Old churches, ministers and families of Virginia. | ||
ARTICLE LXVI.
Hamilton and Leeds Parishes, Fauquier County.
After the division of the former parish of Hamilton into Dettingen
and Hamilton, in the year 1745, the Rev. Mr. Keith continued
to be minister in Hamilton. How long he had been minister
of the whole parish is not known; neither have I been able to ascertain
how long he continued to be minister of Hamilton parish
after the division, only that in 1758 the Rev. Joseph Brunskill was
the minister. The vestry-book, which could have informed us, was
placed in the Clerk's office, and there torn up, page after page, by
the clerks or others, for the purpose of lighting cigars or pipes.
Of the Rev. Mr. Keith and his descendants I have not been able
to obtain all the information I desire and hope for. From all that
I can learn, he was a worthy man. He was a native of Scotland.
Being involved in the rebellion in favour of the Pretender, he was
forced to fly his country, and came to Virginia. Returning to
England for Orders, he was then settled in Hamilton parish, and
performed the duties of his office there for a long time,—probably
until 1757 or 1758. A daughter of his married Colonel Thomas
Marshall, of Oakhill, Fauquier, the seat of the Marshalls to this
day. He was the father of the late Chief-Justice. Both father
and son were in the Revolutionary Army, and fought together at
the battle of Monmouth. Another of Mr. Keith's children was
the Clerk of Frederick county, Virginia, who so long and faithfully
performed the duties of that office. The descendants of Mr.
Keith are numerous. They are also devoted members of the Episcopal
Church. After the division of the parish of Hamilton, Mr.
Keith served, until his death, all that region now embraced in
Fauquier county, as it was not until 1769 that Leeds parish was
cut off. I am unable to ascertain how many churches there were
then in that part now making the parish of Leeds. I can only
speak of the two in that which is now Hamilton,—namely, Elk Run
and Turkey Run Churches, both of which I have often seen, and
in one of which I have preached. Elk Run Church was about
fifteen miles, I think, below Fauquier Court-House, on the road to
Fredericksburg, upon a small stream from which it took its name.
It was a substantial brick church,—cruciform, I believe. I am not
walls continued for many years after this, and I saw them gradually
disappear during my annual visits to the Conventions. The
other was called the Turkey Run Church, and was situated about
a mile below Fauquier Court-House. It was an old frame church,
which, after the erection of one at the court-house, was carried
away and converted into a barn, and is still used as such. It was
here I first met with Bishop Moore, after his arrival in Virginia in
1815. His preaching was very melting. I saw an old Episcopalian
wiping the tears from his eyes during the sermon, but, on speaking
to him afterward about the Bishop's preaching, was surprised to
hear him say that the Bishop was nothing but a Methodist, so different
was his style and manner from what had hitherto been common
in Episcopal pulpits. The Bishop confirmed fifty persons at that
time, the most of whom came forward in ignorance of the proper
qualifications for this rite, or of the nature of true religion. Such
was the case with many other congregations at the Bishop's earlier
visits, some of which had no ministers, and others new ones, so that
due precautions could not be easily taken to prevent unsuitable
persons from coming forward. It injured the Church and the
Bishop not a little for some time. He once told me that he really
feared to hold a Confirmation in a new place, lest some unworthy
candidates should come forward. Of the ministers who succeeded
Mr. Keith, but little is known. In the year 1758, the Rev. Joseph
Brunskill was the minister.[35] In the year 1774, the Rev. James
from Hanover parish, King George, and the Rev. Mr. Iredell, from
Culpepper, as living in the parish and preaching,—neither of whom
was very creditable to the Church. In the year 1805, the Rev.
