Internal Evidence:
In Cocke Lorelles Bote are the following interesting
lines:
Syr this pardon is newe founde
By syde London brydge in a holy grounde
Late called the stewes banke
Ye knowe well all that there was
Some relygyous women in that place
To whome men offred many a franke
And bycause they were so kynde and lyberall
A merueylous auenture there is be fall
Yf ye lyst to here how
There came suche a wynde fro wynchester
That blewe these women ouer the ryuer
In wherye as I wyll you tell
Some at saynt Kateryns stroke a grounde
And many in holborne were founde
Some at saynt Gyles I trowe
Also in aue maria aly and at westmenster
And some in shordyche drewe theder
With grete lamentacyon
And by cause they haue lost that fayre place
They wyll bylde at colman hedge in space
A nother noble mansyon
Fayrer and euer the halfe strete was (151-172).
Alexander Dyce, in the notes to his edition of the works of John Skelton,
cites this passage in
Cocke Lorelles Bote. "The winde from
Winchester," writes Dyce, "alludes to the temporary suppression of the
Southwarke stews at the intercession of the Bishop of Winchester."
[6] Dyce gives neither the date of this
suppression nor the source of his information. In John Stow's
Survey
of London, however, we find the following passage: "Also Robert
Fabian writeth that in the yeare 1506 the 21. of Henry the seuenth, the
saide stewe houses in Southwarke were for a season inhibited, and the dores
close vp, but it was not long saith he, ere the houses there were set open
againe."
[7] Richard Fox was the
Bishop of Winchester in 1506 and he was in a position to "inhibit" the
stews, for he was the landlord. In a Harleian MS (293, ff.62-67) for 1506
there is a transcript of "Ordinances touching the governance of the
stewhoulders
in Southwarke under the direction of the bishope of Winchester, instituted
in the tyme of Henry the Second." Thomas Fuller in his Church History
(1648) also refers to the suppression of the stews by the Bishop of
Winchester in 1506.
[8] No
doubt Dyce is right in his explanation of the allusion but there is another
side to the matter. Fabian's original chronicle ended with the year 1485; the
second edition, printed in 1532, included continuations to the year 1509 but
most likely by another person. Now the reference to the temporary
suppression of the stews for which Stow cites Fabian as his authority does
not appear in this printed continuation of Fabian and I was unable to
discover an actual source for Stow's remarks. In the printed continuation
of Fabian, however, we do find the following interesting entry for the year
1506: "And vpon the euyn of seynt Maury, began an hidious wind, which
endured vppon xi. dayes folowynge, more or lasse, in contynuall blowyng,
by meane whereof the wedercok of Poules was blowen downe, &
moche
other harme done."
[9] Also in Hall's
Chronicle, in the entry for 1506, the 21st year of Henry VII's
reign, we find mentioned a great tempest which was
"wonderful straunge to many men, because the violencie of the wynde had
blowen doune an Egle of brasse . . . fro a pynnacle or spire of Paules
church."
[10] The writer of
Cocke
Lorelles Bote is surely combining in his allusion two historical
events. The big "wynde fro wynchester" refers both to the restraining order
from the Bishop against the stews and to the real wind which blew from the
south and toppled the weathercock of St. Paul's on the London side. The
earliest date for the poem, then, is 1506.
What of the latest date for the poem? First, the events alluded to seem
fresh in the mind of the poet. Secondly, the lines seem to imply that the
"relygyous women" (prostitutes), having crossed the river in ferries ("In
wherye"), settled chiefly at Colman hedge and that the stews on the bank
side were by and large inoperative at the time of writing. Now we have
seen Stow citing Fabian to the effect that "it was not long ere the houses
there were set open againe." And Fuller, though he may be relying on
Stow, assures us that the suppression was not long effective and that the
stew houses were soon again in full operation (no dates are given).[11] Moreover in literature between
1506 and
1509 we find continued reference to the popularity of the stews. Though not
conclusive, these facts argue that the poem was written not long after 1506
— two or three years at the most.