University of Virginia Library


147

Page 147

ARTICLE LX.

Cople Parish, Westmoreland County.

Westmoreland county was cut off from Northumberland county
in 1653, and extended along the Potomac as high as the Falls above
Georgetown. In the years 1661-62 the two counties were temporarily
reunited, because, by the removal of some leading persons,
there was not a suitable number of civil and military gentlemen to
constitute a proper commission in either of them alone. After some
time Stafford was taken from Westmoreland, leaving it a small,
narrow county lying on the Potomac, and only extending half-way
across the neck toward the Rappahannock River. First Lancaster,
then Rappahannock, and then Richmond counties, divided what
is now Westmoreland. In time, all the land lying between the
rivers was given to Westmoreland, and Cople parish occupied the
lower part of the county and Washington the upper. We will begin
with Cople parish.

The first minister we have on any of our lists is the Rev. Charles
Rose, brother to the Rev. Robert Rose, of Essex. He appears on
the earliest list we have,—that of 1754,—but from the diary of his
brother we know that he was its minister some years before this.
He was also minister in 1758. In the year 1773, the Rev. Thomas
Smith was its minister, as he was in 1776. Either before or after
him, we are informed that the Rev. Augustine Smith was its
minister. We presume that they were relatives of the many respectable
persons of that name in this and other counties around,
but we have received no particular account of them. In the year
1799, the Rev. James Elliott was minister. Of him we hear nothing
good from this or any other parish which he served. We hear of
no other minister in Cople parish until the Rev. Washington Nelson
took charge of it in connection with the parishes in Richmond
county. He was succeeded in 1842 by the Rev. Mr. Ward. The
Rev. Mr. Rumney succeeded him in 1849, and was succeeded by
the Rev. Edward McGuire in 1850. He was followed by the Rev.
William McGuire in 1852. The present minister, the Rev. Mr.
Dashiel, took charge of it in 1854.

There were two churches in this parish,—one at Yeocomico River


148

Page 148
or Creek, from which it takes its name, Yeocomico; and another
about ten miles off, on Nominy River or Creek, from which it also
took the name of Nominy. The latter was destroyed by fire soon
after our last war with England, but a new brick one has taken its
place within the last few years. The plate belonging to this church
was carried off by Admiral Cockburn and his party, when they were
on a pillaging-expedition on the Potomac and its tributaries. The
plate was kept on a plantation upon the banks of Nominy River, just
opposite the church. The farm itself was called Nominy, and was
then, and still is, owned by the Griffith family, relatives of the Bishop-elect
of that name. The house was plundered and then burned.
The other—Yeocomico Church—is still in good repair, but among
the rudest and roughest of all the old brick churches. It was built
in 1706. For the first time a new roof has, within a few years,
been put upon it, and some internal changes been made in it.
Although I think it might have been better done and made more
complete, yet it would be difficult, and perhaps not desirable, to
give a more modern aspect to it. The following extract from my
report in 1838 may not be without interest to the reader:—

"On Monday I went, in company with Mr. Nelson, to Yeocomico
Church, in Westmoreland, where I preached, and administered the rite of
Confirmation to three persons.

"Yeocomico Church, so called after the river of that name, is one of
the old churches, being built in the year 1706. The architecture is rough,
but very strong, and the materials must have been of the best kind. Its
figure is that of a cross, and, situated as it is, in a little recess from the
main road, in the midst of some aged trees, and surrounded by an old brick
wall which is fast mouldering away, it cannot fail to be an object of interest
to one whose soul has any sympathy for such scenes. It has undergone
but little repair since its first erection, and indeed has needed little. It is
not known or believed that a single new shingle has ever been put upon
the roof, and the pews and whole interior are the same. During the late
war it was shamefully abused by the soldiers who were quartered in it
while watching the movements of the British on the Potomac. The Communion-table
was removed into the yard, where it served as a butcher's
block, and was entirely defaced. Being of substantial materials, however,
it admitted of a new face and polish, and is now restored to its former
place, where it will answer, we trust, for a long time to come, the holy
purposes for which it was originally designed. Nor was the baptismal font
exempt from profanation. It was taken some miles from the church, and
used as a vessel in which to prepare the excitements to ungodly mirth.
This, however was not long permitted, for in the absence of every member
of our own communion, none being left to do it, a venerable old man of
the Presbyterian connection,[21] mortified at the dishonour done to religion,


