University of Virginia Library

Search this document 

160

Page 160

CHAPTER XII.

Reminiscence by W. M. Moseley, Esq.—Mr. Randolph's Treatment of a
Certain Young Politician of Buckingham.—Happy Retorts.

FOR the following sketch we are indebted to Mr. William
M. Mosely, now of Danville, but who was an eye
witness of the scene described, and at the time an influential
citizen of Buckingham. Mr. Moseley gives us an
illustration of the merciless manner in which Mr. Randolph
dealt with his opponents and the supreme contempt which
he was capable of expressing.

He says:

The last public speech of Mr. Randolph was delivered at Buckingham
Court-house in the year 1833, he then being on his way to Philadelphia
where he died shortly after. He was travelling by private conveyance,
accompanied by his two favorite servants, Juba and John. His expected
arrival had been previously announced, and it being the regular monthly
term of the county court, as might have been expected, the attendance
was unusually large, most of the old citizens of the county being prompted
by a desire to see their former representative in Congress once more, and
to hear him speak, perhaps, for the last time. Those who had never seen
him, but who had heard of his reputation as a speaker, determined to
avail themselves of this opportunity of seeing and hearing one of whom
so much had been said.

He reached the village at about eleven o'clock A. M., by which time a
large concourse of people had assembled upon the court yard, and along
the principal street, all anxiously looking for the arrival of this distinguished
personage; and when his carriage stopped in front of the hotel,
it was immediately surrounded by a dense crowd—a proceeding by which


161

Page 161
Mr. Randolph, in his weak and nervous condition, seemed to be greatly
annoyed. This was clearly evinced by his abrupt command to his servant
who was in the act of opening the door of the carriage, to let it remain
closed until the crowd should retire; adding that he was no wild beast
intended for public exhibition. The crowd, after some hesitation, retired
to a respectful distance, whereupon, the door of the carriage was opened,
and he descended with much difficulty by the assistance of his servants.
He was immediately conducted to the court-house and occupied the
judge's seat, from which, in a sitting posture, after the large court-room
had become filled to its utmost capacity, he proceeded to deliver a speech,
in the making of which he seemed to have had no special object other
than that of giving his opinion as to matters and things in general. Public
men and public measures of the past as well as of the present seemed
to be passing in review before him, and for each of whom he seemed to
have some unkind remembrance. His whole speech, if such it might be
called, evinced an unhappy state of mind, if not a disordered intellect.
No class and no profession escaped his bitter invective and withering sarcasm.
Nothing either in church or state seemed to be progressing according
to his liking.

At the close of his disconnected harangue but few even of his old
constituents ventured to approach him with anything like familiarity, not
knowing how such advances might be received. Among the vast assemblage
there was but one individual who seemed willing to court his especial
attention. This was a young lawyer of much self-importance who
had shortly before been elected to a seat in the state legislature, where he
had gained some notoriety by a speech he made in advocacy of the abolition
of slavery, in the course of which he took occasion to make some very
severe strictures upon Mr. Randolph as a cruel slaveholder. This course
on the part of this young delegate had not met with the approval of his
constituents, as had been evinced by their refusal to reëlect him. He took
this occasion to set himself right before the people, by publicly acknowledging
his political errors, and apologizing to Mr. Randolph for the
supposed injuries he had done him. For this purpose, as soon as Mr.
Randolph had concluded his speech, our young hero arose from his seat
in the bar, and commenced by expressing his deep sympathy for the honorable
gentleman in his seemingly great bodily afflictions, with the hope
that his contemplated visit to Europe would result in the restoration of
his health. He said he had always been a devoted admirer of Mr. Randolph,


162

Page 162
and felt it due to that distinguished gentleman, as well as to his
fellow-citizens of Buckingham, that he should embrace that opportunity of
making a public acknowledgment of his late political errors, as evinced
by a speech which he had made when honored with a seat in the State
legislature, and in the delivery of which he had taken occasion to speak
disparagingly of Mr. Randolph as a tyrannical master to his slaves. His
course, he said, he had reason to know, had not been in accordance
with the sentiments of his constituents, and his personal attack upon his
distinguished friend had been made without a personal knowledge of his
mode of treatment to his slaves. He hoped his constituents would forgive
his past errors, and he trusted to the well known magnanimity of Mr.
Randolph for his forgiveness of the personal injury done him in a moment
of heated debate upon an exciting subject, the wrong side of which he
had unfortunately taken.

During the delivery of this ill-timed speech, Mr. Randolph sat with his
head resting upon his hand, seemingly absorbed in deep thought; and at
its conclusion he straightened himself up, and fixing upon his victim a
penetrating gaze, he proceeded as follows: "I don't know you, sir; what
might be your name?" The name was given, when Mr. Randolph continued
his interrogatories: "Whose son are you? where did you make
the speech you have been talking about? and what did you say you were
trying to speak about?"