Mr. O'Neale and Mr. Charles Marshall appear as delegates in the
Convention, as minister and lay delegate. Mr. O'Neale taught
school in Warrenton for some years, and then removed to Dumfries,
and died since I entered the ministry. Most prostrate was the
condition of the parish in the year 1812 or 1813, when I first visited
it. There was no house of worship at Warrenton belonging to any
denomination, and the old Turkey Run Church was inconvenient,
so that the service was held in the court-house. Notice being given
that I would preach at three or four o'clock on a certain day during
the session of the court, a large crowd assembled from the country
around to hear a young Virginia Episcopalian. It so happened
that a very important case detained the court beyond the appointed
hour of worship. The people, however, gradually filled the house
and hemmed in the lawyers. The ladies ascended the bench on
which judges and magistrates sat, and enclosed the judge, until at
length the business of the court was obliged to stop, and neither
judge nor lawyers could escape. The house being completely filled,
I was sent for, and, being unable to pass through the crowd, was
raised up through the window and put into the sheriff's box, from
which I preached.
About this time, the Episcopalians and Presbyterians proposed
to build a church in conjunction. It was commenced, and a wall
was put up and a roof completed. Some difficulty arising between
the partners, as is generally the case, the Episcopalians determined
to build one for themselves, without relinquishing their claim on
the unfinished one. Accordingly, a frame building was put up and
consecrated as an Episcopal Church. This was used until within a
few years. A still better one of brick now receives the increasing
congregation, under its faithful and zealous minister, the Rev. Mr.
Norton, whose father and myself became candidates for the ministry
at the same time. His lot was cast in Western New York, though
by birth a Virginian. He still lives, a venerable though disabled
minister.
LEEDS PARISH, FAUQUIER.
This parish, as we have seen already, was taken out of Hamilton
in the year 1769. The first and only minister, before the Rev.
Mr. Lemmon took charge of it in 1816, was the Rev. James Thomson,
died in February, 1812. He came to this country in 1767 or 1768.
He lived at first in the family of Colonel Thomas Marshall, of
Oakhill, and instructed his sons, John Marshall, afterward Chief-Justice,
James Marshall, and others. In 1769, he went to England
for Orders. On his return, he married Miss Mary Ann Farrow,
sister of the late Nimrod Farrow, of Leeds Manor, and settled
at the glebe, near Salem, where he had a school, to which some of
the sons of Mr. Thomas Marshall were sent to him again. Mr.
Thomson, at the coming on of the Revolution, partook largely of
the spirit which animated Colonel Marshall and his son, the Chief-Justice.
In a sermon preached at the time of the first difficulties
at Boston, he thus speaks:—
"You have all heard before now of the measures taken by the British
Parliament to deprive his Majesty's subjects of these Colonies of their just
and legal rights, by imposing several taxes upon them destructive of their
liberties as British subjects. And to enforce those acts they have for
some time blocked up the harbour of the city of Boston with ships-of-war,
and overawed the inhabitants by British troops. By which illegal
steps, the people in general have endured great hardships by being deprived
of their trade, and the poor reduced to great want. It is therefore incumbent
upon every one of us, as men and Christians, cheerfully to contribute
according to our ability toward their relief. And as we know not how
soon their case may be our own, I would likewise recommend to you to
contribute something toward supplying the country with arms and ammunition,
that if we be attacked we may be in a posture of defence. And
I make no doubt that what you bestow in this manner will be employed
in the use you intend it for. If you want to be better informed with
respect to the Acts which have been passed with a view to impose illegal
taxes upon us and deprive us of our liberties, I shall refer you to the
gentlemen of the committee for this county, who will satisfy you on that
head."
Mr. Thomson, from the memoranda on a number of sermons
or fragments of sermons I have seen, seemed to have been punctual
in preaching in four churches,—Taylor's Church, not very far from
Warrenton, Goose Creek Church, near Salem, Old Bull Run
Church, whose location I cannot specify, and Piper's Church, in
Leeds Manor, not one of which are now standing. They were, I
suppose, all badly-built wooden churches, which soon came to ruin.
I never saw Mr. Thomson, though he lived in a neighbouring parish
and did not die until the year after I entered the ministry. From
an examination of some of his sermons, or parts of sermons, I
should say that they were marked by more taste and talent than
most of those which have been submitted to my perusal. But the
Episcopal Church from various causes failed, and almost disappeared,
of the ground which was once entirely ours.
