University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
At a Court held for Virginia on Monday in the forenoone the 3° of ffebruary 1620
 
 
 
 
expand section
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

At a Court held for Virginia
on Monday in the forenoone the
3° of
ffebruary 1620[47]

Present

   
Right Honoble Ea: of Southampton. 
Lo: Cauendish. 
     
Sr Edwin Sandys.  mr Bland.  mr Meuerell. 
Sr Iohn Dauers.  mr Sheppard.  mr Baynham. 
mr Gibbs.  mr Withers.  mr Robertℯ. 

214

                 
mr Zouch.  mr Barbor mr Webbe. 
mr Nicho ffarrar.  mr Boothby.  mr Sparrowe. 
mr Wilmer.  mr Steward.  mr Ley. 
mr Tomlins.  mr Mellinge.  mr Barker. 
mr Io: ffarrar.  Capt: Rossingham.  mr Waterhowse. 
mr Ed: Iohnson.  mr Hackett.  with diuers others. 
mr Bromefeild.  mr Cuffe. 
mr Wheatly. 
mr Caswell. 

The Ea: of Southampton signified that this Court was warned by order
of the Court held on ffriday last onely for this one buissines namely
to examine whither those alterac̃ons and amendmentℯ that then passed
were rightly entred or noe. [147]

Mr Wrote said that he havinge pervsed the Act of Counsell of the 4th
of Decemb̴. last, and taken thereout some notℯ, as was permitted by
their lps he found therein as many omissions as in the Court held that
daye wch he desired might be amended; but his lp: told him that could
not nowe be: Wherevpon mr Wrote said he appealed from the pro-
ceedingℯ of this Court vnto the Kinge the fountaine of mercy and
iustice, and to such Deligatℯ as it should please his Matle to appoint
But my Lo: of Southampton told him that notwithstandinge his
appeale they would proceed and goe on in the reveiwe and p̱fectinge
of that wch had passed on ffriday and should be ready to giue an
Account of their doeingℯ.

After this the seuerall passages of the Court held on ffriday last touch-
inge the rectifyinge of the Court held the 4th of December was read
and examined by partℯ, and the addic̃ons and alterac̃ons then made
and passed beinge nowe read and duely entred, The Ea: of South-
ampton put it to the question, whither thingℯ were rightly sett downe
or noe: Wherevpon the whole Court by a generall erecc̃on of handℯ
(noe one dissentinge) testified the p̱ticuler passages of ffridays Court
nowe read to be truely reported, and the amendmentℯ also to be duely
entred in the aforesaid Court of the 4th of December.

 
[47]

Error for 1622.