

281. George W. Spooner, Jr. to Brockenbrough, 9 August 1819, ViU:PP.

[282]

282. Garrett to Brockenbrough, 12 May 1819, ViU:PP. Cocke wanted to unite the hotels and
dormitories in "massive buildings of 2. or 3. stories high," a proposal Jefferson could not
concede to. See TJ to James Breckenridge, Robert B. Taylor, James Madison, and Chapman
Johnson, 8-26 July 1818, in ViU:TJ, and appendix E.

[283]

283. Brockenbrough to TJ, 7 June 1817, CSmH:TJ.

[284]

284. TJ to Brockenbrough, 27 June 1819, ViU:PP. The proctor's design has not been
identified (see in Lasala, "Thomas Jefferson's Designs for the University of Virginia,"
#03-03).

[285]

285. George W. Spooner, Jr. to Brockenbrough, 9 August 1819, ViU:PP.

[286]

286. Spooner to Brockenbrough, 13 August 1819, ViU:PP.

[287]

287. Jefferson owned the 1766 edition, edited by the French printer and publisher Charles
Antoine Jombert (1712-1784). See #4216 in Sowerby, Catalogue of the Library of Thomas
Jefferson
, 4:380.

[288]

288. Oldham to TJ, 21 June 1819, ViU:TJ. Lasala speculates that Oldham's draught was an
unidentified drawing or drawings that might be copies of an architrave detail from Palladio
(see the description of #19-15 in Lasala, "Thomas Jefferson's Designs for the University of
Virginia").

[289]

289. Spooner to Brockenbrough, 9 August 1819, ViU:PP.

[290]

290. Spooner to Brockenbrough, 13 August 1819, ViU:PP.