| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| 2. |
| 3. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| 2. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. | Notes |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| 2. |
| 2.1. |
| 2.1a. |
| 2.1b. |
| 2.2. |
| 2.2a. |
| 2.2b. |
| notes. |
| 1. |
| 2. |
| 3. |
| | ||
Notes
[2]
See G. W. Cooke, A Bibliography of James Russell Lowell (1906), p. 27, and William M. Gibson and George Arms, A Bibliography of William Dean Howells (1948), p. 166. See also F. DeWolfe Miller, "Twenty-Eight Additions to the Canon of Lowell Criticism," above.
| | ||