University of Virginia Library

"Watermarks are Twins," Studies in Bibliography, 4 (1951-52), 66.

"Chain-Indentations in Paper as Evidence," SB, 6 (1954), 181.

The Problem of the Missale speciale (1967), pp. 36-37, 114; "Tudor Roses from John Tate," SB, 20 (1967), 20-21, 27-28, 32-34.

"The Bibliographical Description of Paper," SB, 24 (1971), 45-47.

A New Introduction to Bibliography (1972; rpt. with corrections, 1974), pp. 62, 74.

Tanselle summarizes these in "The Bibliographical Description of Paper," 43-45.

"Paper as Bibliographical Evidence," Library, 5th ser., 17 (1962), 200.

"Turned Chain-lines," Library, 5th ser., 5 (1950-51), 184-200.

Tranchefiles are used to establish imposition patterns in Edward Heawood, "The Position on the Sheet of Early Watermarks," Library, 4th ser., 9 (1928-29), 45; David F. Foxon, "Some Notes on Agenda Format," Library, 5th ser., 8 (1953), 166; and Gilbert and Ransom, "The Imposition of Eighteenmos in Sixes, with Special Reference to Tranchefiles," Bulletin of the Bibliographical Society of Australia and New Zealand, No. 17 (Nov. 1980), 269-275. Gilbert and Ransom also make the interesting point that in French tranchefil is a bookbinder's term meaning "headband" and that historically the term for the added wire in the paper mould seems to have been transfil. For Stevenson's use of tranchefiles, see his Missale speciale, especially pp. 40, 128, 277, and 301, and "Tudor Roses," 28.

Heawood, "The Position on the Sheet," 42; Churchill, Watermarks in Paper in Holland, England, France, etc., in the XVII and XVIII Centuries (1935), items 553-557.

"Tudor Roses," 22, quoting Michael Beazeley.

Wire lines are discussed on p. 312 et passim in "The Size of the Sheet in America: Paper-Moulds Manufactured by N. & D. Sellers of Philadelphia," Proceedings of the American Antiquarian Society, 87 (1977), 299-340.

Philip Gaskell, "Notes on Eighteenth-Century British Paper," Library, 5th ser., 12 (1957), 34.

A Ledger of Charles Ackers, ed. D. F. McKenzie and J.C. Ross (1968); see items 35, 51, 240, 290, 301, 423, 430.

Throughout this paper Griffith is R. W. Griffith, Alexander Pope: A Bibliography (1922-27; rpt. 1968); Foxon is David F. Foxon, English Verse 1701-1750 (1975).

It is unclear whether the mark reads 'CM' or 'GM'. Heawood is also uncertain and identifies some examples as 'CM', others as 'GM' (Watermarks Mainly of the 17th and 18th Centuries [1950]; cf. the examples cited in the index on pp. 51-52).

James McLaverty, Pope's Printer, John Wright, Oxford Bibliographical Society Occasional Publication, No. 11 (1976), pp. 11-12.

Letter of 29 November 1729, in The Correspondence of Alexander Pope, ed. George Sherburn (1956), III, 80.

Public Record Office C.11.2581/36. James R. Sutherland discusses the suit in "The Dunciad of 1729," MLR, 31 (1936), 347-353.

The volume, at Oxford, is Bodley MS. Don. b. 4.

I discuss the problem of the cancel leaves of this edition more fully in "Pope's Revisions During Printing: A Variant Section in The Dunciad," MP, 78 (1981), 393-398.

I am grateful to Phillip Harth and G. Thomas Tanselle for commenting on drafts of this paper.