My nearness to Leeds parish, and its position being such that
I must pass through it on my numerous visits to other parts of
Virginia, caused me to preach more frequently there than in any
of the surrounding parishes. Mr. Thomas Marshall, eldest son of
the Chief-Justice, lived at the old homestead of the Marshalls,
Oakhill, on the road to Warrington and Fredericksburg. He was
one of my earliest and dearest Christian friends. He became a
communicant at an early period. He often begged that, in any
efforts I might make for the promotion of religion, which required
pecuniary aid, I would consider him as ready to afford it. Mr.
Thomas Ambler, a nephew of Judge Marshall, and an old schoolmate
of my early years, lived in the same neighbourhood. Cool
Spring Meeting-house lay between them. At this I often preached,
and it was the place where Mr. Lemmon officiated until perhaps the
close of his labours in that parish. The Marshalls and Amblers
continued to settle in this neighbourhood, until they have become
two small congregations, or rather important parts of two congregations.
The children of my esteemed friend, Mr. Thomas Marshall,
six in number, settled in sight of each other, on the estate
of their father, and are all living.[36]
The Peytons, Turners, Beverleys,
Hendersons, and others, descendants of Episcopal families,
still adhere to the old Church, and are active in seeking its resuscitation.
In the year 1816, the Rev. George Lemmon, of Baltimore,
who graduated at Princeton College a year or two before
me, took charge of both Hamilton and Leeds parishes, and continued
to be the minister, with the exception of a few years spent
in Hagerstown, Maryland, until his death. In my report to the
Convention of 1847, I find the following notice of him:—
"In the death of the Rev. Mr. Lemmon, the Church has parted with one
who had grown old and gray in her service, having devoted all his strength
of body and mind to the promotion of her welfare. He who now addresses
you has lost his earliest and oldest brother in the ministry. Our acquaintance,
our friendship, our choice of the ministry, are all of the same date,
and reach back to forty years save one. During all this period we have
been living in the most intimate communion of soul. A sounder theologian,
a more true-hearted minister, a more sincere Christian, I have never
known."
Never was there a minister more esteemed and beloved by his
attractive, on account of the harshness of his voice, but he was faithful
to the truth, and understood how to present it experimentally
to the people. His forte was in private intercourse as a pastor
and gentleman. Though strict in his views of fashionable amusements,
in which the young are apt to delight, yet so tender, courteous,
and loving was he, that the young were ever pleased with
his company and conversation. It is delightful to hear him spoken
of to this day by his old parishioners. His health was very imperfect
for many years, and his ministrations very irregular; yet
such was the attachment of his people in both congregations, that
they bore it almost without complaining. The active friends of the
Church and Mr. Lemmon were Colonel Randolph, of Easternview,
(who was always sure to be at the minister's house on the first day
of each year with his subscription of one hundred dollars,) the
Horners, the Bells, the Withers, Smiths, Paines, Edmonds, Hendersons,
Fitzhughs, Digges, and others, in Hamilton parish, and
the Marshalls, Amblers, Scotts, Adamses, Carters, Chunns, and
others, in Leeds parish. In Hamilton parish Mr. Lemmon was succeeded
by the present rector, the Rev. Mr. Norton, in the year 1847,
under whose ministry the congregation has greatly increased, and
by whose enterprise, aided by the zeal of some untiring ladies, a
new church has been built at the cost of seven or eight thousand
dollars. I have mentioned before that Judge Marshall had no
hope of the revival of the Church in Virginia, though contributing
liberally to the efforts made for it. He lived to see himself mistaken,
and to unite with his children and grandchildren in the
services of our resuscitated Church in the very place of his nativity
and amid the scenes of his early life. In my frequent visits to
Coolspring and Oakhill, I often met with him, as I had done at my
father's house, and other places in Frederick, in more boyish days.
