1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
6. |
7. |
8. |
9. |
10. |
11. |
12. |
13. |
14. |
15. |
16. |
17. |
18. |
18.1. |
18.2. |
18.3. |
18.4. |
18.5. |
18.6. |
18.7. |
18.8. |
18.9. |
18.10. |
18.11. |
18.12. |
18.13. |
18.14. |
18.15. |
18.16. |
18.17. |
18.18. |
18.19. |
18.20. |
18.21. |
18.22. |
18.23. |
18.24. |
18.25. |
18.26. |
18.27. |
18.28. |
18.29. |
18.30. |
18.31. |
19. |
20. |
21. |
22. |
23. |
24. |
25. |
26. |
27. |
28. |
29. |
30. |
31. |
3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||
Those laws which condemn a man to death on the deposition of a single witness are fatal to liberty. In reason there should be two, because a witness who affirms, and the accused who denies, make an equal balance, and a third must incline the scale.
The Greeks [5] and Romans [6] required one voice more to condemn: but our French laws insist upon two. The Greeks pretend that their custom was established by the gods; [7] but this more justly may be said of ours.
3. The same Subject continued. The Spirit of the Laws | ||