149

Page 149
took pains to regain it and restore it to its former place. It is a large and
beautiful marble font, and by its side I took my station while I heard the
renewal of baptismal vows from the lips of those who were confirmed.
The canvas on which the Ten Commandments, the Lord's Prayer, and the
Creed were impressed was so torn by the soldiers that they could no
longer be permitted to retain their place, and are now lying in fragments
in one of the distant and unoccupied pews.

"It deserves to be mentioned that whatever repairs have been put upon
this house were at the expense of the good man mentioned above, and a
worthy gentleman of New York, a member of our communion, and whose
matrimonial connection in the family often brought him to that part of
Virginia. A large and excellent stove, which completely warmed the
whole church, was a present from the latter, and on the desk and pulpit
the Bible and Prayer-Book bear the name of J. Rogers, of New York."

It deserves to be stated that I have in my possession a contract
with the vestry for the repairs of this church in 1773, at a
cost of one hundred pounds, or five hundred dollars. In the agreement,
various repairs within and without the house and in the walls
around the yard are specified, but nothing is said about a new roof,
which goes to establish the tradition that the present roof is the
original one put upon the house in 1706.

THE McGUIRE FAMILY, BY THE PRESENT MINISTER OF COPLE PARISH.

For twenty years or more, prior to the pastorate of the Rev. Washington
Nelson, this parish was without clerical services. In all that
time there was nothing except the visitations of the Bishop to remind
the people here that there was an Episcopal Church. And
depressing as was such a state of things, and calculated as it was
to break us down entirely, we were just as likely to have the same
end brought about by the life and character of the man who had
last been rector. I do not know whether this man resigned the
parish, or died whilst in charge: be that as it may, his course was
well calculated to disgust people and drive them from our services.
Looking at the consequences which must naturally flow from such
a connection, and from the long period in which there was entire
absence of Episcopal ministrations, we cannot otherwise than wonder,
whilst we thank God, as we now see our Church upon the
same spot enjoying every promise of prosperity. Whilst, during
the period referred to, there was nothing done by us, other Christian
bodies were active; and, under all the influences which operated
against us, it is not surprising that all or nearly all who had any
affection for our Church should have lost their feelings of attachment
and have sought comfort elsewhere. In truth, when Mr.
Nelson came here the Episcopal Church had nearly died out. The


150

Page 150
only communicants he found were three old ladies in the humblest
walks of life. An account of these pious and excellent people was
published by Mr. Nelson, but I believe it must be out of print.
Even, however, if there should be any copies of it in existence,
their history is so remarkable that it will very well bear the mention
here made. The name of these sisters was McGuire,—Miss Emily,
Miss Mary, and a widow, Mrs. Davis. Two of them are still alive
and still continue warmly attached to our Church, and are exerting
a considerable influence in its favour among their acquaintances.
The eldest of them—Miss Emily—died in August, 1855. I tried to
obtain for myself a satisfactory account of how they became Episcopalians,
and how they retained their love for the Church when
every one else in the surrounding country deserted it. They said,
in substance, that they had been educated by their mother, who was
an Episcopalian, and brought up to love all our services. They
were baptized by our ministry, and attended its preaching whenever
they could. When their mother died she left them a large Prayer-Book,
with the request that they would abide by its teachings;
and, from affection for her as well as for the Church, they obeyed
her word. They told how the Church had flourished in days gone
by,—how it had been ridiculed when its clergy behaved badly,—
and how the members had been shamed away from it, and how
themselves still clung to it. I asked them how they got along
during the many years there was no minister. "Why, sir," said
Miss Emily, "whenever there was preaching at Westmoreland or
Richmond Court-House, we would walk to it,—once in a while we
would have this chance,—and when there was no preaching I would
read the Lessons on Sunday to my sister and we would go through
the morning service, and if any neighbours came in maybe I would
read a sermon." Westmoreland Court-House is four miles from
their residence and Richmond Court-House about twelve miles;
and I have it certified by others that the statement of Miss Emily
is true,—they have been known to walk to and from these places
to attend our Church services in the coldest and hottest weather.
I asked them if in that time they never attended the services of
other denominations. "Well, sir," they said, "we did sometimes;
they would be holding church all around us, and sometimes we
would go; but it wasn't like home to us. We know they're good,
but still we felt happier worshipping here in our own way."