These questions were all answered in a hurried and confused manner,
evidently showing that the young orator's situation was becoming unpleasant.
Mr. Randolph, after asking a few more simple questions, the purport
of which is not now remembered, concluded as follows: "I don't think
I ever heard of you or your speech before; and, of course, I have no
particular comment to make upon either. I knew your father, and
have always thought he was a right good sort of a man; and I suppose
you are a degenerate son of a noble sire—a thing that is becoming quite
common in this country. I hope my old constituents, God bless them,
will never again be misrepresented in the legislature, or anywhere else, by
such a creature as you have shown yourself to be."

It is needless to say, the applause throughout the court-room was tremendous;
and it is not believed our young hero ever entertained as good
an opinion of himself from that day until the day of his death, which
occurred only a few months since.


163

Page 163

We have recorded many of Mr. Randolph's short cutting
thrusts, gathered from the recollections of his old constituents.
We now purpose to give the reader a specimen of
his wit, which Mr. Garland considers "the finest retort of
the kind to be found in the English language." It was in
reply to Mr. McLean, who on one occasion, during a speech
delivered in Congress, stated "that the gentleman from Virginia
(Mr. Randolph) had displayed a good head, but he
would not accept that gentleman's head, to be obliged to
have his heart along with it."

Mr. Randolph replied:

"It costs me nothing, sir, to say that I very much regret
that the zeal which I have not only felt but cherished on the
subject of laying taxes in a manner which, in my judgment,
is consistent not merely with the spirit but the very letter of
the constitution, should have given to my remarks on this
subject a pungency, which has rendered them disagreeable,
and even offensive, to the gentleman from Delaware. For
that gentleman I have never expressed any other sentiment
but respect—I have never uttered or entertained an unkind
feeling towards that gentleman, either in the House or elsewhere,
nor do I now feel any such sentiment towards him.
I never pressed my regard upon him—I press it upon no
man. He appears to have considered my remarks as having
a personal application to himself. I certainly did not
intend to give them that direction, and I think that my
prompt disclaimer of any such intention ought to have disarmed
his resentment, however justly it may have been
excited. He has been pleased, sir, to say something, which,
no doubt, he thinks very severe, about my head and my
heart.

"How easy, sir, would it be for me to reverse the gentleman's
proposition, and to retort upon him that I would not


164

Page 164
in return take that gentleman's heart, however good it may
be, if obliged to take such a head into the bargain.

"But, sir, I do not think this, I never thought it, and
therefore I cannot be so ungenerous as to say it; for, Mr.
Speaker, who made me a searcher of hearts, of the heart of
a fellow sinner? Sir, this is an awful subject, better suited
to Friday or Sunday next (Good Friday and Easter Sunday),
two of the most solemn days in the Christian calendar,
when I hope we shall all consider it, and lay it to heart as
we ought to do.

"But, sir, I must maintain that the argument of the gentleman
is suicidal—he has fairly worked the equation, and
one-half of his argument is a complete and conclusive answer
to the other. And, sir, if I should ever be so unfortunate
as, through inadvertence or the heat of debate, to fall
into such an error, I should so far from being offended feel
myself under obligation to any gentleman who would expose
its fallacy, even by ridicule—as fair a weapon as any in the
whole parliamentary armory. I shall not go so far as to
maintain with my Lord Shaftsbury, that it is the unerring
test of truth, whatever it may be of temper; but if it be prescribed
as a weapon, as unfair as it is confessedly powerful,
what shall we say (I put it, sir, to you and to the House) to
the poisoned arrow, to the tomahawk and the scalping
knife? Would the most unsparing use of ridicule justify a
resort to these weapons? Was this a reason that the gentleman
should sit in judgment on my heart? Yes, sir, my
heart, which the gentleman (whatever he may say) in his
heart believes to be a frank heart, as I trust it is a brave
heart. Sir, I dismiss the gentleman to his self complacency—let
him go—yes, sir, let him go, and thank his God
that he is not as this publican."

Many of Mr. Randolph's sarcastic retorts have been published;


165

Page 165
we will repeat one more, taken from "The Memories
of Fifty Years," by W. H. Sparks:

I remember, upon one occasion, pending the debate upon the Missouri
question, and when Mr. Randolph was in the habit of almost daily addressing
the house, that a Mr. Beecher, of Ohio, who was very impatient
of Randolph's tirades, would, in the lengthy pauses made by him, rise
from his place and move the previous question. The speaker would reply:
"The member from Virginia has the floor." The first and second
interruptions were not noticed by Randolph, but upon the repetition a
third time, he slowly lifted his head from contemplating his notes, and
said: "Mr. Speaker, in the Netherlands, a man of small capacity, with
bits of wood and leather, will, in a few moments, construct a toy that,
with the pressure of the finger and thumb, will cry `Cuckoo! Cuckoo!'
With less of ingenuity, and with inferior materials, the people of Ohio have
made a toy that will, without much pressure, cry `Previous question, Mr.
Speaker! Previous question, Mr. Speaker!' "—at the same time designating
Beecher by pointing at him with his long, skeleton-looking finger.
In a moment the house was convulsed with laughter, and I doubt if
Beecher ever survived the sarcasm.