Skip directly to:Main content Main navigation

University of Virginia Library

collapse section

The Text of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet by G. I. Duthie

1.

notes.

collapse section

Some Bibliographical Notes on Samuel Daniel's Civil Wars by James G. McManaway

1.

notes.

collapse section

Bibliography and the Editorial Problem in the Eighteenth Century by William B. Todd

1.

notes.

collapse section

Watermarks Are Twins by Allan H. Stevenson

1.

notes.

collapse section

Some Bibliographical Irregularities in the Shakespeare Fourth Folio by Giles E. Dawson

1.

I. Collation and Pagination

2.

II. Reprinted Sheets

3.

III. Sig. Li, pp. 123-4, Section I

notes.

collapse section

Chaucer's Lak of Stedfastnesse by George B. Pace

1.

notes.

collapse section

Milton and Machiavelli's Discorsi by Maurice Kelley

1.

notes.

collapse section

A Possible New Source for Servius Danielis on Aeneid III-V by Arthur Frederick Stocker

1.

notes.

collapse section

Early American Power Printing Presses by Ralph Green

1.

2.

collapse section

THE LAYING OF A GHOST? Observations on the 1483 Ratdolt Edition of the Fasciculus Temporum Curt F. Bühler

1.

notes.

collapse section

Shakespearian Dated Watermarks Allan H. Stevenson

1.

notes.

collapse section

A Supplement to the Bibliography of 'Shakespeare Idolatry' Margaret Lee Wiley

1.

notes.

collapse section

The Second Quarto of A King and No King, 1625 Berta Sturman

1.

notes.

collapse section

A Prompt Copy of Dryden's Tyrannic Love Henry Hitch Adams

1.

notes.

collapse section

The Variant Sheets in John Banks's Cyrus the Great, 1696 Fredson Bowers

1.

notes.

collapse section

Swift's Verses on the Death of Doctor Swift H. Teerink

1.

notes.

collapse section

Adam Clarke's Bibliographical Dictionary (1802-1806) Francesco Cordasco

1.

notes.

collapse section

The Murray Reprints of George Grabbe: A Publisher's Record Franklin P. Batdorf

1.

notes.

collapse section

The Printer of Harvard's Humble Proposal (1659) Bertram C. Cooper and Richard E. Hasker

1.

notes.

collapse section

Belcher & Armstrong Set Up Shop: 1805 Rollo G. Silver

1.

notes.

collapse section

Twenty-Eight Additions to the Canon of Lowell's Criticism F. DeWolfe Miller

1.

notes.

collapse section

A Note on Lowell Bibliography: The Review of Howells' Venetian Life James L. Woodress, Jr.

1.

notes.

collapse section

The First Printing of Sherwood Anderson's Winesburg, Ohio William L. Phillips

1.

notes.

collapse section

The Text of T. S. Eliot's "Gerontion" William H. Marshall

1.

notes.

Notes

collapse section

A SELECTIVE CHECK LIST OF BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SCHOLARSHIP FOR 1950

1.

PART I: INCUNABULA AND EARLY RENAISSANCE, by Rudolf Hirsch

collapse section

2.

PART II: THE LATER RENAISSANCE TO THE PRESENT, by Howell J. Heaney

collapse section

2.1.

I. Bibliographies, Check Lists, Enumeration

2.1a.

A. English and General

2.1b.

B. United States

collapse section

2.2.

2. Printing, Publishing, Bibliographical, and Textual Scholarship

2.2a.

A. English and General

2.2b.

B. United States

notes.

collapse section

1.

ADDITIONS AND CORRECTIONS

2.

Notes On Contributors

3.

collapse section

Collapse All | Expand All expand section

Notes

[1]

This annotated copy is deposited in the Alderman Library of the University of Virginia.

[2]

In a letter of 10 November 1950, the firm of Harcourt, Brace kindly confirmed that their printings were made "from a similar, if not the same, set of plates," as the Faber and Faber edition, the London printing being the earlier.

[3]

Here, as elsewhere, I am indebted to Mr. Donald C. Gallup of the Yale University Library for special information.

[4]

A misprint in the program not noticed by Eliot.

[5]

The program read "it".

[6]

The program read "man,".

[7]

The omission of the umlaut doubtless arose through an attempt to correct its misplacement in (A).

[8]

The fact that Eliot silently passed over the double quotes in the program-text need not be taken too seriously, since it would seem that only the asterisked variants were specifically pointed out to him. See also line 28 in which a misprint was unnoticed.