The piety of these worthy people is even more remarkable than
their attachment to their Church. They are very poor, but their
uniform contentment and happiness is rarely to be met with. Upon


151

Page 151
one occasion whilst Miss Emily was alive, her sister Mary remarked
that now in their old age they sometimes got right cold while walking
to church in the winter. "But what of that, sister?" says
Miss Emily; "why should we care for that?" "And I don't care
for it," was the reply.

We have mentioned that Miss Emily died in August, 1855. She
was very aged, and for some weeks previous to her decease was
imbecile. It pleased God, however, not to let her depart in this
state. The day before she died her reason returned, and she talked
solemnly and impressively to those around her. She remained thus
conscious almost up to the very moment of her death. Miss Mary
and Mrs. Davis still attend their church and see the parish which
once could number only themselves as its friends, now containing
more than twenty families, about thirty communicants now living,
and many evidences that it is still to flourish. May God help us
to remember and cherish the poor!

To this it well deserves to be added, that during the entire intermission
of services in this parish, these sisters were in the habit
of going once in a year in a sail-boat to Alexandria in order to
receive the Communion.

THE NEWTON FAMILY.

From a document of Mr. Willowby Newton, father of the present
Willowby, and grandson of a Willowby Newton, I learn that at an
early period four brothers emigrated to Virginia,—one of whom
settled in Norfolk, another in Alexandria, one in Westmoreland,
and one in Stafford; so that it is probable that all of the name in
Virginia, and many out of it, are from the same stock. Richard
Lee, of Lee Hall, in Westmoreland, not far from the ruins of the
old burnt house, which was an ancient Lee establishment, married
a Miss Poythress, of Prince George, who was a granddaughter of
Richard Bland. After the death of Mr. Lee—commonly called
Squire Lee—she married Mr. Willowby Newton, both of whom
were vestrymen, as was John Newton, father of this Willowby,
and son of the first Willowby. The name of Willowby was an
ancient one about Norfolk, and intermarried with the Newtons.

At Bushfield, in this county, there is an inscription which gives
us the origin of the name Bushrod, which is incorporated in many
other names of Virginia:—

"Here lies the body of John Bushrod, Gentleman, son of Richard
Bushrod, Gentleman, by Apphia his wife. He was born in Gloucester


152

Page 152
county, Virginia, the 30th of January, 1663. He took for his wife Hannah,
the daughter of William Keene, of Northumberland, and Elizabeth
his wife, and by her left two sons and four daughters, and died the 6th of
February, 1719, in the 56th year of his age."

At Wilmington, the family seat of the Newtons, we have also the
following inscription:—

"Beneath this stone are deposited the remains of Mrs. Sarah Newton,
daughter of George Eskridge, and late wife of Captain Willowby Newton,
of Westmoreland county, who, after having justly established the character
of a dutiful child, a faithful friend, an affectionate mother, and
sincere Christian, departed this life on the 2d of December, 1753, in the
46th year of her age."

In the same graveyard is the tomb of Mrs. Elizabeth Oldham,
wife of Colonel Samuel Oldham, who died in 1759, in her 72d year.

TOMBSTONES IN COPLE PARISH.

From a tombstone in the Burnt-House fields, at Mount Pleasant,
Westmoreland county, where are yet to be seen the foundations
of large buildings, are the following:—

"Hic conditur corpus Richardi Lee, Armigeri, nati in Virginia, filii
Richardi Lee, generosi, et antiqua familia, in Merton-Regis, in comitatu
Salopiensi, oriundi.

"In magistratum obeundo boni publici studiosissimi, in literis Græcis
et Latinis et aliis humanioris literaturæ disciplinis versatissimi.

