University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  

expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 
collapse section 
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
Walt Whitman.
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
 13. 
 14. 
  
expand section 
expand section 
expand section 

expand section 

Walt Whitman.

The October 13, 1888, issue of The Critic (vol. 13) had published Edmund Gosse's provocative essay "Has America Produced a Poet?" Among those who responded in the November 24 number were John Greenleaf Whittier, John Burroughs, Julian Hawthorne, Julia Ward Howe, Charles Dudley Warner, and Walt Whitman, whom Gosse had met three years earlier, in 1885. (Gay Wilson Allen, who described the meeting in The Solitary Singer [1960; pp. 520-522], evidently did not know of Whitman's letter in response to the essay.) Whitman's letter (p. 521) was prefaced by editorial comment:

Walt Whitman's views are, naturally, more radical than those of any other contributor to the discussion:
Briefly to answer impromptu your request of Oct: 19—to answer the question whether I think any American poet not now living deserves a place among the thirteen "English inheritors of unassailed renown" (Chaucer, Spenser, Shakspere, Milton, Dryden, Pope, Gray, Burns, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Byron, Shelley and Keats,)—and which American poets would be truly worthy, &c. Though to me the deep of the matter goes down, down beneath. I remember the London Times at the time, in opportune, profound and friendly articles on Bryant's and Longfellow's deaths, spoke of the embarrassment, warping effect, and confusion on America (her poets and poetic students) "coming in possession of a great estate they had never lifted a hand to form or earn"; and the further contingency of "the English language ever having annexed to it a lot of first-class Poetry that would be American, not European"—proving then something precious over all, and beyond valuation. But perhaps that is venturing outside the question. Of the thirteen British immortals mentioned—after placing Shakspere on a sort of preëminence of fame not to be invaded yet—the names of Bryant, Emerson, Whittier and Longfellow (with even added names, sometimes Southerners, sometimes Western or other writers of only one or two pieces,) deserve in my opinion an equally high niche of renown as belongs to any on the baker's dozen of that glorious list.