Though not a communicant, he was the sincere friend to religion
and the Episcopal Church. I can never forget how he would prostrate
his tall form before the rude low benches, without backs, at
Coolspring Meeting-House, in the midst of his children and grandchildren
and his old neighbours. In Richmond he always set an
example to the gentlemen of the same conformity, though many of
them did not follow it. At the building of the Monumental Church
he was much incommoded by the narrowness of the pews, which
partook too much of the modern fashion. Not finding room enough
for his whole body within the pew, he used to take his seat nearest
the door of his pew, and, throwing it open, let his legs stretch a
a most conscientious man in regard to some things which others
might regard as too trivial to be observed. It was my privilege
more than once to travel with him between Fauquier and Fredericksburg,
when we were both going to the lower country. On one
occasion, the roads being in their worst condition, when we came
to that most miry part called the "Black Jack," we found that
the travellers through it had taken a nearer and better road through
a plantation. The fence being down, or very low, I was proceeding
to pass over, but he said we had better go round, although each
step was a plunge, adding that it was his duty, as one in office, to be
very particular in regard to such things. As to some other matters,
however, he was not so particular. Although myself never much
given to dress or equipage, yet I was not at all ashamed to compare
with him during these travels, whether as to clothing, horse,
saddle, or bridle. Servant he had none. Federalist as he was in
politics, in his manners and habits he was truly republican. Would
that all republicans were like him in this respect! He was fond of
agriculture, and to gratify himself, and for the sake of exercise, he
purchased a small farm a few miles from Richmond, to which he
often went. On one of my visits to Richmond, being in a street
near his house, between daybreak and sunrise one morning, I met
him on horseback, with a bag of clover-seed lying before him, which
he was carrying to his farm, it being the time of sowing such seed.
But the most interesting and striking feature in the domestic character
of this truly great and good man was the tender and assiduous
attentions paid to his afflicted companion. Mrs. Marshall was
nervous in the extreme. The least noise was sometimes agony to
her whole frame, and his perpetual endeavour was to keep the house
and yard and outhouses as free as possible from the slightest cause
of distressing her; walking himself at times about the house and
yard without shoes. On one occasion, when she was in her most
distressing state, the town authorities of Richmond manifested their
great respect for him, and sympathy for her, by having either the
town-clock or town-bell muffled. I am sure that every Virginian
will excuse this digression.[37]
An angel's virtues lay;
Too soon did Heaven assert its claim
And take its own away!
My Mary's worth, my Mary's charms,
Can never more return!
What now shall fill these widow'd arms?
Ah me! my Mary's urn!
Ah me! ah me! my Mary's urn!' "
As to the religious opinions of Judge Marshall, the following extract from a letter
of the Rev. Mr. Norwood may be entirely relied on:—
"I have read some remarks of yours in regard to Chief-Justice Marshall, which
have suggested to me to communicate to you the following facts, which may be useful
should you again publish any thing in relation to his religious opinions. I often
visited Mrs. General Harvey during her last illness. From her I received this statement.
She was much with her father during the last months of his life, and told
me that the reason why he never communed was, that he was a Unitarian in opinion,
though he never joined their society. He told her that he believed in the truth of
the Christian revelation, but not in the divinity of Christ; therefore he could not
commune in the Episcopal Church. But during the last months of his life he read
Keith on Prophecy, where our Saviour's divinity is incidentally treated, and was
convinced by his work, and the fuller investigation to which it led, of the supreme
divinity of the Saviour. He determined to apply for admission to the Communion
of our Church,—objected to commune in private, because he thought it his duty to
make a public confession of the Saviour,—and, while waiting for improved health to
enable him to go to the church for that purpose, he grew worse and died, without
ever communing. Mrs. Harvey was a lady of the strictest probity, the most humble
piety, and of a clear discriminating mind, and her statement, the substance of which
I give you accurately, (having reduced it to writing,) may be entirely relied on.
"I remember to have heard Bishop Moore repeatedly express his surprise (when
speaking of Judge Marshall) that, though he was so punctual in his attendance at
church, and reproved Mr. —, and Mr. —, and Mr. —, when they were absent,
and knelt during the prayers and responded fervently, yet he never communed. The
reason was that which he gave to his daughter, Mrs. Harvey. She said he died an
humble, penitent believer in Christ, according to the orthodox creed of the Church.
"Very truly, your friend and brother in Christ, Wm. Norwood.
"P.S.—Another fact, illustrating the lasting influence of maternal instruction,
was mentioned by Mrs. Harvey. Her father told her that he never went to bed
without concluding his prayer with those which his mother taught him when a
child,—viz.: the Lord's Prayer and the prayer beginning, `Now I lay me down to
sleep.' "
I have nothing more to say of Leeds parish, but that during the
few years of Mr. Lemmon's stay at Hagerstown, the Rev. Mr.