"Deo, quem, summa observantia semper coluit, animam tranquillus
reddidit xii. mo. die Martii, anno MDCCXIV. ætat. LXVIII."

"Hic, juxta, situm est corpus Lætitiæ ejusdem uxoris fidæ, filiæ Henrici
Corbyn, generosi, liberorum matris amantissimæ, pietate erga Deum,
charitate erga egenos, benignitate erga omnes insignis. Obiit Octob. die
vi. MDCCVI. ætatis XLIX."

The first is thus translated:—

"Here lieth the body of Richard Lee, Esq., born in Virginia, son of
Richard Lee, Gentleman, descended of an ancient family of Merton-Regis,
in Shropshire.

"While he exercised the office of a magistrate he was a zealous promoter
of the public good. He was very skilful in the Greek and Latin
languages and other parts of polite learning. He quietly resigned his
soul to God, whom he always devoutly worshipped, on the 12th day of
March, in the year 1714, in the 68th year of his age."

The second is thus translated:—

"Near by is interred the body of Lettuce, his faithful wife, daughter
of Henry Corbyn, Gentleman. A most affectionate mother, she was also


153

Page 153
distinguished by piety toward God, charity to the poor, and kindness to all.
She died on the 6th day of October, 1706, in the 49th year of her age."

VESTRYMEN OF COPLE PARISH.

Although no vestry-book of this parish has come down to us
from which we might give a connected list of the vestrymen, yet
we are glad to present to our readers the result of two elections
which were held in this parish,—the one in 1755, and the other in
1785. Those chosen in 1755 were John Bushrod, Daniel Tibbs,
Richard Lee, Benedict Middleton, Willowby Newton, Robert Middleton,
George Lee, John Newton, Samuel Oldham, Robert Carter,
Fleet Cox, James Steptoe. Those chosen in 1785—thirty years
after—were Vincent Marmaduke, Jeremiah G. Bailey, John A.
Washington, Samuel Rust, John Crabb, Richard Lee, George Garner,
George Turberville, Patrick Sanford, John Rochester, Samuel
Templeman.

CONTEST ABOUT YEOCOMICO CHURCH.

During the ministry of the Rev. Mr. Ward in Cople parish, a
difficulty arose as to this church, and the question was carried
before the Legislature. The following letter from Judge McComas
shows his opinion on the subject. The action of the Legislature
was in favour of the claim of the Episcopal Church:—

"To the Rev. Wm. N. Ward.
"Dear Sir:

You will remember that I objected sitting as a member
of the Committee for Courts of Justice, whilst it was acting upon the
petition in relation to Yeocomico Church, because I was a member of the
Methodist Episcopal Church, and understanding that it was the subject
of dispute between that Church and the Episcopal Church; but at your
instance I did sit, but, being chairman of the committee, its action made
it unnecessary for me to vote. I take this mode, however, of saying that
I perfectly agreed with the committee, and even desired to go further
than the committee in this. I wished to pass a law giving to the Episcopal
Church all churches that it is now in possession of, to which it had a
right before the Revolutionary War. I think the construction given by
the committee to the Act of 1802, or at least my construction of it, is, that
the General Assembly claimed for the Commonwealth the right to all the
real property held by that Church, but that Act expressly forbids the sale
of the churches, &c. It is true, the proviso to that Act does not confer
upon the churches the right of property in the houses, &c. But it intended
to leave the possession and occupancy as it then existed; and, that
possession and occupancy being in the Episcopal Church, it had a right to
retain it until the Legislature should otherwise direct. I believe that the
Committee was of the opinion that the Episcopal Church had a right to
the use and occupancy of the church now in question: it certainly is my


154

Page 154
opinion. I hope my Methodist brethren will see the justness of the determination
of the Committee, and with cheerfulness acquiesce in its
decision.

"Yours very respectfully,
"David McComas."

