University of Virginia Library

Search this document 


  
[title page]

collapse section 
"The Charge of the Light Brigade": The Creation of a Poem by Edgar Shannon and Christopher Ricks
 1. 
[section 1]
 2. 
I
collapse section3. 
II
 01. 
Bibliographical Note: Descriptions of Manuscripts and Proofs in Chronological Order
 02. 
The Charge of the Light Brigade.
 03. 
HISTORICAL COLLATION
 04. 
ALTERATIONS IN THE MANUSCRIPTS
  
Notes
collapse section 
Title-Page Transcription and Signature Collation Reconsidered by G. Thomas Tanselle
 1. 
[section 1]
 2. 
I
 3. 
II
  
Notes
collapse section 
The Analysis of Open Traditions by Michael Weitzman
 1. 
1. Stemmatic analysis and its aims.
 2. 
2. Historical methods in open traditions
 3. 
3. History-free approaches
 4. 
4. The inductive approach to evaluation
 5. 
5. A complementary approach to evaluation and history.
 6. 
6. An experiment
  
Notes
collapse section 
Normalisation of Accidentals in Middle English Texts: The Paradox of Thomas Hoccleve by D. C. Greetham
 1. 
[section 1]
 2. 
Normalisation Model
 3. 
Normalisation: Lexical Types
  
Notes
collapse section 
Sprinklings of Authority: The Folio Text of Richard II by John Jowett and Gary Taylor
 1. 
[section 1]
 2. 
I. Q5 and the Abdication Episode
 3. 
II. Q5 and Act V
collapse section4. 
III. The Pattern of Annotation
 01. 
Compounded Error
 02. 
Shared Error
 03. 
Manuscript Misreadings
 04. 
Lineation
 05. 
Profanity
 06. 
Cuts
 07. 
Corrections of Q1 Error
 08. 
Preliminary Summary
 09. 
Stage Directions
 10. 
Speech Prefixes
 11. 
Act and Scene Divisions
 12. 
Hypothesis
 5. 
IV. Authoritative F Readings
 6. 
V. Censorship and the Abdication Episode
 7. 
VI. Textual History of Richard II
  
Notes
collapse section 
Shakespeare and the Geneva Bible: Hamlet, I.iii.54 by Naseeb Shaheen
  
[section]
  
Notes
collapse section 
Nicholas Ling, Publisher 1580-1607 by Gerald D. Johnson
 1. 
[section 1]
 2. 
Ling's Shops
  
Notes
collapse section 
William Stansby's Early Career by James K. Bracken
  
[section]
  
Notes
collapse section 
John Webster and Thomas Heywood in Appius and Virginia: A Bibliographical Approach to the Problem of Authorship by MacD. P. Jackson
 1. 
Introduction
 2. 
The Quarto of 1654: Printer and Compositors
 3. 
The Manuscript Copy for Q
 4. 
Linguistic Discriminators between Webster and Heywood
 5. 
Linguistic Evidence in APPIUS AND VIRGINIA 1654
 6. 
Conclusion
  
Notes
collapse section 
Frivolous Trifles and Weighty Tomes: Early Proof-Reading at London, Oxford, and Cambridge by James P. Hammersmith
  
[section]
  
Notes
collapse section 
Dryden as a Cambridge Editor by Arthur Sherbo
  
[section]
  
Notes
collapse section 
Dryden's Translation of Virgil's Eclogues and the Tradition by Arthur Sherbo
 1. 
[section 1]
 2. 
THE SEVENTH PASTORAL. Or, MELIBŒUS THE ARGUMENT
  
Notes
collapse section 
Determining Final Authorial Intention in Revised Satires: The Case of Edward Young by James E. May
  
[section]
  
Notes
collapse section 
Sons and Lovers: The Surviving Manuscripts From Three Drafts Dated by Paper Analysis by Helen Baron
 1. 
[section 1]
collapse section2. 
The Paper Research
 01. 
Table 1
 02. 
Table 2
 3. 
Jessie Chambers and Stage II
 4. 
Stage IIIa: the start
 5. 
Stage IIIa: the completion
 6. 
The remains of Stage IIIa
 7. 
The remains of Stage IIIb
 8. 
Edward Garnett's notes on Stage IIIb
 9. 
The survival of the manuscripts
  
Notes
  
A Lost Passage from Hemingway's 'Macomber' by Leger Brosnahan
collapse section 
A Textual History of William Faulkner's The Wishing-Tree and The Wishing Tree by Louis Daniel Brodsky
 1. 
I
 2. 
II
 3. 
III
 4. 
IV
  
Notes

collapse section 
[section]
  
Errata
  
Notes on Contributors
  
BIBLIOGRAPHICAL SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
  
CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS FOR 1984
  
PUBLICATIONS IN PRINT
collapse section Collapse All | Expand All expand section
previous section
next section

Profanity

Each of the classes of variant considered so far as potential additions to the picture established by Table 1 is in isolation too small to be of much statistical significance. This is not so for the God(s)/heauen(s) variants. There are 58 lines with God(s) in Q1; 26 of these are emended to heauen(s) in F1.[23] Another revision of profanity is Would God / I would (4.1.117; TLN 2037).

previous section
next section