Mr. Lemmon's death the Rev. Mr. Slaughter officiated in Leeds
parish in conjunction with Upperville and Middleburg. At Mr.
Slaughter's resignation of the charge, the Rev. Wm. H. Pendleton
became the minister, and so continued until the year 1854. The
present minister is the Rev. Mr. Callaway. The parish has recently
been subdivided. There are two new churches under the care of
the Rev. Mr. Shields, in the part recently cut off, and one in the
other under the care of Mr. Callaway. An excellent parsonage is
now being built.
Mr. Marshall was killed by the falling of a brick upon his head in Baltimore,
on his way to Philadelphia to see his father, who died there a few days after.
The strength as well as tenderness of Judge Marshall's attachment to Mrs.
Marshall will appear from the following affecting tribute to her memory, written by
himself, December 25, 1832:—
"This day of joy and festivity to the whole Christian world is, to my sad heart,
the anniversary of the keenest affliction which humanity can sustain. While all
around is gladness, my mind dwells on the silent tomb, and cherishes the remembrance
of the beloved object which it contains.
"On the 25th of December, 1831, it was the will of Heaven to take to itself the
companion who had sweetened the choicest part of my life, had rendered toil a
pleasure, had partaken of all my feelings, and was enthroned in the inmost recess
of my heart. Never can I cease to feel the loss and to deplore it. Grief for her is
too sacred ever to be profaned on this day, which shall be, during my existence,
marked by a recollection of her virtues.
"On the 3d of January, 1783, I was united by the holiest bonds to the woman I
adored. From the moment of our union to that of our separation, I never ceased
to thank Heaven for this its best gift. Not a moment passed in which I did not
consider her as a blessing from which the chief happiness of my life was derived.
This never-dying sentiment, originating in love, was cherished by a long and close
observation of as amiable and estimable qualities as ever adorned the female bosom.
To a person which in youth was very attractive, to manners uncommonly pleasing,
she added a fine understanding, and the sweetest temper which can accompany a
just and modest sense of what was due to herself. She was educated with a profound
reverence for religion, which she preserved to her last moments. This sentiment,
among her earliest and deepest impressions, gave a colouring to her whole life.
Hers was the religion taught by the Saviour of man. She was a firm believer in
the faith inculcated by the Church (Episcopal) in which she was bred.
"I have lost her, and with her have lost the solace of my life! Yet she remains
still the companion of my retired hours, still occupies my inmost bosom. When
alone and unemployed, my mind still recurs to her. More than a thousand times
since the 25th of December, 1831, have I repeated to myself the beautiful lines
written by General Burgoyne, under a similar affliction, substituting `Mary' for
`Anna:'—
Since writing the article on Hamilton parish, I have learnt something concerning
the Rev. Mr. Brunskill which deserves to be noticed, especially as it is connected
with the question of discipline in the Colonial Church. He was a notorious evil-liver,
being given to intemperance and other vices. His vestry complained of him
to Governor Dinwiddie, who summoned him and his accusers, with their witnesses,
to Williamsburg. They appeared before the Governor and Council, Commissary
Dawson being one of the Council. Being found guilty, the Governor ordered the
vestry to dismiss him and choose another minister. On his return to the parish,
Mr. Brunskill posted the Governor and Council on the church-door, and perhaps
elsewhere, declaring that they had no jurisdiction in the case, and adding in the
same notice a canon of the English Church, whereby none but a Bishop could pass
sentence on a clergyman. The justification of the Governor was, that, although
none but a Bishop could absolutely deprive of Orders, yet the Governor, as supreme
ruler in Virginia, and representing the Crown, which was chief in Church and
State in England, had a right and was bound to exercise some discipline and prevent
such dishonour to religion, and that, as ministers were tried before the civil courts
in England, so Mr. Brunskill had been tried before the Governor and Council, which
was the supreme court in Virginia. Commissary Dawson entertained some doubt
as to the canonical regularity of the proceeding, but in a letter to the Bishop of
London justified it on the ground of necessity.
Old churches, ministers and families of Virginia. | ||