The following letter from Mr. W. L. Rogers, of Princeton, New
Jersey, will form an interesting supplement to what has been said
about Old Yeocomico:—

"To the Right Rev. Bishop Meade.
"Honoured Sir:

The Rev. Wm. Hanson, rector of Trinity Church
in this place, a few days since handed me a number of the `Southern
Churchman' from Alexandria, dated the 27th of February, 1857. In it
is an historical sketch, from your pen, of Cople parish, Westmoreland
county, Virginia, and particularly of Yeocomico Church,—a spot ever
near and dear to my memory. From a long and intimate acquaintance
with its locality and history, I beg leave very respectfully to present the
following facts. It was built in the year 1706, as an unmistakable record
will show,—it being engraved in the solid wall over the front-door. It
was called by that name after the adjacent river,—the Indian name being
preserved. The Rev. Mr. Elliot was the last settled minister up to the
year 1800, when he removed to Kentucky. From that time it was wholly
unused and neglected as a place of worship until the Methodists occasionally
met under the shadow of its ruin about the year 1814, and continued
so to do, keeping alive the spark of vital piety, until the Rev. Mr. Nelson
in 1834 took charge of it as a settled minister. During his ministration
it was jointly used by the Episcopalians and Methodists in Christian harmony
and good-will. He being succeeded by the Rev. Mr. Ward in 1842,
the question of occupancy and right of possession was unhappily agitated,
which led to a decision of the Legislature giving to the wardens and vestry
of the Episcopal Church the exclusive right to its use and control. Thus
it will be seen, for thirty-four years there had been no settled minister of
our communion, or its sublime and beautiful service performed, except
two or three times by occasional visits.

"The Mr. Murphy you allude to was a Scotch gentleman from Ayrshire,
living at Ayrfield, half a mile distant from Old Yeocomico, whose estate,
consisting of some thousands of acres, surrounded the church and burial-ground
on all sides. He was a gentleman of intellectual culture, an
honoured magistrate, and a Presbyterian of the `Covenant' school; whose
residence was the seat of hospitality and the home of the clergy, with a
welcome to all `who proclaimed the glad tidings, that published salvation,
that saith unto Zion, Thy God reigneth.' The Mr. Rogers you kindly
allude to is the unworthy writer of these lines and the following narrative.
I am a citizen of New Jersey by birth and education, (not of New York,
as you incidentally state.) In the spring of 1813, I joined the 36th
Regiment of United States Infantry (Colonel Carberry) at Washington.
In the fall of that year, I was detached by order of General Bloomfield to
Sandy Point, Westmoreland county, Virginia, on the Potomac, with a
company of men to watch the movements of the British fleet. In the
spring of 1814, our quarters becoming uncomfortable, we sought out an
encampment in what is called there the Forest or high ground. Among


