University of Virginia Library

Search this document 
  
  
  
  
  

collapse section1. 
  
 1. 
 2. 
 3. 
 4. 
 5. 
 6. 
 7. 
 8. 
 9. 
 10. 
 11. 
 12. 
collapse section13. 
13.
  
 13. 
 14. 
 15. 
 16. 
 17. 
 18. 
 19. 
 20. 
 21. 
 22. 
collapse section23. 
  
 23. 
collapse section24. 
  
 24. 
 25. 
 26. 
 27. 
collapse section28. 
  
 28. 
 29. 
 30. 
 31. 
collapse section32. 
  
 32. 
collapse section33. 
  
 33. 
collapse section34. 
  
 34. 
 35. 
 36. 
 37. 
 38. 
collapse section39. 
  
 39. 
 40. 
 41. 
 42. 
 43. 
 44. 
collapse section45. 
  
 45. 
 46. 
 47. 
collapse section48. 
  
 48. 
 49. 
 50. 
collapse section51. 
  
 51. 
collapse section52. 
  
 52. 
collapse section53. 
  
 53. 
 54. 
collapse section55. 
  
 55. 
collapse section56. 
  
 56. 
collapse section57. 
  
 57. 
 58. 
 59. 
 60. 
 61. 
 62. 

13.

Let us not under-estimate this fact: that we ourselves, we free spirits, are already a “transvaluation of all values,” a visualized declaration of war and victory against all the old concepts of “true” and “not true.” The most valuable intuitions are the last to be attained; the most valuable of all are those which determine methods. All the methods, all the principles of the scientific spirit of today, were the targets for thousands of years of the most profound contempt; if a man inclined to them he was excluded from the society of “decent” people—he passed as “an enemy of God,” as a scoffer at the truth, as one “possessed.” As a man of science, he belonged to the Chandala[1]... We have had the whole pathetic stupidity of mankind against us—their every notion of what the truth ought to be, of what the service of the truth ought to be—their every “thou shalt” was launched against us. . . . Our objectives, our methods, our quiet, cautious, distrustful manner—all appeared to them as absolutely discreditable and contemptible.—Looking back, one may almost ask one's self with reason if it was not actually an aesthetic sense that kept men blind so long: what they demanded of the truth was picturesque effectiveness, and of the learned a strong appeal to their senses. It was our modesty that stood out longest against their taste...How well they guessed that, these turkey-cocks of God!

Footnotes

[1]

. The lowest of the Hindu castes.