155

Page 155
other places recommended to us by the late General Alexander Parker
we visited the ruins of Yeocomico Church. As soon as I saw it, I exclaimed,
`There is Kirk-Alloway,' (alluding of course to Burns's `Tam
O'Shanter.') Had it stood for the original picture as drawn by the
humorous poet, it could not have more forcibly impressed me with awe
and deep-abiding interest. Its form,—that of a cross,—its solitude, were
strikingly impressive, for it stood in a dell where its silence was only disturbed
by the passing breeze whispering through the pines and cedars and
undergrowth which choked up the entrance. It was overshadowed also
by ancient oaks stretching their gigantic arms, as it were, to guard the
sacred relic from mouldering time and the desolating elements. Its doors
were open, its windows broken, the roof partly decayed and fallen in, and,
to complete its apparent hopeless fate, a pine-tree thirty or forty feet
high was blown up by the roots and lay across the main structure. Its
burial-ground, which is spacious, was enclosed by a costly, high brick wall,
with narrow gateways,—symbolical perhaps of the `narrow path,'—filled
to its utmost capacity with broken tombstones and desolate graves overgrown
with briers and shrubbery, showing that the `rich and the poor
there rested together, and the servant was indeed free from his master,'—
alike unprotected and uncared-for. A ruin outside the wall, which was
intended and once served as a vestry, had rotted down; the chimney, a
strong brick one, alone standing,—a naked monument of better days. In an
alcove of forest-trees a few yards distant flowed numerous springs of cool,
delicious water. Indeed, it required no great stretch of imagination to
fancy the midnight-scene so graphically described in Burns's Kirk-Alloway,
and the race to cross the running stream (for one really flows across the
main road, some hundred yards distant) where `mare Meggie lost her
tail.' With some difficulty I entered the porch, which was built of brick
and formed the upper part of the cross, spacious and on a level with the
ground,—its massive double doorway quite open, presenting within as
hopeless a ruin as its exterior,—the roof rotted away at its angles, one
of the galleries partly down, the girders rotted off and fallen upon the
pews, and the wall in two places mouldered away by years of saturation
from snow and rain. The remains of a large Bible still lay upon
the desk. The font was gone,—which I was told was of marble, and now
used for convivial purposes. The chancel, in the eastern arm of the
cross, to the right of the pulpit, surmounted by a large Gothic window
much broken, was still in tolerable preservation. In it was the Communiontable,—its
frame antique, covered with a heavy walnut slab,—sound, but
rough and soiled from exposure. Large frames, once covered with canvas
exhibiting in distinct characters the Lord's Prayer, the Ten Commandments,
and other texts of Scripture, hung upon the walls, now much
defaced, mouldered, and torn. The aisles were paved with brick, and
covered with abundant evidence of its being the resort of sheep and
cattle running at large; and, to complete the evidence of its abandonment,
the ceiling—which was of boards—was tenanted by squirrels, snakes, and
scorpions. Indeed, we may truly say, `All its hedges were broken down
by the wild boar of the wilderness,' and there was no one to care for it.
Besides, I was told, it was the terror of the neighbourhood, from being
the resort of runaway negroes and wandering vagrants, added to the awe
inseparably connected with the lonely, silent depository of the dead. In
contemplating the scene before me, I felt a mysterious attachment to this
relic of piety and early faith of our fathers,—not dreaming (being a

156

Page 156
stranger and a wanderer) at some future day I should be honoured and
favoured by the commission to restore this temple, now in the dust, to the
service of my Creator and Redeemer. We resolved at once to pitch our
tents outside the wall: a fatigue-party was detailed to trim up the trees,
cut down the undergrowth, and burn up the leaves and rubbish, to remove
the tree which lay across the roof, to cleanse the church and repair
it as far as practicable, to make it a safe depository for our stores and
camp-equipage. This being done, we were presented with a shady grove,
dry ground, and a most inviting and lovely prospect,—with an abundance
of pure, delicious water at our feet, and a central position to make nightly
detachments to guard the historic shores of old Potomac,—for there rest
the remains of the Washingtons, the Lees, the Parkers, and many other
gallant spirits of patriotic memory. As illustrative of the actual condition
of the spot I am now describing, permit me to relate an original anecdote,
which occurred a short time before my visit.

"Colonel Garner, an officer of the Revolution, lived three or four miles
distant: passing the church late in the evening with a friend, they were
overtaken by an angry cloud of wind and rain, accompanied by lightning
and thunder. The colonel proposed taking shelter in the church, leading
their horses in, which they could do without difficulty, as the porch and
pavement of the aisles were on a level with the ground. To this his friend
positively objected, declaring he would rather bear the pelting of the storm
than pass an hour within its gloomy walls. He therefore put spurs to his
horse for his home. Not so with the colonel: he was a brave man, not
fearing hobgoblins or witches. He dismounted at the opening in the wall,
where there had once been a gate. Taking the bridle-rein in his hand, he
proceeded to thread his way through the bushes to the porch. He got
inside, followed by his horse, and was just entering the church, when the
unusual visit frightened a flock of sheep that had taken shelter there, who
suddenly rushed to the door to make their escape. The charge took the
colonel by surprise, knocked him down, routed his horse, and trampled
him in the dust, (for it was not paved as it now is.) After the column
had passed over him, he found in the `mêlée' he had lost his hat, and was
scratched and bruised about the face and hands. Nothing daunted, however,
he groped his way into the church, and, being well acquainted with
its internal arrangement, he took shelter in the pulpit, where he knew was
a comfortable seat, and where he would be protected from the wet by the
sounding-board, made of durable materials and still firmly attached to the
wall. The storm was now raging without, lightning and thundering and
raining, with a tempest of wind. After sitting for a time he fell asleep
and did not awake until three or four in the morning. By this time the
cloud had passed over, the stars were shining, and he was glad to extricate
himself by a hasty retreat homeward. He found his discomfited horse
taking his rest at the stable-door.

"Our happiness at this encampment, after some months, was unexpectedly
broken up by the arrival of a vessel with an order to embark for St. Mary's,
Maryland. We finished our military service by assisting in the defence of
Fort McHenry, Baltimore. We had the satisfaction, however, of carrying
with us the united testimony of the whole neighbourhood that not a chicken,
an egg, or a vegetable, had been wrongfully taken by any one of the soldiers,
nor an injury or an insult offered to any one. The church and its environs
had been sacredly guarded, and we left it in a much better condition than we
found it. But it was not so (as I afterward learned) by our successors, a


157

Page 157
company of militia from the upper country, who proved themselves to be a
scourge to those they professedly came to protect, by robbery, violence, and
destruction of private property. It was they `who made a chopping-block of
the Communion-table' and otherwise defaced the church. In ascribing it to
the soldiers, be assured, sir, you have been led into an unintentional error.
They served under a discipline paternal but strict, both as regards order
and cleanliness. In the year 1820, being on a visit to Ayrfield, and seeing
Old Yeocomico still a ruin, even more deplorable than when I left it, I
proposed to Mr. Murphy to undertake its repair. To this he not only
assented, but gave money, labour, and his personal service. The gentlemen
of the neighbourhood subscribed cheerfully and liberally, and the
work was pushed forward by employing suitable mechanics and importing
from Alexandria lumber, shingles, paints, and seven or eight barrels of
tar for the roof, which had not had a shingle put upon it since the year
1788, at which time, I heard Mr. Murphy say, the gentlemen of the surrounding
estates were assessed to meet the expense. It is true as you
state,—the font, `a beautiful marble one,' as you describe it, had been
taken away and used for unholy purposes, and by him restored; also, the
plate, with a damask tablecloth and napkins marked `Yeocomico Church'
in the centre, had been safely kept at Lee Hall, and were gladly restored
by the pious and excellent lady, the late Mrs. Sarah Newton, who at that
time owned and occupied the mansion and estate. The first thing we did
was to open a double gateway in front, with a wide gravel-walk up to the
porch or apex of the cross, the pavement of which I laid with my own
hands, none there being familiar with such work. If the narrow opening
in the wall was symbolical of the `narrow path,' the one we now opened
was illustrative of `free grace,'—a truth to which I feel myself indebted
for a knowledge of salvation through the interceding blood of a crucified
Redeemer. It is also true, as you state, I presented the church with a
large stove and ample pipe to warm it thoroughly, it having stood for upward
of a century without one. It is also true I had the great pleasure to place
a Bible and Prayer-Book both on the desk and in the pulpit, and I rejoice
to know the church is still protected and cared for,—although I have not
seen it for more than twenty years. Permit me now, sir, in conclusion, to
say I have frequently reflected with sorrow on the mysterious desolation
of the ancient churches of Virginia, and can only account for it by the
demoniac influence of the infidel theories and sentiments of the French
Revolution, which at that time pervaded the public mind and had poisoned
the very fountain of our better nature and sealed the best impulses of the
human heart. These temples of the living God, these sacred monuments
of the faith of our fathers and the religious care of the Provincial Government,
were generally of lofty and commanding structure, of costly finish,
and of the most durable materials,—such as in England have lasted for
centuries. They stood in well-chosen positions, and under their shadow
lay the remains of the kindred of large congregations, many of whom were
the immediate descendants of holy men who had ministered at their altars;
yet, most strange to say, not an arm was put forth to save, or an eye found
to pity. `Behold, therefore, saith the Lord, your house is left unto you
desolate.'

"Be pleased to accept, reverend sir, my most respectful regard,
"WM. L. ROGERS.
 
[21]

The name of this worthy old man is Murphy. He has now gone to his rest.